scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Reduced-Thickness Monolithic Lithium-Disilicate Crowns: One-Year Follow-Up Results

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 2119
Author(s):  
Davor Špehar ◽  
Marko Jakovac

Purpose: The purpose of this in vivo study was to investigate whether the less invasive approach (reduced thickness of the restoration) will result in a comparable risk of failure and similar aesthetic results, compared to conventional layered full porcelain crowns, and can, therefore, be used as a good alternative. Material and Methods: The tested ceramic was lithium-disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max). Forty-four patients with endodontically treated premolars or molars were randomized into two groups and provided with single crowns. One group received conventional all-ceramic crowns made from a lithium-disilicate core and hand-veneered aesthetic ceramic, while another group received full-contoured lithium-disilicate ceramic crowns with reduced wall thickness than manufactures recommendations. The teeth for conventional crowns were prepared with 1 mm rounded shoulder and 2 mm occlusal reduction, while teeth for monolithic crowns were prepared with 0.6 mm wide rounded shoulder and 1 mm occlusal reduction. All crowns were prepared by the same clinician and manufactured in the same laboratory by the same technician. The survival and aesthetics of the crowns were assessed by the independent clinician. Apart from this, patients’ aesthetic satisfaction was evaluated. The assessment was double blind as both the examiner and the patients did not know which type of crown was provided. The observation period was 36 months. Survival of the crowns was assessed using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria and aesthetics and participants’ aesthetic satisfaction with the crowns was evaluated using a visual analogue scale. Results: The one-year survival rate for layered crowns was 100% and for monolithic crowns 95.5%. The median patients’ aesthetic satisfaction with both crowns was 100%. Conclusions: The results indicate similar one-year survival rate of reduced-thickness monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns and conventional veneered crowns. Differences with patients’ satisfaction with the aesthetics of both crowns were not statistically significant and it can be said that the patients’ aesthetic satisfaction was the same for both crowns.

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3102
Author(s):  
Rini Behera ◽  
Lora Mishra ◽  
Darshan Devang Divakar ◽  
Abdulaziz A. Al-Kheraif ◽  
Naomi Ranjan Singh ◽  
...  

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the one-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate (LD) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) class II inlay restorations. Thirty healthy individuals who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. The patients were randomly divided into two study groups (n = 15): LD (IPS e.max press) and ZrO2 (Dentcare Zirconia). In the ZrO2 group, the internal surfaces of the inlays were sandblasted and silanized with Monobond N (Ivoclar, Leichsteistein, Germany). In the LD group, the internal surfaces of the inlays were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid. The ceramic inlays were cemented with self-cure resin cement (Multilink N). Clinical examinations were performed using modified United State Public Health Codes and Criteria (USPHS) after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The one-year survival rate was evaluated. In total, one failure was observed in the ZrO2 group. The survival probability after 1 year for the ZrO2 inlays was 93%, and for the LD inlays was 100%, which was statistically insignificant. The differences between both groups for most USPHS criteria (except for colour match) were statistically insignificant. Within the imitations of the present study, the lithium disilicate- and zirconia dioxide-based inlays exhibited comparable clinical performances. However, the colour and translucency match was superior for the lithium disilicate restorations.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4027-4027 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Fuchs ◽  
J. Marshall ◽  
E. Mitchell ◽  
R. Wierzbicki ◽  
V. Ganju ◽  
...  

