Correlation Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BackgroundImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with clinical benefit in cancer patients of melanoma, a lung cancer. In the present study, we investigated the correlation between irAE and ICI efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.MethodsWe divided the HCC patients who received the anti-PD-1 antibody into two groups as irAE group and non-irAE group according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 4.03. The treatment efficacy of ICIs was evaluated with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultOf the 65 HCC patients who received the anti-PD-1 antibody (monotherapy or combined with targeted medicine), median PFS in the irAE group was superior to that in the non-irAE group (302 days vs. 148 days, p = 0.004). Median OS in the irAE group was also better than that in the non-irAE group (374 days vs. 279 days, p = 0.038). Although the statistical difference for DCR in the irAE group and non-irAE group was not reached, the DCR of the irAE displayed a trend better than that of the non-irAE group (41.20% vs. 20.80%, p = 0.118). Multivariate analysis also demonstrated that the non-irAE group (HR = 6.410, 95% CI: 1.404 to 29.275) was associated independently with the poor prognosis.ConclusionsDevelopment of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for HCC patients who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors; irAE, particularly low-grade irAE, was a predictable marker for better ICI treatment efficiency in HCC patients.

Download Full-text

Lenvatinib Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Improve Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.751159 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Xiaozhun Huang ◽

Lin Xu ◽

Teng Ma ◽

Xin Yin ◽

Zhangkan Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Advanced Hcc ◽

New Strategy

BackgroundNivolumab and pembrolizumab disrupt the programmed cell death-1 immune checkpoint and display promising efficacy and safety results in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the benefits remain limited. The preliminary results of lenvatinib (LEN) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reveal that the combinations were well-tolerated and encouraging. This study aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of LEN plus ICIs in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced HCC.MethodBetween June 4, 2017, and June 30, 2019, 16 patients received LEN plus nivolumab, and 13 patients were treated with LEN plus pembrolizumab, with the confirmed advanced HCC retrospectively analyzed. The clinical parameters, as well as the outcomes, were assessed.ResultsAll the patients had Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer Stage C. LEN with ICIs was used as systemic second-, third-, and fourth-line treatments in seven (24.1%), 14 (48.3%), and eight (27.6%) patients, respectively. At the time of data cutoff, six patients (37.5%) were still receiving LEN with nivolumab, while another six patients (46.2%) were still receiving LEN with pembrolizumab. An objective response was recorded in seven patients (25.9%), while the best overall responses were from one complete response and six partial responses. The 6- and 12-month over survival (OS) rates were 62.6% and 53.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the 6- and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 43.5% and 31.8%, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the 6- and 12-month OS and PFS rates for patients treated with LEN plus nivolumab were 62.5% and 52.1%, respectively, and 43.8% and 30.0%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month OS and PFS rates for patients treated with LEN plus pembrolizumab were 51.3% and 51.3%, respectively, and 49.2% and 49.2%, respectively. A total of 11 (31%) deaths were reported in this study, four of which were attributed to grade 5 adverse events presented as fatal treatment-related hepatitis.ConclusionThe combination of LEN and ICIs is a promising new strategy for the treatment of HCC patients. However, high-grade hepatic toxicity was observed and further evaluation of this combination is still required.

Download Full-text

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with nivolumab

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-019-6150-y ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Ken Masuda ◽

Hirokazu Shoji ◽

Kengo Nagashima ◽

Shun Yamamoto ◽

Masashi Ishikawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Motor Neuropathy ◽

Metastatic Sites

Abstract Background Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with clinical benefit in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, there have been few reports about the correlation between irAEs and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between irAEs and efficacy in AGC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods The subjects of this study were AGC patients received nivolumab monotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018. IrAEs were defined as those AEs having a potential immunological basis that required close follow-up, or immunosuppressive therapy and/or endocrine therapy. We divided the patients who received nivolumab into two groups based on occurrence of irAEs; those with irAEs (irAE group) or those without (non-irAE group). We assessed the efficacy in both groups. Results Of the 65 AGC patients that received nivolumab monotherapy, 14 developed irAEs. The median time to onset of irAEs was 30.5 days (range 3–407 days). Median follow-up period for survivors was 32 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.5). The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 11.5) in the irAE group and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached) in the irAE group and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that number of metastatic sites ≥2 (HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.54), high ALP level (HR = 2.50; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.54), and absence of irAEs (HR = 9.54, 95% CI, 3.34 to 27.30 for yes vs. no) were associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent irAEs was diarrhea/colitis (n = 5). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 6 patients; hyperglycemia (n = 2), diarrhea/colitis (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), aspartate aminotransferase increased (n = 1), peripheral motor neuropathy (n = 1). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events related to nivolumab. Conclusions Development of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for AGC patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy.

