scholarly journals Menamai Sang Nama: Polemik Nama YHWH-Allah

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Deflit Dujerslaim Lilo

Abstract: The focus of this paper is about the polemic that occurred around the use of the names Yahweh and God in Christianity. The name Yahweh is claimed by The Sacred Name Movement as the only name of the LORD to be believed and mentioned by believers. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to examine this view and find out whether the mention of the name of God that used in both the Bible and worship is wrong and Christianity must re-use the name Yahweh. Using qualitative methods sourced from literature studies, authors make the critical but evaluative studies by examining hermeneutically and collecting data from various sources of literature. As a result, researcher concludes that Christianity is not antipathic to the use of the name Yahweh but stating that mentioning and using the name Yahweh will affect on the salvation of someone is an absurd assumption and a logical fallacy.   Keywords: God, the sacred name movement, tetragrammaton, Yudaism   Abstrak-Fokus dari tulisan ini adalah mengenai polemik yang terjadi di seputar penggunaan nama Yahweh dan Allah dalam kekristenan. Nama Yahweh diklaim oleh kelompok Gerekan Nama Suci sebagai satu-satunya nama TUHAN yang harus diimani dan disebut oleh orang percaya. Karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji pandangan tersebut dan menemukan apakah sebutan Allah yang digunakan baik di dalam Alkitab maupun ibadah adalah sebutan yang keliru dan dengan demikian kekristenan harus kembali menggunakan nama Yahweh. Menggunakan metode kualitatif yang bersumber dari studi literatur, penulis membuat kajian yang bersifat kritis namun evaluatif dengan meneliti secara hermeneutis maupun mengumpulkan data dari berbagai sumber kepustakaan. Hasilnya, peneliti menyimpulkan bahwa kekristenan tidak bersikap antipati terhadap penggunaan nama Yahweh tetapi dengan menyatakan bahwa menyebut dan menggunakan nama Yahweh akan memengaruhi keselamatan seseorang merupakan asumsi yang absurd dan cacat logika.   Kata Kunci: Allah, gerakan nama suci, tetragramaton, Yudaisme

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-176
Author(s):  
Zainal Arifin

Abstract: This study appears due MUIS Malaysia ban the use of the word "Allah" for the citizens is not Islam. This study examined for the purposes of the establishment of religious tolerance based on the understanding of religion. This paper seeks to explain that the word "Allah" contained in the Qur'an and the Bible, by limiting the study of the Qur’an and the Bible, to formulate the concept of "Allah" who became God for Muslims. This study found that the word "Allah" though not derived from Arabic, he eventually became part of the Arabic language of the Koran. He also became the name of God for Muslims. Furthermore, the authors found that in addition to Muslims, Christians and Jews may use the word "Allah" to indicate their God. When a Christian used to indicate the name of Jesus, it is also allowed as a form of tolerance. As the infidels Quraish mention sculpture as a means of worshiping God. Abstrak: Kajian ini muncul akibat pelarangan MUIS Malaysia dalam penggunaan kata "Allah" bagi warga bukan Islam. Kajian ini dikaji untuk keperluan tegaknya toleransi beragama berdasarkan pe¬mahaman agama. Tulisan ini berupaya menjelaskan bahwa kata "Allah" tertuang dalam Al-Quran dan Alkitab, dengan membatasi telaah pada Al-Quran dan Alkitab, merumuskan konsep "Allah" yang menjadi Tuhan bagi Muslim. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kata "Allah" walau bukan berasal dari bahasa Arab, ia akhirnya menjadi bagian dari bahasa Quran yang Arab. Ia juga menjadi nama Tuhan bagi umat Islam. Lebih jauh lagi, penulis menemukan bahwa selain Muslim, umat Nasrani dan Yahudi boleh menggunakan kata "Allah" untuk me-nunjukkan Tuhan mereka. Bila seorang Kristiani meng-gunakannya untuk menunjuk¬kan nama Yesus, itu juga dibolehkan sebagai wujud toleransi. Sebagaimana kaum kafir Quraisy me¬nyebutkan patung sebagai sarana me-nyembah Allah. Keywords: Allah, Al-Quran, Alkitab, God, Islam, Kristen.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. LXI-LXVIII
Author(s):  
Judith Becker

This contribution offers a review ofCarly L. Crouch & Jonathan Stökl (eds.): In the Name of God. The Bible in the Colonial Discourse of Empire, Biblical Interpretation Series 126.Leiden: Brill, 2014. viii and 192 pages, € 98, ISBN 978-900-425-8334.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prayuda

Christian Education Based on the Old Testament Perspective and Its Implementation for Children. What is meant by Christian education is an education that centers on teaching the Bible and trying to apply it to the Child. The problem formulation in this study is how To Christian Education In The Old Testament and how it is implemented for children. The purpose of this study is to describe Education based on the perspective of the Bible and its implementation for the Child. This research uses qualitative methods that explore the contents of the Old Testament Bible and literature studies to be able to understand what Christian education in the Old Testament looks like and how it is like the Child.


