Handover of Critical Patients in Urgent Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review of Validated Assessment Tools

The emergency handover of critical patients is used to describe the moment when responsibility for the care of a patient is transferred from one critical patient care healthcare team to another, requiring the accurate delivery of information. However, the literature provides few validated assessment tools for the transfer of critical patients in urgent care and emergency settings. To identify the available evaluation tools that assess the handover of critical patients in urgent and emergency care settings in addition to evaluations of their psychometric properties, a systematic review was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, Web of Science (WoS), and PsycINFO, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the studies was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. Finally, eight articles were identified, of which only three included validated tools for evaluating the handover of critical patients in emergency care. Content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency were the most studied psychometric properties. Three studies evaluated error and reliability, criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity. None of them considered cross-cultural adaptation or the translation process. This systematic psychometric review shows the existing ambiguities in the handover of critically ill patients and the scarcity of validated evaluation tools. For all of these reasons, we consider it necessary to further investigate urgent care and emergency handover settings through the design and validation of an assessment tool.

Download Full-text

Assessment tools for the measurement of the self-efficacy of drug users: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019019 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. e019019

Author(s):

Selene Cordeiro Vasconcelos ◽

Iracema da Silva Frazão ◽

Everton Botelho Sougey ◽

Sandra Lopes de Souza ◽

Tatiana de Paula Santana da Silva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Self Efficacy ◽

Drug Users ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

The Self ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Evaluation Approach ◽

Cosmin Checklist

IntroductionThe abuse of alcohol and other drugs is a worldwide problem, the treatment of which poses a challenge to healthcare workers.ObjectiveThis study presents a proposal for a systematic review to analyse the psychometric properties of assessment tools developed to measure the self-efficacy of drug users with regard to resisting the urge to take drugs in high-risk situations.Methods and AnalysisThe guiding question was based on PICOS (Population Intervention Comparator Outcome Setting), and the report of the methods of review protocol was written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Searches will be performed in the PsycINFO, Cochrane, Pubmed, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases, followed by the use of the ‘snowball’ strategy. The inclusion criteria for the articles will be (1) assessment tool validation studies; (2) assessment tools developed to measure self-efficacy; (3) quantitative measures; (4) measures designed for use on adults; (5) data from self-reports of the participants; (6) studies involving a description of psychometric properties of the measures; and (7) studies that explain how the level of self-efficacy is scored. The search, selection and analysis will be performed by two independent reviewers. In cases of a divergence of opinion, a third reviewer will be consulted. The COSMIN checklist will be used for the appraisal of the methodological quality of the assessment tools and the certainty of the evidence in the articles (risk of bias) will be analysed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol does not require ethical approval. However, this protocol is part of the thesis entitledDrug-Taking Confidence Questionnairefor use in Brazil, presented for obtaining a doctorate in neuropsychiatry and behavioural sciences from the Federal University of Pernambuco, and has received approval from the human research ethics committee of the Federal University of Pernambuco (reference number: 1.179.162).The results will be disseminated to clinicians and researchers through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017068555.

Download Full-text

Assessing food and nutrition literacy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of existing tools

Public Health Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s1368980021004389 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-16

Author(s):

Nicholas Carroll ◽

Maude Perreault ◽

David WL Ma ◽

Jess Haines

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Children And Adolescents ◽

Eating Habits ◽

Life Stage ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Food Label ◽

Specific Criterion ◽

Food Literacy ◽

Cosmin Checklist

Abstract Objective: Food literacy (FL) and nutrition literacy (NL) are concepts that can help individuals to navigate the current food environment. Building these skills and knowledge at a young age is important for skill retention, confidence in food practices and supporting lifelong healthy eating habits. The objectives of this systematic review were to: (i) identify existing tools that measure FL and NL among children and/or adolescents and (ii) describe the psychometric properties. Design: A 4-phase protocol was used to systematically retrieve articles. The search was performed in May 2021. Study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted, and a narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. Risk of bias was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. Setting: Six databases were searched to identify current tools. Participants: Children (2–12 years) and adolescents (13–18 years) participated in this study. Results: Twelve tools were identified. Three tools measured FL, 1 tool measured NL, 4 tools measured both FL and NL, and 4 tools measured subareas of NL—more specifically, critical NL, food label and menu board literacy. Most tools were self-reported, developed based on a theoretical framework and assessed some components of validity and/or reliability for a specific age and ethnic group. The majority of tools targeted older children and adolescents (9–18 years of age), and one tool targeted preschoolers (3–6 years of age). Conclusions: Most widely used definitions of FL and NL do not acknowledge life-stage specific criterion. Continued efforts are needed to develop a comprehensive definition and framework of FL and NL appropriate for children, which will help inform future assessment tools.

