scholarly journals Achievement Goals, Fear of Failure and Self-Handicapping in Young Elite Athletes with and without Chronic Pain

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 591
Author(s):  
Bodile Molenaar ◽  
Charlotte Willems ◽  
Jeanine Verbunt ◽  
Mariëlle Goossens

Background: Pain is a common problem in elite athletes. This exploratory study compares goal orientations towards sport, fear of failure, self-handicapping and pain catastrophizing between active young elite athletes with and without chronic pain (CP) complaints (longer than three months). It examines the associations between chronic pain, fear of failure, goal orientations, self-handicapping and pain catastrophizing in young elite athletes. We explore how far goal orientation can be explained by these factors. Methods: Young elite athletes completed an online questionnaire. Data analysis: Independent samples t-test, correlational analyses and multivariate regression analyses. Results: Participants were 132 young elite athletes (mean 16 years); data for 126 were analyzed. A total of 47% reported current pain, of which 60% had CP. Adolescents with CP showed significantly more pain intensity, fear of failure, self-handicapping and mastery–avoidance goals than those without. Pain intensity was significantly related to fear of failure, self-handicapping, pain catastrophizing and mastery–avoidance. Self-handicapping and fear of failure contributed significantly to mastery–avoidance variance. Performance–avoidance and –approach goals were explained by fear of failure. Conclusion: CP was common, with sufferers showing more fear of failure and self-handicapping strategies, and being motivated to avoid performing worse (mastery–avoidance). Self-handicapping and fear of failure influenced mastery–avoidance orientation, and fear of failure explained part of performance–avoidance and –approach orientations. Longitudinal studies should explore the role of these factors in the trajectory of CP in these athletes.

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasamin Sharifzadeh ◽  
Ming-Chih Kao ◽  
John A. Sturgeon ◽  
Thomas J. Rico ◽  
Sean Mackey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive response to pain that amplifies chronic pain intensity and distress. Few studies have examined how pain catastrophizing relates to opioid prescription in outpatients with chronic pain. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective observational study of the relationships between opioid prescription, pain intensity, and pain catastrophizing in 1,794 adults (1,129 women; 63%) presenting for new evaluation at a large tertiary care pain treatment center. Data were sourced primarily from an open-source, learning health system and pain registry and secondarily from manual review of electronic medical records. A binary opioid prescription variable (yes/no) constituted the dependent variable; independent variables were age, sex, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, depression, and anxiety. Results Most patients were prescribed at least one opioid medication (57%; n = 1,020). A significant interaction and main effects of pain intensity and pain catastrophizing on opioid prescription were noted (P < 0.04). Additive modeling revealed sex differences in the relationship between pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and opioid prescription, such that opioid prescription became more common at lower levels of pain catastrophizing for women than for men. Conclusions Results supported the conclusion that pain catastrophizing and sex moderate the relationship between pain intensity and opioid prescription. Although men and women patients had similar Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores, historically “subthreshold” levels of pain catastrophizing were significantly associated with opioid prescription only for women patients. These findings suggest that pain intensity and catastrophizing contribute to different patterns of opioid prescription for men and women patients, highlighting a potential need for examination and intervention in future studies.


Author(s):  
JiHee Jung ◽  
YoungSeok Park

The purpose of this study is to test the effect of achievement goal orientations and safety climate on safe and unsafe behaviors. Safe behaviors were measured by observances and automatic safe behaviors, and unsafe behaviors by violations and mistakes. Three fifty employees from corporations were participated in this research. Both mastery approach goal and performance approach goal orientations have significant positive relations with the safe behaviors and negative relations with the unsafe behaviors, but both mastery avoidance goal and performance avoidance goal orientations have significant negative relations with the safe behaviors and positive relations with the unsafe behaviors. This results suggest to confirm the multiple goal perspective of the achievement goal orientation argued both mastery goal and performance goal orientations have relations with adaptive and maladaptive behaviors. Safety climates measured by five factors, management values, safety practice, safety training, safety communication, and supervisor leadership, were significant positive relations with safe behaviors and negative relations with unsafe behaviors. Specially safety climates have significantly stronger correlations with unintentional behaviors(automatic safe behavior and mistake) than intentional behaviors(observance and violation). The relative contributions of individual variables and organizational variables to safe and unsafe behaviors were discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
DEASYANTI DEASYANTI ◽  
MARWA NURUZDAH

The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between thesis writing orientation and anxiety in thesis writing. Quantitative method is used in this study with 247 Universitas Negeri Jakarta students who is writing thesis as a samples. Sampling method used in this study is incidental sampling. The Instruments used in this study are adapted from Achievement Questionare Scale (Elliot & McGregor, 2001) and Writing Apprehension Test (Daly & Miller, 1975). Data analyzing method used in this study is pearson product moment. The goal orientations which is found negatively correlated with writing anxiety are mastery approach goal orientation (-0,31) and performance approach goal orientation (-0,18). The goal orientation which is found positively correlated with writing anxiety are mastery avoidance goal orientation (0,19) and performance avoidance (0,26).


