Analisis Kemaslahatan Pada Putusan MA Tentang Wasiat Waji>Bah Dalam Pemberian Hak Waris Bagi Non Muslim (Studi Analisis Pada Putusan MA No. 51.K/AG/1999)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Faradilla Chairunnisa ◽  
Agus Supriyanto
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Inductive Method ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Religious Differences

The objectives of this study are as follows, (1) To find out the legal position wasiat waji>bahin the distribution of inheritance for non-Muslims; (2) To find out the reasons behind the decisionMahkamah Agung in deciding inheritance rights for non-Muslims in the form wasiat waji>bah;and (3) To analyze the benefit of the Verdict Mah-kamah Agung No.51.K/AG/1999. The method usedin this research is the Inductive method, which is in the form of drawing general conclusions or abasic knowledge of specific matters. That is, from the existing facts a conclusion can be drawn. Thistype of research is library research or library research. This research is descriptive and maslahahanalysis. The conclusion of this study, first, the legal position of wills in giving inheritance for non-Muslims in KHI does not mention that a person is prevented from becoming an heir due to religiousdifferences. Non-Muslim heirs in Islamic law are located outside the heirs who have the right toreceive an inheritance, because religious differences become an obstacle to obtaining inheritancerights. The Hanafiyah Ulama viewed the will to non-Muslim heirs as valid and the jurists agreed thatthe testament to the Muslim ghair ahl al-dzimmah was permissible. Therefore, granting inheritancerights to non-Muslims in the form of a compulsory will is legal because religious differences do notbecome a barrier to the validity of a will. Second, in its decision, the Panel of Judges gave reasons forgranting inheritance rights to non-Muslims through a mandatory will without questioning the religionof the heirs by stating that non-Muslim heirs have the right to receive inheritance with the sameproportion as religious heirs. Islam from the inheritance left by the heirs. Third, the researcher foundthat there was a problem in the Supreme Court decision no. 51.K / AG / 1999. First, the existence ofmas} lah} ah according to syara ‘belongs to al-Mas} lah} ah al-Mursalah. Second, the level of needbased on the priority of use is included in the Maslahah Daruriyat aimed at maintaining the purposesof Islamic law (Maqasid al-Syari’ah) and avoiding damage. Third, the content of the maslahah orwhich priority should take precedence is included in the Maslahah al-Ammah. Fourth, change an as afixed or changing limitation, including in Maslahah al-Mutaghayyirah and Fifth, there is a principleof Justice.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP NON MUSLIM DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 331/K/AG/2018/MA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Liana Noviyanti ◽  
Mulati Mulati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Supreme Court Ruling ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

Islamic law has stated that every person of different religion cannot inherit each other, both Muslims inherit for non-Muslims and from non-Muslims inherit for Muslims, but in practice, Judges at the Supreme Court level implement mandatory wills, this is required which has been decided in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This study aims to examine how to implement the mandatory non-Muslim wills in the Supreme Court ruling Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA based on the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and what the Supreme Court Judges consider in implementing mandatory testaments against non-Muslims in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This research is a normative legal research with the nature of qualitative research with the type of library research. Based on the studies that have been carried out, the Decision of the Supreme Court Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA does not include legal considerations in force in Indonesia concerning inheritance provisions and concerning the granting of an approved mandatory will set out in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The application of mandatory wills in the Supreme Court Decision is contrary to the provisions of Islamic Law and the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Article 209 paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning mandatory wills.

scholarly journals HARTA WARIS PADA ANAK ANGKAT MENURUT KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SAMARINDA

LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Abdul Rokhim
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Humanitarian Mission ◽  
Biological Parents ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
General Adoption

In general, adoption according to law is the transfer of a child to adoptive parents from the biological parents in its entirety and is carried out according to legal local customs. So, the biological parents have let go of the child, and the responsibility shifts to the parents who adopted him. Although the Qur'an does not give adopted children the right to inherit from their adoptive parents, this is regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law which is a human product from various schools of thought and made as a source of law in our country by providing provisions. that adopted children are entitled to receive a share of the inheritance.The legal position of the adopted child will result in that in general the child will have an inheritance relationship with the adoptive parents and inherit from the original parent will be removed based on Article 209 Paragraph 2 Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), adopted children who do not receive a will will be given mandatory will. The position of adopted children according to Islamic inheritance law is not getting their inheritance rights from their adoptive parents, but still as legitimate children based on a court decision by not deciding the lineage / blood with their biological parents, because the principle of adoption according to the Islamic Law Compilation is a manifestation of faith that carrying a humanitarian mission that is manifested in the form of maintenance in its growth and development by fulfilling all its needs.Regarding the distribution of inheritance in the Compilation of Islamic Law Article 209 paragraph (2) for adopted children who do not receive a will but are given what is called a will, obligatory maximum of 1/3 (one third) of the inheritance of their adoptive parents, as stated in Article 195 paragraph (2) will allow a maximum will of only 1/3 of the inheritance unless all the heirs agree.

