scholarly journals Is Anticoagulation Necessary for Severely Disabled Cardioembolic Stroke Survivors?

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 586
Author(s):  
Kristaps Jurjans ◽  
Baiba Vikmane ◽  
Janis Vetra ◽  
Evija Miglane ◽  
Oskars Kalejs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cardioembolic Stroke ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Preventive Medication ◽  
One Year

Background and Objectives: Oral anticoagulants are the hallmark of cardioembolic stroke prevention, but they are frequently underused, especially in elderly patients and patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In our paper, we analyzed the long-term outcome of severely disabled cardioembolic stroke survivors depending on the prescribed antithrombotic secondary prevention medication. Materials and Methods: In our study, we retrospectively collected data for ischemic stroke (IS) patients treated in P. Stradins Clinical University hospital, Riga, Latvia, from 2014 until 2017. Patients’ clinical data were collected using local stroke registry, including patients’ demographic data, vascular risk factors, clinical findings, and laboratory results. Severely disabled stroke survivors were followed up by phone at 30/90/180/365 days after discharge. Patients’ functional outcomes were assessed using the adapted version of The Rankin Focused Assessment–Ambulation. The collected data were compared in 4 groups according to prescribed secondary prevention medication. Results: A total of 682 (91.42%) patients were followed up and included in data analysis. The median age of patients was 80 (IQR = 75–85) years. Of these patients, 231 (31%) were males and 515 (69%) were females. One-year probability of survival of patients not taking any preventive medication was 53% (IQR = 29–76), while in patients taking antiplatelet agents it was 57% (IQR = 37–78), 78% (IQR = 68–88) of patients on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 81% (IQR = 72–90) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). One year after discharge 73 (31%) had mRS 0–2, 50 (20.9%), 29 (12.1%) were still severely disabled, and 87 (36.4%) had died. Conclusions: Anticoagulant use in secondary prevention predicts better functional outcome and higher survival rate in patients with severe cardioembolic stroke due to non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), therefore severe neurological deficit must not be a reason of restriction of anticoagulation.

scholarly journals Problems of Cardioembolic Stroke Primary and Secondary Prevention in the Latvian Population / Kardioemboliska Cerebrāla Infarkta Primārās un Sekundārās Profilakses Problēmas Latvijā

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Kristaps Jurjāns ◽  
Santa Sabeļnikova ◽  
Evija Miglāne ◽  
Baiba Luriņa ◽  
Oskars Kalējs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Cardioembolic Stroke ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Primary And Secondary Prevention ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Very High

Abstract Atrial fibrillation is one of major risk factors of cerebral infarction. The use of oral anticoagulants is the only evidence-based method of reducing the risk of cardioembolic accidents. The guidelines of oral anticoagulant admission and usage have been available since 2012. The results of this study show that of 550 stroke patients that were admitted to Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Rīga, Latvia, from 1 January 2014 until 1 July 2014, atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 247 (45%) cases, and of these patients, only 8.5% used oral anticoagulants before the onset of stroke. Six months after discharge of 111 (44.9%) stroke survivors, five (4.5%) used no secondary prevention medication, 27 (24.3%) used antiplatelet agents, 54 (48.6%) warfarin, and 25 (22.5%) used target specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs). The mortality rate was significantly higher in the patient group that used no secondary prevention medication or antiplatelet agents compared to the patient group that used oral anticoagulants. The use of oral anticoagulants for primary stroke prevention in Latvia is insufficient. The mortality of cardioembolic stroke in 180 days is very high - 40.4%. Secondary prevention is essential to prevent recurrent cardioembolic accidents.

scholarly journals CARDIOEMBOLIC STROKE IN LATVIA: PREVENTION AND LONG-TERM OUTCOME

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 615-621
Author(s):  
Elina Pucite ◽  
Kristaps Jurjāns ◽  
Evija Miglāne ◽  
Baiba Luriņa ◽  
Oskars Kalējs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Preventive Medication ◽  
One Year

