scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Pentamidine Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 885
Author(s):  
Soraya Herrera-Espejo ◽  
Tania Cebrero-Cangueiro ◽  
Gema Labrador-Herrera ◽  
Jerónimo Pachón ◽  
María Eugenia Pachón-Ibáñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infections ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a public health problem causing both community and hospital-acquired infections, and thus the development of new therapies for these infections is critical. The objective of this study was to analyze in vitro the activity of pentamidine as adjuvant in combinations to antibiotics against seven clinical P. aeruginosa strains. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was determined following standard protocols, and the results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints; however, the gentamicin activity was interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. The bactericidal in vitro activity was studied at 1×MIC concentrations by time–kill curves, and also performed in three selected strains at 1/2×MIC of pentamidine. All studies were performed in triplicate. The pentamidine MIC range was 400–1600 μg/mL. Four of the strains were MDR, and the other three were resistant to two antibiotic families. The combinations of pentamidine at 1×MIC showed synergistic activity against all the tested strains, except for pentamidine plus colistin. Pentamidine plus imipenem and meropenem were the combinations that showed synergistic activity against the most strains. At 1/2×MIC, pentamidine plus antibiotics were synergistic with all three analyzed strains. In summary, pentamidine in combination with antibiotics showed in vitro synergy against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical strains, which suggests its possible use as adjuvant to antibiotics for the therapy of infections from MDR P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Alone and in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens, Including β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 2360-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Vidaillac ◽  
Steve N. Leonard ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
Michael J. Rybak
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT Ceftaroline is a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin that exhibits bactericidal activity against many gram-positive and -negative pathogens. However, the activity of ceftaroline cannot be solely relied upon for eradication of multidrug-resistant gram-negative isolates, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, which represent a current clinical concern. As drug combinations might be beneficial by potential synergy, we evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftaroline combined with meropenem, aztreonam, cefepime, tazobactam, amikacin, levofloxacin, and tigecycline. Susceptibility testing was performed for 20 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates, 10 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates, 10 ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and 10 AmpC-derepressed Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Time-kill experiments were performed for 10 isolates using antimicrobials at one-fourth the MIC. Ceftaroline exhibited a MIC range of 0.125 to 1,024 μg/ml and was reduced 2- to 512-fold by combination with tazobactam (4 μg/ml) for ESBL-producing strains. In time-kill experiments, ceftaroline plus amikacin was synergistic against 90% of the isolates (and indifferent for one P. aeruginosa isolate). Ceftaroline plus tazobactam was indifferent for E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa strains but synergistic against 100% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates. Combinations of ceftaroline plus meropenem or aztreonam were also synergistic for all E. coli and E. cloacae isolates, respectively, but indifferent against 90% of the other isolates. Finally, combinations of ceftaroline plus either tigecycline, levofloxacin, or cefepime were indifferent for 100% of the isolates. No antagonism was observed with any combination. Ceftaroline plus amikacin appeared as the most likely synergistic combination. This represents a promising therapeutic option, and further studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical value of ceftaroline combinations against resistant gram-negative pathogens.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam vs. Antimicrobial Non-Susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates Obtained from Across Canada as Part of the CANWARD Study, 2008–2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S372-S372
Author(s):  
Andrew Walkty ◽  
Heather J Adam ◽  
Melanie Baxter ◽  
Philippe Lagace-Wiens ◽  
James Karlowsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Research Relationship ◽  
Inhibitor Combination ◽  
Patient Infection

