scholarly journals Clinical Studies on Ultrafractionated Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Scirocco ◽  
Francesco Cellini ◽  
Alice Zamagni ◽  
Gabriella Macchia ◽  
Francesco Deodato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Small Series ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

AimThe efficacy of low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDFRT) and chemotherapy (CHT) combination has large preclinical but little clinical evidence. Therefore, the aim of this review was to collect and analyze the clinical results of LDRT plus concurrent CHT in patients with advanced cancers.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed using the PRISMA methodology. Only studies based on the combination of LDFRT (< 1 Gy/fraction) and CHT were included. Endpoints of the analysis were tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival, with particular focus on any differences between LDFRT-CHT and CHT alone.ResultsTwelve studies (307 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. Two studies were retrospective, one was a prospective pilot trial, six were phase II studies, two were phase I trials, and one was a phase I/II open label study. No randomized controlled trials were found. Seven out of eight studies comparing clinical response showed higher rates after LDFRT-CHT compared to CHT alone. Three out of four studies comparing survival reported improved results after combined treatment. Three studies compared toxicity of CHT and LDFRT plus CHT, and all of them reported similar adverse events rates. In most cases, toxicity was manageable with only three likely LDFRT-unrelated fatal events (1%), all recorded in the same series on LDFRT plus temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme patients.ConclusionNone of the analyzed studies provided level I evidence on the clinical impact of LDFRT plus CHT. However, it should be noted that, apart from two small series of breast cancers, all studies reported improved therapeutic outcomes and similar tolerability compared to CHT alone. Systematic Review Registrationwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020206639.

A phase I study of d-methadone in patients with chronic pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Moryl, MD ◽  
Cristina Tamasdan, MD ◽  
Dana Tarcatu, MD ◽  
Howard T. Thaler, PhD ◽  
Denise Correa, PhD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Nmda Receptor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
The United States ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Racemic Mixture ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

D-Methadone is the d optical isomer of racemic mixture (DL-methadone) used clinically to treat pain and addiction in the United States. D-Methadone is practically devoid of opioid activity but maintains N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism. Evidence from extensive preclinical studies suggests that NMDA receptor antagonists attenuate neuronal plasticity, reverse opioid analgesic tolerance, and alleviate chronic pain states. The authors conducted a phase I open label study of D-methadone administered for the first time to patients with chronic pain to determine the safety and tolerability of D-methadone. In addition to their long-term regimen of opioids, the patients received 40 mg of d-methadone twice daily for 12 days. Analgesia and toxicity were recorded by the patients in a daily diary and assessed in clinic on days 1, 8, and 12. Eight patients of the 10 enrolled completed the study. Pain scores on Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) did not change between days 1 and 12, but five of eight patients (62.5 percent) characterized D-methadone as moderately or very effective in relieving pain on the Global Assessment for pain. Five of the eight patients (62.5 percent) who completed the study requested to start treatment with commercially available methadone (DL-racemic methadone) after completing the study. D-Methadone at the dose of 40 mg PO Q 12 hours was well tolerated.Perspective: This is the first clinical study of D-methadone in patients suffering from chronic pain. Additional phase I and phase II studies are needed to confirm its safety and analgesic effects. If D-methadone is well tolerated, it is likely to become a useful adjuvant to the treatment of a wide spectrum of pain syndromes.

Results of a phase I study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and biological effects of intravenous administration of wild-type reovirus with docetaxel to patients with advanced malignancies

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13524-e13524
Author(s):  
S. M. Rudman ◽  
C. Comins ◽  
D. Mukherji ◽  
M. Coffey ◽  
K. Mettinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Systemic Delivery ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