4027 Background: This multicenter, randomized study assessed efficacy & safety for irinotecan/fluoropyrimidines combinations in previously untreated mCRC. Methods: Pts were randomized to: infusional FOLFIRI, modified bolus IFL (mIFL), or CapeIri; and concurrent celecoxib or placebo in a double-blind fashion. The protocol was amended in April 2004: bevacizumab (bev) was added to the FOLFIRI and mIFL arms, whereas CapeIri was discontinued. Period 1 (P1) and Period 2 (P2) designate subjects enrolled before or after the amendment. Initial efficacy & safety analyses were reported at ASCO ’06. We now report follow-up of 46 months for P1 and 31 months for P2. Results: 430 pts were treated in P1 and 117 pts in P2. Baseline characteristics and post-study treatment were balanced. P1 results: Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.6 mos for FOLFIRI; 5.9 mos for mIFL (p=0.004); and 5.8 mos for CapeIri (p=0.015). Median overall survival (OS) was 23.1 mos for FOLFIRI; 17.6 mos for mIFL (p=0.087); and 18.9 mos for CapeIri (p=0.27). One-year survival rate favored FOLFIRI (75%) compared to either mIFL (65%) or CapeIri (66%). Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 47% in FOLFIRI, 43% in mIFL, 39% in CapeIri (not significantly different). P2 results: Median PFS was 11.2 mos for FOLFIRI+bev and 8.3 mos for mIFL+bev (p=0.28). Median OS was not reached for FOLFIRI+bev but was 19.2 mos for mIFL+bev (p=0.007). One-year survival rate favored FOLFIRI+bev (87%) when compared to mIFL+bev (61%). ORR was 58% for FOLFIRI+bev and 54% for mIFL+bev (p=0.73). Common grade = 3 AEs are listed below. Celecoxib did not impact safety or efficacy. Conclusions: First line FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI+bev were superior to their comparators and show favorable results in survival and tolerability in untreated mCRC. Median survival for FOLFIRI+bev has not been reached. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shujiang Chen ◽  
Meng Lu ◽  
Zhimin Zhu ◽  
Wenchuan C. Chen

Abstract BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic onlays for the treatment of tooth defects and to evaluate the clinical performance and whether they are worth more extensive use as that of the full crown. MethodsPatients who received treatment by lithium disilicate glass-ceramic onlays at the Western China Hospital of Stomatology were recalled after 1~4 years. The clinical performance and patients’ satisfaction of onlays for various tooth defects, cracked or uncracked teeth and endodontically treated or vital teeth were retrospectively evaluated with a combination of modified United States Public Health Service Criteria and questionnaire survey. Statistical analysis was performed by using the chi-squared test, Kaplan–Meier analysis and Log-rank test (a = 0.05) where appropriate. ResultsA total of 154 patients with 166 onlays were recalled for clinical examination. Of the 166 onlays examined, 65 (39.19%) were occlusal onlays, 92 (55.42%) were proximal-occlusive onlays and 9 (5.42%) were buccal-or lingual-occlusal onlays. The clinical performance of O and PO onlays was not significantly different (P > 0.05), according to USPHS Criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 4-year survival rate of O and PO onlays was 95.4% and 97.8%, respectively while there was no failure happened in buccal-or lingual-occlusal onlays. Log- rank test showed that the kinds of defects/onlays, tooth vitality and tooth crack had no influence on the survival rate (P > 0.05). The overall satisfaction rate was more than 98%.ConclusionsThis medium-term analysis indicated that lithium disilicate glass-ceramic onlays achieved satisfactory clinical performance for the restoration of different tooth defects. The survival rate of onlays was comparable to that of full crown. Different kinds of tooth defects, tooth vitality and tooth crack did not influence performance.Trial registrationThe study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Stomatology of Sichuan University with the approval number: WCHSIRB-D-2021-300. Consent to participate was not applicable.


F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanaa Nassar ◽  
Carl H Halim ◽  
Hesham A Katamish

Background: Despite the fact that preliminary clinical results of conservative partial coverage restorations (PCRs) are promising, the clinical behavior of different PCR ceramic materials is rarely investigated in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of partial coverage restorations (PCR) fabricated with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic system compared to partial coverage restorations fabricated with lithium disilicate ceramic system. Methods: 46 vital premolars and molars of 14 patients were restored with PCRs (23 Vita Suprinity and 23 IPS e.max CAD). PCRs were CAD/CAM fabricated in the lab and adhesively luted with dual-polymerizing resin cement (Duolink. BISCO, USA). Clinical evaluation of PCRs was performed according to the Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) at baseline, 6 and 12 months post-insertion. Absolute failure was demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier survival rate analysis. Results: After 12 months observation, all PCRs of both ceramic groups demonstrated 100% survival rate. Non-significant decrease in Alpha ratings for marginal adaptation (p = 0.1560) and marginal discoloration (p = 0.6078) in e-max group. While in the Suprinity group, PCRs demonstrated 100% Alpha ratings for marginal adaptation and only one Bravo rating (p= 0.3625) for marginal discoloration after 12 month observation. Conclusions: Both Vita-Suprinity and e.max CAD partial coverage restorations are considered reliable treatment options for restoring larger defects in posterior dentition. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02861729 04/08/2016


