Faculty Opinions recommendation of Devices and interventions for the prevention of adverse outcomes of tachycardia on heart failure.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Manolis
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Adverse Outcomes

Diabetes and Heart Failure: Is it Hyperglycemia or Hyperinsulinemia?

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Triantafyllos Didangelos ◽  
Konstantinos Kantartzis
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Insulin Treatment ◽  
Close Association ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Treatment Of Diabetes

The cardiac effects of exogenously administered insulin for the treatment of diabetes (DM) have recently attracted much attention. In particular, it has been questioned whether insulin is the appropriate treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure. While several old and some new studies suggested that insulin treatment has beneficial effects on the heart, recent observational studies indicate associations of insulin treatment with an increased risk of developing or worsening of pre-existing heart failure and higher mortality rates. However, there is actually little evidence that the associations of insulin administration with any adverse outcomes are causal. On the other hand, insulin clearly causes weight gain and may also cause serious episodes of hypoglycemia. Moreover, excess of insulin (hyperinsulinemia), as often seen with the use of injected insulin, seems to predispose to inflammation, hypertension, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Nevertheless, it should be stressed that most of the data concerning the effects of insulin on cardiac function derive from in vitro studies with isolated animal hearts. Therefore, the relevance of the findings of such studies for humans should be considered with caution. In the present review, we summarize the existing data about the potential positive and negative effects of insulin on the heart and attempt to answer the question whether any adverse effects of insulin or the consequences of hyperglycemia are more important and may provide a better explanation of the close association of DM with heart failure.

scholarly journals Abnormal Liver Function Tests and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Discharged after Acute Heart Failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1730
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Miyama ◽  
Yasuyuki Shiraishi ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Ayumi Goda ◽  
Yosuke Nishihata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Abnormal Liver Function ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Function Tests ◽  
Parameter Values

Abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) are known to be associated with impaired clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, this implication varies with each single LFT panel. We aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of acute HF (AHF) patients by assessing multiple LFT panels in combination. From a prospective multicenter registry in Japan, 1158 AHF patients who were successfully discharged were analyzed (mean age, 73.9 ± 13.5 years; men, 58%). LFTs (i.e., total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase) at discharge were assessed; borderline and abnormal LFTs were defined as 1 and ≥2 parameter values above the normal range, respectively. The primary endpoint was composite of all-cause death or HF readmission. At the time of discharge, 28.7% and 8.6% of patients showed borderline and abnormal LFTs, respectively. There were 196 (16.9%) deaths and 298 (25.7%) HF readmissions during a median 12.4-month follow-up period. The abnormal LFTs group had a significantly higher risk of experiencing the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.08–2.12, p = 0.017), whereas the borderline LFTs group was not associated with higher risk of adverse events when referenced to the normal LFTs group. Among AHF patients, the combined elevation of ≥2 LFT panels at discharge was associated with long-term adverse outcomes.

scholarly journals Serum uric acid, influence of sacubitril/valsartan, and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PARAGON-HF