Download Full-text

School health assessment tools: a systematic review of measurement in primary schools

PeerJ ◽

10.7717/peerj.9459 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. e9459

Author(s):

Maryam Kazemitabar ◽

Ali Moghadamzadeh ◽

Mojtaba Habibi ◽

Rezvan Hakimzadeh ◽

Danilo Garcia

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Primary Schools ◽

School Health ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Measurement Properties ◽

Cosmin Checklist

Background This systematic review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the school health’s assessment tools in primary schools through COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. We examined the studies that have addressed the measurement properties of school-health instruments to give a clear overview of the quality of all available tools measuring school health in primary schools. This systematic review was registered in PROPERO with the Registration ID: CRD42020158158. Method Databases of EBSCOhost, PubMed, ProQuest, Wily, PROSPERO, and OpenGrey were systematically searched without any time limitation to find all full-text English journal articles studied at least one of the COSMIN checklist measurement properties of a school-health assessment tool in primary schools. The instruments should be constructed based on a school health model. The eligible studies were assessed by COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist to report their quality of methodology for each measurement property and for the whole study by rating high, moderate or low quality. Results At the final screening just seven studies remained for review. Four studies were tool development, three of them were rated as “adequate” and the other study as “very good”; five studies examined the content validity, three of them were appraised as “very good”, and the two remaining as “inadequate”. All seven studies measured structural validity, three of them were evaluated as “very good”, three other were scored as “adequate”, and the last study as “inadequate”. All the seven studies investigated the internal consistency, five of them were assessed as “very good”, one was rated as “doubtful”, and the last one as “inadequate”. Just one study examined the cross-cultural validity and was rated as “adequate”. Finally, all seven studies measured reliability, two of them were rated as “very good” and the rest five studies were appraised as “doubtful”. All rating was based on COSMIN checklist criteria for quality of measurement properties assessment. Conclusion The number of studies addressing school health assessment tools was very low and therefore not sufficient. Hence, there is a serious need to investigate the psychometric properties of the available instruments measuring school health at primary schools. Moreover, the studies included in the present systematic review did not fulfill all the criteria of the COSMIN checklist for assessing measurement properties. We suggest that future studies consider these criteria for measuring psychometric properties and developing school health assessment tools.

Download Full-text

459 - Psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory : A systematic review

International Psychogeriatrics ◽

10.1017/s1041610220003117 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 32 (S1) ◽

pp. 180-180

Author(s):

Philippe Landreville ◽

Alexandra Champagne ◽

Patrick Gosselin

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Methodological Quality ◽

The Body ◽

Self Report ◽

Test Reliability ◽

Cosmin Checklist ◽

Validity Indices

Background.The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) is a widely used self-report measure of anxiety symptoms in older adults. Much research has been conducted on the psychometric properties of the GAI in various populations and using different language versions. Previous reviews of this literature have examined only a small proportion of studies in light of the body of research currently available and have not evaluated the methodological quality of this research. We conducted a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the GAI.Method.Relevant studies (N = 30) were retrieved through a search of electronic databases (Pubmed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar) and a hand search. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent reviewers using the ‘‘COnsensusbased Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments’’ (COSMIN) checklist.Results.Based on the COSMIN checklist, internal consistency and test reliability were mostly rated as poorly assessed (62.1% and 70% of studies, respectively) and quality of studies examining structural validity was mostly fair (60% of studies). The GAI showed adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Convergent validity indices were highest with measures of generalized anxiety and lowest with instruments that include somatic symptoms. A substantial overlap with measures of depression was reported. While there was no consensus on the factorial structure of the GAI, several studies found it to be unidimensional.Conclusions.The GAI presents satisfactory psychometric properties. However, future efforts should aim to achieve a higher degree of methodological quality.

