scholarly journals Super-Enhancers and CTCF in Early Embryonic Cell Fate Decisions

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puja Agrawal ◽  
Sridhar Rao
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Mammalian Development ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Early Mammalian Development

Cell fate decisions are the backbone of many developmental and disease processes. In early mammalian development, precise gene expression changes underly the rapid division of a single cell that leads to the embryo and are critically dependent on autonomous cell changes in gene expression. To understand how these lineage specifications events are mediated, scientists have had to look past protein coding genes to the cis regulatory elements (CREs), including enhancers and insulators, that modulate gene expression. One class of enhancers, termed super-enhancers, is highly active and cell-type specific, implying their critical role in modulating cell-type specific gene expression. Deletion or mutations within these CREs adversely affect gene expression and development and can cause disease. In this mini-review we discuss recent studies describing the potential roles of two CREs, enhancers and binding sites for CTCF, in early mammalian development.

scholarly journals The Interplay Between Chromatin Architecture and Lineage-Specific Transcription Factors and the Regulation of Rag Gene Expression

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuko Miyazaki ◽  
Masaki Miyazaki
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Chromatin Architecture ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Cell type-specific gene expression is driven through the interplay between lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) and the chromatin architecture, such as topologically associating domains (TADs), and enhancer-promoter interactions. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the cell fate decisions and cell type-specific functions, it is important to understand the interplay between chromatin architectures and TFs. Among enhancers, super-enhancers (SEs) play key roles in establishing cell identity. Adaptive immunity depends on the RAG-mediated assembly of antigen recognition receptors. Hence, regulation of the Rag1 and Rag2 (Rag1/2) genes is a hallmark of adaptive lymphoid lineage commitment. Here, we review the current knowledge of 3D genome organization, SE formation, and Rag1/2 gene regulation during B cell and T cell differentiation.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on cell type specific gene expression and splicing during neurogenesis elucidate regulatory mechanisms of brain traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nil Aygün ◽  
Angela L. Elwell ◽  
Dan Liang ◽  
Michael J. Lafferty ◽  
Kerry E. Cheek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Regulatory Effects

SummaryInterpretation of the function of non-coding risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders and brain-relevant traits via gene expression and alternative splicing is mainly performed in bulk post-mortem adult tissue. However, genetic risk loci are enriched in regulatory elements of cells present during neocortical differentiation, and regulatory effects of risk variants may be masked by heterogeneity in bulk tissue. Here, we map e/sQTLs and allele specific expression in primary human neural progenitors (n=85) and their sorted neuronal progeny (n=74). Using colocalization and TWAS, we uncover cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms underlying risk for these traits.

New insights into promoter–enhancer communication mechanisms revealed by dynamic single-molecule imaging

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieru Li ◽  
Alexandros Pertsinidis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Single Molecule Imaging ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Regulatory Information ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Target Promoters

Establishing cell-type-specific gene expression programs relies on the action of distal enhancers, cis-regulatory elements that can activate target genes over large genomic distances — up to Mega-bases away. How distal enhancers physically relay regulatory information to target promoters has remained a mystery. Here, we review the latest developments and insights into promoter–enhancer communication mechanisms revealed by live-cell, real-time single-molecule imaging approaches.

scholarly journals Dynamic changes in cis-regulatory occupancy by Six1 and its cooperative interactions with distinct cofactors drive lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 2880-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Aarthi Ramakrishnan ◽  
Bernd Fritzsch ◽  
Jinshu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Sensory Epithelium ◽  
Hair Bundle ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene

Abstract The transcription factor Six1 is essential for induction of sensory cell fate and formation of auditory sensory epithelium, but how it activates gene expression programs to generate distinct cell-types remains unknown. Here, we perform genome-wide characterization of Six1 binding at different stages of auditory sensory epithelium development and find that Six1-binding to cis-regulatory elements changes dramatically at cell-state transitions. Intriguingly, Six1 pre-occupies enhancers of cell-type-specific regulators and effectors before their expression. We demonstrate in-vivo cell-type-specific activity of Six1-bound novel enhancers of Pbx1, Fgf8, Dusp6, Vangl2, the hair-cell master regulator Atoh1 and a cascade of Atoh1’s downstream factors, including Pou4f3 and Gfi1. A subset of Six1-bound sites carry consensus-sequences for its downstream factors, including Atoh1, Gfi1, Pou4f3, Gata3 and Pbx1, all of which physically interact with Six1. Motif analysis identifies RFX/X-box as one of the most significantly enriched motifs in Six1-bound sites, and we demonstrate that Six1-RFX proteins cooperatively regulate gene expression through binding to SIX:RFX-motifs. Six1 targets a wide range of hair-bundle regulators and late Six1 deletion disrupts hair-bundle polarity. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how Six1 cooperates with distinct cofactors in feedforward loops to control lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium.

