scholarly journals Application of Finite Element Analysis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery—A Literature Review

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Lisiak-Myszke ◽  
Dawid Marciniak ◽  
Marek Bieliński ◽  
Hanna Sobczak ◽  
Łukasz Garbacewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Parameter Analysis ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Reconstructive Operations ◽  
Long Time

In recent years in the field of biomechanics, the intensive development of various experimental methods has been observed. The implementation of virtual studies that for a long time have been successfully used in technical sciences also represents a new trend in dental engineering. Among these methods, finite element analysis (FEA) deserves special attention. FEA is a method used to analyze stresses and strains in complex mechanical systems. It enables the mathematical conversion and analysis of mechanical properties of a geometric object. Since the mechanical properties of the human skeleton cannot be examined in vivo, a discipline in which FEA has found particular application is oral and maxillofacial surgery. In this review we summarize the application of FEA in particular oral and maxillofacial fields such as traumatology, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery and implantology presented in the current literature. Based on the available literature, we discuss the methodology and results of research where FEA has been used to understand the pathomechanism of fractures, identify optimal osteosynthesis methods, plan reconstructive operations and design intraosseous implants or osteosynthesis elements. As well as indicating the benefits of FEA in mechanical parameter analysis, we also point out the assumptions and simplifications that are commonly used. The understanding of FEA’s opportunities and advantages as well as its limitations and main flaws is crucial to fully exploit its potential.

Regional vascular mechanical properties by 3-D intravascular ultrasound with finite-element analysis

1997 ◽  
Vol 272 (1) ◽  
pp. H425-H437 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Vonesh ◽  
C. H. Cho ◽  
J. V. Pinto ◽  
B. J. Kane ◽  
D. S. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Intravascular Ultrasound ◽  
Regional Distribution ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Dimensionless Variable

A method employing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and simultaneous hemodynamic measurements, with resultant finite element analysis (FEA) of accurate three-dimensional IVUS reconstructions (3-DR), was developed to estimate the regional distribution of arterial elasticity. Human peripheral arterial specimens (iliac and femoral, n = 7) were collected postmortem and perfused at three static transmural pressures: 80, 120, and 160 mmHg. At each pressure, IVUS data were collected at 2.0-mm increments through a 20.0-mm segment and used to create an accurate 3-DR. Mechanical properties were determined over normotensive and hypertensive ranges. An FEA and optimization procedure was implemented in which the elemental elastic modulus was scaled to minimize the displacement error between the computer-predicted and actual deformations. The “optimized” elastic modulus (Eopt) represents an estimate of the component element material stiffness. A dimensionless variable (beta), quantifying structural stiffness, was computed. Eopt of nodiseased tissue regions (n = 80) was greater than atherosclerotic regions (n = 88) for both normotensive (Norm) and hypertensive (Hyp) pressurization: Norm, 9.3 +/- 0.98 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.30; Hyp, 11.3 +/- 0.72 vs. 8.5 +/- 0.47, respectively (mean +/- SE x 10(6) dyn/cm2; P < 0.01 vs. nondiseased). No differences in beta between nondiseased and atherosclerotic tissue were noted at Norm pressurization. With Hyp pressurization, beta of atherosclerotic regions were greater than nondiseased regions: 21.5 +/- 2.21 vs. 14.0 +/- 2.11, respectively (P < 0.03). This method provides a means to identify regional in vivo variations in mechanical properties of arterial tissue.

scholarly journals Role of Finite Element Analysis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (27) ◽  
pp. 2024-2028
Author(s):  
Manish Anand ◽  
Shreya Panwar ◽  
Srestha Bisht
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Rapid Change ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
The Body ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma

BACKGROUND Maxillofacial surgeries vary from simple tooth extraction to maxillofacial reconstruction and rehabilitation. The intricate anatomy of the facial bones and complex vital structures surrounding them makes it challenging for the surgical teams to perform complex surgeries. With the rapid change in technology and modern advancement in virtual surgeries, there is a leap towards improvement in healthcare. To study biomechanical properties, it is imperative to include the principles of physical science in the field of medicine. In recent times, Finite element analysis (FEA) has become a useful tool to study the biomechanical properties of craniofacial structures under different mechanical parameters. Since the human structure's biomechanics is not possible to study on an experimental basis, finite element analysis has become an emerging tool to solve these complex biomechanical equations. The finite element method uses a numerical calculation of small heterogeneous geometry into the simple linear equation and predicts biomechanical responses towards each variation. Although used extensively in engineering, this method finds extensive use in the medical field, from planning surgeries to design external prosthesis. This method's most significant advantage includes studying a model outside the body, designing an idle surgical instrument and hardware, models that can be replicated based on user requirements, no ethical consideration needed, and print prosthesis that exactly resembles a typical anatomical structure. This method has certain limitations: high cost, technical flaws, and inability to replicate exact clinical conditions. This review article covers the current FEA scope in maxillofacial surgeries, steps in planning surgeries, advantages, disadvantages and the modifications needed to refine it for future research. KEYWORDS Finite Element Analysis, Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, Orthognathic Surgery, FEA

In Vivo Assessment of Architecture and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Indices of Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Radius

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. van Rietbergen ◽  
G. von Ingersleben ◽  
C. Chesnut ◽  
B. MacDonald ◽  
H. K. Genant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
In Vivo Assessment

Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Exterior FRP Shell

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 1461-1465
Author(s):  
Chuan Min Zhang ◽  
Chao He Chen ◽  
Ye Fan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Concrete Beams ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Beams ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Contact Interface ◽  
Accurate Calculation ◽  
Element Analysis

The paper makes an analysis of the reinforced concrete beams with exterior FRP Shell in Finite Element, and compares it with the test results. The results show that, by means of this model, mechanical properties of reinforced concrete beams with exterior FRP shell can be predicted better. However, the larger the load, the larger deviation between calculated values and test values. Hence, if more accurate calculation is required, issues of contact interface between the reinforced concrete beams and the FRP shell should be taken into consideration.

The equivalent method of double V-wing honeycombs on the in-plane dynamic impact

2021 ◽  
pp. 073168442199086
Author(s):  
Yunfei Qu ◽  
Dian Wang ◽  
Hongye Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Energy Absorption ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Size Factor ◽  
Dynamic Impact ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Equivalent Method

The double V-wing honeycomb can be applied in many fields because of its lower mass and higher performance. In this study, the volume, in-plane elastic modulus and unit cell area of the double V-wing honeycomb were analytically derived, which became parts of the theoretical basis of the novel equivalent method. Based on mass, plateau load, in-plane elastic modulus, compression strain and energy absorption of the double V-wing honeycomb, a novel equivalent method mapping relationship between the thickness–width ratio and the basic parameters was established. The various size factor of the equivalent honeycomb model was denoted as n and constructed by the explicit finite element analysis method. The mechanical properties and energy absorption performance for equivalent honeycombs were investigated and compared with hexagonal honeycombs under dynamic impact. Numerical results showed a well coincidence for each honeycomb under dynamic impact before 0.009 s. Honeycombs with the same thickness–width ratio had similar mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics. The equivalent method was verified by theoretical analysis, finite element analysis and experimental testing. Equivalent honeycombs exceeded the initial honeycomb in performance efficiency. Improvement of performance and weight loss reached 173.9% and 13.3% to the initial honeycomb. The double V-wing honeycomb possessed stronger impact resistance and better load-bearing capacity than the hexagonal honeycomb under impact in this study. The equivalent method could be applied to select the optimum honeycomb based on requirements and improve the efficiency of the double V-wing honeycomb.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document