scholarly journals Ciclesonide Inhaler Treatment for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3545
Author(s):  
Joon-Young Song ◽  
Jin-Gu Yoon ◽  
Yu-Bin Seo ◽  
Jacob Lee ◽  
Joong-Sik Eom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Antiviral Agents ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Viral Shedding ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

Although some intravenous drugs have been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no effective antiviral agents are currently available in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of 14-day ciclesonide treatment vs. standard care for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. A randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial of ciclesonide inhalers was conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Patients were enrolled within 3 days of diagnosis or within 7 days from symptom onset and randomly assigned to receive either ciclesonide (320 µg inhalation twice per day for 14 days) or standard care. The primary endpoint was the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) eradication rate on day 14 from study enrollment. Clinical status was assessed once daily, and serial nasopharyngeal viral load was evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. There were 35 and 26 patients in the ciclesonide and standard care groups, respectively. The SARS-CoV-2 eradication rate at day 14 was significantly higher in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion within 14 days was 12 times more likely in the ciclesonide group (95% confidence interval, 1.187–125.240). Additionally, the clinical failure rate (high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation) was significantly lower in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.034). In conclusion, ciclesonide inhalation shortened SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding duration, and it may inhibit the progression to acute respiratory failure in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04330586.

scholarly journals Zytux in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter, Open-Labeled, Clinical Trial Study of Effectiveness and Safety of a Rituximab Biosimilar

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzad Fatehi ◽  
Kamyar Moradi ◽  
Ali Asghar Okhovat ◽  
Ghazaleh Shojatalab ◽  
Behnaz Sedighi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Myasthenia Gravis ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorder ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Prednisolone Dose ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Post Infusion

Objectives: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune-mediated neuromuscular disorder responsive to immunomodulatory treatments. 10–20% of MGs are not responsive to conventional first-line therapies. Here, we sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in the treatment of patients with refractory MG.Methods: In a 48-week, multicenter, open-labeled, prospective cohort setting, 34 participants with refractory MG were assigned to receive infusions of Zytux, which is a rituximab biosimilar, according to a validated protocol. Clinical, functional, and quality of life (QoL) measurements were recorded at baseline, and seven further visits using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC), Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living profile (MG-ADL), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL-15) scales. Besides, the post-infusion side effects were systematically assessed throughout the study.Results: The correlation analysis performed by generalized estimating equations analysis represented a significant reduction of MGC, MG-ADL, and MGQoL-15 scores across the trial period. The subgroup analysis based on the patients' clinical status indicated a significant effect for the interaction between time and MGFA subtypes on MG-ADL score, MGC score, and pyridostigmine prednisolone dose, reflecting that the worse clinical condition was associated with a better response to rituximab. Finally, no serious adverse event was documented.Conclusions: Rituximab therapy could improve clinical, functional, and QoL in patients with refractory MG in a safe setting. Further investigations with larger sample size and a more extended follow-up period are warranted to confirm this finding.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (Code No: IRCT20150303021315N18).

A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of low-dose selinexor and lenalidomide (Len) versus len maintenance post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): ALLG MM23, Sealand.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8055-TPS8055
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Masa Lasica ◽  
David Routledge ◽  
Anna Kalff ◽  
Andrew Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
National Cooperative

