RETROPERITONEALS SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY: MINI-INVASIVE TECHNICAL, SAFETY AND COSMETIC

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Liem Ngo Thanh ◽  
Hung Nguyen Khoa ◽  
Tung Hoang Van
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Nephrectomy ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Objective Outcome ◽  
Technical Safety

Objective: Outcome of 45 retroperitoneal single incision laparoscopic nephrectomy of benigns nonfunction kidneys at Hue Central Hospital. Patients and method: A prospective study was perform on 45 patients with benign nonfuncion kidney, treated by retroperitoneal single incision laparoscopic nephrectomy at Department of General Surgery - Hue Central Hospital from May 2015 to August 2018. Results: Success: 42/45 patients. Mean operating time 87.5mins (50 - 155 mins), postoperative hospital stay 5-7 days. SILS Port of Covidien was inserted by 2.5 cm skin transverse incision, standard straight laparoscopic instruments were used instead of roticular instruments. Conclusion: This is a mini-invasive technical, safety and cosmetic Keywords: retroperitoneal single incision laparoscopic nephrectomy, single port nephrectomy.

SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN HUE CENTRAL HOSPITAL

2012 ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Xuan Dong Pham ◽  
Nhu Hiep Pham ◽  
Huu Thien Ho ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Hai Thanh Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Chronic Cholecystitis ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Gallbladder Polyp ◽  
Gallbladder Polyps ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
Wound Pain ◽  
Initial Results

Purpose: Evaluating the initial results in applying single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Hue Central Hospital. Patients and methods: 29 gallbladder polyps, gallstones with symptoms of acute or chronic cholecystitis and surgeried by single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Hue Central Hospital from March 2011 to December 2011. Results: Male/female was 0.45/1. Age: 49.24 ± 16.43 (21-81), 40 to 60 years 54.6%. Cholecystitis: 75.9%, 17.3% gallbladder polyp, gallbladder adenomyomatosis 3.4%. Added 1 trocart because difficult dissection surgery 10.2%, bleeding 6.8% difficult to handle, added 2 trocart 3.4%. Bleeding intraoperative 10.3%. Operating time: 76.2 ± 33.5 minutes, hospital stay: 4 - 6 days 51.7%. Wound pain after 2 weeks of hospital discharge 6.9%, with no wound seromas and no wound infection. Conclusions: Single port laparoscopic cholecystestomy is safe, has fewer complications, can be done with experienced surgeons laparoscopic surgery. Keywords: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gallbladder ston Key words: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gallbladder stone

scholarly journals Maneuverability of the Scope and Instruments within Three Different Single-Incision Laparoscopic Ports: An Experimental Pilot Study

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1242
Author(s):  
Georg Haider ◽  
Ursula Schulz ◽  
Nikola Katic ◽  
Christian Peham ◽  
Gilles Dupré
Keyword(s):  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Port System ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
Glove Port ◽  
Analysis System

Single-port access systems (SPASs) are currently used in human and veterinary surgeries. However, they pose technical challenges, such as instrument crowding, intra- and extracorporeal instrument collision, and reduced maneuverability. Studies comparing the maneuverability of the scopes and instruments in different SPASs are lacking. This study aimed to compare the maneuverability of three different SPASs: the Covidien SILS-port, Storz Endocone, and glove port. A clear acrylic box with artificial skin placed at the bottom was used to mimic the abdominal wall and cavity. The three SPASs were placed from below, and a 10-mm endoscope and 5-mm instrument were introduced. A motion analysis system consisting of 18 cameras and motion analysis software were used to track the movement of the endoscope and instrument, to determine the volume of the cone-shaped, three-dimensional figures over which movement was possible, with higher values indicating greater maneuverability. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the analysis. The maneuverability of the endoscope alone was significantly higher in the glove port system than in the other two SPASs. When inserting an additional instrument, the maneuverability significantly decreased in the SILS-port and Endocone, but not in the glove port. The highest maneuverability overall was found in the glove port.

scholarly journals First Canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: Comparison with multi-incision technique