Download Full-text

Immune-Related Adverse Events Predict the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.631949 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Donghui Wang ◽

Cen Chen ◽

Yanli Gu ◽

Wanjun Lu ◽

Ping Zhan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Lung Cancer Patients

BackgroundImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported to be associated with the efficacy of immunotherapy. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to demonstrate that irAEs could predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.MethodsLiterature on the correlation between irAEs and the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients were searched to collect the data on objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients. These data were incorporated into the meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 34 records encompassing 8,115 patients were examined in this study. The irAEs occurrence was significantly associated with higher ORR {risk ratio (RR): 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.06–2.88], p < 0.00001} and improved OS {hazard ratio (HR): 0.51, 95% CI [0.43–0.61], p < 0.00001}, and PFS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.44–0.57], p < 0.00001) in lung cancer patients undergoing ICIs. Subgroup analysis revealed that OS was significantly longer in patients who developed dermatological (OS: HR: 0.53, 95%CI [0.42–0.65], p < 0.00001), endocrine (OS: HR: 0.55, 95%CI [0.45–0.67], p < 0.00001), and gastrointestinal irAEs (OS: HR: 0.58, 95%CI [0.42–0.80], p = 0.0009) than in those who did not. However, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, and high-grade (≥3) irAEs were not correlated with increased OS and PFS.ConclusionThe occurrence of irAEs in lung cancer patients, particularly dermatological, endocrine, and gastrointestinal irAEs, is a predictor of enhanced ICIs efficacy.

Download Full-text

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with nivolumab.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.4049 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4049-4049 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ken Masuda ◽

Hirokazu Shoji ◽

Kengo Nagashima ◽

Shun Yamamoto ◽

Masashi Ishikawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Motor Neuropathy ◽

Progression Of Disease

4049 Background: Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with clinical benefit in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, there have been few reports about the correlation between irAEs and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between irAEs and efficacy in AGC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods: The subjects of this study were AGC patients that had received nivolumab monotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018. IrAEs were defined as those AEs having a potential immunological basis that required close follow-up, or immunosuppressive therapy and/or endocrine therapy. We divided the patients who received nivolumab into two groups based on occurrence of irAEs; those with irAEs (irAE group) or those without (non-irAE group). We assessed the efficacy in both groups. Results: Of the 65 AGC patients that received nivolumab monotherapy, 14 developed irAEs. The median time to onset of irAEs was 30.5 days (range 3–407 days). Median follow-up period for survivors was 32 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.5). The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 11.5) in the irAE group and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached) in the irAE group and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high ALP level (HR = 2.88; 95% CI, 1.51 to 5.51) and absence of irAEs (HR = 3.06, 95% CI, 3.06 to 23.46 for yes vs. no) were associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent irAEs was diarrhea/colitis (n = 5). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 6 patients; hyperglycemia (n = 2), diarrhea/colitis (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), increased aspartate aminotransferase increased (n = 1), peripheral motor neuropathy (n = 1). One of the 14 patients experienced the irAE after discontinuation of nivolumab due to progression of disease. There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events related to nivolumab. Conclusions: Development of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for AGC patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy.

