scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PENAHANAN TERHADAP DEBITOR PAILIT MENURUT UU RI NO 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PKPU

to-ra ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 597
Author(s):  
Jimmy Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Public ◽  
Code Procedure ◽  
Debt Payment

Abstract The Indonesian Criminal Code Procedure (KUHAP) provides fundamental legal basis in conducting detention, in concern that the suspect/defendant shall conduct escapement, erasure or destruction  of the evidence, or shall conduct recidivism. Law Number 37 of 2004 regarding Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation also regulates regarding Detentions towards Bankrupt Debtors on the obligations as Bankrupt Debtors in providing important information/details towards the Administrators, Supervisory Judge, or the Administrators Members concerning the Debtors assets which then shall be managed and settled as bankruptcy assets; however this does not cover the mechanism for detention undertook by the Public Prosecutor evidently appointed by the Supervisory Judge.   Keyword: kewenangan penahanan terhadap debitor pailit

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN YANG TIMBUL DARI HUBUNGAN SEWA MENYEWA MOBIL DIKAITKAN DENGAN PASAL 372 KUHP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Hurip Agustina ◽  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
Aal Lukmanul Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Car Rental

Crime embezzlement car rentals are lately often devastating car rental owner. This is an issue where the meaning of a rule of law if the crime committed community can not be followed by the rule of law, such as crimes by way of evasion is one of the types of crimes against human wealth which is stated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which is a crime that does not exist inexhaustible, both from the bottom layer to the top layer of society can also be committing a criminal act embezzlement is a crime that originated from the existence of a trust in others, and that trust is lost because of the lack of an honesty. It is stated that the crime of embezzlement have a problem that is closely linked to attitudes, moral, mental, honesty and trust humans as individuals. The purpose of this study are as follows: 1) To determine and analyze the occurrence of the crime of embezzlement car rental. 2) To know and analyze the application of Article 372 of the Criminal Code the crime of embezzlement in the rental car. 3) To know and analyze the efforts of the police in preventing crime of embezzlement car lease. This study uses normative juridical approach that is used to make the description clear, systematic, transparent and precise about the facts / specific nature of the area and population which is then analyzed to obtain the desired facts. Criminal offense embezzlement rental car can be imprisoned if they meet the overall elements of the offenses charged by the public prosecutor and the offender accountable for his actions. If the offender does not meet one of the elements of which the accused, then it can not be convicted. The elements of criminal responsibility are: 1) committing illegal or criminal acts; 2) for the criminal should be able to be responsible; 3) to have a fault; 4) absence of an excuse. The conclusion from this study is the adoption of Article 372 of the Criminal Code in criminal offenses of embezzlement car rental where the incidence of criminal acts committed tenants for the rented goods belonging to the owner of the rental rights because of misuse or abuse of trust in which the crime of embezzlement are set in the provisions of Article 372 of the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals From “waiver of indictment” to “withdrawal of indictment”. Remarks on Article 14 § 2 of the Criminal Code

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 222-237
Author(s):  
Piotr Krzysztof Sowiński ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Injured Party

This article discusses the issues related to the application of regulations included in Art. 14, § 2 of the Criminal Code where the withdrawal of the indictment by the public prosecutor was regulated. Moreover, the results of such an activity and the conditions of its performance were indicated. The rights of the accused and the injured party related to the withdrawal of the indictment and also the prohibition of the re-indictment against the same defendant in relation to the same criminal Act were discussed.

TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA (Analisis Putusan Nomor 143/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dmk)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chairunisa Chairunisa ◽  
Alfitra Alfitra ◽  
Mara Sutan Rambe
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Economic Factors ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Permasalahan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah ketidaktepatan penjatuhan pidana oleh Hakim kepada pelaku dalam kasus pencurian dengan pemberatan pada Putusan Nomor 143/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dmk. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor yang melatarbelakangi terjadinya pencurian dengan pemberatan dan pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku dalam Putusan Nomor 143/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dmk. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa faktor yang melatarbelakangi terjadinya tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan dalam putusan Nomor 143/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dmk oleh AD sebagai pelaku turut serta melakukan pencurian dengan pemberatan yaitu disebabkan oleh faktor ekonomi karena ia merupakan tulang punggung keluarga dan harus memenuhi kebutuhan hidup baik untuk dirinya maupun keluarganya. Kemudian, oleh karena semua unsur dalam dakwaan primair telah terpenuhi, Hakim menjatuhkan pidana kepada pelaku dengan dakwaan kesatu yaitu pelaku melanggar Pasal 363 Ayat (1) Ke-3, Ke-4, dan Ke-5 KUHP. Hakim sudah tepat mengambil keputusan yaitu mengadili pelaku dengan tindak pidana pencurian dalam keadaan memberatkan akan tetapi hukuman yang dijatuhkan oleh Hakim sangatlah minim dan lebih rendah dari apa yang dituntut oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum karena pelaku sebelum melakukan tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan baru saja keluar dari Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) dengan kasus Penggelapan dalam Putusan Nomor 133/Pid.B/2014/PN.Pti dan sudah pernah dihukum. Maka dari itu, hukuman yang diberikan kepada pelaku tidaklah sebanding dengan apa yang dilakukannya dan sebaiknya Hakim juga mempertimbangkan dampak dan kerugian yang ditimbulkan bagi korban akibat perbuatan pelaku.AbstractThe main problem in this research is the inaccuracy of the sentence handed down by the judge to the perpetrator of the robbery case weighing Decision Number 143/Pid.B/ 2015/PN.Dmk. This study aims to see and analyze the factors underlying the weighted actions and judges' considerations in imposing crimes against the perpetrators of Decision Number 143/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dmk. The results showed that the factors behind the occurrence of criminal acts of theft with weighting in the decision Number 143/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dmk by AD as the perpetrator participated in committing theft with weight, namely due to economic factors because he was the backbone of the family and had to meet the necessities of life both for himself and his family. Then, because all the elements in the primair indictment had been fulfilled, the Judge sentenced the perpetrator to the first charge, namely the perpetrator violating Article 363 Paragraph (1) 3rd, 4th, and 5th of the Criminal Code. The judge has made the right decision, namely trying the perpetrator with a criminal act of theft in burdensome circumstances, but the sentence handed down by the Judge is very minimal and lower than what is demanded by the Public Prosecutor because the perpetrator before committing the crime of theft with weight has just left the Penitentiary (Lapas) with embezzlement cases in Decision Number 133/Pid.B/2014/PN.Pti and have already been convicted. Therefore, the sentence given to the perpetrator is not proportional to what he has done and the judge should also consider the impact and harm caused to the victim as a result of the perpetrator's actions.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

scholarly journals Disparitas Penuntutan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-78
Author(s):  
Benny Leonard Saragih ◽  
Ediwarman Ediwarman ◽  
Muaz Zul
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Internal Factors ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Substantive Law

Difference in punishment or sentencing disparity is basically a natural thing because it can be said almost no case that is really the same. Disparity becomes a problem when the range of the sentence imposed differences between similar cases so large, giving rise to injustice and can give rise to suspicions in the community. Disparities in the Criminal (disparity of sentencing) is not the same as the application of criminal offenses against the same (same offense) or the criminal acts that are dangerous to be compared (offenses of comparable seriousness) without clear justification. Based on Law No. 16 of 2004 which replaced Law No. 5 of 1991 About the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia is an institution in the field of prosecution of the main authority of the public prosecutor act prosecution about what is meant by the prosecution as well as the reference to the provisions of Article 1 point 7 and Article 137 Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code). Research Methods in writing this thesis carried out by the method of normative law, namely analyzing and searching for answers to the problems raised by the substantive law / legal norms contained in the rules of law, the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA), the Supreme Court Circular, and etc. Factors that cause the disparity criminal offense namely Legislation Provisions factors, internal factors and external factors.

scholarly journals Gugurnya Hak Menuntut Terhadap Korporasi Akibat Pailit

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Audaraziq Ismail ◽  
Eva Achjani Zulfa ◽  
Yutcesyam Yutcesyam ◽  
Fatiatulo Lazira
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Ne Bis In Idem ◽  
Bankruptcy Code

