scholarly journals A Review of Research on Disparities in the Care of Black and White Patients With Cancer in Detroit

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Simon ◽  
Sreejata Raychaudhuri ◽  
Lauren A. Hamel ◽  
Louis A. Penner ◽  
Kendra L. Schwartz ◽  
...  

Racial disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes are well-documented in the US, with Black people having higher incidence rates and worse outcomes than White people. In this review, we present a summary of almost 30 years of research conducted by investigators at the Karmanos Cancer Institute’s (KCI’s) Population Studies and Disparities Research (PSDR) Program focusing on Black-White disparities in cancer incidence, care, and outcomes. The studies in the review focus on individuals diagnosed with cancer from the Detroit Metropolitan area, but also includes individuals included in national databases. Using an organizational framework of three generations of studies on racial disparities, this review describes racial disparities by primary cancer site, disparities associated with the presence or absence of comorbid medical conditions, disparities in treatment, and disparities in physician-patient communication, all of which contribute to poorer outcomes for Black cancer patients. While socio-demographic and clinical differences account for some of the noted disparities, further work is needed to unravel the influence of systemic effects of racism against Black people, which is argued to be the major contributor to disparate outcomes between Black and White patients with cancer. This review highlights evidence-based strategies that have the potential to help mitigate disparities, improve care for vulnerable populations, and build an equitable healthcare system. Lessons learned can also inform a more equitable response to other health conditions and crises.

2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie R. Gaither ◽  
Kirsha Gordon ◽  
Stephen Crystal ◽  
E. Jennifer Edelman ◽  
Robert D. Kerns ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (24) ◽  
pp. 1804-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Anderson ◽  
Philip S. Rosenberg ◽  
Idan Menashe ◽  
Aya Mitani ◽  
Ruth M. Pfeiffer

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Bannour ◽  
I Zemni ◽  
C Ben Nasrallah ◽  
N Aroua ◽  
M Kacem ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Cancer is an eminent public health issue in the developing countries. The risk factors incriminated in cancer higher incidence are multiple such as the growing population rates, increasing tobacco consumption, the changes of diet and lifestyle. In Tunisia, there are three population-based cancer registries at the present time providing data on cancer incidence and survival. According to the data published by WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IACR) (GLOBOCAN 2018), prostate cancer in Tunisia ranks fifth among cancers with almost 819 new cases per year. The aim of this study was to we report trends in the cancer incidence during the span of time between 2002 and 2013 from the population-based cancer registry of the centre of Tunisia, and to predict the future number of cancer cases by 2030. Methods The cancer incidence data were collected from the Center cancer registries from 2003 to 2012.The data were stratified by cancer site, sex and age. We used SPSS software in order to calculate the crude incidence rates and age-standardized incidence rates. SPSS software was used in order to estimate the future number of cancer cases by 2030. Results A total of 725 cases of prostate cancer were enregistrated. The mean age of patients was 71.6 ±10.61years. The crude incidence rates were estimated 23.537. The standardized incidence rate was 33.92. A significant positive trend was noted with a b = 0133 and p < 10-3. 1033 new cases are predicted by 2030 Conclusions The data of the cancer register of the center shows that the incidence of cancer is rising, and it is consistent with the National cancer intelligence, but some cancer incidence showed slightly higher, such as thyroid cancer and prostate cancer. In order to face this alarming situation, many preventive steps should be done such as strengthening early screening and diagnosis of cancer, improving clinical research in order to better control the risks factors. Key messages Prediction of the future number of cancer cases is of great interest to society. Prostate cancer in Tunisia ranks fifth among cancers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Han ◽  
Jianjun Liu ◽  
Weifang Tang ◽  
Shengying Wang ◽  
Shikai Hong