Download Full-text

Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to prior immune checkpoint inhibitors

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2020-001945 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. e001945 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽

Gerry Gin Wai Kwok ◽

Vikki Tang ◽

Bryan Cho Wing Li ◽

Roland Leung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Acquired Resistance ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Primary Resistance ◽

Advanced Hcc

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in patients with advanced HCC with progression on prior ICIs.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.ResultsTwenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range: 51–83). About 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) Grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range: 2.76–30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% CI: 1.61 to 4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 3.99 to 17.8) and the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6%, respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI Grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively). Overall, 52% of patients experienced TRAEs and 12% experienced Grade 3 or above TRAEs.ConclusionsIpilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

Download Full-text

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in advanced head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis

Immunotherapy ◽

10.2217/imt-2020-0070 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (6) ◽

pp. 541-555

Author(s):

Lingrong Tang ◽

Tingting Liu ◽

Jun Chen ◽

Jun Dang ◽

Guang Li

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Systemic Therapies

Aim: We assessed the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors relative to other systemic therapies in previously treated recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: Relative treatment effects were assessed from eligible randomized controlled trials using Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: Among 15 trials evaluating 14 treatments, nivolumab achieved the best overall survival (OS) benefit; zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel provided the best progression-free survival benefit and objective response rate. Buparlisib + paclitaxel and zalutumumab were associated with the best OS rate at 6 and 12 months, respectively; nivolumab yielded the best OS rate at 18–24 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab was the most favorable treatment. Zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel had better efficiency, and might be a better selection for patients with programmed death-ligand 1-low/negative tumors than other treatments.

Download Full-text

Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is There a Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers11081078 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (8) ◽

pp. 1078 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Amit Mahipal ◽

Sri Harsha Tella ◽

Anuhya Kommalapati ◽

Alexander Lim ◽

Richard Kim

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Primary Liver Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

The United States ◽

Hepatic Reserve ◽

Dismal Prognosis ◽

United States Food

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with dismal prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages. Surgical resection of the primary tumor or orthotropic liver transplantation serves as a potential curative option. However, this approach is highly dependent on the hepatic reserve and baseline functional status of the patient. Liver directed therapies such as portal vein embolization (PVE), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and systemic chemotherapy are employed in non-surgical candidates. Sorafenib was the only approved systemic therapeutic agent for almost a decade until the recent approval of lenvatinib by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an alternate first-line agent. Regorafenib, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and cabozantinib are approved by the FDA as second-line agents in patients who failed or could not tolerate sorafenib. Ramucirumab was recently FDA approved for the subset of patients that have high alfa-fetoprotein levels (>400 ng/mL). A better understanding of tumorigenesis and encouraging clinical trial results that evaluated immune-checkpoint inhibitors opened doors for immunotherapy in HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated a prolonged median overall and progression-free survival in a subset of patients with HCC. On-going translational and clinical research will hopefully provide us with a better understanding of tumor markers, genetic aberrations and other factors that determine the immunotherapy response in HCC. In this review, we sought to summarize the potential role and future directions of immunotherapy in the management of HCC.

Download Full-text

Salvage Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.19.03315 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (27) ◽

pp. 3088-3094 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Anita Gul ◽

Tyler F. Stewart ◽

Charlene M. Mantia ◽

Neil J. Shah ◽

Emily Stern Gatof ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Response Rate ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Metastatic Rcc

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The safety and activity of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients who have received prior ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway remains unknown. We evaluated ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC after prior treatment with anti–PD-1 pathway–targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC who received prior anti–PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy and subsequently received ipilimumab and nivolumab were reviewed. Objective response rate and progression-free survival per investigator assessment were recorded. Toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab was also assessed. RESULTS Forty-five patients with metastatic RCC were included. All patients (100%) received prior ICIs targeting the PD-1 pathway. The median age was 62 years (range, 21-82 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the objective response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab was 20%. The median progression-free survival while on ipilimumab and nivolumab was 4 months (range, 0.8-19 months). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade with ipilimumab and nivolumab were recorded in 29 (64%) of the 45 patients; grade 3 irAEs were recorded in 6 (13%) of the 45 patients. CONCLUSION Ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic RCC who had prior treatment with checkpoint inhibition.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic cancers.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e18092 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e18092-e18092

Author(s):

Michelle Kuznicki ◽

Amy Joehlin-Price ◽

Peter Graham Rose ◽

Haider Mahdi

Keyword(s):

Stable Disease ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Gynecologic Cancer ◽

