scholarly journals Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Ajaran Fredrich Schleiermacher Dalam Hubungannya Doktrin Dasar Kristen

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46
Author(s):  
Titus Titus

God created man with many uniqueness from all other types of creation, one of which is the ability to think and reason about something. The purpose of this uniqueness is for humans to become divine partners in protecting and caring for the earth and what is in it. But unfortunately that uniqueness is tainted by because man's own disobedience to God's prohibition in the Garden of Eden.Even so, the human ability to think and reason is not lost. Humans are given the opportunity to work to work on this damaged earth even with pain. This ability to think continues to develop in great works and has become an icon of human civilized history. seen from historical buildings, but also through thoughts that can influence the challenges in people's lives, that is the fruit of the uniqueness of human thought that was created by God.Human thought that has developed over a period of time has become a disaster, where God is no longer needed in the modern world, the rise of liberal theology brings out the power of intellectual thought and intuition. The purity of Christian teachings has become relative and dragged into a vortex of increasingly sharp criticism. Can the Bible dim the teaching deviations, straighten out the understanding that has been dragged into corrupted rationale. Abstrak Indonesia Tuhan menciptakan manusia dengan banyak keunikan dari segala jenis ciptaan lainnya, salah satunya adalah kemampuan untuk berpikir dan menalarkan sesuatu.Tujuan dari keunikan itu adalah supaya manusia menjadi mitra Ilahi dalam menjaga dan memelihara bumi serta yang ada di dalamnya.Tetapi sayang keunikan itu tercemar oleh karena ketidaktaatan manusia itu sendiri terhadapan larangan Allah di Taman Eden.                                   Walaupun demikian kemampuan manusia untuk berpikir dan bernalar tidak hilang, manusia diberi kesempatan untuk berkarya mengusahakan bumi yang sudah rusak itu meskipun dengan bersusah payah.Kemampuan berpikir itu terus berkembang dalam sebuah karya-karya besar dan menjadi ikon sejarah beradaban manusia.Karya agung itu bukan hanya terlihat dari bangunan-bangunan bersejarah, tetapi juga melalui pemikiran-pemikiran yang dapat mempengaruhi tantanan dalam kehidupan masyarakat, itulah buah dari keunikan pemikiran manusia yang diciptakan Allah. Pemikiran manusia yang semakin berkembang dalam kurun waktu tertentu menjadi petaka, dimana Allah menjadi tidak diperlukan lagi dalam dunia modern, kebangkitan teologi liberal menyuguhkan kekuatan pemikiran intelektual dan intuisi. Kemurnian ajaran Kristen menjadi menjadi relative dan terseret dalam pusaran kritik yang semakin tajam.Mampukah Alkitab meredupkan penyimpangan pengajaran, meluruskan pemahaman yang terseret dalam rasional yang tercemar.

Author(s):  
Paul A. Bramadat

Is it possible for conservative Protestant groups to survive in secular institutional settings? Here, Bramadat offers an ethnographic study of the Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship (IVCF) at McMaster University, a group that espouses fundamentalist interpretations of the Bible, women's roles, the age of the earth, alcohol consumption, and sexual ethics. In examining this group, Bramadat demonstrates how this tiny minority thrives within the overwhelmingly secular context of the University.


Author(s):  
Mauricio Onetto Pavez

The year 2020 marks the five hundredth anniversary of the “discovery” of the Strait of Magellan. The unveiling of this passage between 1519 and 1522 allowed the planet to be circumnavigated for the first time in the history of humanity. All maritime routes could now be connected, and the idea of the Earth, in its geographical, cosmographic, and philosophical dimensions, gained its definitive meaning. This discovery can be considered one of the founding events of the modern world and of the process of globalization that still continues today. This new connectivity awoke an immediate interest in Europe that led to the emergence of a political consciousness of possession, domination, and territorial occupation generalized on a global scale, and the American continent was the starting point for this. This consciousness also inspired a desire for knowledge about this new form of inhabiting the world. Various fields of knowledge were redefined thanks to the new spaces and measurements produced by the discovery of the southern part of the Americas, which was recorded in books on cosmography, natural history, cartography, and manuscripts, circulating mainly between the Americas and Europe. All these processes transformed the Strait of Magellan into a geopolitical space coveted by Europeans during the 16th century. As an interoceanic connector, it was used to imagine commercial routes to the Orient and political projects that could sustain these dynamics. It was also conceived as a space to speculate on the potential wealth in the extreme south of the continent. In addition, on the Spanish side, some agents of the Crown considered it a strategic place for imperial projections and the defense of the Americas.