Abstract Objective: In the current study, we aimed to provide a clear insight on the racial disparity of breast conserving rate (BCR) and survival in breast cancer after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Materials and Methods: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER), we estimated breast cancer incidence rates and the rate of BCS by race in two periods (2000-2004 and 2013-2017). Relative survival analysis was based on patient-level data from 1998 to 2017. To be adjusted for baseline differences for different races, inverse probability weighting (IPW) models were stepwise performed.Results: From 2000-2004 to 2013-2017, both the breast cancer incidence (from 4.18 to 5.05 per 1000 white women) and the proportion of patients after BCS (from 55.5% to 59.9) were highest in whites than that of other races. Black individuals’ incidence (1.20 per 1000 black women or relatives 43.6% increased) and the BCR were increased most rapidly (6%) than other races. Asian or Pacific Islanders (APIs) were less likely to be diagnosed at a later stage and had the best prognosis than those of other races. After baselines fully adjusted, whites had the better Breast Cancer Specific Survival (BCSS) and Overall Survival (OS) than that of minorities (all p< 0.001).Conclusions: We identified the racial disparities of breast cancer incidence, BCR, and survival differences. We found increase trends of breast cancer incidence and BCR in minorities; however, we also identified the worse survival of minorities than that of whites, regardless of age, tumor stage, grade, and Luminal subtype.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0045
Author(s):  
Christa Wentt ◽  
Morgan Jones ◽  
Greg Strnad ◽  
Isaac Briskin ◽  
Kurt Spindler ◽  
...  

Objectives: Several clinical studies have outlined differences in clinical outcomes and access to care when controlling for race. No published clinical study has ever investigated healthcare disparities between Black and White patients presenting for sports medicine knee surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if the racial disparities described in the literature for total joint arthroplasty and spine surgery are also preset in patients presenting for sports medicine knee surgery. Our first hypothesis is that Black patients presenting for sports medicine knee surgery have worse baseline patient-reported quality of life scores, pain, and function compared to White patients. Our second hypothesis is that Black patients have more disease severity at the time of surgery compared to their White counterparts. Methods: We prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs), disease severity, and treatment utilizing the [BLINDED DATABASE]. Patient race, body mass index (BMI) and insurance were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record (EMR). We included consecutive patients undergoing both knee arthroscopy (partial meniscectomy) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. We excluded patients undergoing other chondral replacement or complex ligamentous procedures (e.g. MPFL reconstruction, multiligamentous knee surgery, etc). Univariate ("unadjusted") analysis was utilized to compare differences between groups with ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis Testing and Pearson’s Chi-square testing. Subsequently, a multivariate analysis model was constructed to control for confounding variables within Black patients vs White patients in order to evaluate for racial disparities in baseline PROs and disease severity. All testing was considered significant at the 5% level. Results: We enrolled a total of 4,557 patients for this study. In the arthroscopy group (APM) we enrolled 3086 total patients. In this group there were 2593 White patients and 408 Black patients. Eighty-five patients identified as “Other”. In the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) group there were 1471 patients. In this group 1197 patients identified as White, 202 patients identified as Black and 72 patients identified as “Other”. Univariate analysis in the APM group demonstrated racial disparities in certain key metrics. BMI was worse in Black patients (32.4) compared to White patients (30.3) (p < 0.001). Both KOOS pain (41.7 versus 47.2; p < 0.001) and KOOS function (51.5 versus 58.0; p < 0.001) were worse in Black patients compared to White patients. A larger portion of Black patients were current smokers compared to White patients (16.% versus 10%; p < 0.001). Baseline VR12 scores were also lower in Black versus White patients (48.4 versus 55.9, p 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed no racial disparities for any baseline patient-reported outcome measure (pain, function, or quality of life). This is a result of Black patients being more likely to present with higher BMI, current smoker status, fewer years of formal education, and Medicaid insurance. No significant differences between Black and White patients were noted with respect to disease severity (intraoperative pathology; i.e. worse chondral grade, compartments involved, meniscus tear severity). Our ACLR group demonstrated similar findings on univariate analysis with Black patients more likely to have Medicare/Medicaid than commercial insurance, a higher BMI, smoking history and a lower VR12 score compared to White patients. Linear regression analysis demonstrates that age, gender (female worse), BMI, years of education, smoking status and insurance are all significant drivers of outcome for KOOS pain. With respect to additional intra-articular pathology at the time of ACL tear, female sex and increasing years of education were at an increased odds of having a complete meniscal tear. Neither race or insurance status were significant drivers of concomitant intra-articular findings in ACL tear patients. Conclusions: There is no statistically significant racial disparity in baseline patient reported outcomes with respect to patients presenting for sports medicine knee surgery when controlling for important covariates. Black patients did present with worse subjective KOOS knee pain and functional scores, however, when possible confounding variables were controlled for in a multivariable analysis, there was no difference between the White and Black cohorts. The results of this study show that there may be modifiable risk factors that affect outcomes of patients irrespective of racial background. Addressing factors such as BMI, smoking status and healthcare literacy may help to improve outcomes for patients. Further research into interventions to correct these risk factors is needed.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L Schlett ◽  
Thomas Mayrhofer ◽  
Travis Hallett ◽  
Judd Hollander ◽  
Maros Ferencik ◽  
...  