scholarly journals Pemberian Grasi dan Maaf dalam Bingkai Kajian Teoritik Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Komparatif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam)

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-90
Author(s):  
Asih Puspo Sari
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right

Abstract In the Criminal Code there are several differences that are the reasons for the review of theories and the application of reasons for clemency or forgiveness. The theories that form the basis of forgiveness will lead to different views. In connection with sources of clemency (Positive Criminal Law) and forgiveness (Islamic Criminal Law) have differences. Where clemency is the prerogative of the president as the temporary head of state, forgiveness can only be given by the heirs of the victim as the party who lost the victim. This study aims to find out where the justice is if the granting of pardon/ apology is given by the president with only consideration from the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, in Islamic Law also regulates the apology for the perpetrators of the crime of murder which is the right of the heirs of the victim. This research is a qualitative research with the type of research used is library research. It is said as library research or document study because this research is mostly conducted on written regulations or other legal materials which are secondary in the library. Keyword: Pardon, Forgiveness, and Crime of Murder

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HARTA WARISAN DARI PEWARIS NON MUSLIM DAN PENERAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH BAGI AHLIWARIS NON MUSLIM (Analisis Penetapan Pengadilan Agama Badung Nomor: 4/Pdt.P/2013/PA.Bdg Tanggal 7 Maret 2013)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37
Author(s):  
Kartika Herenawati ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
I Made Hendra Kusuma
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
The Will ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Religious Differences