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 491-491
Author(s):  
Soumitri Sil ◽  
Alison Manikowski ◽  
Mallory Schneider ◽  
Lindsey L Cohen ◽  
Carlton D. Dampier

Abstract Introduction: Youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) and chronic pain are a heterogeneous group with variability in their daily pain experience and physical and psychosocial functioning. We aimed to 1) empirically derive chronic pain subgroups based on sensory pain characteristics using cluster analysis within a sample of youth with chronic SCD pain, and 2) investigate derived subgroups for differences in sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and psychosocial and functional outcomes. We hypothesized that chronic SCD pain subgroups with higher sensory pain experiences would be associated with poorer functional and psychosocial outcomes. Methods: Children and adolescents receiving care at comprehensive SCD clinics at three tertiary care locations within a southeast children's hospital were included if they were aged 10-18 years, any SCD genotype, reported chronic pain (i.e., pain on most days per month for a duration of at least 3 months), and had English fluency. Youth were excluded if they had comorbid medical conditions typically associated with pain but unrelated to SCD or had significant cognitive or developmental limitations that would interfere with study procedures. Patients completed a battery of patient-reported outcomes including pain characteristics (i.e., intensity, frequency, and the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool to assess number of pain locations and pain quality descriptors), PROMIS Pediatric Short Forms for pain interference, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, the Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale for sleep quality, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization outcomes were abstracted from electronic medical records including number of inpatient admissions for pain and emergency department visits for pain in the prior 12 months. Chronic SCD pain subgroups were based on sensory pain characteristics including pain intensity ratings, pain frequency, number of body sites affected by pain, and pain quality descriptors. Hierarchical cluster analysis informed the number of clusters at the patient level. K-means cluster analysis was used to assign patients to clusters once the number of clusters was established. Clusters were compared on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization, and child psychosocial and functional outcomes. Results: Youth (n=62) were on average (M) 13.9 years old (SD=2.5), 56% female, 95% Black or African American, and 85% Non-Hispanic/Latinx. Most (75%) had HbSS or HbSβ 0 and 67% were prescribed hydroxyurea. Hierarchical cluster analysis and k-means clustering supported a 2-cluster solution (see Figure 1). Cluster 1 (n=35; Frequent, Moderate Pain) was distinguished by significantly lower scores on worst pain intensity (M=6.4, SD=0.4), lower number of pain days per month (M=12.1, SD=2.8), fewer number of body sites affected by pain (M=8.9, SD=0.9), and lower pain quality ratings (M=15.9, SD=1.3). Cluster 2 (n=27; Almost Daily, High Pain) represented patients who reported high ratings of worst pain intensity (M=8.2, SD=0.3), daily to almost daily pain (M=20.3, SD=1.7), higher number of body sties affected by pain (M=12.5, SD=1.5), and higher ratings of pain quality (M=40.8, SD=1.9) (all p's <.05). There were no differences between chronic SCD pain subgroups by sociodemographics (e.g., age, sex, family income), clinical characteristics (e.g., genotype, history of avascular necrosis, disease-modifying treatments, prescribed long-acting opioids, neuropathic medications, or antidepressants), or healthcare utilization. Patients in the Almost Daily High Pain subgroup reported significantly higher pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing compared to patients in the Frequent, Moderate Pain subgroup (see Table 1). There were no differences between subgroups on anxiety or sleep quality. Conclusions: Two subgroups of chronic SCD pain were identified based on pain, psychosocial, and functional outcomes. Beyond sensory pain characteristics, pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing were the only variables that best differentiated the chronic SCD pain subgroups. These empirically derived subgroups are comparable to other non-SCD chronic pain subgroups in pediatrics and adults. Identifying homogenous chronic SCD pain subtypes can inform tailored assessment and management of chronic pain. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 205510292091725
Author(s):  
Nadine Matthie ◽  
Coretta Jenerette ◽  
Ashley Gibson ◽  
Sudeshna Paul ◽  
Melinda Higgins ◽  
...  

