scholarly journals Cytokine Profiles and Antibody Response Associated to Choclo Orthohantavirus Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tybbysay P. Salinas ◽  
Jose L. Garrido ◽  
Jacqueline R. Salazar ◽  
Publio Gonzalez ◽  
Nicole Zambrano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Cytokine Profiles ◽  
Th2 Cytokine ◽  
Igg1 Subclass ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals

BackgroundNew World Hantaviruses (NWHs) are the etiological agent underlying hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS), a severe respiratory disease with high mortality rates in humans. In Panama, infections with Choclo Orthohantavirus (CHOV) cause a much milder illness characterized by higher seroprevalence and lower mortality rates. To date, the cytokine profiles and antibody responses associated with this milder form of HCPS have not been defined. Therefore, in this study, we examined immune serological profiles associated with CHOV infections.MethodsFor this retrospective study, sera from fifteen individuals with acute CHOV-induced HCPS, were analyzed alongside sera from fifteen convalescent phase individuals and thirty-three asymptomatic, CHOV-seropositive individuals. Cytokine profiles were analyzed by multiplex immunoassay. Antibody subclasses, binding, and neutralization against CHOV-glycoprotein (CHOV-GP) were evaluated by ELISA, and flow cytometry.ResultsHigh titers of IFNγ, IL-4, IL-8, and IL-10 serum cytokines were found in the acute individuals. Elevated IL-4 serum levels were found in convalescent and asymptomatic seropositive individuals. High titers of IgG1 subclass were observed across the three cohorts analyzed. Neutralizing antibody response against CHOV-GP was detectable in few acute individuals but was strong in both convalescent and asymptomatic seropositive individuals.ConclusionA Th1/Th2 cytokine signature is characteristic during acute mild HCPS caused by CHOV infection. High expression of Th2 and IL-8 cytokines are correlated with clinical parameters in acute mild HCPS. In addition, a strong IL-4 signature is associated with different cohorts, including asymptomatic individuals. Furthermore, asymptomatic individuals presented high titers of neutralizing antibodies.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits a rapid neutralizing antibody response that correlates with disease severity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Trinité ◽  
Ferran Tarrés-Freixas ◽  
Jordi Rodon ◽  
Edwards Pradenas ◽  
Víctor Urrea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Limit ◽  
Antibody Response ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Maximal Activity ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals ◽  
Rapid Kinetics ◽  
Kinetics Of

AbstractThe protective effect of neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is not yet well defined. To address this issue, we have analyzed the kinetics of neutralizing antibody responses and their association with disease severity. Between March and May 2020, the prospective KING study enrolled 72 COVID-19+ participants grouped according to disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed by serological and virological tests. Plasma neutralizing responses were assessed against replicative virus and pseudoviral particles. Multiple regression and non-parametric tests were used to analyze dependence of parameters. The magnitude of neutralizing titers significantly increased with disease severity. Hospitalized individuals developed higher titers compared to mild-symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, which together showed titers below the detection limit in 50% of cases. Longitudinal analysis confirmed the strong differences in neutralizing titers between non-hospitalized and hospitalized participants and showed rapid kinetics of appearance of neutralizing antibodies (50% and 80% of maximal activity reached after 11 and 17 days after symptoms onset, respectively) in hospitalized patients. No significant impact of age, gender or treatment on the neutralizing titers was observed in this limited cohort. These data identify a clear association of humoral immunity with disease severity and point to immune mechanisms other than antibodies as relevant players in COVID-19 protection.

scholarly journals Potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses are Associated with Better Prognosis in Hospital Inpatient COVID-19 Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J Tighe ◽  
Richard A Urbanowicz ◽  
Lucy Fairclough ◽  
C Patrick McClure ◽  
Brian J Thomson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Intervention ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Effective Vaccine ◽  
Hospital Inpatient ◽  
Protein Variant ◽  
Immune Correlates

COVID-19 continues to cause a pandemic, having infected more than 20 million people globally. Successful elimination of the SARS-CoV-2 virus will require an effective vaccine. However, the immune correlates of infection are currently poorly understood. While neutralizing antibodies are believed to be essential for protection against infection, the contribution of the neutralizing antibody response to resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection has not yet been defined. In this study the antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid proteins were investigated in a UK patient cohort, using optimised immunoassays and a retrovirus-based pseudotype entry assay. It was discovered that in severe COVID-19 infections an early antibody response to both antigens was associated with improved prognosis of infection. While not all SARS-CoV-2-reactive sera were found to possess neutralizing antibodies, neutralizing potency of sera was found to be greater in patients who went on to resolve infection, compared with those that died from COVID-19. Furthermore, viral genetic variation in spike protein was found to influence the production of neutralizing antibodies. Infection with the recently described spike protein variant 614G produced higher levels of neutralizing antibodies when compared to viruses possessing the 614D variant. These findings support the assertion that vaccines targeting generation of neutralizing antibodies may be useful at limiting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Assessment of the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 at time of diagnosis will be a useful addition to the diagnostic toolkit, enabling stratification of clinical intervention for severe COVID-19 disease.