TPS8055 Background: Len maintenance post ASCT is standard of care for patients (pts) with NDMM. Deep responses (CR or better) post ASCT correlates with better progression free survival (PFS). In a meta-analysis of len maintenance post ASCT (McCarthy PL et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017), only 10.7% of pts achieve CR post ASCT, and 72% of pts who discontinued len maintenance did so because of progressive disease (PD). Selinexor is a selective inhibitor of nuclear export that blocks exportin 1, thus retaining tumour suppressor proteins within the nucleus while blocking proto-oncoprotein translation. It is approved in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (dex) for pts with MM who have had at least 1 prior line of treatment, or with dex for pts with penta-refractory MM by the FDA. The oral bioavailability and weekly schedule of selinexor makes it suitable in combination with len for maintenance therapy. Given the encouraging activity (ORR 92%) and tolerability of selinexor, len and dex from the phase 1b/2 STOMP study, we hypothesise that combination low-dose selinexor and len (XR) will be well tolerated and effective, increasing CR and MRD negativity rate post ASCT, thus prolonging PFS compared to len. Methods: ALLG MM23 SeaLAND, is an ongoing randomised, multi-centre, phase 3 trial. Eligible pts ( > 17 years of age) have measurable disease, have undergone 3-6 cycles (C) of induction containing a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and/or immunomodulatory drug and recovered post melphalan-conditioned ASCT with adequate haematopoiesis, renal and liver function, and with ECOG performance status. Registration occurs prior to ASCT with screening between 75 to 115 days post ASCT. The study includes a lead-in safety phase of 20 patients with XR: Len 10mg daily days 1 to 21 and Selinexor 40mg weekly in a 28-day cycle. If well tolerated, Selinexor escalates to 60mg po weekly from C2 and Len to 15mg po daily from C4. Two safety reviews will occur after the 10th and 20th patients completes C2, respectively. Upon meeting safety criteria, a sample size of 290 pts will be randomised 1:1 to XR or lenalidomide (R). Therapy will continue until PD. The primary endpoint is PFS at 3 years post randomisation. Secondary endpoints include ORR and MRD-negativity rate (International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria), PFS on next treatment line (PFS2), OS, safety and tolerability, quality of life, and cost effectiveness. Main analysis occurs after 232 patients complete 3-years of follow-up. Exploratory objective is to correlate immunological and molecular profiles to treatment response and resistance. ALLG MM23 SeaLAND is a multisite bi-national investigator-initiated trial lead by Australia and New Zealand’s national cooperative group, the Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group. Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12620000291987p. Clinical trial information: 12620000291987.

scholarly journals Protocol for the DisCoVeRy trial: multicentre, adaptive, randomised trial of the safety and efficacy of treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e041437
Author(s):  
Florence Ader
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Antiviral Agents ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
National Agency ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hospitalised Patients

IntroductionTo find effective and safe treatments for COVID-19, the WHO recommended to systemically evaluate experimental therapeutics in collaborative randomised clinical trials. As COVID-19 was spreading in Europe, the French national institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm) established a transdisciplinary team to develop a multi-arm randomised controlled trial named DisCoVeRy. The objective of the trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different investigational re-purposed therapeutics relative to Standard of Care (SoC) in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.Methods and analysisDisCoVeRy is a phase III, open-label, adaptive, controlled, multicentre clinical trial in which hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in need of oxygen therapy are randomised between five arms: (1) a control group managed with SoC and four therapeutic arms with re-purposed antiviral agents: (2) remdesivir + SoC, (3) lopinavir/ritonavir + SoC, (4) lopinavir/ritonavir associated with interferon (IFN)-β−1a + SoC and (5) hydroxychloroquine + SoC. The primary endpoint is the clinical status at Day 15 on the 7-point ordinal scale of the WHO Master Protocol (V.3.0, 3 March 2020). This trial involves patients hospitalised in conventional departments or intensive care units both from academic or non-academic hospitals throughout Europe. A sample size of 3100 patients (620 patients per arm) is targeted. This trial has begun on 22 March 2020. Since 5 April 2020, DisCoVeRy has been an add-on trial of the Solidarity consortium of trials conducted by the WHO in Europe and worldwide. On 8 June 2020, 754 patients have been included.Ethics and disseminationInserm is the sponsor of DisCoVeRy. Ethical approval has been obtained from the institutional review board on 13 March 2020 (20.03.06.51744) and from the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) on 9 March 2020. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT04315948 Eudra-CT 2020-000936-23.

