Is There a Bidirectional Association between Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Periodontitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has reproductive and metabolic properties that may be linked to periodontitis (PD). This study aimed to update and render a robust critical assessment on all evidence linking PCOS and PD, and appraising a hypothetical bidirectional association. Five databases (PubMed, Scholar, EMBASE, Web of Science and CENTRAL) were searched up to May 2020. Case-control and cohort studies on the association of PCOS and PD were included. The risk of bias of observational studies was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random effects meta-analyses of standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were performed. We followed Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) to appraise the strength and quality of the evidence. Twelve case-controls fulfilled the inclusion criteria (876 with PCOS and 48170 healthy controls), all scored as having a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis revealed that PCOS females have 28% more risk towards PD, and PD females have 46% more risk to have PCOS. PCOS females with PD had higher gum bleeding, periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment loss than non-PCOS females with PD. Populations with undefined periodontal status contribute to underestimated results. On the basis of the available evidence, it is possible to assume a bidirectional link between PCOS and PD. That is, PCOS increases by 28% the risk of having PD and in the same fashion, PD increases by 46% the risk of having PCOS. Furthermore, women with PCOS were associated with worsening clinical characteristics and inflammation of PD. These findings suggest that PCOS and PD may be linked. Hence, further prospective and clinical trial studies with nonsurgical periodontal therapy are necessary to clarify the existence of an increased risk of PCOS in women with PD and vice-versa.

Download Full-text

Antioxidants as Adjuvants in Periodontitis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity ◽

10.1155/2019/9187978 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-24 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Micaele Maria Lopes Castro ◽

Nathallia Neves Duarte ◽

Priscila Cunha Nascimento ◽

Marcela Barauna Magno ◽

Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Conventional Therapy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Clinical Parameter ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Clinical Attachment Loss ◽

Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Meta Analyses

This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of antioxidants as an adjuvant in periodontitis treatment. The following databases were consulted: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Lilacs, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. Based on the PICO strategy, the inclusion criteria comprised interventional studies including periodontitis patients (participants) treated with conventional therapy and antioxidants (intervention) compared to patients treated only with conventional therapy (control) where the periodontal response (outcome) was evaluated. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB tool (for randomized studies) and ROBINS-I tool (for nonrandomized studies). Quantitative data were analyzed in five random effects meta-analyses considering the following periodontal parameters: clinical attachment loss (CAL), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD). After all, the level of certainty was measured with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Among the 1884 studies identified, only 15 interventional studies were according to the eligibility criteria and they were included in our review. From them, 4 articles presented a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference for CAL (SMD 0.29 (0.04, 0.55), p=0.03, I2=13%), PI (SMD 0.41 (0.18, 0.64), p=0.0005, I2=47%), and BOP (SMD 0.55 (0.27, 0.83), p=0.0001, I2=0%). The GRADE tool showed a moderate to high certainty in the quality of evidence depending on the clinical parameter and antioxidants used. These results suggest that the use of antioxidants is an adjunct approach to nonsurgical periodontal therapy which may be helpful in controlling the periodontal status.

Download Full-text

Determinants of periodontitis according to the immunological and virological profiles of HIV-infected patients in Yaoundé, Cameroon

BMC Oral Health ◽

10.1186/s12903-020-01353-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Joseph Fokam ◽

Buolikeze Kuoh Nji Geh ◽

Samuel Martin Sosso ◽

Desire Takou ◽

Ezechiel Semengue Ngufack ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Periodontal Diseases ◽