Abstract Background Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a broad spectrum of activity that includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of C/T and relevant comparators vs. a large collection of antimicrobial non-susceptible (NS) P. aeruginosa clinical isolates obtained from patients across Canada (CANWARD, 2008–2016). Methods From January 2008 to December 2016, inclusive, 12 to 15 sentinel hospitals across Canada submitted clinical isolates from patients attending ERs, medical and surgical wards, hospital clinics, and ICUs (CANWARD). Each center was asked to annually submit clinical isolates (consecutive, one per patient/infection site) from blood, respiratory, urine, and wound infections. Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution as described by CLSI. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested NS to at least one antimicrobial from ≥3 classes. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested NS to at least one antimicrobial from ≥5 classes. Results 3229 P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained as a part of CANWARD. The in vitro activity of C/T and relevant comparators is presented below. Conclusion C/T demonstrated excellent in vitro activity vs. antimicrobial NS P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including MDR, XDR, and meropenem NS subsets. It may prove useful in the treatment of infections caused by these organisms. Disclosures D. Hoban, Abbott: Research relationship, Research support Achaogen: Research relationship, Research support Astellas: Research relationship, Research support Merck Canada: Research relationship, Research support Merck USA: Research relationship, Research support Paratek Pharma: Research relationship, Research support Pharmascience: Research relationship, Research support Sunovion: Research relationship, Research support Tetraphase: Research relationship, Research support The Medicines Co.: Research relationship, Research support Zoetis: Research relationship, Research support; G. Zhanel, Achaogen: Research relationship, Research support Astellas: Research relationship, Research support Merck Canada: Research relationship, Research support Merck USA: Research relationship, Research support Paratek Pharma: Research relationship, Research support Pharmascience: Research relationship, Research support Sunovion: Research relationship, Research support Tetraphase: Research relationship, Research support The Medicines Co.: Research relationship, Research support Zoetis: Research relationship, Research support

scholarly journals In Vitro 24-Hour Time-Kill Studies of Vancomycin and Linezolid in Combination versus Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 4495-4497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shveta Rani Singh ◽  
Alfred E. Bacon ◽  
David C. Young ◽  
Kimberly A. Couch
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antagonistic Activity ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT Many clinicians are trying unique strategies, including vancomycin and linezolid in combination, for treatment of patients who do not respond to conventional therapy against methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In our study, which illustrated in vitro activity only, no synergistic activity was seen when the two agents were combined. Conversely, antagonistic activity occurred in three of five strains when linezolid was added to vancomycin. Our results indicate that vancomycin and linezolid in combination should be avoided.

scholarly journals In vitro activity of antimicrobial combinations against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denissani Aparecida Ferrari dos Santos Lima ◽  
Margarida Maria Passeri do Nascimento ◽  
Lucia Helena Vitali ◽  
Roberto Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Antimicrobial Combinations

scholarly journals 1581. Comparative In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane/tazobactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Clinical Isolates in Colombia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S577-S577
Author(s):  
Cristhian Hernández-Gómez ◽  
Elsa De La Cadena ◽  
Maria F Mojica ◽  
Adriana Correa ◽  
Marcela Perengüez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Resistance Rates ◽  
Outer Membrane Permeability

Abstract Background Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (Ent) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) are involved in a considerable number of healthcare-associated infections, thus representing a therapeutic challenge. Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C/T) is a combination of a novel cephalosporin with a known β-lactamase inhibitor. Ceftolozane has high affinity for penicillin-binding proteins, improved outer membrane permeability, increased stability against efflux and enhanced stability against chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases compared with other β-lactam antibiotics. This agent is not active against carbapenemases. We evaluated the in vitro activity of C/T against clinical isolates of Ent and Pae collected from 2016- 2017 and compared it to the activity of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Methods 1.644 Ent and Pae non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 13 medical centers located in 12 Colombian cities. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were performed by broth microdilution and interpreted according to current CLSI guidelines. Isolates tested included 813 Escherichia coli (Eco), 441 Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kpn), 82 Enterobacter spp., (Enb); 60 Serratia marcescens (Sma) and 248 Pae. Comparator agents were ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MEM). Results Susceptibilities to C/T and comparators of 4 Ent species and Pae are shown in Table 1. Compared with other β-lactams such as CRO, CAZ, TZP, and FEP, C/T had considerably higher susceptibility rates against ESBL, non-carbapenem-resistant (CR) Eco and Kpn isolates. C/T MIC50/90 were: Eco (≤1/≤1); Kpn (≤1/128); Enb (≤1/64); Sma (≤1/≥256); Pae (≤1/≥256). In the case of P.aeruginosa despite the high resistance rates observed in the study, C/T had the best susceptibility, even higher than the carbapenems. Conclusion Overall, C/T demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and TZP when tested against Ent and Pae. C/T provides an important treatment option against infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing Gram-negative pathogens. Further studies are warranted to identify an emerging mechanism of resistance in Colombia. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Colistin (Polymyxin E) against 3,480 Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals in the CANWARD Study, 2007-2008

