scholarly journals Data Collection to Fulfil the Targets for the SDGs: The APIK Gender Justice Index (AGJI)

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Saskia Wieringa
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Gender Justice ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Flexible Tool ◽  
Political Empowerment ◽  
Indonesian Archipelago ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
Policies And Programs

<p>Indonesia has committed itself to the 2030 Agenda with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which were approved by the United Nations on September 25, 2015. Seventeen objectives and 169 related targets must be achieved by 2030. Gender equality is an independent goal (SDG number 5), but gender related issues are also contained in the goal of poverty alleviation (SDG 1), health care including maternal and child health (SDG 3) and education (SDG 4). SDG number 16 concerns a commitment to peace, access to justice and strong institutions. Reliable and inclusive gender statistics are needed to monitor progress towards achieving gender equality and justice and to identify key gender inequalities that require policy interventions. Both quantitative and qualitative data are needed. In addition, certain problems are specific for women, such as maternal death. Given the wide diversity in gender relations and socio-economic conditions of the Indonesian archipelago subnational data are required. This article outlines the methodology of designing the APIK Gender Justice Index. The main findings are that the availability of sex-disaggregated data at the subnational level leaves much to be desired. The AGJI proves to be a reliable, comprehensive and flexible tool that can easily be used by policy makers and activists to design policies and programs to address gender-based discrimination in Indonesia, for instance in the field of health. The AGJI is based on locally available data. The advantages of the AGJI are that it can be computed with a minimum of cost and effort to achieve a maximum of reliability and ease in use. The GSI was found to be comparable with the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI) for Indonesia but it is more sensitive to political empowerment. The AGJI assesses in how far women have been able to take up leadership positions at subnational levels, including at the village level and are represented in the major decision-making bodies such as the judiciary.</p>

scholarly journals Gender equality and inequalities in self-reported health in 27 European countries (2004 to 2016)

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Roxo ◽  
C Bambra ◽  
J Perelman
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Use Of Time ◽  
Reported Health ◽  
Education And Employment ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Across Europe, women tend to report worse health than men, probably due to women's lower position in society. Although societal gender inequalities have decreased, differences persist regarding employment, income and use of time. This study aims to assess the evolution of gender-based inequalities in 27 European countries between 2004 and 2016, and to analyze the impact of societal gender equality in this evolution. Methods We used data from the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), from subjects between 25 and 64 years old (N = 2,931,081) from 27 European countries. Logistic regressions were performed with bad self-reported health as dependent variable, first adjusted for age, country and year, and later also for education and employment. Interactions between gender and year were added to the models to assess changes over time. Countries were clustered according to their societal gender equality, based on their Gender Equality Index of 2005 and 2015 (GEI). Analyzes were stratified by education, employment and cluster of GEI. Results Women were 17% (OR = 1.17, 95%CI=1.15-1.19) more likely than men to report bad health. Considering education and employment, women were 3% less likely to report bad health (OR = 0.97, 95%CI=0.96-0.99). Gender-based inequalities were larger among the cluster with higher GEI (OR = 1.37, 95%CI=1.26-1.48) and those with lower education (OR = 1.21, 95%CI=1.18-1.24). Although the gender gap reduced from 26% (OR = 1.26, 95%CI=1.18-1.34) in 2004 to 16% (OR = 1.16, 95%CI=1.08-1.24) in 2016, the decrease was not significant. Differences between years were not significant when analyses were stratified for education, employment or cluster of GEI. Conclusions Gender-based inequalities persisted between 2014 and 2016 and were strongly related to differences in education and employment. The gender gap was larger among countries with greater societal gender equality. Key messages Women’s disadvantage in self-reported health persisted in 2016 and was connected to socioeconomic differences. The gender gap is not smaller in countries with greater societal gender equality.

Equal pay, equal access

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Social Representations ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Equal Pay ◽  
Life Balance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pertinent Information ◽  
Different Dimensions ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context. Findings Global workforces are still impacted by gender inequalities – there remains a gender gap in pay, in access to roles of responsibility and in terms of work-life balance. A challenge facing gender equality in the workplace is an agreed definition – organizations, managers and employees have different social representations of gender equality and place differing levels of importance on different dimensions. This can affect implementation of gender equality policies in the workplace, which rely on the goodwill of individuals to put policy into practice. Organizations need to recognize which dimensions are most important to their workplace in order to successfully implement equality. Originality The briefing saves busy executives and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.