Prosecution is basically an action by the public prosecutor to delegate a criminal case to the competent District Court so that it is examined and decided by a judge in a court session. With regard to prosecution, Article 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that there are 3 reasons for stopping prosecution, namely that an event is not a criminal act, there is not enough evidence collected by investigators to prove the fulfillment of the elements in a criminal act and for the sake of law. The Criminal Code, First, with regard to the application of the principle of ne bis in idem. Second, if the Defendant dies, Third, Expires, Fourth, Settlement outside the court, Article 82 of the Criminal Code has described if an offense is threatened with a fine only, then prosecution can be avoided by paying the maximum fine directly. Against corporations, prosecution is limited by a number of provisions, in this case also including when the corporation is bankrupt. That as a result, if the entire corporate assets are included in the bankruptcy code, there will be a transfer of corporate licenses and an impact on the liquidation process. Thus, based on the provisions of Article 142 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, the corporation is dissolved. Thus, the prosecution of the bankrupt corporation can be dropped.

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN URUSAN PEMERINTAH KONKUREN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT DI KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rido Rikardo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Case Files ◽  
Victims Of Crime ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Sense Of Justice

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami bagaimana Tugas dan Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI nomor: 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam kaitannya dengan perkara tindak pidana ringan Harta Kekayaan di dalam KUHP dalam proses Pra Penuntutan (Studi Kasus Perkara Pencurian di Kejaksaan Negeri Kampar) dan Apakah kendala dan hambatan yang dihadapi Jaksa Peneliti dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor : 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan lingkup Harta Kekayaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara sosiologis yakni berdasarkan fakta fakta yang ada dilapangan. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam melaksanakan tugasnya dibidang para penuntutan dalam menerima berkas perkara Penyidikan oleh Pihak Kepolisian harus dengan seksama melihat apakah suatu perkara masuk dalam kategori Tindak Pidana Ringan yang dimaksudkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 atau tidak dengan berbagai pertimbangan yang dapat dipahami oleh Penyidik Kepolisian tentu saja hal ini akan memberikan rasa keadilan baik bagi Tersangka maupun bagi korban tindak pidana dan masyarakat pada umumnya.Kata kunci: kewenangan; penyelesaian; dendaABSTRACTThis study aims to find out and understand how the Duties and Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number: 02 of 2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in relation to cases of minor criminal offenses. (Case Study of Theft Case in the Kampar District Prosecutor's Office) and What are the obstacles and obstacles faced by the Research Prosecutor in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation No. 02/2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in Minor Crimes in the scope of Assets. this is done sociologically, based on facts in the field. The results of the study found that the Public Prosecutor in carrying out his duties in the field of prosecution in receiving case files Investigations by the Police must carefully see whether a case is included in the category of Minor Crimes as intended by Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 or not with various considerations that can understood by Police Investigators, of course this will give a sense of justice both to the Suspect and to victims of crime and the community at large.Keywords: authority; settlement; fines

scholarly journals Overmacht Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Perspektif Fiqh JinÂyah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-335
Author(s):  
Muhammad Riza Fahmi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Conditional Sentence