INTRODUCTION: Untreated non-valvular atrial fibrillation is one of major causes of stroke. The goal of the study was to evaluate the use of antithrombotic medication stroke prevention and assess long-term stroke outcome.METHODS: This study involved 531 cardio embolic stroke patients of the Paul’s Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia, in 2014. After discharge the patients or their relatives were interviewed by phone after 30, 90, 180, and 365 days. Standardized questions were asked about the patients’ abilities and use of prescribed secondary prevention medication. The results were compared between patient groups, assigned according to prescribed medications.RESULTS: Of all the patients included in the study, 8.9% were using oral anticoagulants before stroke onset. One year after discharge, 1.44% of patients were not using any preventive medication, 23.56% were using antiplatelet agents, 43.27% warfarin, and 31.73% target-specific oral anticoagulants. The one-year mortality rate was 40.7%. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the patient group using no secondary preventive medication or antiplatelet agents compared to the patient group that used oral anticoagulants.CONCLUSION: Cardio embolic stroke primary and secondary prevention in Latvia is lacking. The study outcomes suggest that action is needed to increase the use of oral anticoagulants in primary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Poor function outcomes, dementia, and patients’ incompliance limits the use of oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Practical Considerations for the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Stacy ◽  
Sara Richter
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant risk factor for stroke and peripheral thromboembolic events (TEs). Preventing blood clots in the heart to reduce stroke and TE risk is a key goal of AF therapy. Traditional stroke risk assessment tools for patients with nonvalvular AF include the CHADS2 and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores, while long-term outcome data with the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging. The goals of this review were to assess traditional therapies and existing treatment guidelines and to discuss key pharmacologic properties of the DOACS, noting how these may benefit at-risk patients with AF. This narrative review was developed on the basis of the authors’ clinical knowledge, extensive reading of the literature, and broad pharmacy experience in the management of patients with AF. Limitations of oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) include slow onset of action, the need for regular monitoring of their anticoagulation effect, significant food and drug interactions, and unpredictable dose–response properties. Key clinical trial data led to the approvals of apixaban, dabigatran etexilate, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the United States to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. With predictable pharmacologic properties and limited drug and/or dietary interactions, the DOACs offer several benefits over traditional oral anticoagulation therapy with VKA. However, they have limitations, including the absence of immediate reversal agents and limited options for monitoring their anticoagulation effects in clinical practice. As experience with the use of DOACs grows, optimized treatment regimens and improved patient care are expected.

P4757Vitamin k antagonists are associated with higher risk of osteoporotic fractures compared to non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants among atrial fibrillation patients: a nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Binding ◽  
J B Olesen ◽  
B Abrahamsen ◽  
L Staerk ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Osteoporosis Medication ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background/Introduction Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high mortality and reduced life quality in an elderly population. Several studies report an increased risk of fractures among patients treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC), however, only sparse research has been made to clarify the difference between treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) regarding the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in long-term VKA or NOAC treatment. Methods Patients with AF were identified using Danish national registries and were included when they had undergone 180 days OAC treatment, and only if they had no prior use of osteoporosis medication. The study period was from 1 January 2013 until 30 June 2017, and patients were followed for 2 years, or until death, outcome or emigration. Outcomes were hip fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, any fracture, initiation of osteoporosis medication, and a combined endpoint. G-formula was used to determine standardized absolute risk, and multiple covariate adjusted Cox regressions were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR). Results Overall, 37,350 patients with AF were included; 32.6% received VKA treatment (median age 72 years, 61.8% men) and 67.4% received NOAC treatment (median age 73 years, 55.9% men). The standardized absolute 2-year risk of any fracture was low among NOAC treated patients (3.1%; 95% CI: 2.9% to 3.3%), and among VKA treated patients (3.8%; 95% CI: 3.4% to 4.2%). NOAC was associated with a significantly lower relative risk of any fracture (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.97), of major osteoporotic fractures (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.99), and of initiating osteoporotic medication (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.95). A combined endpoint showed that patients treated with NOAC had a significantly lower risk of suffering from any fracture or initiating osteoporosis medication (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.93). Adjusted relative two-year risks Conclusion In a nationwide population, the absolute risk of osteoporotic fractures was low among AF patients on OAC, but NOAC was associated with a significantly lower risk of osteoporotic fractures compared to VKA. Acknowledgement/Funding Scholarship from The Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte

scholarly journals Old and new oral anticoagulants for secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Tommaso Sacquegna ◽  
Anna Zaniboni ◽  
Andrea Rubboli ◽  
Gaetano Procaccianti ◽  
Michela Crisci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Significant Difference

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, used in oral anticoagulation therapy currently represent the standard drugs for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), with a relative risk reduction close to 70%. Newer oral anticoagulants, such as direct thrombin inhibitors (<em>i.e</em>., dabigatran) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (<em>i.e</em>., apixaban and rivaroxaban) have been recently compared with warfarin in large randomized trials for stroke prevention in AF. The new oral anticoagulants showed, compared with warfarin, no statistically significant difference in the rate of stroke or systemic embolism in secondary prevention (patients with previous transient ischemic attack or stroke) subgroups. With regard to safety, the risk of intracranial bleeding was reduced with new anticoagulants compared with warfarin. Indirect treatment comparisons of clinical trials on secondary prevention cohorts showed no significant difference in efficacy among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran; but dabigatran 110 mg was associated with less intracranial bleedings than rivaroxaban.

scholarly journals Adherence and persistence to direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a population-based study

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amitava Banerjee ◽  
Valerio Benedetto ◽  
Philip Gichuru ◽  
Jane Burnell ◽  
Sotiris Antoniou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidities ◽  
One Year ◽  
Over Time