scholarly journals Enhancers and Transcriptional Regulation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. SCI-14-SCI-14
Author(s):  
Joanna Wysocka
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract Interactions between the genome and its cellular and signaling environments, which ultimately occur at the level of chromatin, are the key to comprehending how cell-type-specific gene expression patterns arise and are maintained during development or are misregulated in disease. Central to the cell type-specific transcriptional regulation are distal cis-regulatory elements called enhancers, which function in a modular way to provide exquisite spatiotemporal control of gene expression during development. We are using a combination of genomic, genetic, biochemical, and single-cell approaches to investigate how enhancers are activated in response to developmental stimuli, how they communicate with target promoters over large genomic distances to regulate transcriptional outputs, what is the role of chromatin modification and remodeling in facilitating or restricting enhancer activity and how regulatory sequence change leads to the phenotypic divergence in humans. I will discuss our latest results on the mechanisms underlying enhancer function and gene regulation in development and disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals An integrated analysis of cell-type specific gene expression reveals genes regulated by REVOLUTA and KANADI1 in the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e1008661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasthi Ram ◽  
Sudeep Sahadevan ◽  
Nittaya Gale ◽  
Monica Pia Caggiano ◽  
Xiulian Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Shoot Apical Meristem ◽  
Apical Meristem ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

scholarly journals Comprehensive analysis of single cell ATAC-seq data with SnapATAC

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongxin Fang ◽  
Sebastian Preissl ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Xiaomeng Hou ◽  
Jacinta Lucero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Single Cell Analysis ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractIdentification of the cis-regulatory elements controlling cell-type specific gene expression patterns is essential for understanding the origin of cellular diversity. Conventional assays to map regulatory elements via open chromatin analysis of primary tissues is hindered by sample heterogeneity. Single cell analysis of accessible chromatin (scATAC-seq) can overcome this limitation. However, the high-level noise of each single cell profile and the large volume of data pose unique computational challenges. Here, we introduce SnapATAC, a software package for analyzing scATAC-seq datasets. SnapATAC dissects cellular heterogeneity in an unbiased manner and map the trajectories of cellular states. Using the Nyström method, SnapATAC can process data from up to a million cells. Furthermore, SnapATAC incorporates existing tools into a comprehensive package for analyzing single cell ATAC-seq dataset. As demonstration of its utility, SnapATAC is applied to 55,592 single-nucleus ATAC-seq profiles from the mouse secondary motor cortex. The analysis reveals ~370,000 candidate regulatory elements in 31 distinct cell populations in this brain region and inferred candidate cell-type specific transcriptional regulators.

scholarly journals A scalable platform for the development of cell-type-specific viral drivers

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinisa Hrvatin ◽  
Christopher P Tzeng ◽  
M Aurel Nagy ◽  
Hume Stroud ◽  
Charalampia Koutsioumpa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Heterologous Gene Expression ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Type Specificity ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
The Many ◽  
Dna Regulatory Elements

Enhancers are the primary DNA regulatory elements that confer cell type specificity of gene expression. Recent studies characterizing individual enhancers have revealed their potential to direct heterologous gene expression in a highly cell-type-specific manner. However, it has not yet been possible to systematically identify and test the function of enhancers for each of the many cell types in an organism. We have developed PESCA, a scalable and generalizable method that leverages ATAC- and single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols, to characterize cell-type-specific enhancers that should enable genetic access and perturbation of gene function across mammalian cell types. Focusing on the highly heterogeneous mammalian cerebral cortex, we apply PESCA to find enhancers and generate viral reagents capable of accessing and manipulating a subset of somatostatin-expressing cortical interneurons with high specificity. This study demonstrates the utility of this platform for developing new cell-type-specific viral reagents, with significant implications for both basic and translational research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document