Download Full-text

Complications following volar locking plate fixation for distal radial fractures: a systematic review

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) ◽

10.1177/1753193413511936 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 39 (7) ◽

pp. 745-754 ◽

Cited By ~ 46

Author(s):

A. Bentohami ◽

K. de Burlet ◽

N. de Korte ◽

M. P. J. van den Bekerom ◽

J. C. Goslings ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Quality Assessment ◽

Locking Plate ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Plate Fixation ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Volar Locking Plate ◽

Locking Plate Fixation ◽

Distal Radial Fractures ◽

Level Of Evidence

The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the prevalence of complications following volar locking plate fixation of distal radial fractures. A computer-based search was carried out using EMBASE and PUBMED/MEDLINE. Only prospective comparative and prospective cohort studies that presented data concerning complications after treatment of distal radial fractures with a volar locking plate in human adults with a minimal follow-up of 6 months were included. Two quality assessment tools were used to assess the methodological quality of the studies (level of evidence rating according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence Based Medicine and the modified version of the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group’s former quality assessment tool). Thirty three studies were eligible for final assessment. Most complications were problems with nerve and tendon function as well as complex regional pain syndrome. With an overall complication rate of 16.5%, most of which were ‘minor’ complications and low rates of nonunion and malunion, volar locking plate fixation can be considered a reasonably safe treatment option for patients with distal radial fractures.

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties and feasibility of use of dementia specific quality of life instruments for use in care settings: a systematic review

International Psychogeriatrics ◽

10.1017/s1041610218002259 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 1-15 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Laura J. Hughes ◽

Nicolas Farina ◽

Thomas E. Page ◽

Naji Tabet ◽

Sube Banerjee

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Care Home ◽

Care Homes ◽

Cosmin Checklist ◽

Many Instruments ◽

The Uk ◽

Quality Instruments

ABSTRACTBackground:Over 400,000 people live in care home settings in the UK. One way of understanding and improving the quality of care provided is by measuring and understanding the quality of life (QoL) of those living in care homes. This review aimed to identify and examine the psychometric properties including feasibility of use of dementia-specific QoL measures developed or validated for use in care settings.Design:Systematic review.Methods:Instruments were identified using four electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL) and lateral search techniques. Searches were conducted in January 2017. Studies which reported on the development and/or validation of dementia specific QoL instruments for use in care settings written in English were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. Feasibility was assessed using a checklist developed specifically for the review.Results:Six hundred and sixteen articles were identified in the initial search. After de-duplication, screening and further lateral searches were performed, 25 studies reporting on 9 dementia-specific QoL instruments for use in care home settings were included in the review. Limited evidence was available on the psychometric properties of many instruments identified. Higher-quality instruments were not easily accessible or had low feasibility of use.Conclusions:Few high-quality instruments of QoL validated for use in care home settings are readily or freely available. This review highlights the need to develop a well-validated measure of QoL for use within care homes that is also feasible and accessible.

Download Full-text

Emergency care education in South Africa and the unique requirement of physical preparedness: A scoping review

Australasian Journal of Paramedicine ◽

10.33151/ajp.18.878 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 ◽

Author(s):

Dagmar Muhlbauer ◽

Craig Vincent-Lambert ◽

Yoga Coopoo

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Emergency Care ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Current Knowledge ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Knowledge Gap ◽

Care Education ◽

Narrative Literature Review ◽

Task Oriented

Introduction The Bachelor Degree in Emergency Medical Care (BEMC) is a unique program in that students operate in both emergency care and rescue contexts, unlike international paramedic degree programs which focus only on emergency care. The learning activities associated with the rescue content are physically strenuous and therefore BEMC students need to be physically and mentally prepared to engage in diverse austere environments. Although South African BEMC programs have a common medical rescue curriculum, approaches to the training and assessment of physical preparedness vary between the institutions. The objective of this research was to explore the knowledge gap through the review of literature that describes the unique physical preparedness requirements in the field of emergency care education. Methods We conducted a scoping review in the form of a narrative literature review. Results Seventy-five (n) articles were initially identified, however, only four were relevant to the objective of this study. This highlighted the paucity of literature describing the unique physical fitness requirements of the BEMC program and the current challenges experienced by educators in the field. Conclusion While physical preparedness training exists in higher education institutes and there are assessments conducted at these higher education institutes, none of these assessment tools have yet been scientifically validated which creates a challenge for educators. The current knowledge gap within EMC education is therefore the absence of a scientifically validated task-oriented physical preparedness assessment tool which addresses the desired physical attributes and abilities of EMC students linked to the BEMC curriculum and associated learning experiences.