Author(s):  
Kathleen C. Oberlin

The typical story about creationist social movements centers on battles in the classroom or in the courtroom—like the Scopes Trial in 1925. But there is a new setting: a museum. “Prepare to Believe” is the slogan that greets visitors throughout the Creation Museum located in Petersburg, Kentucky. It carries the message that the organization Answers in Genesis (AiG) uses to welcome fellow believers as well as skeptics since opening in 2007. The Creation Museum seeks to persuade visitors that if one views both the Bible (a close, literal reading) and nature (observational, real world data) as sources of authority, then the earth appears to be much younger than conventionally understood in mainstream society. This book argues that the impact of the Creation Museum does not depend on the accuracy or credibility of its scientific claims, as many scholars, media critics, and political pundits would suggest. Instead, what AiG goes after by creating a physical site like the Creation Museum is the ability to foster plausibility politics—broadening what the audience perceives as possible and amplifying the stakes as the ideas reach more people. Destabilizing the belief that only one type of secular institution may make claims about the age of the earth and human origins, the Creation Museum is a threat to this singular positioning. In doing so, AiG repositions itself to produce longstanding effects on the public’s perception of who may make scientific claims. Creating the Creation Museum is a story about how a group endures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David C Tollerton

This article focuses upon the manner in which the Book of Job’s dissonant messages of theological radicalism and conservatism have been utilised within discussion of two specific episodes of innocent suffering in the modern world – the murder of six million Jews during the Holocaust and the suffering of the oppressed in the developing world. Overlaying the discussion, the following model is proposed: that, firstly, Christian liberation theologians emphasise the more theologically conservative messages that can be drawn from Job while asserting radical political opposition to those who possess power. Conversely, Jewish Holocaust theologians empathise with Job’s more theologically radical elements, yet do so within outlooks committed to conservatively maintaining the security and power of the state of Israel after two thousand years of Jewish powerlessness. This model is tested by focusing upon seven treatments of Job associated with liberation or Holocaust theologies. It is concluded that, although there are significant complications, in broad terms the model largely holds ”“ offering a comparative insight into contextual Christian and Jewish interpretations of the Bible in which political radicalism and theological radicalism are found to be at odds with one another.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-131
Author(s):  
Jarosław Horowski

One of the most difficult problems, which is to be solved by contemporary culture, is the ecological problem. It concerns the culture because the hedonistic and consumerist mentality of man plays an important part in it. Biocentrism states that the ecological problem results from traditional Western attitudes to the non-human world based on the belief that humans are the central and most significant entities in the universe. Biocentrism puts forward a teleological argument for the protection of the environment. It indicates that non-human species have inherent value as well and each organism has a purpose and a reason for being, which should be respected. Biocentrism states that the anthropocentric attitude to the non-human world results from the Christian worldview based on the Bible where it is written that God gives man dominion over all creatures. The author analyses the main issues of the Catholic concept of the relationship between human beings and other creatures. He indicates that ecotheology respects the inherent value of non-human creatures because, as the Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the modern world Gaudium et spes says: “all things are endowed with their own stability, truth, goodness, proper laws and order”, but maintains that the purpose of the world is connected with its relationship to God. The author considers also what is the human subjectivity in behaving towards the environment and what is the dependence between the autonomy of the world and the subjectivity of man in ecotheology. In the end, the author comes to the conclusion that according to ecotheology the ecological problem results from the broken relationship between the human and God and in consequence it the broken relationship between the world and God.