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Selvaraj ◽  
B.L Claggett ◽  
D.V Veldhuisen ◽  
I.S Anand ◽  
B Pieske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Serum Uric Acid ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Serum uric acid (SUA) is a biomarker of several pathobiologies relevant to the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though by itself may also worsen outcomes. In HF with reduced EF, SUA is independently associated with adverse outcomes and sacubitril/valsartan reduces SUA compared to enalapril. These effects in HFpEF have not been delineated. Purpose To determine the prognostic value of SUA, relationship of change in SUA to quality of life and outcomes, and influence of sacubitril/valsartan on SUA in HFpEF. Methods We analyzed 4,795 participants from the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF) trial. We related baseline hyperuricemia to the primary outcome (CV death and total HF hospitalization), its components, myocardial infarction or stroke, and a renal composite outcome. At the 4-month visit, the relationship between SUA change and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) and several biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were also assessed. We simultaneously adjusted for baseline and time-updated SUA to determine whether lowering SUA was associated with clinical benefit. Results Average age was 73±8 years and 52% were women. After multivariable adjustment, hyperuricemia was associated with increased risk for most outcomes (primary outcome HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.37, 1.90, Fig 1A). The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan for the primary outcome was not modified by baseline SUA (interaction p=0.11). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SUA −0.38 mg/dL (95% CI: −0.45, −0.31) compared with valsartan (Fig 1B), with greater effect in those with baseline hyperuricemia (−0.50 mg/dL) (interaction p=0.013). Change in SUA was independently and inversely associated with change in KCCQ-OSS (p=0.019) and eGFR (p<0.001), but not NT-proBNP (p=0.52). Time-updated SUA was a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes over baseline SUA. Conclusions SUA independently predicts adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces SUA compared to valsartan, an effect that was stronger in those with higher baseline SUA, and reducing SUA was associated with improved outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis

scholarly journals Sex Differences in the Association between Atrial Fibrillation and 90-Day Adverse Outcomes among Older Adults with Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2237
Author(s):  
Youn-Jung Son ◽  
Da-Young Kim ◽  
Mi Hwa Won
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Male And Female

Sex differences in the prognostic impact of coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) in older patients with heart failure (HF) have not been well-studied. This study, therefore, compared sex differences in the association between AF and its 90-day adverse outcomes (hospital readmissions and emergency room (ER) visits) among older adults with HF. Of the 250 older adult patients, the prevalence rates of coexisting AF between male and female HF patients were 46.0% and 31.0%, respectively. In both male and female older patients, patients with AF have a significantly higher readmission rate (male 46.0%, and female 34.3%) than those without AF (male 6.8%, and female 12.8%). However, there are no significant differences in the association between AF and ER visits in both male and female older HF patients. The multivariate logistic analysis showed that coexisting AF significantly increased the risk of 90-day hospital readmission in both male and female older patients. In addition, older age in males and longer periods of time after an HF diagnosis in females were associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission. Consequently, prospective cohort studies are needed to identify the impact of coexisting AF on short- and long-term outcomes in older adult HF patients by sex.

Abstract 14922: Prognostic Value of Baseline BNP and NT-ProBNP and its Interaction With Spironolactone in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction in the TOPCAT Trial

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inder S Anand ◽  
Scott D Solomon ◽  
Brian Claggett ◽  
Sanjiv J Shah ◽  
Eileen O’Meara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patient Selection Criterion ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Background: Plasma natriuretic peptides (NP) are helpful in the diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and predict adverse outcomes. Levels of NP beyond a certain cut-off level are often used as inclusion criteria in clinical trials to ensure that the patients have HF, and to select patients at higher risk. Whether treatments have a differential effect on outcomes across the spectrum of NP levels is unclear. In the I-Preserve trial a benefit of irbesartan on all outcomes was only seen in HFpEF patients with low but not high NP levels. We hypothesized that in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial, spironolactone might have a greater benefit in patients with lower NP levels. Methods and Results: BNP (n=468) or NT-proBNP (n=400) levels were available at baseline in 868 patients with HFpEF enrolled in the natriuretic peptide stratum (BNP ≥100 pg/mL or an NT- proBNP ≥360 pg/mL) of the TOPCAT trial. In a multi-variable Cox regression model, that included age, gender, region (Americas vs. Russia/Georgia), atrial fibrillation, diabetes, eGFR, BMI and heart rate, higher BNP or NT-proBNP as a continuous, standardized log-transformed variable or grouped by terciles (see Figure for BNP & NT-proBNP tercile values) was independently associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for heart failure (Figure-1). There was a significant interaction between the effect of spironolactone and baseline BNP or NT-proBNP terciles for the primary outcome (P=0.02, Figure-2), with greater benefit of the drug in the lower compared to higher NP terciles. Conclusions: The benefit of spironolactone in lower risk HFpEF patients may indicate effects of the drug on early, but not late higher-risk stage of the disease. These findings question the strategy of using elevated NP as a patient selection criterion in HFpEF trials.