Download Full-text

Development of performance indicators for systems of urgent and emergency care in the Republic of Ireland. Update of a systematic review and consensus development exercise

HRB Open Research ◽

10.12688/hrbopenres.12805.2 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 ◽

pp. 6 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Siobhan Boyle ◽

Rebecca Dennehy ◽

Orla Healy ◽

John Browne

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Emergency Care ◽

Performance Indicators ◽

Online Survey ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Nominal Group ◽

Consensus Development ◽

Republic Of Ireland ◽

Care Systems ◽

The Republic

Objectives: To develop a set of performance indicators to monitor the performance of emergency and urgent care systems in the Republic of Ireland. Design: This study comprised of an update of a previously performed systematic review and a formal consensus development exercise. The literature search was conducted in PubMed and covered the period 2008 to 2014. The results of the review were used to inform a consensus group of 17 national experts on urgent and emergency care in Ireland. The consensus development exercise comprised an online survey followed by a face-to-face nominal group technique meeting. During this meeting participants had the opportunity to revise their preferences for different indicators after listening to the views of other group members. A final online survey was then used to confirm the preferences of participants. Results: Initial literature searches yielded 2339 article titles. After further searches, sixty items were identified for full-text review. Following this review, fifty-seven were excluded. Three articles were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. These papers produced 42 unique indicators for consideration during the consensus development exercise. In total, 17 indicators had a median of greater than 7 following the meeting and met our pre-specified criterion for acceptable consensus. Discussion: Using this systematic review and nominal group consensus development exercise, we have identified a set of 17 indicators, which a consensus of different experts regard as potentially good measures of the performance of urgent and emergency care systems in Ireland. Pragmatic implications are discussed with reference to three subsequently performed original studies which used some of the indicators

Download Full-text

Systematic review of the tools of oral and dental health literacy: Assessment of conceptual dimensions and psychometric properties

10.21203/rs.3.rs-15964/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Mohtasham Ghaffari ◽

Sakineh Rakhshanderou ◽

Ali Ramezankhani ◽

Yadollah Mehrabi ◽

Ali Safari-Moradabadi

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Health Literacy ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Dental Health ◽

Qualitative Assessment ◽

One Dimension ◽

Literacy Assessment ◽

General Evaluation ◽

Cosmin Checklist ◽

Literacy Methods

Abstract Background This article aims to provide a description of conceptual dimensions and psychometric properties of the tools of oral and dental health literacy. Methods Two authors in this study conducted electronic searches in the Medline (via PubMed), and Embase databases to find relevant articles from 1990 to present day. Evaluation of the tools was carried out in two parts; general evaluation of the tools using skills introduced by Sørensen et al., and qualitative assessment of psychometric properties using COSMIN checklist. Results After reviewing 1839 articles on oral and dental health literacy and evaluating 33 full text articles for eligibility, 21 articles entered the study. The sample size varied from 20 to 1405 subjects and the items of each tool ranged from 11 to 99 items. Of the 21 tools examined, 16 tools were evaluated for word recognition. For the studies examined, the evaluation of COSMIN scores was often fair or good. Of the 21 tools examined, 9 tools at least in one dimension were in the category of "poor", 19 tools were in the category of "fair", 20 tools were in the category of "good", and 4 tools were in the category of "excellent" in at least one dimension. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that some aspects of oral and dental health literacy are being ignored in the existing tools. Therefore, the authors of present study emphasize on the necessity to design and develop a comprehensive tool and take into account two characteristics of simplicity and briefness for international use.

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review of Formative Assessment Tools in the Blended Learning Environment

International Journal of Engineering & Technology ◽

10.14419/ijet.v7i4.11.20684 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (4.11) ◽

pp. 33 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Indah Febriani ◽

M. M. Irsyad Abdullah

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Learning Environment ◽

Blended Learning ◽

Formative Assessment ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Exclusion Process ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Research Approach ◽

Automatic Assessment ◽

Method Of Assessment

An effective method of student assessment technique is necessary for assessing student knowledge. Nowadays, the utilization of formative assessment tools in blended learning is increasing because it can enhance the learning quality. The main aim of this study to identify and classify existing research through the research approach, assessment tools type, and assessment specialty on formative assessment tools in a blended learning environment. This study guiding the educators in choosing and developing new assessment tools. The methodology of this research using a systematic review. This method using the inclusion and exclusion process to make a systematic review focused and choose appropriate studies. The result shows that the highest usage of assessment tool type is automatic assessment with the percentage of 87%. Semi-Automatic assessment has 13% and manual assessment 0%. It proves that technology is an important part of education and teaching because significantly transform the method of assessment from manual to automatic assessment type. This is a great transformation from the traditional method to the modern method of assessment. We recommend to further improve methods for online formative assessment and develop computer-based testing in a blended learning environment for future work.

Download Full-text