scholarly journals CoV-RBD121-NP Vaccine Candidate Protects against Symptomatic Disease Following SARS-CoV-2 Challenge in K18-hACE2 Mice and Induces Protective Responses That Prevent COVID-19-Associated Immunopathology

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1346
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. DeMarco ◽  
Joshua M. Royal ◽  
William E. Severson ◽  
Jon D. Gabbard ◽  
Steve Hume ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Vaccine Candidate ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Symptomatic Disease ◽  
Human Igg1

We developed a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate (CoV-RBD121-NP) comprised of a tobacco mosaic virus-like nanoparticle conjugated to the receptor-binding domain of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 fused to a human IgG1 Fc domain. CoV-RBD121-NP elicits strong antibody responses in C57BL/6 mice and is stable for up to 12 months at 2–8 or 22–28 °C. Here, we showed that this vaccine induces a strong neutralizing antibody response in K18-hACE2 mice. Furthermore, we demonstrated that immunization protects mice from virus-associated mortality and symptomatic disease. Our data indicated that a sufficient pre-existing pool of neutralizing antibodies is required to restrict SARS-CoV-2 replication upon exposure and prevent induction of inflammatory mediators associated with severe disease. Finally, we identified a potential role for CXCL5 as a protective cytokine in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results suggested that disruption of the CXCL5 and CXCL1/2 axis may be important early components of the inflammatory dysregulation that is characteristic of severe cases of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 370 (6521) ◽  
pp. 1227-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ania Wajnberg ◽  
Fatima Amanat ◽  
Adolfo Firpo ◽  
Deena R. Altman ◽  
Mark J. Bailey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Antibody Response ◽  
York City ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Global Pandemic

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic with millions infected and more than 1 million fatalities. Questions regarding the robustness, functionality, and longevity of the antibody response to the virus remain unanswered. Here, on the basis of a dataset of 30,082 individuals screened at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City, we report that the vast majority of infected individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 experience robust immunoglobulin G antibody responses against the viral spike protein. We also show that titers are relatively stable for at least a period of about 5 months and that anti-spike binding titers significantly correlate with neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2. Our data suggest that more than 90% of seroconverters make detectable neutralizing antibody responses. These titers remain relatively stable for several months after infection.

scholarly journals Antiviral antibody responses to systemic administration of an oncolytic RNA virus: the impact of standard concomitant anticancer chemotherapies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e002673
Author(s):  
Victoria Roulstone ◽  
David Mansfield ◽  
Robert J Harris ◽  
Katie Twigger ◽  
Christine White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Rna Virus ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trials ◽  
Antiviral Antibody ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundOncolytic reovirus therapy for cancer induces a typical antiviral response to this RNA virus, including neutralizing antibodies. Concomitant treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapies has been hypothesized to improve the therapeutic potential of the virus. Chemotherapy side effects can include immunosuppression, which may slow the rate of the antiviral antibody response, as well as potentially make the patient more vulnerable to viral infection.MethodReovirus neutralizing antibody data were aggregated from separate phase I clinical trials of reovirus administered as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine, docetaxel, carboplatin and paclitaxel doublet or cyclophosphamide. In addition, the kinetics of individual antibody isotypes were profiled in sera collected in these trials.ResultsThese data demonstrate preserved antiviral antibody responses, with only moderately reduced kinetics with some drugs, most notably gemcitabine. All patients ultimately produced an effective neutralizing antibody response.ConclusionPatients’ responses to infection by reovirus are largely unaffected by the concomitant drug treatments tested, providing confidence that RNA viral treatment or infection is compatible with standard of care treatments.

scholarly journals Immunogenicity of Multiple Doses of pDNA Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Iman Almansour ◽  
Nabela Calamata Macadato ◽  
Thamer Alshammari
Keyword(s):  
Immune Responses ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Natural Infection ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Effective Measure ◽  
Vaccine Candidates ◽  
Cellular Immune