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin Adams ◽  
Vanya Icheva ◽  
Caroline Deppisch ◽  
Josefine Lauer ◽  
Gloria Herrmann ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Several recent clinical studies revealed an accumulation of ceramide in bronchial epithelial cells of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Degradation of ceramide concentrations in lungs of CF patients employing the functional acid sphingomyelinase inhibitor amitriptyline revealed a benefit in lung function, weight and exacerbation rates. Methods: To test for a beneficial effect of amitriptyline in vivo, we performed two phase II randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. CF patients were treated with 25 mg amitriptyline twice daily, i.e. a total dose of 50 mg/d. After those two studies part of the patients used amitriptyline in an off-lable-use for routine treatment. These patients were observed after one, two and three years after continuous use of amitriptyline and were matched with those patients who were not treated. These patients were used as a control group. Results: After one year of treatment, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec predicted (FEV1) increased significantly by 7.6±7.0%, p=<0.001, and weight increased by 2.1±2.3kg, p=<0.001 in the amitriptyline population (n=20), whereas FEV1 decreased significantly in the control group by 1.8±3.3%, p=0.010, and weight increased by 1.1±2.7kg, p=0.010 (n=14). After two years of treatment, FEV1 increased significantly by 5.6±10.3%, p=0.009, and weight increased by 3.6±2.9kg, p=<0.001 in the amitriptyline population (n=12). In contrast, FEV1 decreased in the control group by 2.1±3.7%, p=0.051 and weight increased by only 0.4±2.9kg, p=0.31 (n=10). After three years of treatment, FEV1 increased significantly by 7.7±8%, p=0.050, and weight increased by 7.3±3.8kg, p=0.016, in the amitriptyline population (n=5), whereas FEV1 decreased in the control group by 1.0±1.3%, p=0.075 and weight increased by 0.4±1.5kg, p=0.29 (n=5). Conclusion: Amitriptyline significantly increases FEV1, reduces ceramide in lung cells and increases weight of CF patients.


1980 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. M. Marks ◽  
R. S. Stern ◽  
D. Mawson ◽  
J. Cobb ◽  
R. McDonald

SummaryForty chronic obsessive-compulsive ritualizers were randomly assigned to treatment with oral clomipramine or placebo for 8 months. During weeks 4 to 7 these two groups were each randomly split into treatment by relaxation or by exposure in vivo, and during weeks 7 to 10 all patients had exposure in vivo. Double blind assessments were made at weeks 4, 7, 10, 18, 36, 62 and 114.Results are reported to one year. Clomipramine produced significant improvement in rituals, mood and social adjustment, but only in those patients who initially had depressed mood. The clomipramine effect was maximum from weeks 10 to 18 and diminished thereafter. On stopping clomipramine patients often relapsed and improved again on restarting the drug. Relaxation produced little change. Exposure produced significant lasting improvement in rituals, but less change in mood; improvement generalized to social adjustment at follow-up. Clomipramine plus exposure had a slight additive but not interactional effect. Clomipramine enhanced compliance both with exposure and with relaxation.Clomipramine is useful for compulsive ritualizers with depressed mood, but may need continuation for over a year and combination with exposure in vivo. Exposure in vivo remains the treatment of choice for rituals without depressed mood.


Author(s):  
K.E. Krizan ◽  
J.E. Laffoon ◽  
M.J. Buckley

With increase use of tissue-integrated prostheses in recent years it is a goal to understand what is happening at the interface between haversion bone and bulk metal. This study uses electron microscopy (EM) techniques to establish parameters for osseointegration (structure and function between bone and nonload-carrying implants) in an animal model. In the past the interface has been evaluated extensively with light microscopy methods. Today researchers are using the EM for ultrastructural studies of the bone tissue and implant responses to an in vivo environment. Under general anesthesia nine adult mongrel dogs received three Brånemark (Nobelpharma) 3.75 × 7 mm titanium implants surgical placed in their left zygomatic arch. After a one year healing period the animals were injected with a routine bone marker (oxytetracycline), euthanized and perfused via aortic cannulation with 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer pH 7.2. Implants were retrieved en bloc, harvest radiographs made (Fig. 1), and routinely embedded in plastic. Tissue and implants were cut into 300 micron thick wafers, longitudinally to the implant with an Isomet saw and diamond wafering blade [Beuhler] until the center of the implant was reached.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Spriestersbach ◽  
L. Bruder ◽  
B. Sanders ◽  
E. Fioretta ◽  
D. O h-Icí ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document