scholarly journals Analysis of LAGEs Family Gene Signature and Prognostic Relevance in Breast Cancer

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Hoang Dang Khoa Ta ◽  
Wan-Chun Tang ◽  
Nam Nhut Phan ◽  
Gangga Anuraga ◽  
Sz-Ying Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Breast cancer (BRCA) is one of the most complex diseases and involves several biological processes. Members of the L-antigen (LAGE) family participate in the development of various cancers, but their expressions and prognostic values in breast cancer remain to be clarified. High-throughput methods for exploring disease progression mechanisms might play a pivotal role in the improvement of novel therapeutics. Therefore, gene expression profiles and clinical data of LAGE family members were acquired from the cBioportal database, followed by verification using the Oncomine and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method was applied to explore correlations between expressions of LAGE family members and prognoses of breast cancer patients. MetaCore, GlueGo, and GluePedia were used to comprehensively study the transcript expression signatures of LAGEs and their co-expressed genes together with LAGE-related signal transduction pathways in BRCA. The result indicated that higher LAGE3 messenger (m)RNA expressions were observed in BRCA tissues than in normal tissues, and they were also associated with the stage of BRCA patients. Kaplan-Meier plots showed that overexpression of LAGE1, LAGE2A, LAGE2B, and LAGE3 were highly correlated to poor survival in most types of breast cancer. Significant associations of LAGE family genes were correlated with the cell cycle, focal adhesion, and extracellular matrix (ECM) receptor interactions as indicated by functional enrichment analyses. Collectively, LAGE family members’ gene expression levels were related to adverse clinicopathological factors and prognoses of BRCA patients; therefore, LAGEs have the potential to serve as prognosticators of BRCA patients.

scholarly journals Integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression profiles identified potential breast cancer-specific diagnostic markers

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinhua Liu ◽  
Yonglin Peng ◽  
Ju Wang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Expressions ◽  
Normal Tissues

Abstract Breast cancer is a common malignant tumor among women whose prognosis is largely determined by the period and accuracy of diagnosis. We here propose to identify a robust DNA methylation-based breast cancer-specific diagnostic signature. Genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression profiles of breast cancer patients along with their adjacent normal tissues from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were obtained as the training set. CpGs that with significantly elevated methylation level in breast cancer than not only their adjacent normal tissues and the other ten common cancers from TCGA but also the healthy breast tissues from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were finally remained for logistic regression analysis. Another independent breast cancer DNA methylation dataset from GEO was used as the testing set. Lots of CpGs were hyper-methylated in breast cancer samples compared with adjacent normal tissues, which tend to be negatively correlated with gene expressions. Eight CpGs located at RIIAD1, ENPP2, ESPN, and ETS1, were finally retained. The diagnostic model was reliable in separating BRCA from normal samples. Besides, chromatin accessibility status of RIIAD1, ENPP2, ESPN and ETS1 showed great differences between MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. In conclusion, the present study should be helpful for breast cancer early and accurate diagnosis.

scholarly journals Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seokhyun Yoon ◽  
Hye Sung Won ◽  
Keunsoo Kang ◽  
Kexin Qiu ◽  
Woong June Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Intrinsic Subtypes ◽  
Receptor Status

AbstractThe cost of next-generation sequencing technologies is rapidly declining, making RNA-seq-based gene expression profiling (GEP) an affordable technique for predicting receptor expression status and intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer (BRCA) patients. Based on the expression levels of co-expressed genes, GEP-based receptor-status prediction can classify clinical subtypes more accurately than can immunohistochemistry (IHC). Using data from the cancer genome atlas TCGA BRCA and METABRIC datasets, we identified common predictor genes found in both datasets and performed receptor-status prediction based on these genes. By assessing the survival outcomes of patients classified using GEP- or IHC-based receptor status, we compared the prognostic value of the two methods. We found that GEP-based HR prediction provided higher concordance with the intrinsic subtypes and a stronger association with treatment outcomes than did IHC-based hormone receptor (HR) status. GEP-based prediction improved the identification of patients who could benefit from hormone therapy, even in patients with non-luminal BRCA. We also confirmed that non-matching subgroup classification affected the survival of BRCA patients and that this could be largely overcome by GEP-based receptor-status prediction. In conclusion, GEP-based prediction provides more reliable classification of HR status, improving therapeutic decision making for breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Differences in gene-expression profiles in breast cancer between African and European-ancestry women

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ping ◽  
Xingyi Guo ◽  
Fei Ye ◽  
Jirong Long ◽  
Loren Lipworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract African American (AA) women have an excess breast cancer mortality than European American (EA) women. To investigate the contribution of tumor biology to this survival health disparity, we compared gene expression profiles in breast tumors using RNA sequencing data derived from 260 AA and 155 EA women who were prospectively enrolled in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) and developed breast cancer during follow-up. We identified 59 genes (54 protein-coding genes and 5 long intergenic non-coding RNAs) that were expressed differently between EA and AA at a stringent false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01. A gene signature was derived with these 59 genes and externally validated using the publicly available Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data from180 AA and 838 EA breast cancer patients. Applying C-statistics, we found that this 59-gene signature has a high discriminative ability in distinguishing AA and EA breast cancer patients in the TCGA dataset (C-index = 0.81). These findings may provide new insight into tumor biological differences and the causes of the survival disparity between AA and EA breast cancer patients.