Protective Role ◽

Sub Saharan Africa ◽

Periodontal Pocket ◽

Pocket Depth ◽

Clinical Attachment Loss ◽

Attachment Loss ◽

Cd8 Cells ◽

Reference Centre ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Background HIV infection is associated to different oral manifestations (including periodontal diseases), which have decreased with the advent of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Yet, the occurrence of periodontitis is still consistent among patients with HIV living in sub Saharan-Africa, with limited evidence on the driven factors and mitigating measures in these settings. We aimed at evaluating the occurrence of periodontitis and its associated immunological and virological factors in patients with HIV living in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Methods We included 165 (44 ART-naïve and 121 ART-experienced) patients > 18 years old attending the Yaoundé Central Hospital and the Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre, from January-April 2018. The periodontal status was assessed by measuring the clinical attachment loss, periodontal pocket depth, plaques index and gingival bleeding index. CD4+/CD8+ cells and viremia were measured using the fluorescence-activated cell sorting method (FACS Calibur) and the Abbott m2000 RT HIV-1 RNA kit respectively. A standard-questionnaire concerning participants’ medical records and oral hygiene methods was filled. Data was analyzed and p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results There was a significantly high prevalence of periodontitis in the ART-naïve (53.2%) compared to the ART-experienced group (37.3%), with a twofold increased risk of the ART-naïve population presenting with periodontitis than the ART-experienced population (OR 2.06, p = 0.03). More importantly, ART-naïve, patients with CD4 < 200 cells presented with higher risk of having periodontitis compared to those with higher CD4-values, with a threefold difference (OR 3.21). Worth noting, males presented with a higher risk of having clinical attachment loss (OR 6.07). There was no significant association between the occurrence of periodontitis and the CD8 (p = 0.45) or viremia (p = 0.10). Conclusion In the Cameroonian context, a considerable number of adults infected with HIV suffer from periodontitis regardless of their treatment profile. Nonetheless, ART-naïve patients have a higher risk, indicating the protective role of ART. Interestingly, severely immune-compromised patients and men are vulnerable to periodontitis, thereby highlighting the need for clinicians to refer patients for regular periodontal screening especially male patients and those with low CD4. Such measures could greatly improve the quality of life of the population living with HIV in Cameroon.

Download Full-text

Bone Density and Clinical Periodontal Attachment in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Dental Research ◽

10.1177/0022034516682017 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 96 (3) ◽

pp. 261-269 ◽

Cited By ~ 42

Author(s):

D.C. Penoni ◽

T.K.S. Fidalgo ◽

S.R. Torres ◽

V.M. Varela ◽

D. Masterson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Postmenopausal Women ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Qualitative Synthesis ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Clinical Attachment Loss ◽

Attachment Loss ◽

Meta Analyses ◽

Periodontal Attachment

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and has been considered a risk factor for periodontal disease. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to verify the scientific evidence for the association of periodontal attachment loss with low BMD in postmenopausal women. A systematic search of the literature was performed in databases until August 2016, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligibility criteria included studies that compared clinical attachment loss (CAL) between postmenopausal women with low and normal BMD. Studies using similar methodology, with lower and higher risk of bias, were pooled into 3 different meta-analyses to compare CAL among women with normal BMD, osteoporosis, and osteopenia. In the first meta-analysis, mean CAL was compared among groups. In the other 2 meta-analyses, the mean percentages of sites with CAL ≥4 mm and ≥6 mm were respectively compared among groups. From 792 unique citations, 26 articles were selected for the qualitative synthesis. Eleven of the studies were appraised as presenting low risk of bias, and the association between low BMD and CAL was observed in 10 of these studies. Thirteen cross-sectional articles were included in the meta-analysis for osteoporosis and 9 in the osteopenia analysis. Women with low BMD presented greater mean CAL than those with normal BMD (osteoporosis = 0.34 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20–0.49], P < 0.001; osteopenia = 0.07 mm [95% CI, 0.01–0.13], P = 0.02). Only studies with lower risk of bias were available for the analysis of CAL severity. Women with low BMD presented more severe attachment loss, represented as mean percentage of sites with CAL ≥4 mm (osteoporosis = 3.04 [95% CI, 1.23–4.85], P = 0.001; osteopenia = 1.74 [95% CI, 0.36–3.12], P = 0.01) and CAL ≥6 mm (osteoporosis = 5.07 [95% CI, 2.74–7.40], P < 0.001). This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia may exhibit greater CAL compared with women with normal BMD.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes in COVID-19 and cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BMJ Open Gastroenterology ◽

10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000739 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. e000739

Author(s):

Paul Middleton ◽

Catherine Hsu ◽

Mark P Lythgoe

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

English Language ◽

Design Method ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prognostic Score ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Assessment Instrument ◽

Hospitalised Patients ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Meta Analyses

BackgroundCOVID-19 continues to pose a significant healthcare challenge throughout the world. Comorbidities including diabetes and hypertension are associated with a significantly higher mortality risk. However, the effect of cirrhosis on COVID-19 outcomes has yet to be systematically assessed.ObjectivesTo assess the reported clinical outcomes of patients with cirrhosis who develop COVID-19 infection.Design/MethodPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies included up to 3 February 2021. All English language primary research articles that reported clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19 were included. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognostic Score (QUIPS) risk-of-bias assessment instrument for prognostic factor studies template. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane RevMan V.5.4 software using a random effects model.Results63 studies were identified reporting clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and concomitant COVID-19. Meta-analysis of cohort studies which report a non-cirrhotic comparator yielded a pooled mortality OR of 2.48 (95% CI: 2.02 to 3.04). Analysis of a subgroup of studies reporting OR for mortality in hospitalised patients adjusted for significant confounders found a pooled adjusted OR 1.81 (CI: 1.36 to 2.42).ConclusionCirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in COVID-19 infection compared to non-cirrhotic patients. Patients with cirrhosis should be considered for targeted public health interventions to prevent COVID-19 infection, such as shielding and prioritisation of vaccination.