JURNAL KADESI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Endang Pasaribu

This study aims to reveal,produce data and facts whether the death penalty is something that is in line with human rights and the Bible as a Christian foundation. The benefits of this research theoretically provide an understanding to the wider community about the death penalty and human rights, increase and equip society to have This research uses descriptive qualitative methods, this method is used for social and humanities research and can also be used in theological studies. The results of this study indicate that the death penalty in Indonesia is a standard and legal matters in the Criminal Code, even though human rights are not in line and in agreement with its implementation, the death penalty will still be implemented if the Criminal Code does not undergo a revision in the chapter that contains the death penalty. The implementation of this research is to teach every person or Christian to be the authority to accept and be responsible for receiving the death penalty, because it is impossible for the death penalty to be given to a person who has not committed a crime.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-87
Author(s):  
Sri Lina Betty Lamsihar Simorangkir ◽  
Andreas Marhain Sumarno

Abstract: The Bible is the word of God which teaches the truth by understanding it through comprehensive study. In following Jesus, believers must return to the correct understanding of materiality and wealth so as not to be trapped. In this study, it was found that living in abundance in the teachings of prosperity theology does not indicate that God's children must be prosperous and abundant in material things. This study uses qualitative methods with exposition and exegesis approaches. Thus, it can be concluded that the theological review of the concept of abundant life in the perspective of prosperity theology. First, it brings the congregation to understand the nature of Abundant Life in prosperity theology by looking at the background and teachings of Prosperity Theology. Furthermore, understanding in a comprehensive manner that a Bible review of several verses that are used as the basis for Abundant Life as a Prosperity Theology Teaching becomes an apologist who brings a new paradigm. And the last Bible review of abundance in a biblical perspective and educating believers' attitudes about wealth according to the Bible. Abstrak: Alkitab adalah firman Allah yang mengajarkan kebenaran dengan memahaminya melalui mempelajarinya secara konprihensif. Dalam mengikut Yesus, orang percaya harus kembali kepada pemahaman yang benar tentang materi dan kekayaan agar tidak terjebak. Dalam penelitian ini di dapatkan bahwa hidup berkelimpahan dalam ajaran teologi kemakmuran tidak menunjukkan bahwa anak Tuhan harus makmur dan berlimpah dalam materi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan eksposisi dan eksegesa. Demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa tinjauan teologis konsep hidup berkelimpahan dalam perspektif teologi kemakmuran. Pertama membawa jemaat dapat mengerti hakikat Hidup berkelimpahan dalam teologi kemakmuran dengan melihat latar belakang berdiri dan Ajaran Teologi Kemakmuran. Selanjutnya memahami secara konfrernhensif bahwa tinjauan Alkitab tentang beberapa ayat yang dipergunakan sebagai dasar untuk Hidup Berkelimpahan Sebagai Ajaran Teologi Kemakmuran menjadi apologet yang membawa paradigma baru. Dan yang terakhir Tinjauan Alkitab tentang kelimpahan dalam perspektif Alkitab dan mengedukasi bagi Sikap orang percaya tentang kekayaan Menurut Alkitab.


Kurios ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Eben Munthe

The use of the terms El and YHWH relating to the name of God or God in the Bible produces a lot of discussion, in which groups eventually tend to maintain YHWH or Yahweh as names that cannot be replaced. The group is usually called Yahweism, or the admirers of the name Yahweh. This article provides a literature review with a qualitative approach to the texts of the Scriptures concerning the use of the term name. With descriptive and analytical methods, the conclusion is that the use of El and YHWH in the Old Testament refers to the same person so that it is not necessary to debate its use. El refers to revelation in general, while YHWH shows special revelation in the context of the election and salvation of a nation or people. AbstrakPenggunaan istilah El dan YHWH berkaitan dengan nama Allah atau Tuhan dalam Alkitab menghasilkan banyak diskusi, di mana pada akhirnya muncul kelompok yang cenderung mempertahankan YHWH atau Yahweh sebagai nama diri yang tidak boleh diganti. Kelompok tersebut biasa disebut Yahweisme, atau para pengagum nama Yahweh. Artikel ini memberikan kajian literature dengan pendekatan kualitatif pada teks-teks Kitab Suci berkenaan dengan penggunaan istilah nama tersebut. Dengan metode deskriptif dan analisis, maka diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa penggunaan El dan YHWH dalam Perjanjian Lama merujuk pada satu pribadi yang sama sehingga tidak perlu diperdebatkan penggunaannya. El menunjuk pada pewahyuan secara umum, sementara YHWH menunjukkan pewahyuan khusus dalam konteks pemilihan dan keselamatan sebuah bangsa atau umat.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-88
Author(s):  
Lucyana Henny