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of a Conditionally Replication-Defective Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine in CMV-Seronegative Subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart P Adler ◽  
Nicole Lewis ◽  
Anthony Conlon ◽  
Mark P Christiansen ◽  
Mohamed Al-Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Injection Site ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Viral Shedding

Abstract Background A conditionally replication-defective human cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine (V160) derived from AD169 and genetically engineered to express CMV pentameric complex (gH/gL/pUL128/pUL130/pUL131) was developed and evaluated for phase 1 vaccine safety and immunogenicity in CMV-seronegative and CMV-seropositive adults. Methods Subjects received 3 doses of V160 or placebo on day 1, month 1, and month 6. Four vaccine dose levels, formulated with or without aluminum phosphate adjuvant, were evaluated. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) and vaccine viral shedding were monitored. CMV-specific cellular and humoral responses were measured by interferon-gamma ELISPOT and virus neutralization assay up to 12 months after last dose. Results V160 was generally well-tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. Transient, mild-to-moderate injection-site and systemic AEs were reported more frequently in vaccinated subjects than placebo. Vaccine viral shedding was not detected in any subject, confirming the nonreplicating feature of V160. Robust neutralizing antibody titers were elicited and maintained through 12 months postvaccination. Cellular responses to structural and nonstructural viral proteins were observed, indicating de novo expression of viral genes postvaccination. Conclusions V160 displayed an acceptable safety profile. Levels of neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses in CMV-seronegative subjects were within ranges observed following natural CMV infection. Clinical Trial Registration . NCT01986010.

scholarly journals A Phase III open-label trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of CPI-613 plus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) versus FOLFIRINOX (FFX) in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (28) ◽  
pp. 3189-3196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A Philip ◽  
Marc E Buyse ◽  
Angela T Alistar ◽  
Caio MSPR Lima ◽  
Sanjeev Luther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Entry Points ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Pancreas

Devimistat (CPI-613®) is a novel lipoate analog that inhibits the tricarboxcylic acid cycle at two key carbon entry points. Through its inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase and a-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complexes, devimistat inhibits the entry of glucose and glutamine derived carbons, respectively. Pancreatic cancer is dependent on mitochondrial function for enhanced survival and aggressiveness. In a Phase I study of modified FOLFIRINOX, in combination with devimistat for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, there was a 61% objective response rate including a 17% complete response rate. This report outlines the rationale and design of the AVENGER 500 study, a Phase III clinical trial of devimistat in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX compared with FOLFIRINOX alone for patients with previously untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Clinical trial registration: NCT03504423

scholarly journals Clinical and immunological benefits of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19: insights from a single center open label randomised control trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogiraj Ray ◽  
Shekhar Ranjan Paul ◽  
Purbita Bandopadhyay ◽  
Ranit D’Rozario ◽  
Jafar Sarif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Passive Immunization ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Plasma Therapy ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Clinical Benefits

AbstractIntroductionA single center open label phase II randomised control trial was done to assess the pathogen and host-intrinsic factors influencing clinical and immunological benefits of passive immunization using convalescent plasma therapy (CPT), in addition to standard of care (SOC) therapy in severe COVID-19 patients, as compared to patients only on SOC therapy.MethodsConvalescent plasma was collected from patients recovered from COVID-19 following a screening protocol which also included measuring plasma anti SARS-CoV2 spike IgG content. Retrospectively, neutralizing antibody content was measured and proteome was characterized by LC-MS/MS for all convalescent plasma units that were transfused to patients. Severe COVID-19 patients with evidence for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with PaO2/FiO2 ratio 100-300 (moderate ARDS) were recruited and randomised into two parallel arms of SOC and CPT, N=40 in each arm. Peripheral blood samples were collected on the day of enrolment (T1) followed by day3/4 (T2) and day 7 (T3). RT-PCR and sequencing was done for SARS-CoV2 RNA isolated from nasopharyngeal swabs collected at T1. A panel of cytokines and neutralizing antibody content were measured in plasma at all three timepoints. Patients were followed up for 30 days post-admission to assess the primary outcomes of all cause mortality and immunological correlates for clinical benefits.ResultsWhile across all age-groups no statistically significant clinical benefit was registered for patients in the CPT arm, significant immediate mitigation of hypoxia, reduction in hospital stay as well as survival benefit was recorded in severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS aged less than 67 years receiving convalescent plasma therapy. In addition to its neutralizing antibody content a prominent effect of convalescent plasma on attenuation of systemic cytokine levels possibly contributed to its benefits.ConclusionPrecise targeting of severe COVID-19 patients is necessary for reaping the clinical benefits of convalescent plasma therapy.Clinical trial registrationClinical Trial Registry of India No. CTRI/2020/05/025209

scholarly journals First-in-human Phase 1 open label study of the BET inhibitor ODM-207 in patients with selected solid tumours