Abstract: The Judge’s ruling in the legal decition of the Lamongan District Court No. 164/Pid.B/2013/PN.LMG on the crime of persecution that causes the death of the victim is regarded true since it has been fulfilled all elements as required by Article 351 Paragraph (3) of Criminal Code as indicted by the public prosecutor. In deciding this case, the judge also considered the testimony of witnesses, the information from the defendant, the facts revealed at the hearing as well as the things that burdensome and relieve the defendant. Therefore, the defendant shall be sentenced for 5 months in prison and does not have to go through due to the imposed conditional sentence. In Islamic criminal law, the case is equated with a semi-deliberate murder and sanctioned by diyât and kafârat in the form of ta’zîr. In this case, the defendant can not be punished because of his self-defense. So that the defendant is free from a criminal liability in Islam.Keywords: Persecution, victim died, Islamic law. Abstrak: Putusan hukum hakim Nomor: 164/Pid.B/2013/PN.LMG tentang tindak pidana penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan korban meninggal dunia berdasarkan telah terpenuhinya semua unsur-unsur dari pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP seperti yang didakwakan oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Dalam memutuskan perkara ini hakim juga mempertimbangkan keterangan saksi, keterangan terdakwa, fakta-fakta yang terungkap di persidangan, serta hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan terdakwa. Oleh karena itu, terdakwa dipidana dengan 5 bulan penjara dan tidak perlu menjalaninya dikarenakan dikenakan hukuman bersyarat. Dalam fiqh jinâyah, perkara ini disamakan dengan pembunuhan semi sengaja. Untuk sanksinya yaitu membayar diyat dan kafârat, sedangkan untuk hukuman penggantinya berupa hukuman ta’zîr. Dalam kasus ini, para terdakwa meskipun telah melakukan perbuatan tersebut, namun tidak bisa dikenakan hukuman tersebut, karena adanya unsur pembelaan diri, sehingga terbebas dari pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam Islam.Kata Kunci: Penganiayaan,  meninggal dunia, Hukum Islam. 

OPTIMALISASI ASAS OPORTUNITAS PADA KEWENANGAN JAKSA GUNA MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK PRIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PEMIDANAAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-236
Author(s):  
Yodi Nugraha
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
The Public

In the Indonesian criminal justice system, every public prosecutor possesses the authority to cease criminal prosecution in the name of public interest. In contrast, in the Netherland, only the Attorney General (Procureur Generaal) at the Supreme Court has this authority.  This article discusses this authority to cease of terminate criminal prosecution in the name of public interest.  To do this a comparative approach is used in which the ruling of this authority to terminate criminal prosecution as found in the Draft of the Indonesian Criminal Code will be compared against the same regulation and policy used in the Netherlands.  A doctrinal and comparative law approach will be used. One recommendation resulting from this research is the need to re-evaluate the existing procedure and requirement of terminating criminal prosecution in the public interest in the Indonesian context and the introduction of Rechter-Commissaris into the criminal justice system.

scholarly journals Ajaran Turut Serta Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-52
Author(s):  
Harry Arfhan ◽  
Mohd. Din ◽  
Sulaiman Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Banda Aceh

Penyertaan pada dasarnya diatur dalam pasal 55 dan 56 KUHP yang berarti bahwa ada dua orang atau lebih yang melakukan suatu tindak pidana atau dengan perkataan ada dua orangatau lebih mengambil bahagian untuk mewujudkan suatu tindak pidana. Penyertaan di dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2001 disebut sebagai pembantuan.Dalam putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 1769 K/PID.SUS/2015 menyatakan bahwa Terdakwa I Indra Gunawan Bin Alm. Saleh tersebut tidak terbukti secara sah dan menyakinkan bersalah melakukan perbuatan sebagaimana yang didakwakan dalam semua dakwaan Penuntut Umum dan Menyatakan Terdakwa II Irfan Bin Husen telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana “Turut Serta Melakukan Korupsi”. Majelis Hakim Judex Factie Pengadilan Tinggi/Tipikor Banda Aceh dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara Aquo telah salah dalam menerapkan hukum atau suatu peraturan hukum tidak diterapkan atau diterapkan tidak sebagaimana mestinya, yaitu mengenai penerapan hukum pembuktian sehingga harus dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.The participation is basically regulated in articles 55 and 56 of the Criminal Code, which means that there are two or more people who commit a crime or say that there are two or more people taking part to realize a crime. The participation in the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crime namely Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 is referred to as assistance. In the decision of the Supreme Court Cassation Number: 1769 K / PID.SUS / 2015 stated that Defendant I Indra Gunawan Bin Alm. Saleh is not proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing an act as charged in all charges of the Public Prosecutor and Stating Defendant II Irfan Bin Husen has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal offense "Also Participating in Corruption". Judex Factie Judge of the High Court / Corruption Court in Banda Aceh in examining and adjudicating the case of Aquo has been wrong in applying the law or a legal regulation was not applied or applied improperly, namely regarding the application of verification law so that it must be canceled by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document