e13524 Background: Reovirus has minimal pathogenicity in humans but selectively replicates in cells with activated Ras. Wild- type reovirus serotype 3 Dearing strain (Reolysin) has selective antitumor activity in vitro, in murine models, and after systemic delivery in humans in phase 1 trials. Synergistic tumour kill has been observed combining reovirus with taxanes in a range of cancer cell lines and in vivo. Methods: Patients were treated in an open-label, dose-escalating, phase I trial and received 3- weekly 75mg/m2 docetaxel i.v. and reovirus i.v. (day 1–5 of first week inclusive). Reovirus was administered at a starting dose of 3x109 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) and then increased to 1 x 1010 and 3 x 1010 TCID50. Primary endpoints were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and to recommend a dose and schedule for future investigation. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate pharmacokinetics, neutralizing antibody development, cell- mediated immune response and anti-tumour activity. Results: 17 patients were treated (15 males, median age 60 years). No MTD has been reached. DLT's observed were G4 neutropenia (and a recurrent perianal abcess) and G3 rise in AST. Other toxicities observed were fatigue, hypotension and neutropenic sepsis. At present, 5 patients remain on treatment. We have observed 2 partial responses (breast and gastric carcinoma) and 10 patients had stable disease as best response. Conclusions: Reovirus is well tolerated when administered in combination with intravenous docetaxel, with predictable toxicity observed. The recommended dose has been defined at 3x1010 TCID50 and phase II studies are planned. Objective radiological evidence of anticancer activity for this combination has been observed. [Table: see text]

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the cardiotoxicity of TAS-102.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16053-e16053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Lopez ◽  
Elham Azimi-Nekoo ◽  
Su Yun Chung ◽  
James Newman ◽  
Janice Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Increased Risk

e16053 Background: Fluoropyrimidines such as 5-FU and capecitabine are known to be cardiotoxic drugs. TAS-102 (trifluridine-tipiracil) is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine that was recently FDA approved to treat gastric and colon cancer. However, the incidence of cardiac related events of TAS-102 is not fully ascertained. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the incidence of cardiotoxic events associated with TAS-102. Methods: We performed a literature search through PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify any publications in any language up to December 31st, 2019 where TAS-102 (and equivalent terms such as “trifluridine-tipiracil” and “Lonsurf”) was used. These were then manually reviewed to identify any publications reporting cardiac events. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for meta-analysis to determine the incidence of cardiotoxic events, which were summarized as pooled odds ratios (OR) when compared to placebo. Non-randomized, non-controlled clinical trials (phase I and phase II studies) were included in the systematic review but excluded from the pooled OR calculation. Results: 869 publications were identified in the initial literature search, of which 17 trials (3 Phase III studies, 6 Phase II studies, and 8 phase I studies) met inclusion criteria. A total of 1,877 patients among 4 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, TAS-102 did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (OR 1.97 95% CI [0.22-17.89]), hypertension (OR 0.73 95% CI [0.37, 1.44]), palpitations (OR 1.51 95% CI [0.30, 7.56]), cardio-pulmonary arrest (OR 0.83 95% CI [0.11-6.32]), or syncope (OR 1.50 95% CI [0.06-37.14]). Among the 1,252 patients receiving TAS-102, the overall incidence of cardiovascular events was low, with hypertension being the most common side effect (21 events), followed by palpitations (6 events), cardiopulmonary arrest (2 events), and myocardial infarction (3 events), though there was no statistically significant increased risk compared to placebo. No deaths were reported. Conclusions: Unlike other fluoropyrimidines, TAS-102 appears to be a cardiogentle drug, with no increased risk of cardiac events compared to placebo. Since fluoropyrimidines remain the backbone of treatment for gastrointestinal malignancies, TAS-102 can offer an alternative to patients who developed cardiotoxicities from other agents. Prospective studies with consideration of cardiac risk factors are required.

scholarly journals A Prospective, Phase I/II, Open-Label Pilot Trial to Assess the Safety of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Oncological Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Yurttas ◽  
Philipp Horvath ◽  
Imma Fischer ◽  
Christoph Meisner ◽  
Silvio Nadalin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Short Term Mortality

Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common fatal disease with unfavorable prognosis, even after oncological resection. To improve survival, adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been suggested. Whether HIPEC entails disproportional short-term mortality is unknown and a prospectively determined adverse events profile is lacking. Since both pancreatic resection and HIPEC may relevantly influence morbidity and mortality, this uncontrolled single-arm, open-label, phase I/II pilot trial was designed to assess the 30-day mortality rate, treatment feasibility, and adverse events connected with HIPEC after oncological pancreatic surgery. Methods This trial recruited patients scheduled for PDAC resection. A sample size of 16 patients receiving study interventions was estimated to establish a predefined margin of treatment-associated short-term mortality with a power of > 80%. Patients achieving complete macroscopic resection received HIPEC with gemcitabine administered at 1000 mg/m2 body surface area heated to 42 °C for 1 hour. Results Within 30 days after intervention, no patient died or experienced any adverse events higher than grade 3 that were related to HIPEC. Furthermore, treatment-related adverse events were prospectively documented and categorized as expected or unexpected. This trial supports that the actual mortality rate after PDAC resection and HIPEC is below 10%. HIPEC treatment proved feasible in 89% of patients allocated to intervention. Pancreatic fistulas, as key complications after pancreas surgery, occurred in 3/13 patients under risk. Conclusion Combined pancreas resection and gemcitabine HIPEC proved feasible and safe, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Based on these results, further clinical evaluation can be justified. Registration Number NCT02863471 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

A phase I, open-label study of lapatinib plus chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5553-5553 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Harrington ◽  
J. Bourhis ◽  
C. M. Nutting ◽  
D. Rosine ◽  
A. M. Theodosiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Dose Levels

5553 Background: Lapatinib is a selective and potent dual, competitive inhibitor of EGFR and ErbB2. A high level of expression of EGFR is reported in SCCHN (ranging from 55% to 90%), which is a negative prognostic factor, whereas ErbB2 expression ranges between 40% to 60%. The rationale for EGFR inhibition in combination with fractionated radiotherapy is to enhance radiosensitivity and inhibit cellular proliferation, including accelerated repopulation, during treatment. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced SCCHN were enrolled at escalating dose levels of lapatinib (500–1,500 mg/d) in combination with radiotherapy (66–70 Gy/6–7 weeks given 5 days a week in 2 Gy daily fractions) and intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m2, days 1, 22 and 43 of radiotherapy). Each cohort was to include 3 pts, with expansion to 6 in the event of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Main eligibility criteria were confirmed SCCHN, excluding nasopharynx, stage III, IVa,b, and adequate organ function. Regular safety assessments were performed during therapy and follow-up period. Cardiac assessments using MUGA or ECHO scans were also performed. Results: Seventeen pts were treated (500 mg - 7; 1,000 mg - 7; 1,500 mg - 3; expanded cohort of 9 additional pts is currently recruiting). The most common side effects were Grade 1-3 dysphagia, mucositis and dermatitis, typically observed with cisplatin and radiotherapy in this population. Lapatinib-related adverse events were minor. In the 500mg cohort: 2 pts had diarrhea (Gr 1), 1 pt had tinnitus (Gr 1); in the 1,000mg cohort: 2 pts had nausea (Gr 2) and vomiting (Gr 2), 1 pt had transient elevated liver enzymes (Gr 3); in the 1,500mg cohort 2 pts had nausea (Gr 1) and 3 pts vomiting (1 pt Gr 1, and 2 pts Gr 2). One DLT was reported both at 500 mg and 1,000 mg dose levels; no further DLT were reported at the final 1,500 mg dose level. The optimally tolerated regimen was lapatinib 1,500 mg OD, given concurrently with conventional radiotherapy and cisplatin. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was encouraging. Conclusions: The combination of lapatinib and concomitant chemoradiation is well tolerated, has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in this population of locally advanced SCCHN patients, and warrants phase II studies in this disease. [Table: see text]

Phase I dose-escalating study of PM02734 in a 24-hour infusion schedule every 21 days in advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2511-2511
Author(s):  
T. R. Evans ◽  
A. Oaknin ◽  
R. J. Jones ◽  
A. Vandermeeren ◽  
C. Coronado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Escalating