Introduction: A disparity in health outcomes between black and white patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) has also been reported with pathophysiological differences in CAD and racial disparities in providing health care as potential explanations. Hypothesis: To determine racial disparity in emergency care of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing cardiac CT angiography (cCTA), which provides knowledge of underlying CAD status. Methods: We combined patient level data of the ACRIN-PA 4005 (American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Pennsylvania) and ROMICAT II (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trials, which enrolled patients presenting with suspicion of ACS who were randomized to cCTA as a first diagnostic test at 14 US sites. Sample was restricted to subjects with known CAD status based on cCTA. Self-reported race while the race ‘Black’ were defined as “a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa” and the race ‘white’ as “a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa”. Results: We included 1,191 patients (53% white, 47% black). Pretest probability for ACS was similar (TIMI score, p=0.77) between black and white patients, while black patients had lower presence and extent of CAD (calcium score: 39.3±189.3 vs. 88.2±292.1, p<0.001; obstructive CAD 8.3% vs. 17.5%, p<0.001) and ACS (4.0% vs 6.9%, p=0.03). After accounting for the underlying CAD, black patients were more likely admitted to the hospital (β: 0.29 [95%CI: 0.05-0.54-]) and were more likely to undergo additional testing (β: 0.47 [95%CI: 0.09-0.85]) while remaining management showed no significant differences. Conclusions: After adjustment for underlying CAD, among patients in the ED with suspicion of ACS, those who are black received more downstream testing and were more frequently admitted to hospital than white patients.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3652-3652
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Saber ◽  
Maragatha Kuchibhatla ◽  
Alys Adamski ◽  
Lisa C. Richardson ◽  
Nimia Reyes ◽  
...  