Download Full-text

O-075 The association between high birth weight and long-term outcomes-implications for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Human Reproduction ◽

10.1093/humrep/deab125.005 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Å Magnusson ◽

H Laivouri ◽

A Loft ◽

N Oldereid ◽

A Pinborg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Birth Weight ◽

Psychiatric Disorders ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

High Birth Weight ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Study question Do high birth weight or large for gestational age (LGS) increase the risk of serious disease later in life? Summary answer High birth weight and/or LGA were associated with elevated risks for certain child malignancies, breast cancer, psychiatric disorders, childhood hypertension and diabetes type 1. What is known already Previous studies have shown that children born after frozen embryo transfer (FET) have an increased risk of being born LGA or having a high birth weight. In recent years the practice of FET in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) has increased rapidly. The perinatal risks of being born LGA or with a high birth weight are well studied, however less is known about the impact on long-term health and morbidity. Study design, size, duration Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until December 2020. 11 748 abstracts were screened, 172 publications were selected for systematic review and 63 for meta-analyses. The methodological quality in terms of risk of bias was assessed by pairs of reviewers. Robin-I (www.methods.cochrane.org) was used for assessing risk of bias in original articles. For systematic reviews AMSTAR was used. For certainty of evidence the GRADE system was used. Participants/materials, setting, methods Exposures were LGA and high birth weight. Long-term morbidity outcomes were cancer, metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease and psychiatric disorders. Cancer was focused on breast cancer, child malignancies in the central nervous system (CNS), hematological malignancies and Wilm´s tumor. Metabolic diseases included diabetes type 1 and type 2. Cardiovascular diseases were focused on hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric disorders on schizophrenia/psychosis and cognitive disorders. Main results and the role of chance Pooled Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) for outcome variables were compared for birth weights >4000 or > 4500 g versus < 4000 g. For cancer, meta-analyses showed AOR of 1.24 (95% 1.11-1.39) for development of breast cancer, AOR of 1.15 (95% CI 1.05-1.27) for development of CNS tumors, AOR of 1.29 (95% CI 1.20-1.39) for childhood leukemia and AOR 1.68 (95% CI 1.38-2.06 ) for Wilm´s tumor. For metabolic disease a meta-analysis showed AOR of 1.15 (95%CI 1.05-1.26) for the association between high birth weight and type 1 diabetes. For psychiatric diseases an association was found between high birth weight and/or LGA and schizophrenia and depression. For cardiovascular disease, an association was found between high birth weight and hypertension in childhood with an inverse association in adulthood. No difference in the risk of coronary heart disease in adults born with high birth weight compared to normal birth Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation is that all data are based on observational studies with their inborn risk of selection bias. Our conclusions are however, mainly based on meta-analyses and/or studies with low risk of bias. Wider implications of the findings Even though high birth weight and LGA are associated with an increased risk of serious diseases, both in childhood and in adulthood, the size of these effects seems modest. However, the identified risk associations should be taken into account in stimulation strategies and when considering fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Trial registration number Not applicable

Download Full-text

To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?

Human Reproduction Update ◽

10.1093/humupd/dmaa031 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 26 (6) ◽

pp. 929-941

Author(s):

Esmee M Bordewijk ◽

Rui Wang ◽

Madelon van Wely ◽

Michael F Costello ◽

Robert J Norman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ◽

Ovulation Induction ◽

Polycystic Ovary ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Methodological Issues ◽