Worship according to the concept of Christianity is God's commandment that must be done by every person who has been redeemed and saved by the Lord Jesus Christ. The purpose of the study is to answer: What is the meaning of worship of believers? What are the elements of worship according to the Bible? How is worship lived in church life? Research using qualitative methods using literature review (library research). The results of the study are: (1) worship truly is a service to God by offering all souls and spirits with various actions and attitudes of respect and adoration, submission, and obedience with a thankful welcome. (2) Worship without doubt is the inner confession of a person who accepts that God is sovereign in power and good. With a series of personal offerings and the offerings of the people, approaching the altar of God by bringing sacrifice. (3) worship lived in church life is Jesus as the subject of worship through hymns, prayers, confessions of sins begging for forgiveness, giving thanks. Church life gives the best offerings to God, body, soul and spirit, which must be accompanied by service to others.AbstrakBeribadah menurut konsep kekristenan adalah perintah Tuhan yang wajib dilakukan oleh setap orang yang sudah di tebus dan diselamatkan oleh Tuhan Yesus Kristus.  Tujuan penelitian adalah menjawab: Apakah makna ibadah persekutuan orang percaya? Apakah unsur-unsur ibadah menurut Alkitab?  Bagaimanakah ibadah dihayati dalam kehidupan bergereja? Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan kajian literature (library research). Hasil penelitian adalah: (1) ibadah yang benar adalah  pelayanan kepada Allah dengan mempersembahkan seluruh tubuh jiwa dan roh  dengan aneka tindakan dan sikap penuh hormat dan puja, ketundukan, serta ketaatan dengan penuh ucapan syukur. (2)  unsur-unsur ibadah adalah ungkapan batin seseorang yang mengakui bahwa Allah berdaulat penuh kuasa dan baik. Dengan rangkaian persembahan pribadi maupun persembahan umat, menghampiri mezbah Allah dengan membawa kurban.  (3) ibadah dihayati dalam kehidupan bergereja adalah Yesus sebagai pokok penyembahan melalui nyanyian pujian, doa, pengakuan dosa mohon pengampunan, mengucap syukur. Kehidupan bergereja itu  memberikan persembahan terbaik kepada Tuhan yaitu tubuh, jiwa dan roh, yang harus dibarengi dengan pelayanan kepada sesama. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-424
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Martinon

AbstractAs is well known, the biblical sixth commandment, “Thou shall not kill”, is intimately linked to the First Commandment, “I am the Lord”. By linking the two at the top of Moses's two-column table, language is given priority: the name of God can be uttered only when the possibility of death has been set aside. In this way, the linking of these two commandments marks not only the birth of language, but also, more importantly, the start of ethics. As such, commandments one and six form the basis of practically all Western ethics from Kant's categorical imperative (the unconditional maxim needs a First Word to enter into force) to Lyotard's language games (for which all utterances are charged with the moral imperative to respond), for example. But how on earth does this famous linguistic and ethical structure fare in a context whereby the written text is not given priority, in a situation where prohibitions are inherited orally? This paper will attempt to expose the thorny issue of the role of the sixth commandment in the context of Rwanda. This will imply neither the exposition of the history of the arrival of the Bible in Rwanda nor the way it helped to consolidate the colonial regime. This paper will also not examine the neglect of the prohibition against murder during the genocide of 1994. Instead, the essay will examine the linguistic and cultural problems one faces when determining the birth of ethics in two radically different contexts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-87
Author(s):  
Obet Nego Nego ◽  
Debby Christ Mondolu

Dalam berteologi, Allah adalah sumber teologi, pokok teologi dan tujuan teologi. Dalam hal ini, Allah membuat manusia mempelajari-Nya di dalam Alkitab (Sola Scriptura), dan Roh Kudus yang menyingkapkan kebenaran-Nya sehingga menimbulkan iman di dalam diri umat-Nya (Sola Fide) kepada Allah dan kebenaran-Nya yang final, yaitu Tuhan Yesus Kristus saja (Sola Christo). Akhirnya, memimpin umat-Nya kepada diri-Nya sendiri dan demi kemuliaan nama Allah (Soli Deo Gloria). Dalam karya tulis memandang prinsip-prinsip dalam konsep Emotional Spiritual Quotient (ESQ) penting untuk diintegrasikan ke dalam doing theology atau berteologi. Dalam upaya mensinergiskan kecerdasan intelektual, emosi dan spiritual dalam berteologi yang teosentris, di mana kecerdasan spiritual (SQ) menjadi pusat kecerdasan.   In theology, God is the source of theology, theology and the aim of theology. In this case, God made people study Him in the Bible (Sola Scriptura), and the Holy Spirit who revealed His truth so as to cause faith in His people (Sola Fide) in God and His final truth, namely God Jesus Christ alone (Sola Christo). Finally, leading His people to Himself and for the glory of the name of God (Soli Deo Gloria). In writing, the principles in the concept of Emotional Spiritual Quotient (ESQ) are important to be integrated into doing theology or doing theology. In an effort to synergize intellectual, emotional and spiritual intelligence in a theocentric theology, where spiritual intelligence (SQ) becomes the center of intelligence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document