Co‑expression Network Analysis by WGCNA and Identify Potential Prognostic Markers Associated with Lung Metastasis in Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
xixun zhang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract Backgroud: Breast cancer (BC) is an aggressive cancer with a high percentage recurrence and metastasis. As one of the most common distant metastasis organ in breast cancer, lung metastasis has a worse prognosis than that of liver and bone. Therefore, it’s important to explore some potential prognostic markers associated with the lung metastasis in breast cancer for preventive treatment. Methods: In our study, transcriptomic data and clinical information of breast cancer patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Co-expression modules was built by Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to find out the royalbule modules which is significantly associated with lung metastasis in breast cancer. Then, co-expression genes were analyzed for functional enrichment. Furthermore, the prognostic value of these genes was assessed by GEPIA Database and Kaplan-Meier Plotter. Results: Results showed that the hub genes, LMNB and CDC20, were up-regulated in breast cancer and indicated worse survival. Therefore, we speculate that these two genes play crucial roles in the process of lung metastasis in breast cancer, and can be used as potential prognostic markers in lung metastasis of breast cancer. Conclusion: Collectively, our study identified two potential key genes in the lung metastasis of breast cancer, which might be applied as the prognostic markers of the precise treatment in breast cancer with lung metastasis.

scholarly journals Integrative transcriptome data mining for identification of core lncRNAs in breast cancer

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Zhang ◽  
Jing Zhuang ◽  
Lijuan Liu ◽  
Zhengguo He ◽  
Cun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Data Set

Background Cumulative evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play an important role in tumorigenesis. This study aims to identify lncRNAs that can serve as new biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis or screening. Methods First, the linear fitting method was used to identify differentially expressed genes from the breast cancer RNA expression profiles in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Next, the diagnostic value of all differentially expressed lncRNAs was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Then, the top ten lncRNAs with the highest diagnostic value were selected as core genes for clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis. Furthermore, core lncRNA-mRNA co-expression networks based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were constructed, and functional enrichment analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). The differential expression level and diagnostic value of core lncRNAs were further evaluated by using independent data set from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Finally, the expression status and prognostic value of core lncRNAs in various tumors were analyzed based on Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA). Results Seven core lncRNAs (LINC00478, PGM5-AS1, AL035610.1, MIR143HG, RP11-175K6.1, AC005550.4, and MIR497HG) have good single-factor diagnostic value for breast cancer. AC093850.2 has a prognostic value for breast cancer. AC005550.4 and MIR497HG can better distinguish breast cancer patients in early-stage from the advanced-stage. Low expression of MAGI2-AS3, LINC00478, AL035610.1, MIR143HG, and MIR145 may be associated with lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Conclusion Our study provides candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer, as well as a bioinformatics basis for the further elucidation of the molecular pathological mechanism of breast cancer.

scholarly journals Nomogram Models Based on Gene Expression in Prediction of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng-di Fan ◽  
Di-kai Bei ◽  
Song-wei Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Hub Genes ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Patient Prognosis ◽  
Kaplan Meier Plotter

Abstract Objective: To design a weighted co-expression network and build gene expression signature-based nomogram (GESBN) models for predicting the likelihood of bone metastasis in breast cancer (BC) patients. Methods: Dataset GSE124647 was used as a training set, and GSE14020 was taken as a validation set. In the training cohort, limma package in R was adopted to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BC non-bone metastasis and bone metastasis patients, which were used for functional enrichment analysis. After weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier plotter analyses were performed to screen potential prognosis-related genes. Then, GESBN models were constructed and evaluated. Further, the expression levels of genes in the models were explored in the training set, which was validated in GSE14020. Finally, the prognostic value of hub genes in BC was explored. Results: A total of 1858 DEGs were obtained. WGCNA result showed that the blue module was most significantly related to bone metastasis and prognosis. After survival analyses, GAJ1, SLC24A3, ITGBL1, and SLC44A1 were subjected to construct a GESBN model for overall survival. While GJA1, IGFBP6, MDFI, ITGFBI, ANXA2, and SLC24A3 were subjected to build a GESBN model for progression-free survival. Kaplan-Meier plotter and receiver operating characteristic analyses presented the reliable prediction ability of the models. Besides, GJA1, IGFBP6, ITGBL1, SLC44A1, and TGFBI expressions were significantly different between the two groups in GSE124647 and GSE14020. The hub genes had a significant impact on patient prognosis. Conclusion: Both the four-gene signature and six-gene signature could accurately predict patient prognosis, which may provide novel treatment insights for BC bone metastasis.

