scholarly journals The Effect of Lead-Time Weather Forecast Uncertainty on Outage Prediction Modeling

Forecasting ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-516
Author(s):  
Feifei Yang ◽  
Diego Cerrai ◽  
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Experiment ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Environmental Parameters ◽  
Weather Forecast ◽  
Tree Canopy ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Wind Gust ◽  
Forecast Uncertainty ◽  
Prediction Uncertainty

Weather-related power outages affect millions of utility customers every year. Predicting storm outages with lead times of up to five days could help utilities to allocate crews and resources and devise cost-effective restoration plans that meet the strict time and efficiency requirements imposed by regulatory authorities. In this study, we construct a numerical experiment to evaluate how weather parameter uncertainty, based on weather forecasts with one to five days of lead time, propagates into outage prediction error. We apply a machine-learning-based outage prediction model on storm-caused outage events that occurred between 2016 and 2019 in the northeastern United States. The model predictions, fed by weather analysis and other environmental parameters including land cover, tree canopy, vegetation characteristics, and utility infrastructure variables exhibited a mean absolute percentage error of 38%, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.54, and normalized centered root mean square error of 68%. Our numerical experiment demonstrated that uncertainties of precipitation and wind-gust variables play a significant role in the outage prediction uncertainty while sustained wind and temperature parameters play a less important role. We showed that, while the overall weather forecast uncertainty increases gradually with lead time, the corresponding outage prediction uncertainty exhibited a lower dependence on lead times up to 3 days and a stepwise increase in the four- and five-day lead times.

scholarly journals Rapid Cyclogenesis from a Mesoscale Frontal Wave on an Atmospheric River: Impacts on Forecast Skill and Predictability during Atmospheric River Landfall

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1779-1794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Martin ◽  
F. Martin Ralph ◽  
Anna Wilson ◽  
Laurel DeHaan ◽  
Brian Kawzenuk
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Forecast Uncertainty ◽  
Water Vapor Flux ◽  
Vapor Flux ◽  
Frontal Wave ◽  
Atmospheric River

Abstract Mesoscale frontal waves have the potential to modify the hydrometeorological impacts of atmospheric rivers (ARs). The small scale and rapid growth of these waves pose significant forecast challenges. We examined a frontal wave that developed a secondary cyclone during the landfall of an extreme AR in Northern California. We document rapid changes in significant storm features including integrated vapor transport and precipitation and connect these to high forecast uncertainty at 1–4-days’ lead time. We also analyze the skill of the Global Ensemble Forecast System in predicting secondary cyclogenesis and relate secondary cyclogenesis prediction skill to forecasts of AR intensity, AR duration, and upslope water vapor flux in the orographic controlling layer. Leveraging a measure of reference accuracy designed for cyclogenesis, we found forecasts were only able to skillfully predict secondary cyclogenesis for lead times less than 36 h. Forecast skill in predicting the large-scale pressure pattern and integrated vapor transport was lost by 96-h lead time. For lead times longer than 36 h, the failure to predict secondary cyclogenesis led to significant uncertainty in forecast AR intensity and to long bias in AR forecast duration. Failure to forecast a warm front associated with the secondary cyclone at lead times less than 36 h caused large overprediction of upslope water vapor flux, an important indicator of orographic precipitation forcing. This study highlights the need to identify offshore mesoscale frontal waves in real time and to characterize the forecast uncertainty inherent in these events when creating hydrometeorological forecasts.

scholarly journals Tornado Probability of Detection and Lead Time as a Function of Convective Mode and Environmental Parameters

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1261-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerald A. Brotzge ◽  
Steven E. Nelson ◽  
Richard L. Thompson ◽  
Bryan T. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Wind Shear ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Vertical Wind Shear ◽  
Environmental Parameters ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Tornado Warnings ◽  
Supercell Storms

Abstract The ability to provide advanced warning on tornadoes can be impacted by variations in storm mode. This research evaluates 2 yr of National Weather Service (NWS) tornado warnings, verification reports, and radar-derived convective modes to appraise the ability of the NWS to warn across a variety of convective modes and environmental conditions. Several specific hypotheses are considered: (i) supercell morphologies are the easiest convective modes to warn for tornadoes and yield the greatest lead times, while tornadoes from more linear, nonsupercell convective modes, such as quasi-linear convective systems, are more difficult to warn for; (ii) parameters such as tornado distance from radar, population density, and tornado intensity (F scale) introduce significant and complex variability into warning statistics as a function of storm mode; and (iii) tornadoes from stronger storms, as measured by their mesocyclone strength (when present), convective available potential energy (CAPE), vertical wind shear, and significant tornado parameter (STP) are easier to warn for than tornadoes from weaker systems. Results confirmed these hypotheses. Supercell morphologies caused 97% of tornado fatalities, 96% of injuries, and 92% of damage during the study period. Tornado warnings for supercells had a statistically higher probability of detection (POD) and lead time than tornado warnings for nonsupercells; among supercell storms, tornadoes from supercells in lines were slightly more difficult to warn for than tornadoes from discrete or clusters of supercells. F-scale intensity and distance from radar had some impact on POD, with less impact on lead times. Higher mesocyclone strength (when applicable), CAPE, wind shear, and STP values were associated with greater tornado POD and lead times.

scholarly journals A Spatiotemporal Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Network for Mean Wave Period Field Forecasting

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Ting Yu ◽  
Jichao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Wave Period ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Data Driven Approach ◽  
Mean Wave Period ◽  
Scattering Index ◽  
Gated Recurrent Unit ◽  
Methods Numerical