Objective Response ◽

Complete Response ◽

Rank Test ◽

First Line

e18092 Background: There is limited data on outcomes for gynecologic cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outside the scope of clinical trials. Here we present our Institutional experience with a cohort of endometrial (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) treated with ICI. Methods: 59 patients who received ICI were included (23 OC and 36 EC). Progression-free (PFS) and Overall survivals (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and log rank test. Comparison of duration of response (DOR) and stable disease (DOSD) was done with unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA. Rates of objective response (ORR) including partial response (PR) and complete response (CR), and stable disease (SD) were compared by Fischer’s exact test. Results: Median age was 66 years. 23 patients were microsatellite stable (MSS), 23 microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). Median number of prior lines was 2 (0-11). PFS and OS for EC and OC were overlapping; therefore outcomes for both were combined [(PFS 6.4m OC vs 7.3 m EC, p = 0.61), (OS 15.9 m OC vs 14.2 m EC, p = 0.78)]. Response rates consisted of 20.3% PR, 8.5% CR, 37.3% SD. Differences in responses were noted for clear cell carcinoma (CC) (33.3% PR, 11.1% CR, 33.3% SD) and MSI-H (36.4% PR, 18.2% CR, 22.7% SD) compared to MSS (11.8% PR, 0% CR, 47% SD). MSI-H had higher ORR vs. MSS (54.1% vs 11.8%, p = 0.0078). CC trended toward improved ORR vs. MSS (44.4% vs 11.8%, p = 0.14). PFS was improved for MSI-H vs. MSS (10m v 5.0m, p = 0.03). OS for CC compared to any other histology was improved (NR vs 12.8m respectively, p = 0.009). 5 recurrent MSI-H EC patients received ICI as first line monotherapy. Responses included 4 PR and 1 SD (80% ORR, 100% clinical benefit). PFS was 9.2m (3.3-13.3). 80% remained progression-free at last follow up. Overall, 38.9% experienced toxicity: hypothyroidism (15%), dermatitis (5%), pneumonitis (10%), LFT elevation (2%), amylase/lipase elevation (3%), colitis or diarrhea (5%), uveitis (2%) or nephritis (5%). 10% of patients required discontinuation of ICI secondary to toxicity. Trends for PFS and OS favored improved outcomes in patients with toxicity vs. no toxicity [(PFS 12.9m vs 5.6m, p = 0.07), (OS 22.9m vs 13.1m, p = NS)] respectively. Conclusions: In this study, immunotherapy with ICI outcomes favor MSI-H and CC compared to MSS disease. CC had promising OS compared to other histology types. ICI showed promising efficacy in MSI-H EC with 100% clinical benefit rate in chemonaive patients. First line ICI should be investigated in these patients. Positive correlation between toxicity and outcome is noted and will be further investigated.

Download Full-text

Eosinophil Count as Predictive Biomarker of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) Therapies in Oncological Patients

Immuno ◽

10.3390/immuno1030017 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (3) ◽

pp. 253-263

Author(s):

Elisa Giommoni ◽

Roberta Giorgione ◽

Agnese Paderi ◽

Elisa Pellegrini ◽

Elisabetta Gambale ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mathematical Model ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Eosinophil Count ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Predictive Biomarker ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Analysis Model

Background: To date, no biomarkers are effective in predicting the risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to evaluate the association between basal absolute eosinophil count (AEC) and irAEs during treatment with ICIs for solid tumors. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 168 patients with metastatic melanoma (mM), renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) receiving ICIs at our medical oncology unit. By combining baseline AEC with other clinical factors, we developed a mathematical model for predicting the risk of irAEs, which we validated in an external cohort of patients. Results: Median baseline AEC was 135/µL and patients were stratified into two groups accordingly; patients with high baseline AEC (>135/µL) were more likely to experience toxicity (p = 0.043) and have a better objective response rate (ORR) (p = 0.003). By constructing a covariance analysis model, it emerged that basal AEC correlated with the risk of irAEs (p < 0.01). Finally, we validated the proposed model in an independent cohort of 43 patients. Conclusions: Baseline AEC could be a predictive biomarker of ICI-related toxicity, as well as of response to treatment. The use of a mathematical model able to predict the risk of developing irAEs could be useful for clinicians for monitoring patients receiving ICIs.

Download Full-text