scholarly journals Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Refractory Ovarian Cancers: Clear Cell and Mucinous Carcinomas

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 6120
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Shunsuke Tatsuki ◽  
Marina Abe ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Molecular Target ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Gynecological Cancers ◽  
Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Ovarian cancer has the worst prognosis among gynecological cancers. In particular, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas are less sensitive to chemotherapy. The establishment of new therapies is necessary to improve the treatment outcomes for these carcinomas. In previous clinical studies, chemotherapy with cytotoxic anticancer drugs has failed to demonstrate better treatment outcomes than paclitaxel + carboplatin therapy. In recent years, attention has been focused on treatment with molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors that target newly identified biomarkers. The issues that need to be addressed include the most appropriate combination of therapies, identifying patients who may benefit from each therapy, and how results should be incorporated into the standard of care for ovarian clear cell and mucinous carcinomas. In this article, we have reviewed the most promising therapies for ovarian clear cell and mucinous carcinomas, which are regarded as intractable, with an emphasis on therapies currently being investigated in clinical studies.

scholarly journals Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Chie Sato ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
Yoshitaka Kaido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Targeted Drugs ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

scholarly journals Targeting macrophages in cancer immunotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaojun Duan ◽  
Yunping Luo
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Cellular Immunotherapy ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Tumor Vaccines ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Promising Treatment ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapies

AbstractImmunotherapy is regarded as the most promising treatment for cancers. Various cancer immunotherapies, including adoptive cellular immunotherapy, tumor vaccines, antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and small-molecule inhibitors, have achieved certain successes. In this review, we summarize the role of macrophages in current immunotherapies and the advantages of targeting macrophages. To better understand and make better use of this type of cell, their development and differentiation characteristics, categories, typical markers, and functions were collated at the beginning of the review. Therapeutic strategies based on or combined with macrophages have the potential to improve the treatment efficacy of cancer therapies.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Brain Metastases: A Primer for Neurosurgeons

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. E281-E288
Author(s):  
Elisa Aquilanti ◽  
Priscilla K Brastianos
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Recognition ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Programmed Death 1

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance immune recognition of tumors by interfering with the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed death 1 (PD1) pathways. In the past decade, these agents brought significant improvements to the prognostic outlook of patients with metastatic cancers. Recent data from retrospective analyses and a few prospective studies suggest that checkpoint inhibitors have activity against brain metastases from melanoma and nonsmall cell lung cancer, as single agents or in combination with radiotherapy. Some studies reported intracranial response rates that were comparable with systemic ones. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of clinical data supporting the use of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 agents in brain metastases. We also touch upon specific considerations on the assessment of intracranial responses in patients and immunotherapy-specific toxicities. We conclude that a subset of patients with brain metastases benefit from the addition of checkpoint inhibitors to standard of care therapeutic modalities, including radiotherapy and surgery.

scholarly journals Management of pulmonary toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (154) ◽  
pp. 190012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Delaunay ◽  
Grégoire Prévot ◽  
Samia Collot ◽  
Laurent Guilleminault ◽  
Alain Didier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Pulmonary Toxicity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Life Threatening

Immunotherapy has become a standard of care in oncology, following the recent approvals of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 and programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, bladder, head and neck cancers. Besides their efficacy, these agents also generate specific immune-related adverse events. Due to the increasing prescription of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune toxicity will continue to rise. The awareness of immune-related adverse events is key to ensuring both diagnosis and management of the possible serious adverse events. Although severe immune-related adverse events remain rare, they can lead to discontinued treatment or to death if they are not forecasted and managed properly. Even if lung toxicity is not the most frequent adverse event, it remains critical as it can be life-threatening. Herein, the main aspects of pulmonary toxicity are reviewed and guidelines are also proposed in order to manage the possible side-effects.

scholarly journals Biological intratumoral therapy for the high-grade glioma part I: intratumoral delivery and immunotoxins

CNS Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. CNS38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Loya ◽  
Charlie Zhang ◽  
Emily Cox ◽  
Achal S Achrol ◽  
Santosh Kesari
Keyword(s):  
Translational Research ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Major Focus ◽  
Microsurgical Resection ◽  
Intratumoral Delivery ◽  
Novel Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Novel Therapeutic

Management of high-grade gliomas remains a complex challenge. Standard of care consists of microsurgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation, but despite these aggressive multimodality therapies the overall prognosis remains poor. A major focus of ongoing translational research studies is to develop novel therapeutic strategies that can maximize tumor cell eradication while minimizing collateral side effects. Particularly, biological intratumoral therapies have been the focus of new translational research efforts due to their inherent potential to be both dynamically adaptive and target specific. This two-part review will provide an overview of biological intratumoral therapies and summarize key advances and remaining challenges in intratumoral biological therapies for high-grade glioma. Part I focuses on discussion of the concepts of intratumoral delivery and immunotoxin therapies.

