PENGUATAN PUBLIK DALAM PEMBAHASAN RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG PENYIARAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Herman herman Herman
Keyword(s):  

Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang Nomor. 32/2002 mengenai penyiaran berlangsung dari 2017 hingga saat ini, DPR sebagai pengusul berkomitmen RUU tersebut mutlak disahkan periode DPR 2019-2024. Berlarut-larutnya pembahasan terletak pada tata cara perpindahan dari analog ke digital, dimana masing-masing fraksi memiliki kepentingan. Selain itu DPR juga berpegang pada Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 terkait Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, sehingga perdebatan antara kepentingan dan peraturan perundang-undangan di DPR menjadi faktor yang sulit disatukan. Melalui studi kualitatif ke lapangan didapatkan bahwa berlarut-larutnya pembahasan RUU terletak pada regulasi di DPR dan perbedaan pandangan terkait penyelenggara multiplexing. Melalui Teori Strukturasi Anthony Giddens dan stategi penelitian yang ditetapkan dapat dilihat peran struktur dan agen dalam pembentukan RUU tersebut, dimana strukturasi dapat dibaca bahwa tindakan-tindakan sosial itu selalu bergulir dari waktu ke waktu, kapanpun dan dimanapun, sehingga menimbulkan perubahan-perubahan sosial dan tindakan sosial, hal tersebut dapat diamati dari dua konsep besar, yakni agen dan struktur. Agen bisa individu bisa institusi bisa apapun, sedangkan struktur terdiri dari komponen rule dan resources

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-93
Author(s):  
Elif Gezgin
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Arizka Warganegara

This study is about the law development of social democracy in the perspective of Eduard Bernstein andAnthony Giddens. It applied the method of qualitative analysis and used the library research, the data inthis study analyzed with the content of analysis. The main purposes of this study wants to describe andanalysis of Law Development of Social Democracy in the perspective of Bernstein and Giddens.Socialism Democracy of Bernstein and Cosmopolitan Democracy of Giddens used as toll of comparative.Social Democracy has been revision three times, Bernstein is the first generation, The second generationis Social Democratic Party of Germany with The bad Godesberg Program and the last is Giddens. Theinteresting of this study is the basic difference among Bernstein and Giddens in the understanding ofconcept of Social Democracy. The different time and context imply the different ontology andepistemology to this ideology. If Bernstein lived in the time of raised of capitalism and Industrialization inEurope, Giddens has lived in the time of this ideology must be against the raises of Neo liberalism andGlobalization. Actually The basic concept of Social democracy of Bersntein is his critics to the theory andconcept of Karl Marx, this causes the different perspective with Giddens. Finally Giddens made thisideology more Liberal than before, many political scientist assume that The Third Way of Giddens is thecontinuously of Capitalism.Keywords : Social Democracy, Bad Godesberg and Capitalism


Author(s):  
Gerald O’Collins, SJ

Help towards understanding the human and religious functions of tradition comes from such sociologists as Peter Berger, Anthony Giddens, and Edward Shils. Tradition by Shils continues to illuminate how, although human beings modify inherited beliefs and change traditional patterns of behaviour, the new always incorporates something of the past. Shils takes a global view of tradition; it embodies everything individuals inherit when born into the world. It is through tradition that new members of society begin to identify themselves. The bearers of tradition may be not only official but also ‘learned’ and ‘ordinary’. Shils dedicates many further pages to changes in traditions and the forces leading to these changes. What sociologists like Giddens say about globalization also affects theological reflection on tradition. Surprisingly, the very few theologians who have published on tradition have ignored the sociologists.


1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Goss ◽  
Bruce Lindquist

This article applies the theory of structuration to international labor migration using case study material from the Philippines. It first provides a brief review of the functional and structural approaches to understanding labor migration and the theoretical impasse that has been created between them. It then reviews several attempts to resolve this impasse, including systems and networks approaches; these solutions are rejected on theoretical and empirical grounds. We suggest that migrant institutions may be a more appropriate mid-level concept than households or social networks to articulate various levels of analysis. We develop this concept in the context of the structuration theory of Anthony Giddens and attempt to apply this to the Philippines, concluding that this framework is eminently suited for further research on international labor migration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-25
Author(s):  
Casiavera

This study explains about PKH recipients’ strategy to accept the assistance and not to be graduated. This study used the qualitative approach using descriptive type. Informants are chosen based on purposive sampling technique while data collection applies observation technique and in-depth interview (loosely structured interview). It uses Structuration theory proposed by Anthony Giddens which focuses on duality relation between agent and structure.


2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (699-700) ◽  
pp. 15-40
Author(s):  
José Luis Benítez

Este estudio analiza las relaciones entre los procesos y prácticas de comunicación, y la configuración de identidades colectivas en la experiencia de los migrantes salvadoreños en Estados Unidos. En concreto, la investigación se enfoca en la comunidad salvadoreña inmigrante en el área metropolitana de Washington D.C. La metodología empleada consiste en una etnografía de  comunicación que combina observación participante y entrevistas en profundidad acerca del consumo de medios y las prácticas de lectura y recepción de ciertos textos mediáticos. En la primera parte se plantean los principales elementos conceptuales alrededor de esta temática: transnacionalismo y estudios trans nacionales ; comunicación, migración y diás poras ; identidades colectivas y medios de comunicación. En esta parte propongo algunos aspectos conceptuales que desde la teoría de la estructuración de Anthony Giddens se podrían aplicar al estudio de medios de comunicación transnacionales. En la segunda parte se describen algunas características de la comunidad salvadoreña in migrante en Washington D.C., y se hace una bre ve caracterización histórica de los principales medios locales de comunicación: periódicos, ra dios y estaciones de televisión. A continuación, se analizan los programas trans nacionales de radio y televisión dirigidos a la comunidad salvadoreña inmigrante, y las formas de apropiación de estos productos mediáticos. Finalmente, en la conclusión se resalta la importancia de los medios de comunicación como mediadores socioculturales en la formación de identidades, y la necesidad de repensar po líticas transnacionales de comunicación y cultura para El Salvador. ECA Estudios Centroamericanos, Vol. 62, No. 699-700, 2007: 15-40.  


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiano Luis Lenzi
Keyword(s):  

No presente texto tomamos a obra de Anthony Giddens para avaliar a forma pela qual a questão ecológica veio a ser incorporada pela teoria social. Giddens se tornou nas últimas décadas num dos grandes nomes das ciências sociais contemporâneas e, no decorrer dos últimos anos, passou a ter uma intervenção importante no cenário político com sua proposta de construção de uma Terceira Via. Ao mesmo tempo, ao longo desse período, muitos trabalhos das ciências sociais passaram a expressar também um interesse cada vez maior pelo tema ambiental. Um fenômeno que pode ser visto até mesmo nos próprios trabalhos de Giddens onde iremos encontrar uma referência permanente aos temas do risco, perigo, segurança e de conceitos como desenvolvimento sustentável, modernização ecológica e sociedade de risco. Em razão desse quadro geral, parece pertinente avaliarmos o que um teórico social como Giddens tem a nos dizer sobre a crise ecológica contemporânea. No texto procuramos mostrar como esse tema se entrelaça com três fases distintas do pensamento do autor. Ao final, avaliamos brevemente algumas críticas que são endereçadas ao seu trabalho.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document