Scriptura ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Giffone

Has biblical scholarship become irrelevant to modern secular societies? Are the threats to the viability of biblical scholarship of the same nature as the threats to other areas of the humanities (history, philosophy, literature), or is there a qualitative difference? What about the role of technology in biblical research and biblical education? What is the future of the institutions of biblical scholarship such as universities, seminaries, journals, and academic presses? What is the role of biblical scholars in secular and post-secular societies, as contrasted with scholars in/from emerging communities? This essay argues that the problem of “validation” lies at the heart of biblical scholarship’s irrelevancy within the broader secularity of modern world and that this problem is even more evident in the scholarly discourse coming from regions like Eastern Europe and South Africa. However, the loss of authority of biblical scholarship more generally represents an opportunity for these communities. Rather than becoming enamoured of validation from the North Atlantic world, Bible-reading communities must cultivate their own forms of validation based in their unique histories with the Bible, and the affinities between their own histories/cultures and the cultures that produced the Old and New Testament texts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Zanatta ◽  
Fabio Zampieri ◽  
Cristina Basso ◽  
Gaetano Thiene

[first paragraph of article]Galileo Galilei (1564–1642), professor of mathematics at the University of Padua from 1592 to 1610, was a pillar in the history of our University and a symbol of freedom for research and teaching, well stated in the university motto ‘‘Universa Universis Patavina Libertas’’ (Total freedom in Padua, open to all the world). He invented the experimental method, based on evidence and calculation (‘‘science is measure’’) and was able, by using the telescope, to confirm the Copernican heliocentric theory, a challenge to the Bible. Bertrand Russell (1872–1970), in his book ‘‘The Problems of Philosophy’’ stated: ‘‘Almost everything that distinguishes modern world from earlier centuries is attributable to science, which achieved the most spectacular triumphs in the seventeenth century. Together with Harvey, Newton and Keplero, Galileo was a protagonist of this scientific revolution in the late Renaissance’’. 


Author(s):  
Bambang Wiku Hermanto

Bambang Wiku Hermanto, A study and description of Theologic Apologetic to the phrase God Repent in the bible. The phrase "God repent" in the Bible Old Testament for some or perhaps most people, hard to understand. To gain a sense of that phrase, the writer conducted the research, there is: Biblika research: to dig understanding the phrase "God repent" by investigation meaning of words or phrases of Hebrew, after getting the data, conducted a study; whether there is deviation understanding of people believe in the phrase "God repent that and conducted the eforts correction to rectifying the mistake. Based on the research of a Hebrew word meaning, the word ~x;n" (nawkham) translated repent, not only has a single meaning: 1) God grieving, sad or concerned with the human condition that have done evil, Revolting and against the God will; 2) god be merciful to his son; 3) god loves his son are aware of his sin and repent; 4) The word "sorry" that means indeed repent as people who repent, in the sense of repent by God expected His people or human thought that God would repent; 5) The word "sorry" that means indeed repent as people who repent, God does not and will never repent. Bambang Wiku Hermanto, Kajian dan Uraian Apologetis Teologis Terhadap Ungkapan "Allah Menyesal" Dalam Alkitab. Ungkapan "Allah menyesal" di dalam Alkitab Perjanjian Lama untuk sebagian atau mungkin sebagian besar orang, sulit dipahami. Untuk memperoleh pengertian makna ungkapan tersebut, penulis melakukan penelitian, yakni: Penelitian Biblika, untuk menggali pengertian ung-kapan "Allah menyesal" berdasarkan penulusuran makna kata atau frasa dari Bahasa Ibrani, setelah mendapatkan data tersebut, dilakukan suatu kajian; apakah terjadi penyimpangan pengertian orang percaya terhadap ungkapan "Allah menyesal" tersebut dan dilakukan upaya koreksi untuk meluruskan kekeliruan tersebut. Berdasarkan penelusuran makna kata dari Bahasa Ibrani, kata ~x;n" (nawkham) yang diterjemah-kan menyesal, bukan hanya memiliki makna tunggal: 1) Allah berduka, bersedih atau prihatin dengan keadaan manusia yang telah berbuat jahat, memberontak dan melawan kehendak Allah; 2) Allah menaruh belaskasihan terhadap umat-Nya; 3) Allah mengasihani umat-Nya yang menyadari dosanya dan bertobat; 4) Kata "menyesal" yang artinya memang menyesal sebagaimana manusia yang menyesal, dalam pengertian Allah diharapkan menyesal oleh umat-Nya atau manusia berpikir bahwa Allah akan menyesal; 5) Kata "menyesal" yang artinya memang menyesal sebagaimana manusia yang menyesal. Allah memang ti-dak akan dan tidak pernah menyesal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document