scholarly journals Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Ohki ◽  
Yoshio Igarashi ◽  
Keita Yamauchi
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Sick Leave ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Working Environment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Work Program ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Work Continuation

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the Japanese re-work program (RP) to aid in recurrent sick leave prevention.Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort research was conducted for workers who returned to work (RTW) after sick leave due to mood disorder. Work continuation for subjects who RTW after RP participation and treatment as usual (TAU) and subjects who received TAU only were compared. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized. Additionally, propensity score matching was conducted to control for possible confounds.Results: Log-rank test of overall cohort (n = 323) showed that work continuation of RP + TAU subjects was significantly better compared to that of TAU-only subjects (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found a hazard rate of recurrent sick leave for TAU-only subjects of 2.121 (p = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.360–3.309). Additionally, the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 100) had similar differences (p = 0.008), with a hazard ratio of recurrent sick leave of 2.871 (p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.302–6.331) for TAU-only subjects.Limitations: Only workers who RTW after sick leave were targeted, and no examination was made considering cases who dropped out from RP or TAU. Moreover, the sample was a non-randomized controlled trial, with propensity score matching performed. However, there was an inability to retrieve and adjust for working environment background factors after RTW.Conclusions: Work continuation of subjects with RP was observed to be significantly better, suggesting that the RP was effective for recurrent sick leave prevention.

Impact of morphine use on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI - preliminary data from a new registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Szabo ◽  
A Szabo ◽  
IF Edes ◽  
D Becker ◽  
B Merkely ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
P2y12 Antagonists ◽  
Current Guidelines

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Opioids decrease the effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in vitro and observational reports suggest that morphine use is associated with larger infarct size. Our research group presented previously, using a prospective single-center registry, that periprocedural morphine use may have no impact on long-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and clopidogrel. Purpose Our purpose is to check this interaction using a new registry of patients treated according to the current guidelines, including novel antiplatelet agents. Methods From May until November 2020, we collected 196 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. 88 (44.9%) of them got morphine during the prehospital and periprocedural care. Baseline demographic, anamnestic, procedural, and laboratory data were collected. Survival data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. To adjust for confounding, a 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis was performed using 114 cases. Results An adequate balance on baseline covariates was achieved during propensity score-matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in 30-days mortality of the patients treated with or without morphine neither in the original nor in the propensity score-matched population (p = 0.094 and p = 0.309, respectively). Conclusion Our preliminary data suggest that morphine may have no impact on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and medical therapy according to the current guidelines including novel P2Y12 antagonists. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves

scholarly journals Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
J. Rhu ◽  
G. S. Choi ◽  
J. M. Kim ◽  
C. H. D. Kwon ◽  
S. J. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Right Hemihepatectomy ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Right Posterior Sectionectomy

Background and Aims: This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterior segments. Material and Methods: The study included patients who underwent either laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy or laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6 or 7 from January 2009 to December 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:1 propensity score matching, patient baseline characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan–Meier log-rank test. Results: Among 61 patients with laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy and 37 patients with laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, 30 patients from each group were analyzed after propensity score matching. After matching, baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar including tumor size (3.4 ± 1.2 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 3.7 ± 2.1 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.483); differences were significant before matching (3.1 ± 1.3 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 4.3 ± 2.7 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in operative and postoperative data except for free margin size (1.04 ± 0.71 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 2.95 ± 1.75 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P < 0.001). Disease-free survival (5-year survival: 38.0% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 47.0% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.510) and overall survival (5-year survival: 92.7% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 89.6% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.593) did not differ between the groups based on Kaplan–Meier log-rank test. Conclusion: For hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterior segments, laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy was feasible compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

scholarly journals Higher Mortality of Ischaemic Stroke Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Compared to Historical Controls

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Harrison ◽  
Elnara Fazio-Eynullayeva ◽  
Deirdre A. Lane ◽  
Paula Underhill ◽  
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Historical Controls