2511 Background: PM02734 is a chemically synthesized depsipeptide with a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors in vitro (breast, colon, lung, neuroblastoma, prostate, sarcoma and thyroid) and in vivo (breast, prostate, melanoma); as well as an acceptable non-clinical toxicology profile. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic or advanced solid tumors were enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalating study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose (RD) of PM02734 infused over 24 hours every 21 days (d). The starting dose was 0.48 mg/m2. Cohorts of 1–6 pts were treated at different dose levels. Results: Thirty seven pts were treated in this study. The median age was 55 years (40–75), sex: males/females 20/19. The median PS was 1 (range 0–2). The most frequent cancer types were colon/ gastric/ sarcoma (n=8/5/5). Most patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of prior therapy lines of 4 (1–12). Patients were treated at 8 dose levels (0.48, 0.72, 1.0, 1.6, 2.4, 3.6, 5.4, and 6.8 mg/m2), the MTD was 6.8 mg/m2 and the RD was 5.4 mg/m2 (10 mg flat dose).Common toxicities grade ≤ 2 included asthenia, nausea/emesis, lymphopenia, injection site reactions and asymptomatic elevated transaminases (TAs). DLT were grade 3 asymptomatic, reversible TA elevations at 6.8 mg/m2. Preliminary PK data is characterized by long half life (>100 h), a wide distribution and high inter-patient variability. Clearance was not correlated with dose or body surface area (BSA), therefore, flat dose was implemented and the RD was explored with this schedule. Efficacy data showed one complete response (CR) of +28 months observed in a pt with metastatic large cell esophageal carcinoma, and five more showed stable disease (SD) for more than 3 months in different histologies. Conclusions: PM02734 shows to be safe, well tolerated and with evidence of activity (1 CR and 5 SD > 3 months) in pts with advanced solid tumors. The DLT was grade 3 asymptomatic and reversible TA elevations, and the RD for further phase II studies is 10 mg. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of pemetrexed (P) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with refractory breast, ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13515-e13515
Author(s):  
D. A. Richards ◽  
D. Loesch ◽  
S. J. Vukelja ◽  
H. H. Wu ◽  
W. J. Hyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

e13515 Background: P and PLD are clinically active as single agents and synergistic in preclinical models. This phase I, open-label trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of P followed by PLD in patients (pts) with breast or gynecologic cancers. Methods: Using standard phase I (3+3 dose escalation) study design, cohorts of 3–9 pts received escalating doses of P followed by PLD in 28-day cycles: P 400–500 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 15 and PLD 30–45 mg/m2 on Day 1. All pts received folic acid (350–1000 μg daily) and vitamin B12 (1000 μg) until 21 days after last dose of P. Pts continued until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or disease progression (PD) occurred. Results: From 11/05 to 1/08, 29 pts were registered/treated. Median age: 60.6 years (range, 47.5–80.1); ECOG performance status 0/1: 28%/72%; primary disease sites: ovarian (55%), breast (35%), peritoneal (10%); prior therapies: chemotherapy (100%), surgery (72%), hormones/biologics (35%), radiation (21%). Dosing results are shown below. At dose level (L) 2 and L3, 1 pt/cohort had DLTs; L5 was added and 3/3 pts had DLTs; 4 more pts were treated at L4 (1 pt replaced). Most frequent drug-related Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities: neutropenia (86%), leukopenia (59%), thrombocytopenia (48%), anemia (41%). Most frequent drug-related Grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicities: hand-foot syndrome (14%), hypokalaemia (10%). Major reasons for discontinuation: PD (48%), toxicity (28%), pt request (14%). Overall best responses (n=24): 5 pts (21%) had partial response (PR), 14 pts (58%) had stable disease (SD), 2 pts (8%) had PD, 3 pts (13%) were not evaluable. All 5 PR and 8 SD pts were ovarian; 5 SD and both PD pts were breast. Conclusions: P followed by PLD was reasonably tolerated in this heavily-pretreated population. The MTD was P 500 mg/m2 and PLD 40 mg/m2. These dose levels may be carried forward to phase II studies in more specific patient populations. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase I Study of Weekly Oxaliplatin in Relapsed or Refractory Pediatric Solid Malignancies

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (27) ◽  
pp. 4394-4400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Geoerger ◽  
François Doz ◽  
Jean-Claude Gentet ◽  
Michele Mayer ◽  
Judith Landman-Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Solid Malignancy ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Solid Malignancies ◽  
Two Phases