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or both, represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. VTE is the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer, after cancer itself, in the United States. Previous studies have suggested differences by race in the occurrence of VTE among cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical differences in black and white patients with VTE and cancer. Methods: We conducted an analysis of a CDC/Duke VTE surveillance project at the three hospitals in Durham County, North Carolina (Duke University Hospital, Duke Regional Hospital and the Durham VA Medical Center) from April 2012 through March 2014. A combination of electronic and manual review methods were used to identify unique Durham County residents with new diagnoses of objectively confirmed VTE. Data abstracted included demographics, risk factors including cancer, clinical data, treatment, and outcomes. Results: A total of 1028 patients with a new VTE were identified during the surveillance period. Twenty-seven patients who were not black or white (e.g., race not listed; Asian; etc), and 41 with VTE affecting areas other than PE or limb DVT (e.g., cerebral sinus venous thrombosis) were excluded from this analysis. Of the remaining 960 patients, slightly more than half were female (497/960=51.8%), more than half were black (508/960=52.9%), almost a third were obese (337/960 = 35.1%), and median age was 59 years old. At the time of their VTE diagnosis, 184 patients with VTE (19.2%) had active cancer, defined as metastatic or diagnosed within the previous 6 months. The proportion of VTE associated with cancer varied by race. Among the 508 black patients with VTE, 111 (21.9%) had active cancer; in comparison, among the 452 white patients with VTE, 73 (16.1%) had active cancer (p-value=0.025). Black patients with VTE and cancer were older, had a lower body mass index (BMI), and were less likely to have sustained a prior VTE compared to black patients with VTE who did not have cancer (Table 1). Similarly, white patients with VTE and cancer had a lower BMI than white patients without cancer (Table 1). However, in contrast to the findings for black patients, white patients with VTE and cancer were not significantly older and did not show differences in having a prior VTE than white patients with VTE who did not have cancer. Additionally, white patients with VTE and cancer were much more likely to have sustained a PE, with or without DVT, and less likely to have sustained a DVT alone, than white patients with VTE who did not have cancer (Table 1). Black and white patients with both VTE and cancer, were similar in several aspects; however, white patients were less likely to have sustained a DVT alone and more likely to have sustained a PE, with or without DVT, compared to black patients. The types of cancer most frequently encountered in black patients with VTE were gastrointestinal (24.3%), genitourinary (23.4%), and lung (18.9%), followed by breast (8.1%), gynecologic (9.0%) and hematologic malignancies (9.9%). The types of cancer most frequently encountered in white patients with VTE were lung (27.4%), breast (16.4%), and gastrointestinal (13.7%), followed by genitourinary (9.6%), gynecologic (8.2%) and hematologic malignancies (6.8%). Black and white patients with VTE and cancer were treated similarly to black and white patients with VTE who did not have cancer, with most receiving anticoagulant therapy and fewer than 10% receiving an IVC filter (Table 1). Enoxaparin was used most frequently, followed by warfarin. Conclusions: There are several notable demographic and clinical differences between patients with VTE with and without cancer. While differences were observed for both black and white patients, several factors that were variable according to cancer status were unique to either black patients or white patients. One notable difference between black and white patients with both VTE and cancer was a lower proportion of DVT only and a higher proportion of PE, with or without DVT, in white patients. Disclosures Ortel: Instrumentation Laboratories: Consultancy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (22) ◽  
pp. 2610-2618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie McCarthy ◽  
Mirar Bristol ◽  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Peter W. Groeneveld ◽  
Younji Kim ◽  
...  

Purpose Racial disparities in BRCA1/2 testing have been documented, but causes of these disparities are poorly understood. The study objective was to investigate whether the distribution of black and white patients across cancer providers contributes to disparities in BRCA1/2 testing. Patients and Methods We conducted a population-based study of women in Pennsylvania and Florida who were 18 to 64 years old and diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2007 and 2009, linking cancer registry data, the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, and patient and physician surveys. The study included 3,016 women (69% white, 31% black), 808 medical oncologists, and 732 surgeons. Results Black women were less likely to undergo BRCA1/2 testing than white women (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.48; P < .001). This difference was attenuated but not eliminated by adjustment for mutation risk, clinical factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and attitudes about testing (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P < .001). The care of black and white women was highly segregated across surgeons and oncologists (index of dissimilarity 64.1 and 61.9, respectively), but adjusting for clustering within physician or physician characteristics did not change the size of the testing disparity. Black women were less likely to report that they had received physician recommendation for BRCA1/2 testing even after adjusting for mutation risk (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; P < .001). Adjusting for physician recommendation further attenuated the testing disparity (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.02; P = .06). Conclusion Although black and white patients with breast cancer tend to see different surgeons and oncologists, this distribution does not contribute to disparities in BRCA1/2 testing. Instead, residual racial differences in testing after accounting for patient and physician characteristics are largely attributable to differences in physician recommendations. Efforts to address these disparities should focus on ensuring equity in testing recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document