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Law ◽  
Neal Rowe ◽  
Jason Archambault ◽  
Sofia Nastis ◽  
Alp Sener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Site Access ◽  
Da Vinci Robotic System ◽  
Incision Technique

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> We compared the outcomes of single-incision, robotassisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. multiple-incision pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robotic system.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We reviewed all consecutive robotic pyeloplasties by a single surgeon from January 2011 to August 2015. A total of 30 procedures were performed (16 single:14 multi-port). Two different single-port devices were compared: the GelPort (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) and the Intuitive single-site access port (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. Mean operating time was similar among the single and multi-port groups (225.2 min vs. 198.9 minutes [p=0.33]). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay in either group (86.2 hr vs. 93.2 hr [p=0.76]). There was no difference in success rates or postoperative complications among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Single-port robotic pyeloplasty is non-inferior to multiple-incision robotic surgery in terms of operative times, hospitalization time, success rates, and complications. Verifying these results with larger cohorts is required prior to the wide adoption of this technique. Ongoing objective measurements of cosmesis and patient satisfaction are being evaluated.</p><p> </p>

EARLY RESULTS OF SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

2017 ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Minh Duc Pham
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
The Mean ◽  
A New Technique

Background: Conventional three–port laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming popular for the treatment of acute appendicitis. In this report, we present the early results of a new technique of laparoscopic appendectomy conducted through a single-port. Patients and Methods: From March 2011 to October 2013, we have performed 86 operations Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy at Hue University Hospital and Hue Central Hospital. SILS Port (Covidien) is used, it can be performed with basic laparoscopic instruments. Results: In this study, 86 patients underwent Single-Port laparoscopic appendectomy, among them 52.33% were femele, 47.67% were male, female/male ratio was 1.09. The mean age was 33.09. An orther trocar insertion was required in 2 patients (2.33%). The mean operation time was 42.03 minutes and mean postoperative hospital stay 3.37 days. Postoperative complication occurred in 2 case (2.33%) was of omphalitis. During 2 weeks follow up, 2 case (2.33%) was of omphalitis. Conclusions: Single - port intracorporeal appendectomy is a safe, minimal invasive procedure with excellent cosmetic results. Key words: Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy, appendectomy

ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY AT HUE CENTRAL HOSPITAL

2011 ◽  
pp. 114-118
Author(s):  
Nhu Hiep Pham ◽  
Huu Thien Ho ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Van Nghia Tran
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
Rate Female

Objectives: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is becoming popular for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Since it was the first described, LA has been modified various times. We present the results of a new technique of LA conducted through a single port. Materials and methods: From March 2011 to November 2011, we have performed 28 operations Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy at the Surgical Department of Hue Central Hospital. Results: There were 28 patients, 57.1% were female, 42.9% were male, rate female/male was 1.3. The mean age is 36.4. The second port insertion was required in 2 patients (7.2%). Mean operation time was 44.6 minutes and postoperative hospital stay 3-5 days took 71.4%. Postoperative compications occurred in 1 case (3.6%) was of omphalitis. During 2-4 weeks follow up no problem related to the appendectomy have been reported. Conclusions: Single - port intracorporeal appendectomy procedure is a safe, minimal invasive procedure with excellent cosmetic results.

scholarly journals Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Using a 2 mm Atraumatic Grasper without Trocar

HPB Surgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Gulpinar ◽  
Suleyman Ozdemir ◽  
S. Erpulat Ozis ◽  
Turgut Aydin ◽  
Atila Korkmaz
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Scar Formation ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Skin Scar

Purpose. We present our experience in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a grasper directly without using a trocar in five patients. Methods and Results. The technique involves the use of Karl Storz 27290F grasper in order to perform gallbladder retraction in single port cholecystectomy. The grasper was introduced directly into the skin through abdominal wall without using any trocar and used to mobilize gallbladder whenever needed during surgery without causing any perforation or leakage of the gallbladder. There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications in 5 patients with the advantages of shorter operation time and almost invisible postoperative skin scar formation. Conclusion. We claim that the use of this instrument in SILS surgery might be advantageous than the conventional placement of sutures for the gallbladder mobilization.