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Increasing evidence suggests patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop thrombosis and thrombosis-related complications. Some previous evidence has suggested COVID-19-associated strokes are more severe with worse outcomes for patients, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The aim of this study was to determine the association between COVID-19 and mortality for patients with ischaemic stroke in a large multicentre study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of inpatients from 50 healthcare organizations, predominately from the USA. Patients with ischaemic stroke within 30 days of COVID-19 were identified. COVID-19 was determined from diagnosis codes or a positive test result identified with CO­VID-19-specific laboratory codes between January 20, 2020, and October 1, 2020. Historical controls with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19 were identified in the period January 20, 2019, to October 1, 2019. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to balance the cohorts with and without CO­VID-19 on characteristics including age, sex, race and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause 60-day mortality by COVID-19 status were produced. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, there were 954 inpatients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19. During the same time period in 2019, there were 48,363 inpatients with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19 (historical controls). Compared to patients with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19, patients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 had a lower mean age, had a lower prevalence of white patients, a higher prevalence of black or African American patients and a higher prevalence of hypertension, previous cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, neoplasms, and mental disorders due to known physiological conditions. After propensity score matching, there were 952 cases and 952 historical controls; cases and historical controls were better balanced on all included characteristics (all <i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the survival probability was significantly lower in ischaemic stroke patients with COVID-19 (78.3% vs. 91.0%, log-rank test <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). The odds of 60-day mortality were significantly higher for patients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 compared to the propensity score-matched historical controls (odds ratio: 2.51 [95% confidence interval 1.88–3.34]). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusions:</i></b> Ischaemic stroke patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher 60-day all-cause mortality compared to propensity score-matched historical controls (ischaemic stroke patients without COVID-19).

Surgical resection of the primary lesion for osteosarcoma patients with metastasis at initial diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liuzhe Zhang ◽  
Toru Akiyama ◽  
Takashi Fukushima ◽  
Shintaro Iwata ◽  
Katsushi Takeshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Primary Lesion ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Unresectable Metastasis

Abstract Background Approximately 10–20% of osteosarcoma patients present with metastasis on diagnosis. Completely resecting the lesion is associated with better prognosis. However, evidence regarding optimal surgical strategies for patients with unresectable metastasis is limited. Methods This retrospective analysis was based on the Japanese Nationwide Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor registry. In total, 335 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma with metastasis were included. Factors affecting overall survival were identified using multivariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the overall survival by the status of surgical intervention. Two hundred and four patients who did not undergo surgery for metastasis were divided into two groups, depending on whether they underwent surgery for the primary lesion. The background differences between these two groups were adjusted with propensity score matching, with 43 patients per group. The overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with a log-rank test. Results Factors positively impacting overall survival were age &lt;40, female sex, extremity origin, surgery for the primary lesions, surgery for metastasis and radiotherapy without surgery. For patients with unresectable metastasis, after propensity score matching, the survival rate was higher in the group that underwent primary lesion surgery than the group without surgery. Their median survival was 19 (95% confidence interval: 11.7–26.3) and 11 months (95% confidence interval: 4.5–17.5) (P = 0.02), respectively. Conclusions Surgical resection of the primary osteosarcoma lesion did not worsen prognosis, even in patients with unresectable metastasis. Further study is needed to identify which patient group will benefit from primary lesion resection.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of Onodera’s nutritional index for intermediate- and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Tingting Tao ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Zhi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Nutritional Index

Abstract Background Immunoinflammatory and nutritional markers, such as the peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI), have gained considerable attention and have been preliminarily revealed as prognostic markers of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods In this study, we first investigated the prognostic value of OPNI in GISTs treated with or without TKIs based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. All of the patients had received surgical resection for primary GIST, and data from 2010 to 2018 were initially and retrospectively identified from our gastrointestinal center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results The patients were divided into groups treated and not treated with TKIs, and we used the propensity score matching method to homogenize their baseline data. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to identify associations with outcome variables. A total of 563 GISTs were initially chosen, and 280 of them were included for analysis under the inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 200 patients included. Multivariate analyses identified OPNI as an independent prognostic marker that was associated with primary site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, necrosis, and modified NIH risk classification. Low OPNI (< 42.6; HR 0.409; P < 0.001) was associated with worse RFS. Conclusions Preoperative OPNI is a novel and useful prognostic marker for GISTs both treated and not treated with TKIs. Higher NLR and PLR have negative effects on RFS.