First Line ◽

Ovary Syndrome ◽

Inconsistency Rate ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract BACKGROUND In our recent individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), IPD were only available from 20 studies of 53 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We noticed that the summary effect sizes of meta-analyses of RCTs without IPD sharing were different from those of RCTs with IPD sharing. Granting access to IPD for secondary analysis has implications for promoting fair and transparent conduct of RCTs. It is, however, still common for authors to choose to withhold IPD, limiting the impact of and confidence in the results of RCTs and systematic reviews based on aggregate data. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We performed a meta-epidemiologic study to elucidate if RCTs without IPD sharing have lower quality and more methodological issues than those with IPD sharing in an IPD meta-analysis evaluating first-line ovulation induction for PCOS. SEARCH METHODS We included RCTs identified for the IPD meta-analysis. We dichotomized RCTs according to whether they provided IPD (shared group) or not (non-shared group) in the IPD meta-analysis. We restricted RCTs to full-text published trials written in English. We assessed and compared RCTs in the shared and non-shared groups on the following criteria: Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0), GRADE approach, adequacy of trial registration; description of statistical methods and reproducibility of univariable statistical analysis; excessive similarity or difference in baseline characteristics that is not compatible with chance; and other miscellaneous methodological issues. OUTCOMES In total, 45 trials (8697 women) were included in this study. IPD were available from 17 RCTs and 28 trials were categorized as the non-shared IPD group. Pooled risk rates obtained from the shared and non-shared groups were different. Overall low risk of bias was associated with 13/17 (76%) of shared RCTs versus 7/28 (25%) of non-shared RCTs. For RCTs that started recruitment after 1 July 2005, adequate trial registration was found in 3/9 (33%) of shared IPD RCTs versus 0/16 (0%) in non-shared RCTs. In total, 7/17 (41%) of shared RCTs and 19/28 (68%) of non-shared RCTs had issues with the statistical methods described. The median (range) of inconsistency rate per study, between reported and reproduced analyses for baseline variables, was 0% (0–92%) (6 RCTs applicable) in the shared group and 54% (0–100%) (13 RCTs applicable) in the non-shared group. The median (range) of inconsistency rate of univariable statistical results for the outcome(s) per study was 0% (0–63%) (14 RCTs applicable) in the shared group and 44% (0–100%) (24 RCTs applicable) in the non-shared group. The distributions of simulation-generated P-values from comparisons of baseline continuous variables between intervention and control arms suggested that RCTs in the shared group are likely to be consistent with properly conducted randomization (P = 0.163), whereas this was not the case for the RCTs in the non-shared group (P = 4.535 × 10−8). WIDER IMPLICATIONS IPD meta-analysis on evaluating first-line ovulation induction for PCOS preserves validity and generates more accurate estimates of risk than meta-analyses using aggregate data, which enables more transparent assessments of benefits and risks. The availability of IPD and the willingness to share these data may be a good indicator of quality, methodological soundness and integrity of RCTs when they are being considered for inclusion in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Download Full-text

Differentiating PSP from MSA using MR planimetric measurements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Neural Transmission ◽

10.1007/s00702-021-02362-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Beatrice Heim ◽

Florian Krismer ◽

Klaus Seppi

Keyword(s):

Sensitivity And Specificity ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Index Test ◽

Study Quality ◽

Parkinsonian Syndromes ◽

Quantitative Mr ◽

Meta Analyses ◽

Planimetric Measurements

AbstractDifferential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes is considered one of the most challenging in neurology. Quantitative MR planimetric measurements were reported to discriminate between progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and non-PSP-parkinsonism. Several studies have used midbrain to pons ratio (M/P) and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) in distinguishing PSP patients from those with Parkinson's disease. The current meta-analysis aimed to compare the performance of these measures in discriminating PSP from multiple system atrophy (MSA). A systematic MEDLINE review identified 59 out of 2984 studies allowing a calculation of sensitivity and specificity using the MRPI or M/P. Meta-analyses of results were carried out using random effects modelling. To assess study quality and risk of bias, the QUADAS-2 tool was used. Eight studies were suitable for analysis. The meta‐analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for the MRPI of PSP versus MSA of 79.2% (95% CI 72.7–84.4%) and 91.2% (95% CI 79.5–96.5%), and 84.1% (95% CI 77.2–89.2%) and 89.2% (95% CI 81.8–93.8%), respectively, for the M/P. The QUADAS-2 toolbox revealed a high risk of bias regarding the methodological quality of patient selection and index test, as all patients were seen in a specialized outpatient department without avoiding case control design and no predefined threshold was given regarding MRPI or M/P cut-offs. Planimetric brainstem measurements, in special the MRPI and M/P, yield high diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of PSP from MSA. However, there is an urgent need for well-designed, prospective validation studies to ameliorate the concerns regarding the risk of bias.