A case of advanced melanoma treated with molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Skin Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-226
Author(s):  
Aya TANAKA ◽  
Atsushi TANAMURA ◽  
Kuniko IKINAGA ◽  
Yukinobu NAKAGAWA ◽  
Eiji KIYOHARA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Molecular Target ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Molecular Target Therapy

Effect of smoking on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14109-e14109
Author(s):  
Chia Ching Lee ◽  
Ivan Weng Keong Tham ◽  
Yu Yang Soon ◽  
Jeremy Chee Seong Tey
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
P Value ◽  
Never Smokers

e14109 Background: The association between smoking history and benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of ICIs in advanced cancers according to smoking status (never-smokers vs ever-smokers). Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunotherapy with standard-of-care in the treatment of advanced cancers which reported overall survival (OS) as the outcome, stratified by smoking status. We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) for OS using random-effect models and assessed the differences in OS between the two estimates (never smoker (vs) ever smoker). using a test of heterogeneity. We also performed prespecified subgroup analyses based on disease site, line of therapy, proportion of never-smokers in the trials and trial conclusion to assess the potential association of oncologic and methodologic factors in effect modification of smoking status with the efficacy of ICIs. Results: We identified ten RCTs on non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck, and urothelial cancers, including 4,245 ever-smokers and 972 never-smokers. The difference in the effects of ICIs on OS between ever-smokers (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.84) and never-smokers (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02) was not statistically significant (interaction P-value = 0.69). There were no significant differences in the effects of ICIs on OS between ever-smokers and never smokers in the pre-specified subgroups. Conclusions: There was no significant association between smoking status and improved survival outcome with ICIs in the treatment of advanced cancers. Smoking status should not be used as a biomarker for guiding treatment with immunotherapy.

Concordance between PD-L1 assays for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14259-e14259
Author(s):  
Matthew Labriola ◽  
Jason Zhu ◽  
Sachica Cheris ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Kathryn Perkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Tissue

e14259 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard of care for mRCC and mUC patients (pts). PD-L1 status is gaining importance as a predictive biomarker, particularly for cisplatin-ineligible mUC. PD-L1 positivity is defined differently by PD-L1 assay and tumor type, with limited concordance studies. Given real-world limitations in PD-L1 testing, assay concordance studies are needed to distinguish positive (pos)/negative (neg) results and treatment selection. We compared Dako 28–8 and Ventana SP142 assays in mRCC and Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 assays in mUC. Methods: 32 pts with mRCC and 18 pts with mUC who had received ICI therapy at Duke Cancer Institute were identified. FFPE archival tumor samples for pts with mRCC were evaluated with Dako 28–8 and Ventana SP142 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. For pts with mUC, FFPE archival tumor samples were evaluated with Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 PD-L1 IHC assays. Scoring was validated by two pathologists using the scoring system for each assay. PD-L1 status was subsequently correlated to best RECIST response (objective response rate (ORR) defined as stable disease or better). Results: Tissue was obtained from primary tissue in 72% of mRCC cases and in 61% of mUC cases, with remainder from metastatic biopsies. The majority of mRCC cases (29/32, 91%) were concordant between Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP142 assays (8 cases pos and 21 cases neg), with 3 discordant cases (1 case pos for Dako 28-8 but neg for Ventana SP142 and 2 cases neg for Dako 28-8 but pos for Ventana SP142), all from primary tissue. The majority of mUC cases (17/18, 94%) were also concordant between Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 assays (2 pos cases and 15 neg cases), with 1 indeterminate Dako 22C3 test on a metastatic biopsy due to background lymph node. In mRCC, the ORR for PD-L1 pos cases was 45% (5/11) versus 33% (8/24) for PD-L1 neg cases. In mUC, the ORR for PD-L1 positive cases was 50% (1/2) versus 31% (5/16) for PD-L1 neg cases. Conclusions: There was strong concordance between the clinically meaningful PD-L1 assays chosen for comparison in both mRCC and mUC. mUC results were limited by low PD-L1 expression in this cohort. Although PD-L1 status does not fully predict for response to ICIs, this suggests that PD-L1 testing could be used interchangeably for the majority of cases when selecting ICI treatment in mRCC and mUC.

Concordance between PD-L1 assays for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 577-577
Author(s):  
Jason Zhu ◽  
Matthew Labriola ◽  
Sachica Cheris ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Kathryn Perkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Cell Assays ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

577 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care for mRCC and mUC patients (pts). PD-L1 status is gaining importance as a predictive biomarker, particularly for cisplatin-ineligible mUC. Four different PD-L1 assays vary in thresholds of PD-L1 positivity dependent on tumor type, with limited concordance studies. Given real-world limitations in PD-L1 testing, concordance between assays are needed to distinguish positive (pos)/negative (neg) results and treatment selection. We undertook comparisons of Dako 28–8 and Ventana SP142 assays in mRCC and Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 assays in mUC. Methods: 32 patients with mRCC and 18 patients with mUC who had received ICI therapy at Duke Cancer Institute were identified. FFPE archival tumor samples for pts with mRCC were evaluated with Dako 28–8 and Ventana SP142 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. For pts with mUC, FFPE archival tumor samples were evaluated with Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 PD-L1 IHC assays. Scoring was validated by two pathologists using the scoring system for each assay. PD-L1 status was subsequently correlated to best RECIST response (objective response rate (ORR) defined as stable disease or better)). Results: The majority of mRCC cases (29/32, 91%) were concordant between Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP142 assays (8 cases pos and 21 cases neg), with 3 discordant cases (1 case pos for Dako 28-8 but neg for Ventana SP142 and 2 cases neg for Dako 28-8 but pos for Ventana SP142). The majority of mUC cases (17/18, 94%) were also concordant between Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 assays (2 pos cases and 15 neg cases), with 1 indeterminate Dako 22C3 test due to background lymph node. In mRCC, the ORR for PD-L1 pos cases was 45% (5/11) versus 33% (8/24) for PD-L1 neg cases. In mUC, the ORR for PD-L1 positive cases was 50% (1/2) versus 31% (5/16) for PD-L1 neg cases. Conclusions: There was strong concordance between PD-L1 tumor/immune cell assays chosen for comparison in both mRCC and mUC with similar performance characteristics. Although PD-L1 positivity enriches for response to ICIs, many patients respond who are PD-L1 negative. PD-L1 status could be used interchangeably for the majority of cases when selecting treatment in mRCC and mUC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document