Purpose To explore feasibility, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) for phase II studies of weekly oxaliplatin for the treatment of relapsed or refractory pediatric solid malignancies. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were 6 months to 21 years old, had a diagnosis of a solid malignancy, and had experienced treatment failure with at least two or more previous lines of therapy. The phase I study was multicentric, open-label, and nonrandomized. It foresaw two phases: a dose-escalation phase (comprising six levels) to find the RD and an extension at the RD to evaluate the cumulative toxicity. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously over 2 hours on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results Forty-five patients were enrolled: 29 patients in the dose-escalation phase and 16 patients in the extension at the RD. Median age was 9.5 years (range, 2.8 to 20.0 years) and 7.8 years (range, 1.8 to 19.2 years), respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities during the first treatment cycle were grade 3 (G3) sepsis at 50 mg/m2, G3 dysesthesia at 90 mg/m2, and G3 dysesthesia and G3 paresthesia at 110 mg/m2, thus the MTD and RD was 90 mg/m2. No case of ototoxicity was reported. Stable disease was reported in seven patients (16.3%), and confirmed partial response was observed in two patients (4.7%), one with neuroblastoma and one with osteosarcoma. Conclusion Oxaliplatin administered in a weekly schedule has an acceptable safety profile, different from cisplatin and carboplatin, and shows activity in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, suggesting further investigation in pediatric malignancies.

Evolution of Clinical Trial Design in Early Drug Development: Systematic Review of Expansion Cohort Use in Single-Agent Phase I Cancer Trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (33) ◽  
pp. 4260-4267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Manji ◽  
Irene Brana ◽  
Eitan Amir ◽  
George Tomlinson ◽  
Ian F. Tannock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Trial Design ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Cancer Trials ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Purpose To evaluate the use and objectives of expansion cohorts in phase I cancer trials and to explore trial characteristics associated with their use. Methods We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE, limiting studies to single-agent phase I trials recruiting adults and published after 2006. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers. Data were assessed descriptively, and associations were tested by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results We identified 611 unique phase I cancer trials, of which 149 (24%) included an expansion cohort. The trials were significantly more likely to use an expansion cohort if they were published more recently, were multicenter, or evaluated a noncytotoxic agent. Objectives of the expansion cohort were reported in 74% of trials. In these trials, safety (80%), efficacy (45%), pharmacokinetics (28%), pharmacodynamics (23%), and patient enrichment (14%) were cited as objectives. Among expansion cohorts with safety objectives, the recommended phase II dose was modified in 13% and new toxicities were described in 54% of trials. Among trials aimed at assessing efficacy, only 11% demonstrated antitumor activity assessed by response criteria that was not previously observed during dose escalation. Conclusion The utilization of expansion cohorts has increased with time. Safety and efficacy are common objectives, but 26% fail to report explicit aims. Expansion cohorts may provide useful supplementary data for phase I trials, particularly with regard to toxicity and definition of recommended dose for phase II studies.

scholarly journals Denosumab for effective tumor size reduction in patients with giant cell tumors of the bone: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Yayan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Open Label Phase

Abstract Background Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that is used in the successful treatment of giant cell bone tumors. These tumors are rare and, in principle, benign, but they are highly aggressive, locally advanced, and osteolytic bone tumors that can metastasize to the lungs. Denosumab is an effective treatment when these tumors cannot be surgically removed or when surgical resection is likely to lead to severe morbidity (e.g., loss of limbs or joints). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the patients with giant cell bone tumors who experienced tumor progression during treatment with denosumab and to compare them with patients who experienced reduction of their giant cell bone tumors during treatment with denosumab. Methods The Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases were searched until February 28, 2018 for trials reporting the efficacy and safety of denosumab in patients with giant cell bone tumors. Results Thirty-three studies were reviewed, involving a total of 350 patients who had giant cell bone tumors and were treated with denosumab. Of the 33 studies, 67% of the patients were from open-label phase II studies, 27% from case series, and 6% from case reports. The response rate for denosumab as a treatment for giant cell bone tumors was 95.3%, with statistical significance (P < 0.0001). Osteonecrosis of the jaw was statistically the most common adverse event for denosumab treatment in open-label phase II studies (P < 0.0001). No treatment-related deaths occurred in the reviewed studies. Conclusion Cumulative evidence supports the addition of surgery to optimal medical therapy with denosumab to reduce tumor size, clinical symptoms, and mortality among patients with giant cell bone tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document