scholarly journals Impact of 70-Gene Signature Use on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 2814-2819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Kuijer ◽  
Marieke Straver ◽  
Bianca den Dekker ◽  
Annelotte C.M. van Bommel ◽  
Sjoerd G. Elias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Test Result

Purpose Gene-expression profiles increasingly are used in addition to conventional prognostic factors to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) decisions. The Dutch guideline suggests use of validated gene-expression profiles in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) –positive, early-stage breast cancer without overt lymph node metastases. We aimed to assess the impact of a 70-gene signature (70-GS) test on CT decisions in patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study in patients younger than 70 years old who had undergone surgery for ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, physicians were asked whether they intended to administer adjuvant CT before deployment of the 70-GS test and after the test result was available. Results Between October 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, 660 patients, treated in 33 hospitals, were enrolled. Fifty-one percent of patients had pT1cN0, BRII, HER2-Neu-negative breast cancer. On the basis of conventional clinicopathological characteristics, physicians recommended CT in 270 (41%) of the 660 patients and recommended withholding CT in 107 (16%) of the 660 patients. For the remaining 43% of patients, the physicians were unsure and unable to give advice before 70-GS testing. In patients for whom CT was initially recommended or not recommended, 56% and 59%, respectively, were assigned to a low-risk profile by the 70-GS (κ, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.11). After disclosure of the 70-GS test result, the preliminary advice was changed in 51% of patients who received a recommendation before testing; the definitive CT recommendation of the physician was in line with the 70-GS result in 96% of patients. Conclusion In this prospective, multicenter study in a selection of patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, 70-GS use changed the physician-intended recommendation to administer CT in half of the patients.

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Case Identification Based on Deep Learning and Bioinformatics Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongfang Jia ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Fangfang Chen ◽  
Ningrui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neural Network ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Hub Genes

Mastering the molecular mechanism of breast cancer (BC) can provide an in-depth understanding of BC pathology. This study explored existing technologies for diagnosing BC, such as mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET) and summarized the disadvantages of the existing cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to use gene expression profiles of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to classify BC samples and normal samples. The method proposed in this article triumphs over some of the shortcomings of traditional diagnostic methods and can conduct BC diagnosis more rapidly with high sensitivity and have no radiation. This study first selected the genes most relevant to cancer through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differential expression analysis (DEA). Then it used the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network to screen 23 hub genes. Finally, it used the support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), Bayesian network (BN), artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network CNN-LeNet and CNN-AlexNet to process the expression levels of 23 hub genes. For gene expression profiles, the ANN model has the best performance in the classification of cancer samples. The ten-time average accuracy is 97.36% (±0.34%), the F1 value is 0.8535 (±0.0260), the sensitivity is 98.32% (±0.32%), the specificity is 89.59% (±3.53%) and the AUC is 0.99. In summary, this method effectively classifies cancer samples and normal samples and provides reasonable new ideas for the early diagnosis of cancer in the future.

scholarly journals A six-gene-based signature for breast cancer radiotherapy sensitivity prediction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Chen ◽  
Junjie Zheng ◽  
Min ling Zhuo ◽  
Ailong Zhang ◽  
Zhenhui You
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cancer Genome ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Abstract Background: Breast cancer (BRCA) represents the most common malignancy among women worldwide that with high mortality. Radiotherapy is a prevalent therapeutic for BRCA that with heterogeneous effectiveness among patients. Methods: we proposed to develop a gene expression-based signature for BRCA radiotherapy sensitivity prediction. Gene expression profiles of BRCA samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) were obtained and used as training and independent testing dataset, respectively. Differential expression genes (DEGs) in BRCA tumor samples compared with their paracancerous samples in the training set were identified by using edgeR Bioconductor package followed by dimensionality reduction through autoencoder method and univariate Cox regression analysis to screen genes among DEGs that with significant prognosis significance in patients that were previously treated with radiation. LASSO Cox regression method was applied to screen optimal genes for constructing radiotherapy sensitivity prediction signature. Results: 603 DEGs were obtained in BRCA tumor samples, and seven out of which were retained after univariate cox regression analysis. LASSO Cox regression analysis finally remained six genes based on which the radiotherapy sensitivity prediction model was constructed. The signature was proved to be robust in both training and independent testing sets and an independent marker for BRCA radiotherapy sensitivity prediction. Conclusions: this study should be helpful for BRCA patients’ therapeutics selection and clinical decision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document