Abstract 13304: Liver Dispersion Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Hotsuki ◽  
Akiomi Yoshihisa ◽  
Koichiro Watanabe ◽  
Yu Sato ◽  
Yusuke Kimishima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Event ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasonography ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Glutamyl Transferase

Background: It has been recently reported that liver stiffness assessed by transient elastography reflects right atrial pressure (RAP), and is associated with worse outcome in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the relationship between liver dispersion (LD, a novel indicator of liver viscosity) determined by abdominal ultrasonography and RAP, and prognostic impacts of LD on HF patients have not been fully examined. We aimed to clarify associations of LD with parameters of liver functional test (LFT) and right-heart catheterization (RHC), and cardiac event such as cardiac death and worsening HF in patients with HF. Methods and Results: We performed abdominal ultrasonography, LFT, RHC, and followed up cardiac events including cardiac death and unplanned hospitalization due to HF in patients with HF (n=157). We examined associations of LD with parameters of LFT and RHC. There were significant correlations between LD and circulating levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (R=0.197, P=0.018), cholinesterase (R=-0.301, P=0.001), and 7S domain of collagen type IV (P4NP 7S, a marker of fibrosis, R=0.334, P<0.001), but not with RAP (R=0.067, P=0.514) or cardiac index (R=-0.038, P=0.667). During the follow up period (median 305 days), 6 cardiac deaths and 18 unplanned hospitalization due to HF occurred. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis ( Figure ), cardiac event rate was significantly higher in the high LD group (LD ≥10.0 (m/s)/kHz, n=79) than in the low LD group (LD < 10.0 (m/s)/kHz, n=78; log-rank, P=0.007). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, high LD was found to be an independent predictor of cardiac event (hazard ratio 3.274, 95% confidence interval 1.203-8.912, P=0.020). Conclusions: LD assessed by abdominal ultrasonography reflects liver fibrosis rather than liver congestion, and is associated with adverse prognosis in HF patients.

scholarly journals Serial sodium values and adverse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 290 ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasnim F. Imran ◽  
Katherine E. Kurgansky ◽  
Yash R. Patel ◽  
Ariela R. Orkaby ◽  
Robert R. McLean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Mean and Pulse Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang-Fei Wei ◽  
Yuzhong Wu ◽  
Ruicong Xue ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
Xin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

It remains debated whether pulse pressure is associated with left ventricular traits and adverse outcomes over and beyond mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. We investigated these associations in 3428 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (51.5% women; mean age, 68.6 years) enrolled in the TOPCAT trial (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist). We computed association sizes and hazards ratios with 1-SD increase in MAP and pulse pressure. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, association sizes ( P ≤0.039) for MAP were 0.016 cm and 0.014 cm for septal and posterior wall thickness, −0.15 for E/A ratio, −0.66 for E/e′, and −0.64% for ejection fraction, independent of pulse pressure. With adjustment additionally applied for MAP, E/A ratio and longitudinal strain increased with higher pulse pressure with association sizes amounting to 0.067 ( P =0.026) and 0.40% ( P =0.023). In multivariable-adjusted analyses of both placebo and spironolactone groups, lower MAP and higher pulse pressure predicted the primary composite end point ( P ≤0.028) and hospitalized HF ( P ≤0.002), whereas MAP was also significantly associated with total mortality ( P ≤0.007). Sensitivity analyses stratified by sex, median age, and region generated confirmatory results with exception for the association of adverse outcomes with pulse pressure in patients with age ≥69 years. In conclusion, the clinical application of MAP and pulse pressure may refine risk estimates in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. This finding may help further investigation for the development of HF with preserved ejection fraction preventive strategies targeting pulsatility and blood pressure control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document