Since its identification in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has resulted in 46 million cases and more than one million deaths worldwide, as of 30 October 2020. Limited data exist on the magnitude and durability of antibodies generated by natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 and whether they can provide long-lasting immunity from reinfection. Vaccination has proven the most effective measure for controlling and preventing pandemics and, thus, development of a vaccine against COVID-19 is a top priority. However, the doses required to induce effective, long-lasting antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 remain undetermined. Here, we present the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates encoding the viral spike (S) gene, generated using plasmid (p)DNA technology, and we demonstrate the eliciting of S-specific antibodies in mice after three and four doses. The magnitude of binding and neutralizing antibody responses with three doses of synthetic, codon-optimized, full-length S (S.opt.FL) vaccine is comparable to that generated after four doses, suggesting that three doses are sufficient to elicit robust immune responses. Conversely, four doses of S1.opt pDNA vaccine, containing the S globular head, are required to elicit high levels of neutralizing antibodies. Furthermore, the S.opt.FL pDNA vaccine induces the highest serum levels of interferon (IFN)-γ, a marker for activation of cellular immune responses. Overall, our data show that three doses of S.FL pDNA vaccine elicit potent neutralizing antibody responses, with preclinical data that support the immunogenicity of these COVID-19 vaccine candidates and provide justification for further translational studies.

scholarly journals Antibody dynamics to SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic COVID-19 infections

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Lei ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Hongyan Hou ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Yandi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Humoral Immunity ◽  
Exposure Time ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Pseudotyped Virus ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals ◽  
Antibody Dynamics

Abstract Importance Asymptomatic COVID-19 infections have a long duration of viral shedding and contribute substantially to disease transmission. However, the missing asymptomatic cases have been significantly overlooked because of imperfect sensitivity of nucleic acid testing. We aimed to investigate the humoral immunity in asymptomatics, which will help us develop serological tests and improve early identification, understand the humoral immunity to COVID-19, and provide more rational control strategies for the pandemic. Objective To better control the pandemic of COVID-19, dynamics of IgM and IgG responses to 23 proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibody in asymptomatic COVID-19 infections after exposure time were investigated. Design, setting, and participants 63 asymptomatic individuals were screened by RT-qPCR and ELISA for IgM and IgG from 11,776 personnel returning to work, and close contacts with the confirmed cases in different communities of Wuhan by investigation of clusters and tracing infectious sources. 63 healthy contacts with both negative results for NAT and antibodies were selected as negative controls. 51 mild patients without any preexisting conditions were also screened as controls from 1056 patients during hospitalization in Tongji Hospital. A total of 177 participants were enrolled in this study and serial serum samples (n=213) were collected. The research was conducted between 17 February 2020 and 28 April 2020. Serum IgM and IgG profiles of 177 participants were further probed using a SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray. Neutralizing antibody responses in different population were detected by a pseudotyped virus neutralization assay system. The dynamics of IgM and IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies were analyzed with exposure time or symptoms onset. Results Asymptomatics were classified into four subgroups based on NAT and serological tests. In particular, only 19% had positive NAT results while approximately 81% detected positive IgM/IgG responses. Comparative SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray further demonstrated that there was a significantly difference of antibody dynamics responding to S1 or N proteins among three populations, although IgM and IgG profiles could not be used to differentiate them. S1 specific IgM responses were elicited in asymptomatic individuals as early to the seventh day after exposure and peaked on days from 17d to 25d, which might be used as an early diagnostic biomarker and give an additional 36.5% seropositivity. Mild patients produced stronger both S1 specific IgM and neutralizing antibody responses than asymptomatic individuals. Most importantly, S1 specific IgM/IgG responses and the titers of neutralizing antibody in asymptomatic individuals gradually vanished in two months. Conclusions and relevance Our findings might have important implications for the definition of asymptomatic COVID-19 infections, diagnosis, serological survey, public health and immunization strategies.

scholarly journals Role of the Antigen Capture Pathway in the Induction of a Neutralizing Antibody Response to Anthrax Protective Antigen

mBio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Verma ◽  
Miriam M. Ngundi ◽  
Gregory A. Price ◽  
Kazuyo Takeda ◽  
James Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Protective Antigen ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antigen Presenting Cells ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Bacterial Diseases ◽  
Anthrax Protective Antigen ◽  
Antigen Presenting