Religious differences are one of the things that can cause a person to not be able to receive inheritance. Similarly, as stated by Rasullah SAW. Badung religious court judges view that the Hadith is only a suggestion, not an order. In the hadith, it is not clear what infidels are not allowed to receive inheritance. While the Prophet Muhammad always distinguishes someone's disbelief class. In the verses of the Holy Qur'an does not emphasize the prohibition of inheriting mutual inheritance for heirs of different religions. The contents of the Compilation of Islamic Law also do not regulate exactly about inheritance rights for non-Muslim family members. So far it is still a hot topic that is always debated among Ulama and the community. Based on this problem, the Badung Religious Court through its stipulation Number: 4/Pdt.P/201/PA.Bdg dated 7 March 2013 made a breakthrough in Islamic inheritance law, namely establishing Muslims as heirs of apostate heirs, as well as providing part of inheritance in forms of wills are mandatory for heirs of different religions. The formulation of the problem in this study is How is the legal logic of the Judge in the determination of Number: 4/Pdt. /2013 PA.Bdg dated 7 March 2013 related to the settlement of cases of inheritance of different religions and the application of mandatory wills as a way out? This research uses normative legal research methods. The author uses Gustav Radburch's legal goals theory which includes justice, expediency, and legal certainty. Based on the results of the study found that in the compilation of Islamic law does not regulate to whom the heir property that has lapsed can be given. Religious differences as a barrier to inheritance are specifically addressed to heirs. So it can be concluded that Muslim heirs can inherit the assets of non-Muslim heirs, but not vice versa. In this study, although non-Muslim heirs cannot inherit property from Muslim heirs, in order to fulfill a sense of justice and humanity, the non-Muslim heirs still obtain inheritance through compulsory wills whose processes are based on court decisions. The will is obliged to be determined as a way out in the delivery of inheritance to non-Muslim heirs because the heir has died, and there is no other way to be able to transfer the heir's assets to the non-Muslim heirs.Perbedaan agama merupakan salah satu hal yang dapat menyebabkan seseorang tidak bisa menerima harta warisan. Demikian seperti yang dihadistkan Rasullah SAW. Majelis Hakim pengadilan agama badung memandang Hadist tersebut hanya bersifat anjuran, bukan suatu perintah. Di dalam hadist tersebut tidak diperjelas lagi kafir yang bagaimana yang tidak diperbolehkan menerima harta warisan. Sementara Nabi Muhammad SAW selalu membedakan golongan kekafiran seseorang. Didalam ayat suci Al-Qur’an tidak menegaskan larangan saling mewarisi bagi ahli waris yang berbeda agama. Kandungan Kompilasi Hukum Islam, juga tidak mengatur secara pasti mengenai hak kewarisan bagi anggota keluarga non muslim. Sehingga sampai saat ini masih menjadi topik hangat yang selalu diperdebatkan di kalangan Ulama dan masyarakat. Atas permasalahan inilah maka Pengadilan Agama Badung melalui penetapannya Nomor: 4/Pdt.P/2013/PA.Bdg tanggal 7 Maret 2013 melakukan terobosan terhadap hukum kewarisan Islam, yaitu menetapkan orang muslim sebagai ahliwaris dari pewaris yang telah murtad, serta memberikan bagian harta warisan dalam bentuk wasiat wajibah kepada ahliwaris yang berbeda agama. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana logika hukum Hakim dalam penetapan Nomor: 4/Pdt.P/2013 PA.Bdg tanggal 7 Maret 2013 terkait penyelesaian kasus waris beda agama dan penerapan wasiat wajibah sebagai jalan keluarnya? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Penulis menggunakan teori tujuan hukum Gustav Radburch yang mencakup keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa didalam kompilasi hukum Islam tidak mengatur kepada siapakah harta pewaris yang telah murtad dapat diberikan. Perbedaan agama sebagai penghalang untuk dapat mewarisi adalah khusus ditujukan kepada ahliwaris. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa ahliwaris muslim dapat mewarisi harta pewaris non muslim, tetapi tidak sebaliknya. Dalam penelitian ini, meskipun ahliwaris non muslim tidak dapat mewarisi harta dari pewaris muslim, demi memenuhi rasa keadilan dan rasa kemanusiaan, ahliwaris non muslim tersebut tetap mendapatkan harta warisan melalui wasiat wajibah yang prosesnya berdasarkan penetapan pengadilan. Wasiat wajibah ditetapkan sebagai jalan keluar dalam pemberian harta warisan kepada ahliwaris non muslim karena pewaris telah meninggal dunia, dan tidak ada cara lain untuk dapat mengalihkan harta pewaris kepada ahliwaris yang non muslim.

scholarly journals Primary law in medicine, its legal nature

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
K. Zarins
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Economic Interests ◽  
Economic Opportunities ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right

Thework will discuss the problems arising from the thesis that the economic opportunities are incompatible with the person's primary law - the right to life and equality of treatment. An actively maintained hypothesis claims that the country's economic opportunities and funding should not restrict or reduce a person's right to life and health. In this aspect, it will also study the role of the constitutional court. The author points to the fact that the adoption of such, here the Supreme Court decision, successive constitutional court for a preliminary inaccurate claim and interpretation of the country's economic interests, could deny the right of people to life only after the consideration that they are of no use and financially expensive to be maintained.

scholarly journals The Position of Women's Heritage Rights in the Context of Islamic Heritage in Indigenous Mandailing in Sipirok District, Tapanuli Selatan Regency

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 531-539
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusuf Siregar ◽  
Risdalina Risdalina ◽  
Sriono Sriono
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Inheritance Laws

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the Position of Inheritance Rights of Girls in the Context of Islamic Inheritance in Indigenous Mandailing in Sipirok District, South Tapanuli Regency. This research is empirical normative namely research by looking at existing conditions in the field by linking the source of Islamic Law and the legal source of Regulations in force in the Republic of Indonesia. The benefits to be received from the results of this study are to determine the Position of Inheritance of Girls in the Context of Islamic Law and Regulations in Indonesia and the Position of Inheritance of Girls in the Context of Islamic Inheritance in Mandailing Customs in Sipirok District, South Tapanuli Regency, the results of the study stated that In Islamic Inheritance Law strongly recognizes the position of the daughter in receiving inheritance with a strong legal basis in accordance with the al-Qur’an. In Islamic Inheritance Laws, a daughter has a position as Nasabiyah's heir so that she has the right to receive inheritance. In the Mandailing customary inheritance law in Sipirok Mandailing Natal, the position of a daughter is considered as an heir when a male heir is found, but if the girl is a mere woman, the woman is not entitled to inheritance from her parents. The distribution of inheritance in the Mandailing Inheritance law in Sipirok Mandailing Natal uses local customary law, as a basis for the distribution of inheritance which is still being realized in the Community.