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (12) ◽  
pp. 1730-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malaka Ameratunga ◽  
Irene Braña ◽  
Petri Bono ◽  
Sophie Postel-Vinay ◽  
Ruth Plummer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Bet Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract Background Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) proteins are reported to be epigenetic anti-cancer drug targets. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumour activity of the BET inhibitor ODM-207 in patients with selected solid tumours. Methods This was an open-label Phase 1 study comprised of a dose escalation part, and evaluation of the effect of food on pharmacokinetics. ODM-207 was administered orally once daily. The dose escalation part was initiated with a dose titration in the initial cohort, followed by a 3 + 3 design. Results Thirty-five patients were treated with ODM-207, of whom 12 (34%) had castrate-resistant prostate cancer. One dose-limiting toxicity of intolerable fatigue was observed. The highest studied dose achieved was 2 mg/kg due to cumulative toxicity observed beyond the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) treatment window. Common AEs included thrombocytopenia, asthenia, nausea, anorexia, diarrhoea, fatigue, and vomiting. Platelet count decreased proportionally to exposure with rapid recovery upon treatment discontinuation. No partial or complete responses were observed. Conclusions ODM-207 shows increasing exposure in dose escalation and was safe at doses up to 2 mg/kg but had a narrow therapeutic window. Clinical trial registration The clinical trial registration number is NCT03035591.

Phase II multicenter, single arm, open label study of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with ipilimumab (IPI) as first line in adult patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM): GEM1402 NCT02626962.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9533-9533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep M. Piulats ◽  
Luis De La Cruz-Merino ◽  
Maria Teresa Curiel Garcia ◽  
Alfonso Berrocal ◽  
Lorenzo Alonso-Carrión ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Acute Thyroiditis

9533 Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Overall Survival (OS) at 5 years(y) is 62% due high incidence of liver metastasis, fatal within 4-9 months(m) from diagnosis. No standard treatment exists for MUM. NIVO+IPI combination has shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, MUM pts were excluded in these trials. Methods: GEM1402 is a phase-2 trial evaluating NIVO+IPI in untreated adult pts with MUM; is being conducted in 10 centers in Spain, leading by the Spanish Melanoma Group. Eligible pts had histologically-confirmed MUM, ECOG-PS 0/1, and no prior systemic treatment for MUM. Treatment consisted in NIVO (1mg/kg, iv, q3 weeks [wk]) and 4 doses of IPI (3mg/kg iv q3wk) followed by NIVO (3mg/kg q2wk) until progressive disease (PD), toxicity or withdrawal. Primary endpoint is OS and secondary progression free survival (PFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR) (per RECIST 1.1) and safety. Radiologic evaluations q6wk. Interim analysis (n = 19) was planned per protocol to assess safety and ORR. Intention to treat analysis includes pts with PD at first radiological evaluation. Safety population includes all pts receiving at least one dose of study treatment. Results:19 pts enrolled from April to July 2016: Median age 62y (43y-82y), 63% male, liver M1 84% pts and extra-liver M1 42% pts, 31% elevated baseline LDH. 11 pts completed cycle 2 and 8 pts stopped after 1 dose (6 PD, 2 toxicity). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 12 pts and lead to end of treatment in 2 pts. Grade ≥3 toxicities were seen in 7 pts (36.8%): diarrhea, transaminitis, dermatological events, anemia, acute thyroiditis. All G3/4 were resolved following the toxicity guideline. One G5 acute thyroiditis related to NIVO+IPI was reported. ORR was observed in 15.8% and disease stabilization in 47.4%. With a median follow-up of 4.6m, PFS was 4.99m. Median OS was not reached at time of this analysis. Conclusions: Combination of NIVO+IPI is feasible for MUM. In this INTERIM ANALYSIS, ORR did not reach yet 20%, but PFS seems promising. The clinical trial is ongoing. Final results will be updated. Clinical trial information: 2015-004429-15.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document