Mean wave period (MWP) is one of the key parameters affecting the design of marine facilities. Currently, there are two main methods, numerical and data-driven methods, for forecasting wave parameters, of which the latter are widely used. However, few studies have focused on MWP forecasting, and even fewer have investigated it with spatial and temporal information. In this study, correlations between ocean dynamic parameters are explored to obtain appropriate input features, significant wave height (SWH) and MWP. Subsequently, a data-driven approach, the convolution gated recurrent unit (Conv-GRU) model with spatiotemporal characteristics, is utilized to field forecast MWP with 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-h lead times in the South China Sea. Six points at different locations and six consecutive moments at every 12-h intervals are selected to study the forecasting ability of the proposed model. The Conv-GRU model has a better performance than the single gated recurrent unit (GRU) model in terms of root mean square error (RMSE), the scattering index (SI), Bias, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R). With the lead time increasing, the forecast effect shows a decreasing trend, specifically, the experiment displays a relatively smooth forecast curve and presents a great advantage in the short-term forecast of the MWP field in the Conv-GRU model, where the RMSE is 0.121 m for 1-h lead time.

scholarly journals A Preliminary Look at the Social Perspective of Warn-on-Forecast: Preferred Tornado Warning Lead Time and the General Public’s Perceptions of Weather Risks

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hoekstra ◽  
K. Klockow ◽  
R. Riley ◽  
J. Brotzge ◽  
H. Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Stated Preference ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public Understanding ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Present System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Tornado Warnings ◽  
Tornado Warning ◽  
Weather Risks

Abstract Tornado warnings are currently issued an average of 13 min in advance of a tornado and are based on a warn-on-detection paradigm. However, computer model improvements may allow for a new warning paradigm, warn-on-forecast, to be established in the future. This would mean that tornado warnings could be issued one to two hours in advance, prior to storm initiation. In anticipation of the technological innovation, this study inquires whether the warn-on-forecast paradigm for tornado warnings may be preferred by the public (i.e., individuals and households). The authors sample is drawn from visitors to the National Weather Center in Norman, Oklahoma. During the summer and fall of 2009, surveys were distributed to 320 participants to assess their understanding and perception of weather risks and preferred tornado warning lead time. Responses were analyzed according to several different parameters including age, region of residency, educational level, number of children, and prior tornado experience. A majority of the respondents answered many of the weather risk questions correctly. They seemed to be familiar with tornado seasons; however, they were unaware of the relative number of fatalities caused by tornadoes and several additional weather phenomena each year in the United States. The preferred lead time was 34.3 min according to average survey responses. This suggests that while the general public may currently prefer a longer average lead time than the present system offers, the preference does not extend to the 1–2-h time frame theoretically offered by the warn-on-forecast system. When asked what they would do if given a 1-h lead time, respondents reported that taking shelter was a lesser priority than when given a 15-min lead time, and fleeing the area became a slightly more popular alternative. A majority of respondents also reported the situation would feel less life threatening if given a 1-h lead time. These results suggest that how the public responds to longer lead times may be complex and situationally dependent, and further study must be conducted to ascertain the users for whom the longer lead times would carry the most value. These results form the basis of an informative stated-preference approach to predicting public response to long (>1 h) warning lead times, using public understanding of the risks posed by severe weather events to contextualize lead-time demand.

scholarly journals Tornado Warnings, Lead Times, and Tornado Casualties: An Empirical Investigation

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Simmons ◽  
Daniel Sutter
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Conventional Wisdom ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Consistent Effect ◽  
Tornado Warnings ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Conventional wisdom holds that improved tornado warnings will reduce tornado casualties, because longer lead times on warnings provide extra opportunities to alert residents who can then take precautions. The relationship between warnings and casualties is examined using a dataset of tornadoes in the contiguous United States between 1986 and 2002. Two questions are examined: Does a warning issued on a tornado reduce the resulting number of fatalities and injuries? Do longer lead times reduce casualties? It is found that warnings have had a significant and consistent effect on tornado injuries, with a reduction of over 40% at some lead time intervals. The results for fatalities are mixed. An increase in lead time up to about 15 min reduces fatalities, while lead times longer than 15 min increase fatalities compared with no warning. The fatality results beyond 15 min, however, depend on five killer tornadoes and consequently are not robust.

HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT FORECASTS USING MARKOV CHAINS AND REGRESSION MODELS (A CASE STUDY FOR NORTHWEST OF ALGERIA)

2021 ◽  
pp. 90-103
Author(s):  
A. RAHMOUNI ◽  
◽  
M. MEDDI ◽  
A. HAMOUDI SAAED ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Robust Regression ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Hydrological Drought ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Chain Process ◽  
Markov Switching Model ◽  
North West ◽  
Switching Model ◽  
The North

An effective drought forecast is an important measure to mitigate some of its most damaging impacts. In this study we compare the effectiveness of two models: Markov Switching Model (MSM) and Robust Regression Model (RRM) with three different approaches to forecast hydrological drought events in the north-west of Algeria using Standardized Runoff Index (SRI). The validation of these models is carried out by hydro-climatic series of 41 stations for the period of 1968-2009. The values of SRI 3, SRI 6, and SRI 12 have been forecasted over lead times of 1 and 6 months. The performance of forecast results is measured using R2 and RMSE. For the lead time of 1 month, the results are quite similar for both models with slight superiority for the Markov chain process. The addition of the SPI or RDI indices as independent variables improves this performance for some stations while it decreases accuracy for other stations. However, forecast accuracy declines significantly as the lead time increases to 6 months particularly for regression results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document