ABSTRACTToxin neutralizing antibodies represent the major mode of protective immunity against a number of toxin-mediated bacterial diseases, including anthrax; however, the cellular mechanisms that lead to optimal neutralizing antibody responses remain ill defined. Here we show that the cellular binding pathway of anthrax protective antigen (PA), the binding component of anthrax toxin, determines the toxin neutralizing antibody response to this antigen. PA, which binds cellular receptors and efficiently enters antigen-presenting cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis, was found to elicit robust anti-PA IgG and toxin neutralizing antibody responses. In contrast, a receptor binding-deficient mutant of PA, which does not bind receptors and only inefficiently enters antigen-presenting cells by macropinocytosis, elicited very poor antibody responses. A chimeric protein consisting of the receptor binding-deficient PA mutant tethered to the binding subunit of cholera toxin, which efficiently enters cells using the cholera toxin receptor rather than the PA receptor, elicited an anti-PA IgG antibody response similar to that elicited by wild-type PA; however, the chimeric protein elicited a poor toxin neutralizing antibody response. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the antigen capture pathway can dictate the magnitudes of the total IgG and toxin neutralizing antibody responses to PA as well as the ratio of the two responses.IMPORTANCENeutralizing antibodies provide protection against a number of toxin-mediated bacterial diseases by inhibiting toxin action. Therefore, many bacterial vaccines are designed to induce a toxin neutralizing antibody response. We have used protective antigen (PA), the binding component of anthrax toxin, as a model antigen to investigate immune mechanisms important for the induction of robust toxin neutralizing antibody responses. We found that the pathway used by antigen-presenting cells to capture PA dictates the robustness of the neutralizing antibody response to this antigen. These results provide new insights into immune mechanisms that play an important role in the induction of toxin neutralizing antibody responses and may be useful in the design of new vaccines against toxin-mediated bacterial diseases.

scholarly journals Deconstructing the Antiviral Neutralizing-Antibody Response: Implications for Vaccine Development and Immunity

2016 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 989-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. VanBlargan ◽  
Leslie Goo ◽  
Theodore C. Pierson
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Polyclonal Antibody ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Vaccine Development ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Distinct Structure ◽  
Antibody Specificities ◽  
The Individual

SUMMARYThe antibody response plays a key role in protection against viral infections. While antiviral antibodies may reduce the viral burden via several mechanisms, the ability to directly inhibit (neutralize) infection of cells has been extensively studied. Eliciting a neutralizing-antibody response is a goal of many vaccine development programs and commonly correlates with protection from disease. Considerable insights into the mechanisms of neutralization have been gained from studies of monoclonal antibodies, yet the individual contributions and dynamics of the repertoire of circulating antibody specificities elicited by infection and vaccination are poorly understood on the functional and molecular levels. Neutralizing antibodies with the most protective functionalities may be a rare component of a polyclonal, pathogen-specific antibody response, further complicating efforts to identify the elements of a protective immune response. This review discusses advances in deconstructing polyclonal antibody responses to flavivirus infection or vaccination. Our discussions draw comparisons to HIV-1, a virus with a distinct structure and replication cycle for which the antibody response has been extensively investigated. Progress toward deconstructing and understanding the components of polyclonal antibody responses identifies new targets and challenges for vaccination strategies.

scholarly journals IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Sterlin ◽  
Alexis Mathian ◽  
Makoto Miyara ◽  
Audrey Mohr ◽  
François Anna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Specific Antibody ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Humoral Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Virus Neutralization ◽  
Secondary Memory ◽  
Specific Antibody Response ◽  
Humoral Responses

AbstractA major dogma in immunology has it that the IgM antibody response precedes secondary memory responses built on the production of IgG, IgA and, occasionaly, IgE. Here, we measured acute humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2, including the frequency of antibody-secreting cells and the presence of specific, neutralizing, antibodies in serum and broncho-alveolar fluid of 145 patients with COVID-19. Surprisingly, early SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral responses were found to be typically dominated by antibodies of the IgA isotype. Peripheral expansion of IgA-plasmablasts with mucosal-homing potential was detected shortly after the onset of symptoms and peaked during the third week of the disease. While the specific antibody response included IgG, IgM and IgA, the latter contributed to a much larger extent to virus neutralization, as compared to IgG. However, specific IgA serum levels notably decrease after one month of evolution. These results represent a challenging observation given the present uncertainty as to which kind of humoral response would optimally protect against re-infection, and whether vaccine regimens should consider boosting a potent, although, at least in blood, fading IgA response.One sentence SummaryWhile early specific antibody response included IgG, IgM and IgA, the latter contributed to a much larger extent to virus neutralization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document