scholarly journals Preprocedural SARS-CoV-2 Testing to Sustain Medically Needed Health Care Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghady Haidar ◽  
Ashley Ayres ◽  
Wendy C King ◽  
Mackenzie McDonald ◽  
Alan Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
New York ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Community Hospitals ◽  
Symptom Screening ◽  
Academic Hospitals ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
A Prospective Study

Abstract Background We implemented a preprocedural severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening initiative designed to sustain health care during a time when the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection was unknown. Methods This was a prospective study of patients undergoing procedures at 3 academic hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (April 21–June 11), and 19 community hospitals across Middle/Western Pennsylvania and Southwestern New York (May 1–June 11). Patients at academic hospitals underwent symptom screening ≤7 days preprocedure, then SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing 1–4 days preprocedure. A subset also underwent day-of-procedure testing. Community hospital patients underwent testing per local protocols. We report SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rates, impact, and barriers to testing encountered through June 11. PCR positivity rates of optional preprocedural SARS-CoV-2 testing for 2 consecutive periods following the screening initiative are also reported. Results Of 5881 eligible academic hospital patients, 2415 (41.1%) were tested (April 21–June 11). Lack of interest, distance, self-isolation, and nursing home/incarceration status were barriers. There were 11 PCR-positive patients (10 asymptomatic) among 10 539 patients tested (0.10%; 95% CI, 0.05%–0.19%): 3/2415 (0.12%; 95% CI, 0.02%–0.36%) and 8/8124 (0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%–0.19%) at academic and community hospitals, respectively. Procedures were performed as scheduled in 40% (4/10) of asymptomatic PCR-positive patients. Positivity increased during subsequent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surges: 54/34 948 (0.15%; 95% CI, 0.12%–0.20%) and 101/24 741 (0.41%; 95% CI, 0.33%–0.50%) PCR-positive patients from June 12–September 10 and September 11–December 15, respectively (P &lt; .0001). Conclusions Implementing preprocedural PCR testing was complex and revealed low infection rates (0.24% overall), which increased during COVID-19 surges. Additional studies are needed to define the COVID-19 prevalence threshold at which universal preprocedural screening is warranted.

Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures Using a Suture Anchor and an Anterior Approach

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. BALABAUD ◽  
C. RUIZ ◽  
J. NONNENMACHER ◽  
P. SEYNAEVE ◽  
P. KEHR ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Distal Biceps Tendon ◽  
Isokinetic Testing ◽  
Distal Biceps ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
A Prospective Study

In a prospective study, eight consecutive patients with nine ruptures of the distal biceps tendon underwent repair through a single incision. All patients were satisfied with their clinical results and had full ranges of elbow and forearm motion. There were no radial nerve injuries and no radio-ulnar synostoses. Isokinetic testing, after correction for dominance, demonstrated a 6% strength deficit, but 7% higher endurance in the repaired extremity for the flexion-concentric test, and no strength deficit and 13% higher endurance for supination. The improved endurance is probably explained by initial reduced effort due to apprehension which minimized subsequent fatigue.

scholarly journals Initial Experience Of Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

1970 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
SK Biswas ◽  
MM Arefin ◽  
JC Saha ◽  
T Ahmed ◽  
MM Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Mesh Repair ◽  
The Mean ◽  
A Prospective Study

The laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a safe alternative to open mesh repair. The procedure has the advantages of minimal access surgery and lower recurrence rate. A prospective study of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair of our first 11 patients was performed from July 2008 to December 2009. No serious intraoperative or postoperative morbidity was encountered, only two patients developed seroma. The mean operating time was 90 minutes (60 to 180 minutes). The mean day of discharge after surgery was 3 days (2-7 days). No patient developed a recurrence during mean follow up period of 10 months. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia has been shown to be feasible, safe and effective. However, careful patient selection and acquiring the necessary advanced laparoscopic surgical skills coupled with the proper use of equipment are mandatory before embarking on this procedure.Key Words: Incisional hernia; Laparoscopic repair; Mesh; Polypropylene DOI: 10.3329/fmcj.v5i2.6819Faridpur Med. Coll. J. 2010;5(2):41-45

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document