Among 170 adults with sickle cell disease, we evaluated chronic pain impact and disability prevalence, assessed age and gender differences, and identified psychosocial predictors of chronic pain intensity and disability. Most participants had a high level of disability. Chronic pain intensity and disability were significantly associated with pain catastrophizing and chronic pain self-efficacy, and worsened with age. Further research is needed to confirm study findings and develop interventions, including palliative care approaches that address catastrophizing and disability, particularly for young women and middle-aged adults with sickle cell disease. Moreover, consistent clinical assessment of chronic pain and psychosocial health should be implemented.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
ALÉXIA O. R. MOURA ◽  
LÍGIA C. O. SILVA

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the degree to which the meaning of work, specifically the work centrality dimension, and the types of achievement goal orientations at work, predict professional fulfillment. Originality/value: The main contribution is to provide background for the identification of antecedents of a concept yet narrowly studied, which is professional fulfillment, signaling how counselors and organizations may facilitate the greater achievement of what is most valued in a career. We evidence the need to consider work an important sphere of life and to invest efforts in self-development to attain professional fulfillment. Design/methodology/approach: This is quantitative, survey-type research involving 140 people who have been working for at least 6 months. An online questionnaire was answered containing absolute and relative work centrality, achievement goal orientation at work and professional fulfillment scales, as well as socio-demographic questions. Data were analyzed using bivariate correlations and multiple regression analysis. Findings: Significant relationships of prediction were found between work centrality and professional fulfillment, as well as between one of the types of goal orientation and professional fulfillment. The results support two of the three predicted hypotheses, in addition to converging with previous research on the positive impacts of work centrality and the mastery approach orientation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Fisher ◽  
Lauren C Heathcote ◽  
Christopher Eccleston ◽  
Laura E Simons ◽  
Tonya M Palermo

Abstract Objective To conduct a systematic review of pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain measures psychometrically established in youth with chronic pain. The review addresses three specific aims: (1) to identify measures used in youth with chronic pain, summarizing their content, psychometric properties, and use; (2) to use evidence-based assessment criteria to rate each measure according to the Society of Pediatric Psychology (SPP) guidelines; (3) to pool data across studies for meta-analysis of shared variance in psychometric performance in relation to the primary outcomes of pain intensity, disability, generalized anxiety, and depression. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and relevant literature for possible studies to include. We identified measures studied in youth with chronic pain that assessed pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, or fear of pain and extracted the item-level content. Study and participant characteristics, and correlation data were extracted for summary and meta-analysis, and measures were rated using the SPP evidence-based assessment criteria. Results Fifty-four studies (84 papers) met the inclusion criteria, including seven relevant measures: one assessed pain anxiety, three pain catastrophizing, and three fear of pain. Overall, five measures were rated as “well established.” We conducted meta-analyses on four measures with available data. We found significant positive correlations with the variables pain intensity, disability, generalized anxiety, and depression. Conclusion Seven measures are available to assess pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain in young people with chronic pain, and most are well established. We present implications for practice and directions for future research.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Sturgeon ◽  
Maisa S. Ziadni ◽  
Zina Trost ◽  
Beth D. Darnall ◽  
Sean C. Mackey

AbstractBackground and purposePrevious research has highlighted the importance of cognitive appraisal processes in determining the nature and effectiveness of coping with chronic pain. Two of the key variables implicated in appraisal of pain are catastrophizing and perceived injustice, which exacerbate the severity of pain-related distress and increase the risk of long-term disability through maladaptive behavioural responses. However, to date, the influences of these phenomena have not been examined concurrently, nor have they been related specifically to quality of life measures, such as life satisfaction.MethodsUsing data froman online survey of330 individuals with chronic pain, structural path modelling techniques were used to examine the independent effects of pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, and average pain intensity on life satisfaction. Two potential mediators of these relationships were examined: depressive symptoms and pain-related interference.ResultsResults indicated that depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship between pain catastrophizing and life satisfaction, and pain interference fully mediated the relationship between pain intensity and life satisfaction. Both depressive symptoms and pain interference were found to significantly mediate the relationship between perceived injustice and life satisfaction, but perceived injustice continued to demonstrate a significant and negative relationship with life satisfaction, above and beyond the other study variables.ConclusionsThe current findings highlight the distinct affective and behavioural mediators of pain and maladaptive cognitive appraisal processes in chronic pain, and highlight their importance in both perceptions of pain-related interference and longer-term quality of life.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Schwab

This study focuses on the goal orientations of students with and without special educational needs (SEN). The sample (mean age 13 years, 10 months) was composed of 37 students with low IQ, but without SEN; 37 students who were diagnosed as having learning disability (LD); and 37 students having emotional or behavioral disorders (ED). The groups were matched by IQ and gender. The results showed that students without SEN scored significantly higher in mastery goal orientation, significantly lower in performance-avoidance orientation, and had a lower work-avoidance orientation than students with LD or ED. Students with ED showed a significantly lower performance-approach orientation than students without SEN and students with LD. Results from correlational and regression analyses showed that SEN is always an explaining variable for goal orientation and that group differences cannot be explained by IQ, gender, actual achievement, self-estimation of achievement, and school anxiety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document