BackgroundDespite simpler regimens than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), adherence (taking drugs as prescribed) and persistence (continuation of drugs) to direct oral anticoagulants are suboptimal, yet understudied in electronic health records (EHRs).ObjectiveWe investigated (1) time trends at individual and system levels, and (2) the risk factors for and associations between adherence and persistence.MethodsIn UK primary care EHR (The Health Information Network 2011–2016), we investigated adherence and persistence at 1 year for oral anticoagulants (OACs) in adults with incident AF. Baseline characteristics were analysed by OAC and adherence/persistence status. Risk factors for non-adherence and non-persistence were assessed using Cox and logistic regression. Patterns of adherence and persistence were analysed.ResultsAmong 36 652 individuals with incident AF, cardiovascular comorbidities (median CHA2DS2VASc[Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age≥75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke, Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category] 3) and polypharmacy (median number of drugs 6) were common. Adherence was 55.2% (95% CI 54.6 to 55.7), 51.2% (95% CI 50.6 to 51.8), 66.5% (95% CI 63.7 to 69.2), 63.1% (95% CI 61.8 to 64.4) and 64.7% (95% CI 63.2 to 66.1) for all OACs, VKA, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. One-year persistence was 65.9% (95% CI 65.4 to 66.5), 63.4% (95% CI 62.8 to 64.0), 61.4% (95% CI 58.3 to 64.2), 72.3% (95% CI 70.9 to 73.7) and 78.7% (95% CI 77.1 to 80.1) for all OACs, VKA, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Risk of non-adherence and non-persistence increased over time at individual and system levels. Increasing comorbidity was associated with reduced risk of non-adherence and non-persistence across all OACs. Overall rates of ‘primary non-adherence’ (stopping after first prescription), ‘non-adherent non-persistence’ and ‘persistent adherence’ were 3.5%, 26.5% and 40.2%, differing across OACs.ConclusionsAdherence and persistence to OACs are low at 1 year with heterogeneity across drugs and over time at individual and system levels. Better understanding of contributory factors will inform interventions to improve adherence and persistence across OACs in individuals and populations.

Abstract 18371: Higher Treatment Persistence of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants than Vitamin K Antagonists at 1 Year in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Real-World Practice

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Martinez ◽  
Christopher Wallenhorst ◽  
Anja Katholing ◽  
Ben Freedman
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Real World ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are under-utilised in atrial fibrillation (AF). Even patients prescribed an OAC may stop taking the drug soon after treatment initiation, particularly with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA). The Non-VKA OAC (NOAC) drugs offer greater ease of use, and persistence is likely to be higher. Aim: To determine persistence on treatment in the first year after inception of NOACs and VKA in incident AF in real-world clinical practice. Methods: We studied 24,467 OAC-naïve patients with incident non-valvular AF diagnosed between Jan 2011-Feb 2014, mean age 73.9 ± 12.5, 45.6% female, in a very large UK primary care database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, CRPD), with full linkage to medication use. Follow up was for a mean of 1.2 ± 0.9 years. The proportion of OAC initiation in the 90 days after first-time AF and of those remaining on OAC one year after initiation were estimated using competing risk survival analyses censoring for use of alternative OAC. Results: NOAC drugs prescribed included Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran and Apixaban. Overall, 12,579 (51.4%) were commenced on an OAC: 11,888 on VKA and 691 on NOAC, within 90 days after incident AF. Amongst all OAC users, the proportion taking NOAC increased from 0.3% in 2011 to 12.3% in 2014. Persistence, defined as the proportion still taking the OAC after one year, declined over the 12 months to 54.3% for VKA and 80.7% for NOAC (Table). Persistence was significantly greater for NOAC than VKA at all time points. Conclusions: There is a progressive fall in VKA use amongst OAC naïve patients with AF in real-world practice to only 54% at 1 year. This contributes to under-utilisation of anticoagulation in AF and would result in an increased rate of stroke. Persistence was significantly improved with NOACs compared to VKA, and this factor alone could lead to reduced stroke burden with increasing uptake of the NOACs.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Cardioversion: What Is Crucial to Take into Account

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3212
Author(s):  
Fabiana Lucà ◽  
Simona Giubilato ◽  
Stefania Angela Di Fusco ◽  
Laura Piccioni ◽  
Carmelo Massimiliano Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Significant Advance ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Thromboembolic Risk ◽  
Pharmacological Cardioversion

The therapeutic dilemma between rhythm and rate control in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unresolved and electrical or pharmacological cardioversion (CV) frequently represents a useful strategy. The most recent guidelines recommend anticoagulation according to individual thromboembolic risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been routinely used to prevent thromboembolic events. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent a significant advance due to their more predictable therapeutic effect and more favorable hemorrhagic risk profile. In hemodynamically unstable patients, an emergency electrical cardioversion (ECV) must be performed. In this situation, intravenous heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) should be administered before CV. In patients with AF occurring within less than 48 h, synchronized direct ECV should be the elective procedure, as it restores sinus rhythm quicker and more successfully than pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) and is associated with shorter length of hospitalization. Patients with acute onset AF were traditionally considered at lower risk of thromboembolic events due to the shorter time for atrial thrombus formation. In patients with hemodynamic stability and AF for more than 48 h, an ECV should be planned after at least 3 weeks of anticoagulation therapy. Alternatively, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) should be performed, followed by ECV and anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks. Theoretically, the standardized use of TEE before CV allows a better stratification of thromboembolic risk, although data available to date are not univocal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document