scholarly journals Pravni položaj poštenog i nepoštenog posjednika u odnosu na vlasnika stvari

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 527-543
Author(s):  
Jadranko Jug
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Basic Method ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Basic Characteristics ◽  
The Right

This paper deals with the problems related to the legal position of honest and dishonest possessors in relation to the owner of things, that is, it analyses the rights belonging to the possessors of things and the demands that possessors may require from the owners of things to whom the possessors must submit those things. Also, in contrast, the rights and requirements are analysed of the owners of things in relation to honest and dishonest possessors. In practice, a dilemma arises in defi ning the essential and benefi cial expenditure incurred by honest possessors, what the presumptions are for and until when the right of retention may be exercised for the sake of remuneration of that expenditure, when the statute of limitations expires on that claim, and the signifi cance of the provisions of the Civil Obligations Act in relation to unjust enrichment, management without mandate and the right of retention, and which provisions regulate these or similar issues. The answers to some of these dilemmas have been provided in case law, and therefore the basic method used in the paper was analysis and research of case law, especially decisions by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia. The introduction to the paper provides the basic characteristics of the concept of possession and possession of things, and the type and quality of possession, to provide a basis for the subsequent analysis of the legal position of the possessor of a thing in relation to the owner of that thing.

scholarly journals Pemberian Hak Hadanah Kepada Ibu Tiri dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sidoarjo Nomor: 0763/Pdt.G/2018/Pa.Sda Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-263
Author(s):  
Wafda Firyal
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Good Person ◽  
Biological Child ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Right

This article is a library research on the granting of rights to stepmothers in the decision of the Sidoarjo Religious Court Number: 0763/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Sda. The research data are collected using documentation techniques and are analysed using descriptive analysis techniques and using a deductive mindset that is by outlining the decision of the Sidoarjo Religious Court which is then reviewed from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. The panel of judges in determining the right of gift to stepmothers in the Sidoarjo Religious Court's decision, based on article 41 letter (a) of Law Number 1 of 1974 jo. article 105 and article 156 letter (a) Compilation of Islamic Law and the proposition in the book Bajuri juz II. In addition, a willingness from the Defendant who is the biological father of the child to give the right of gift to the Plaintiff's Reconstruction is a point that is included as consideration by the panel of judges. In Islamic law which is examined from the theory of maslahah mursalah, the judge's consideration to establish the right of hadanah to the stepmother in the Sidoarjo Religious Court's ruling is in accordance with the purpose of the hadanah namely to prioritize the interests and benefit of the child so that later he or she can grow into a good person under the care of an appropriate person, even though the child is not a biological child of the Reconvention Plaintiff, the Reconvention Plaintiff is in fact more feasible and competent to have the right of hadanah.

The Right to Assisted Dying: Constitutional Jurisprudence and Its Impact in Canada, Germany and Austria

ICL Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Braun
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Supreme Court Of Canada ◽  
Assisted Dying ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Federal Constitutional ◽  
The Right ◽  
Constitutional Jurisprudence

Abstract Many states are grappling with the regulation of assistance in suicide and ending the life of another upon their request. Initially punishable in most countries, a growing number of jurisdictions have now introduced permissive frameworks decriminalising, to varying degrees, rendering assistance in dying. Other countries, however, have proceeded with the criminal prohibition and several courts have upheld the lawfulness of the respective criminal laws during human rights and constitutional challenges. Yet, the Supreme Court of Canada in 2015, the German Federal Constitutional Court in February 2020 and the Austrian Constitutional Court in December 2020 have respectively declared unconstitutional and void national criminal laws prohibiting rendering assistance in dying. This article first outlines the criminal law framework relating to assisted dying in Canada, Germany and Austria. It subsequently analyses the judgments before pondering their impact on the legal landscape in the three countries. The article concludes that while the Canadian Supreme Court decision appears to have had a significant impact on the introduction of subsequent legislation in Canada, the effects of the Constitutional Courts’ judgments seem much more subdued in Germany and are yet to unfold in Austria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document