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 4924-4926 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Walkty ◽  
M. DeCorby ◽  
K. Nichol ◽  
J. A. Karlowsky ◽  
D. J. Hoban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Polymyxin E

ABSTRACT The in vitro activity of colistin was evaluated versus 3,480 isolates of gram-negative bacilli using CLSI broth microdilution methods. The MIC90 of colistin was ≤2 μg/ml against a variety of clinically important gram-negative bacilli, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All multidrug-resistant (n = 76) P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to colistin (MIC, ≤2 μg/ml). These data support a role for colistin in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activities of Tritrpticin Alone and in Combination with Other Antimicrobial Agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3923-3925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Cirioni ◽  
Andrea Giacometti ◽  
Carmela Silvestri ◽  
Agnese Della Vittoria ◽  
Alberto Licci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Procoagulant Activity ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity

ABSTRACT The in vitro activity of the cathelicidin tritrpticin was investigated against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The isolates were susceptible to the peptide at concentrations of 0.50 to 8 mg/liter. Tritrpticin completely inhibits lipopolysaccharide procoagulant activity at a 10 μM concentration. Fractionary inhibitory concentration indexes (0.385, 0.312, and 0.458) demonstrated synergy between the peptide and β-lactams.

scholarly journals 1594. Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Demonstrates Higher In Vitro Susceptibility than Ceftazidime–Avibactam Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Respiratory Tract of Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S581-S582
Author(s):  
Patrick James Nolan ◽  
Tiffeny Smith ◽  
James D Finklea ◽  
Leah Cohen ◽  
Raksha Jain
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a commonly isolated pathogen in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Antimicrobial resistance is an escalating problem due to chronic colonization and frequent antimicrobial exposure. Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) exhibit promising activity against antimicrobial-resistant organisms, including P. aeruginosa. In this study, we compared in vitro activity of C/T and CZA against P. aeruginosa isolated from respiratory cultures obtained from adult patients with CF. Methods This is a retrospective study of respiratory cultures positive for P. aeruginosa collected from adult CF patients between January 1, 2015 to November 30, 2018. The first isolate per patient per year that underwent susceptibility testing for C/T, CZA, and colistin were included in the study. All isolates underwent in-house susceptibility testing for 9 anti-pseudomonal agents according to the methodology established by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Susceptibility testing of C/T, CZA, and colistin were performed by a reference lab. Isolates were classified into 3 drug-resistant categories using the following definition: multidrug-resistant (MDR) non-susceptible (NS) to ≥1 agent in ≥3 different antimicrobial classes, extensive drug-resistant (XDR) NS to 4 or 5 different classes, and pan drug-resistant (PDR) NS to all 6 classes except colistin. Results Forty-two P. aeruginosa respiratory isolates from 32 patients with CF were included. The overall susceptibility to C/T and CZA was 59.5% and 42.9%, respectively. Thirty-eight (90%) isolates were considered MDR with susceptibility of 55.3% to C/T and 44.7% to CZA. Among the 11 XDR isolates, susceptibility to C/T was 81.8% vs. CZA 72.7%. Susceptibility to C/T vs. CZA was also higher (37.5% vs. 25%) among the 24 PDR isolates. Conclusion Among P. aeruginosa isolated from CF respiratory cultures, C/T appears to have better in vitro activity compared with CZA, and remained true among isolates considered XDR and PDR. These results suggest using C/T while awaiting susceptibilities when standard anti-pseudomonal agents cannot be used. Future studies evaluating clinical outcomes for the treatment of pulmonary CF exacerbations are needed to assess the applicability of in vitro susceptibility data. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document