Download Full-text

Comparative efficacy and safety of interventions for treating head lice: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BMJ Paediatrics Open ◽

10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001129 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. e001129

Author(s):

Bill Stevenson ◽

Wubshet Tesfaye ◽

Julia Christenson ◽

Cynthia Mathew ◽

Solomon Abrha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Randomised Controlled Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Head Lice ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Meta Analyses

BackgroundHead lice infestation is a major public health problem around the globe. Its treatment is challenging due to product failures resulting from rapidly emerging resistance to existing treatments, incorrect treatment applications and misdiagnosis. Various head lice treatments with different mechanism of action have been developed and explored over the years, with limited report on systematic assessments of their efficacy and safety. This work aims to present a robust evidence summarising the interventions used in head lice.MethodThis is a systematic review and network meta-analysis which will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement for network meta-analyses. Selected databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be systematically searched for randomised controlled trials exploring head lice treatments. Searches will be limited to trials published in English from database inception till 2021. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, AHRQ, Grey Literature Report, Grey Matters, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry. Additional studies will be sought from reference lists of included studies. Study screening, selection, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality will be undertaken by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved via a third reviewer. The primary outcome measure is the relative risk of cure at 7 and 14 days postinitial treatment. Secondary outcome measures may include adverse drug events, ovicidal activity, treatment compliance and acceptability, and reinfestation. Information from direct and indirect evidence will be used to generate the effect sizes (relative risk) to compare the efficacy and safety of individual head lice treatments against a common comparator (placebo and/or permethrin). Risk of bias assessment will be undertaken by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations guideline for network meta-analysis. All quantitative analyses will be conducted using STATA V.16.DiscussionThe evidence generated from this systematic review and meta-analysis is intended for use in evidence-driven treatment of head lice infestations and will be instrumental in informing health professionals, public health practitioners and policy-makers.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017073375.

Download Full-text

Predictability of rotational tooth movement with orthodontic aligners comparing software-based and achieved data: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Journal of Orthodontics ◽

10.1177/14653125211027266 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 146531252110272

Author(s):

Despina Koletsi ◽

Anna Iliadi ◽

Theodore Eliades

Keyword(s):

Effect Size ◽

Tooth Movement ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Patient Treatment ◽

Qualitative Synthesis ◽

Meta Analyses ◽

Enamel Reduction

Objective: To evaluate all available evidence on the prediction of rotational tooth movements with aligners. Data sources: Seven databases of published and unpublished literature were searched up to 4 August 2020 for eligible studies. Data selection: Studies were deemed eligible if they included evaluation of rotational tooth movement with any type of aligner, through the comparison of software-based and actually achieved data after patient treatment. Data extraction and data synthesis: Data extraction was done independently and in duplicate and risk of bias assessment was performed with the use of the QUADAS-2 tool. Random effects meta-analyses with effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed and the quality of the evidence was assessed through GRADE. Results: Seven articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which three contributed to meta-analyses. Overall results revealed a non-accurate prediction of the outcome for the software-based data, irrespective of the use of attachments or interproximal enamel reduction (IPR). Maxillary canines demonstrated the lowest percentage accuracy for rotational tooth movement (three studies: effect size = 47.9%; 95% CI = 27.2–69.5; P < 0.001), although high levels of heterogeneity were identified (I2: 86.9%; P < 0.001). Contrary, mandibular incisors presented the highest percentage accuracy for predicted rotational movement (two studies: effect size = 70.7%; 95% CI = 58.9–82.5; P < 0.001; I2: 0.0%; P = 0.48). Risk of bias was unclear to low overall, while quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: Allowing for all identified caveats, prediction of rotational tooth movements with aligner treatment does not appear accurate, especially for canines. Careful selection of patients and malocclusions for aligner treatment decisions remain challenging.

Download Full-text

PARP1 rs1136410 Val762Ala contributes to an increased risk of overall cancer in the East Asian population: a meta-analysis

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060521992956 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 49 (3) ◽

pp. 030006052199295

Author(s):

Yijuan Xin ◽

Liu Yang ◽

Mingquan Su ◽

Xiaoli Cheng ◽

Lin Zhu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Risk ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Chinese Population ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Asian Population ◽

Cancer Type ◽

East Asians ◽

Asian Populations ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Meta Analyses

Objectives To investigate the association between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 ( PARP1) rs1136410 Val762Ala and cancer risk in Asian populations, as published findings remain controversial. Methods The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched, and references of identified studies and reviews were screened, to find relevant studies. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the association between PARP1 rs1136410 Val762Ala and cancer risk, reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 24 studies with 8 926 cases and 15 295 controls were included. Overall, a significant association was found between PARP1 rs1136410 Val762Ala and cancer risk in East Asians (homozygous: OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06, 1.35; heterozygous: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; recessive: OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02, 1.25; dominant: OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; and allele comparison: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03, 1.15). Stratification analyses by race and cancer type revealed similar results for gastric cancer among the Chinese population. Conclusion The findings suggest that PARP1 rs1136410 Val762Ala may be significantly associated with an increased cancer risk in Asians, particularly the Chinese population.

Download Full-text