Abstract 67: Effects of Single vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Long Term Stroke and Death After Carotid Endarterectomy

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Belkin ◽  
Alexander S Fairman ◽  
Benjamin M Jackson ◽  
Paul J Foley ◽  
Scott M Damrauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Current evidence suggests that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces perioperative stroke, but increases bleeding after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The long term effects of antiplatelet therapy after CEA have yet to be studied. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing CEA in the national Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2018) was performed. Based on antiplatelet regimen at discharge, patients were propensity score matched on aspirin monotherapy vs. DAPT. Multivariable logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to investigate the long term effects of antiplatelet regimen on mortality and stroke/TIA. Results: Of the 72,122 patients undergoing CEA, 64.6% were discharged on aspirin, and 35.4% on DAPT. The DAPT group had higher frequencies of comorbidities (COPD, HTN, CHF, smoking, diabetes) as well as atherosclerotic diseases (PAD, CAD, prior PCI, prior CABG). After propensity score matching, two groups of 8,722 patients with comparable comorbidities were formed. While unmatched Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the DAPT cohort to have higher mortality (p=0.001), this difference dissipated after matching. The resultant matched DAPT cohort did not differ from the aspirin group in one year stroke/TIA (1.7% vs. 1.6%, p=0.70), or mortality (3.1% vs. 3.3%, p=0.55). At 5 years, however, patients treated with DAPT did exhibit a mortality benefit (6.4% vs. 7.3%, p=0.02) with multivariable logistic regression identifying DAPT as an independent predictor of reduced mortality (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99, p=0.04). Conclusions: Patients discharged on DAPT after CEA represent a significantly different cohort than those discharged on aspirin monotherapy. After propensity score matching, there was no difference at one year stroke/TIA or mortality outcomes, but DAPT was found to be protective against long-term mortality. Further study is warranted to investigate this finding.

Abstract 14598: Multiple Arterial Coronary Bypass Grafting is Associated With Improved Survival in Females

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrick Tam ◽  
Rodolfo Rocha ◽  
Jiming Fang ◽  
Maral Ouzounian ◽  
Joanna Chikwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Administrative Databases ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arterial Grafting

Introduction: Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with improved survival and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in observational studies of mostly males. It is not known whether the MAG is beneficial in females. Herein, we compared the late clinical outcomes of MAG versus single arterial grafting (SAG) in females undergoing CABG for multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) Methods: Clinical and administrative databases for Ontario, Canada, were linked to obtain all female patients with angiographic evidence of left main, triple, or double vessel disease undergoing isolated non-emergent primary CABG from 2008-2019. Baseline characteristics were compared and 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to account for differences. 30-day mortality was compared in the matched groups. Late mortality and MACCE ( composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and death) was compared between the matched groups with a stratified log rank test and Cox-proportional hazard model. Results: In total 2,961 and 7,954 females underwent CABG with MAG and SAG respectively for multivessel CAD. Prior to propensity-score matching, compared to SAG, those that underwent MAG were younger (66.0 vs. 68.9 years) and had less comorbidities. After propensity-score matching, 2,446 well-matched pairs were formed. In matched patients, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (1.6% vs 1.8%, P=0.43) between MAG and SAG. The median and maximum follow-up was 5.0 and 11.0 years respectively. Over the entire follow-up, MAG was associated with improved survival (Figure, hazard ratio (HR): 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.98) and freedom from MACCE (HR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.76-0.95). Conclusions: MAG was associated with improved survival and freedom from MACCE and should be considered for female patients with good life expectancy requiring CABG.

scholarly journals Health literacy and exercise interventions on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with diabetes: a propensity score-matched comparison

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001179
Author(s):  
Yan Wei ◽  
Yingyao Chen ◽  
Yingnan Zhao ◽  
Russell Rothman ◽  
Jian Ming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Literacy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Literacy Intervention ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

