scholarly journals Establishment of a Prognostic Signature of Stromal/Immune-Related Genes for Gastric Adenocarcinoma Based on ESTIMATE Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Yu ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Ke Peng ◽  
Minzhi Lyu ◽  
Fenglin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Prognostic Signature ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Different subtypes of gastric cancer differentially respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study aimed to investigate whether the Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in Malignant Tumor tissues using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm is related to the classification and prognosis of gastric cancer and to establish an ESTIMATE-based gene signature to predict the prognosis for patients. The immune/stromal scores of 388 gastric cancer patients from TCGA were used in this analysis. The upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in patients with high stromal/immune scores were identified. The immune-related hub DEGs were selected based on protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis. The prognostic values of the hub DEGs were evaluated in the TCGA dataset and validated in the GSE15460 dataset using the Kaplan-Meier curves. A prognostic signature was built using the hub DEGs by Cox proportional hazards model, and the accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Different subtypes of gastric cancer had significantly different immune/stromal scores. High stromal scores but not immune scores were significantly associated with short overall survivals of TCGA patients. Nine hub DEGs were identified in PPI analysisThe expression of these hub DEG negatively correlated with the overall survival in the TCGA cohort, which was validated in the GSE15460 cohort. A 9-gene prognostic signature was constructed. The risk factor of patients was calculated by this signature. High-risk patients had significantly shorter overall survival than low-risk patients. ROC analysis showed that the prognostic model accurately identified high-risk individuals within different time frames. We established an effective 9-gene-based risk signature to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients, providing guidance for prognostic stratification.

scholarly journals Impact of Palliative Gastrectomy in Patients with Incurable Gastric Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Park ◽  
Byunghyuk Yu ◽  
Ki Bum Park ◽  
Oh Kyoung Kwon ◽  
Seung Soo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Palliative Resection ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Palliative Intent ◽  
Palliative Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background and Objectives: The prognosis of metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer is dismal, and the benefits of the palliative resection of primary tumors with noncurative intent remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of palliative gastrectomy (PG) on overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-eight gastric cancer patients who underwent PG or a nonresection (NR) procedure between January 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to select and analyze clinicopathological factors that affected prognosis. Results: Fifty-five patients underwent primary tumor resection with palliative intent, and 93 underwent NR procedures owing to the presence of metastatic or unresectable disease. The PG group was younger and more female dominant. In the PG group, R1 and R2 resection were performed in two patients (3.6%) and 53 patients (96.4%), respectively. The PG group had a significantly longer median overall survival than the NR group (28.4 vs. 7.7 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the overall survival was significantly better after palliative resection (hazard ratio (HR), 0.169; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.088–0.324; p < 0.001) in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) scores ≤1 (HR, 0.506; 95% CI, 0.291–0.878; p = 0.015) and those who received postoperative chemotherapy (HR, 0.487; 95% CI, 0.296–0.799; p = 0.004). Among the patients undergoing palliative resection, the presence of <15 positive lymph nodes was the only significant predictor of better overall survival (HR, 0.329; 95% CI, 0.121–0.895; p = 0.030). Conclusions: PG might lead to the prolonged survival of certain patients with incurable gastric cancer, particularly those with less-extensive lymph-node metastasis.

scholarly journals ELISA study of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 7, 9 and their type 2 tissue inhibitor in the tumors of gastric cancer patients: clinical and pathologic correlations

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-329
Author(s):  
E. S. Gershtein ◽  
A. A. Ivannikov ◽  
V. L. Chang ◽  
N. A. Ognerubov ◽  
М. M. Davydov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinases ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Gastric Cancer Tissue ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Background: Over the last 10 years the incidence of gastric cancer has declined significantly. Nevertheless, it remains one of the most prevalent malignancies both in Russia and worldwide. Therefore, the problems of early diagnostics, prognosis and individualized treatment choice are still on the agenda. Much attention is paid to the evaluation of molecular biological characteristics of the tumor, as well as to the development of multiparametric prognostic systems for gastric cancer based on its identified characteristics. An important place among potential tumor biological markers belongs to matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) involved into all the stages of tumor progression, first of all, into the regulation of invasion and metastasizing.Aim: Comparative quantitative evaluation of some MMP family members (MMP-2, 7, and 9) and one of the tissue MMP inhibitors (TIMP-2) levels in the tumors and adjacent histologically unchanged mucosa in gastric cancer patients, the analysis of their associations with the main clinical and pathological features of the disease and its prognosis.Materials and methods: Sixty six (66) primary gastric cancer patients (32 male and 34 female) aged 24 to 82 years (median, 61 year) were recruited into the study. Twenty two (22) patients were with stage I of the disease, 11 with stage II, 28 with stage III, and 5 with stage IV. The concentrations of the proteins studied were measured in the tumor and unchanged mucosa extracts by standard direct ELISA kits (Quantikine®, R&D Systems, USA).Results: Tumor MMP-2, 7 and 9 levels were significantly increased, compared to those in the adjacent histologically unchanged mucosa, in 80, 70 and 72% of gastric cancer patients, respectively, while the increase of TIMP-2 level found in 61% of the tumors was not statistically significant. Tumor MMP-2 and TIMP-2 content was increasing significantly with higher T index – size and advancement of the primary tumor (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 respectively). Tumor MMP-2 level was also increasing in parallel with the N index (regional lymph node involvement; p < 0.01); it was significantly higher in the patients with distant metastases than in those without them (p < 0.05). Tumor MMP-9 and MMP-7 concentrations were not significantly associated with the indices of the tumor progression. The patients were followed up for 1 to 85 months (median, 18.3 months). According to the univariate analysis, high (> 32.6 ng/mg protein) MMP-2 and low MMP-7 (< 1.1 ng/mg protein) levels in the gastric cancer tissue represent statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival. Increased TIMP-2 level is associated with a non-significant decrease in the overall survival (p > 0.05), whereas the MMP-9 level was unrelated to the gastric cancer prognosis. Only T index (p = 0.0034) and tumor MMP-7 content (p = 0.026) remained independent prognostic factors in the multivariate regression analysis.Conclusion: The majority of gastric cancer patients demonstrate a significant increase in the expression of three MMP family members, i.e. gelatinases (MMP-2 and 9), and matrilysin (MMP-7), in the tumors, as compared to adjacent histologically unchanged mucosa. Only MMP-2 levels were associated with the disease progression, increasing with higher TNM system indices. High MMP-2 and low MMP-7 content in the gastric cancer tissue are significant unfavorable prognostic factors for the overall survival in the univariate analysis, but only MMP-7 has retained its independent prognostic value in the multivariate assessment.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of FLOT regimen vs. DCF, FOLFOX, and ECF regimens as Perioperative Chemotherapy Treatments for Resectable Gastric Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pegah Farrokhi ◽  
Alireza Sadeghi ◽  
Mehran sharifi ◽  
Payam Dadvand ◽  
Rachel Riechelmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Resectable Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

AbstractAimThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and toxicity of common regimens used as perioperative chemotherapy including ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, and FLOT to identify the most effective chemotherapy regimen with less toxicity.Material and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was based on 152 eligible gastric cancer patients recruited in a tertiary oncology hospital in Isfahan, Iran (2014-2019). All resectable gastric cancer patients who had received one of the four chemotherapy regimens including ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, or FLOT, and followed for at least one year (up to five years) were included. The primary endpoint of this study was Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), and R0 resection. We also considered toxicity according to CTCAE (v.4.0) criteria as a secondary endpoint. Cox -regression models were used applied to estimate OS and PFS time, controlled for relevant covariates.ResultsOf included patients, 32(21%), 51(33.7%), 37(24.3%), and 32(21%) had received ECF, DCF, FOLFOX and FLOT, respectively. After the median 25 months follow-up, overall survival was higher with the FLOT regimen in comparison with other regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 0. 052). The median OS of the FLOT regimen was not reachable in Kaplan-Meier analysis and the median OS was 28, 26, and 23 months for DCF, FOLOFX, and ECF regimens, respectively. On the other hand, a median PFS of 25, 17, 15, and 14 months was observed for FLOT, DCF, FOLFOX, and ECF regimens, respectively (Log-rank = 0. 021). FLOT regimen showed 84. 4% ORR which was notably higher than other groups (p-value<0. 01).ConclusionsFor resectable gastric cancer patients, the perioperative FLOT regimen seemed to lead to a significant improvement in patients’ OS and PFS in comparison with ECF, DCF, and FOLFOX regimens. As such, the FLOT regimen could be considered as the optimal option for managing resectable gastric cancer patients.

scholarly journals Association between ABCB1 Immunohistochemical Expression and Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (16) ◽  
pp. 6935-6938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana de Oliveira ◽  
Aledson Vitor Felipe ◽  
Ricardo Artigiani Neto ◽  
Celina Tizuko Oshima ◽  
Marcelo de Souza Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

The Clinicopathological Significance and Prognostic Value of Obg-Like Atpase 1 (OLA1) in Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Wang ◽  
Zihan Zheng ◽  
Qinghua Cao ◽  
Xiufen Liu ◽  
Zhiqing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Tissues

Abstract Backgroud Obg-like ATPase 1 (OLA1) is a member of the Obg family of P-loop NTPases and has recently been detected in several human cancer cells. However, its expression type and clinical relevance in gastric cancer remains unclear. Methods In the present study, 2 datasets downloaded from the open Gene Expression Omnibus database were used to evaluate the mRNA level of OLA1 in gastric cancer. Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR further validated the mRNA expression in gastric cancer tissues. Immunohistochemistry was performed on gastric cancer tissue microarray to assess OLA1 protein expression type, prognostic value, biological significance and its association with Snail in 334 patients of gastric cancer. The prognostic value of combination of OLA1 and Snail has been evaluated. Results The results showed that OLA1 mRNA and protein were elevated in gastric cancer tissues. High expression of OLA1 was significantly associated with aggressive features, such as tumor size, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage (P = 0.0146, P = 0.0037, P < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, high levels of OLA1 predicted worse overall survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high expression of OLA1 was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.573; 95% confidence interval, 0.376–0.872; P = 0.009). Additionally, OLA1 expression was positively correlated with Snail, and combination of them revealed improved prognostic accuracy for gastric cancer patients. Conclusions Our results suggested that OLA1 high expression was considered as an independent factor for the prediction of unfavorable prognosis in gastric cancer patients, and we believe that OLA1 could serve as a biomarker of poor prognosis and a novel target in treating gastric cancers.

First-degree relatives of early-onset gastric cancer patients show a high risk for gastric cancer: phenotype and genotype profile

2013 ◽  
Vol 463 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Marcos-Pinto ◽  
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro ◽  
Fátima Carneiro ◽  
Xiaogang Wen ◽  
Carlos Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Genotype Profile ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Cancer Phenotype ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document