IntroductionPatients with diabetes in China have low health literacy, which likely leads to poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of health literacy and exercise interventions on clinical measurements in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Research design and methodsA cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted from February 2015 through April 2017 in Shanghai, China. 799 patients with T2DM aged 18 years or older recruited from eight Community Healthcare Centers were randomized into one control arm and three intervention arms receiving 1-year health literacy intervention, exercise intervention or both as the comprehensive intervention. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential imbalance in randomization. The intervention-attributable effects on main clinical outcomes were estimated using a difference-in-difference regression approach.ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 634 patients were included in the analysis. The three intervention groups had decreased hemoglobin A1c (A1c) level after 12 months of intervention. The largest adjusted decrease was observed in the health literacy group (−0.95%, 95% CI: −1.30 to −0.59), followed by the exercise group (−0.81%, 95% CI: −1.17 to −0.45). However, A1c was observed to increase in the health literacy and the comprehensive groups from 12 to 24 months. No obvious changes were observed for other measurements including high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterols, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures.ConclusionsHealth literacy and exercise-focused interventions improve glycemic control in Chinese patients with diabetes after 12 months of intervention, and the health literacy intervention shows the greatest effect. Our results suggest that the interventions may have the potential to improve diabetes self-management and reduce diabetes burden in China.Trial registration numberISRCTN76130594.

scholarly journals Electrolytes supplementation can decrease the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients with solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omary M. S. Minzi ◽  
Tatu E. Lyimo ◽  
Francis F. Furia ◽  
Alphonce I. Marealle ◽  
Manase Kilonzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract Background Cisplatin is an important drug in the treatment of various Cancers. However, this drug causes nephrotoxicity that is linked to electrolyte derangement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of electrolyte supplementation in reducing kidney injury in patients receiving cisplatin-based regimen. Methods This was non-randomized interventional study conducted at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) among patients with confirmed solid tumors. Patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at a dose of ≥50 mg with intravenous normal saline supplemented with Magnesium, Calcium and Potassium (triple electrolyte supplementation) were compared with those who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy with normal saline alone. The patients were followed up for 4 weeks and serum creatinine was measured at every visit. Nephrotoxicity was defined as serum creatinine elevation > 1.5 times that at baseline. Results A total of 99 patients were recruited, whereby 49 patients (49.5%) received electrolyte supplementation (treatment group) and 50 patients (51.5%) did not receive electrolyte supplementation (control group). The incidence risk of nephrotoxicity was 20.41% (n = 10) in the treatment group and 54% (n = 27) in the control group. Patients in the control group were 2.6 times more likely to experience nephrotoxicity as compared to treatment group [Relative Risks (RR); 2.6, 95%CI; 1.5–4.9, P < 0.0001]. The most common malignancy was cervical cancer, n = 43 (87.8%) in treatment group and n = 45 (90.0%) in the control group (P = 0.590). The Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test revealed that electrolytes supplementation was associated with extended survival with less nephrotoxicity incidences [P = 0.0004; Hazard ratio (HR) 0.3149; 95% CI 0.165 to 0.6011]. Conclusions Electrolytes supplementation decreases the risk of nephrotoxicity after chemotherapy with cisplatin. A randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size is recommended to evaluate the robustness of these findings.

scholarly journals Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined with Sorafenib in Treatment of HBV Background Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Yuan ◽  
Xin Yin ◽  
Bei Tang ◽  
Hui Ma ◽  
Lan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Rank Test

Objectives. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains a challenge in management. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been used for patients with PVTT but efficiency was limited with a median overall survival of 4 to 6.1 months. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of TACE combined with sorafenib in HBV background HCC with PVTT. Methods. A total of 498 patients were enrolled in the study including 69 patients who received TACE combined with sorafenib and 429 patients treated with TACE alone between January 1st, 2008, and April 30st, 2014. Using the 1:2 propensity score matching, 138 well-balanced patients were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the OS, and the differences between groups were analyzed with a log-rank test. Results. TACE combined with sorafenib improved the OS of the patients compared with TACE alone (13.0 vs 6.0 months, p<0.001). After propensity score matching, the median OS of combination therapy and TACE were 13.0 and 7.0 months, respectively (p=0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the patients younger than 60 years old, male patients, AFP more than 400ng/ml, tumor size more than 5cm, or type III/IV PVTT had OS benefits from TACE combined with sorafenib. Conclusions. Compared with TACE therapy alone, TACE combined with sorafenib could improve OS in HBV background HCC patients with PVTT. The patients who are younger, male, or with more tumor burden may benefit more from combination therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document