The gender gap in sport event attendance in Europe: The impact of macro-level gender equality

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Lagaert ◽  
Henk Roose
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Macro Level ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Gender Gaps ◽  
Sport Event ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Eu Countries ◽  
The Impact

This paper studies the gender gap in sport event attendance – characterized by higher male and lower female participation – using a macro-sociological and cross-national comparative approach. We argue that because gender is produced and justified in the realm of sport, gender gaps in sport event attendance may be more pronounced in some societies than others, depending on the position women and men have in the particular context in which someone ‘does’ his/her gender. So, in addition to individual attributes, one has to consider the societal, macro-level gender equality in order to understand the individual-level gender inequalities in sport event attendance. Using multilevel analyses on Eurobarometer data (2007), we evaluate whether the size of the gender gap in sport event attendance varies across European Union (EU) countries and how this variation relates to societal gender equality, as measured by the Gender Equality Index of the European Institute for Gender Equality. We find higher male than female attendance in all EU countries, but also conclude that higher levels of macro-level gender equality are associated with smaller gender gaps in sport event attendance.

scholarly journals Gender Inequalities and Social Sustainability. Can Modernization Diminish the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Roig ◽  
Cristina Aybar ◽  
Jose M. Pavía
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Classical Problem ◽  
Political Knowledge ◽  
Development Theory ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Cultural Attitudes ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Survey Responses

The gender gap in political knowledge is a classical problem of Western democracies. In the 21st century, political knowledge is still unequally distributed between men and women, as many cross-section studies have shown. This is an indicator of women’s disempowerment and the distance which remains to be covered to achieve an inclusive and sustainable society. Could public policies and gender equality laws change the situation? Using a longitudinal database in which 600,000 survey responses are analysed from 1996 to 2017, this case study of Spain aims to shed some light on this question. It combines sociological and political approaches in line with the development theory of the gender gap of Inglehart and Norris (2000, 2003), whose core argument is that modernization changes cultural attitudes toward gender equality. From this perspective, this paper proposes the following hypothesis: the modernization process of Spain (from a dictatorship to a democracy) has given rise to changes in traditional sex roles, driving women‘s access to political knowledge and diminishing the gender gap. This is a step towards achieving objective number 5 of the 2030 United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development (gender equality and empowerment of women and girls), according to which gender equality is not only a fundamental human right but a necessary foundation for a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world.

Gender equality influence on the economic development in the Baltic Sea Region

2020 ◽  
pp. 141-160
Author(s):  
Magdalena Tomala ◽  
Michał Słowak
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
The Baltic Sea ◽  
Political Empowerment ◽  
Essential Condition ◽  
Baltic Sea Region ◽  
The Baltic

One of the most exposed value in an Age of Neoliberalism is a gender equality, which is an essential condition to achieve goals of economic growth, employment and social cohesion. The Baltic Sea Region (BSR) is a non-homogeneous region. When examining the economic situation of the region, the BSR countries are traditionally divided into two groups: (1) the high-income countries Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Germany and Iceland, which are called “old market economy countries”, or “developed economies of the region”; (2) the middle- or low-income countries as Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Russia. The latter are classified as post-socialist or transitional economies. The aim of the article is to analyse similarities and differences between those two groups of countries from 2006 to 2016 (ten years). The article compared gender gap using special tools as an economic participation, educational attainment and political empowerment

Analysing non-legal barriers to land ownership by women.

2021 ◽  
pp. 100-112
Author(s):  
Katriel Marks ◽  
Rhonda Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Educational Attainment ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Political Empowerment ◽  
The World ◽  
World Economic ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Legal Barriers

Abstract This chapter explores barriers to women's land ownership. It investigates the potential factors behind why women's rights to own land are often ignored despite laws permitting women to own and inherit land. Measures of gender equality are correlated, as presented in the World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Index 2020 (economic participation and equality, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment) to percentages of land held by women in a nation. Commonalities between case studies on women's land ownership around the world are discussed as well.

Water, poverty and gender: review of evidences from Nepal, India and South Africa

Water Policy ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 503-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhawana Upadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Irrigated Agriculture ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Policies And Programs ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Gender Participation

Access to water in equitable manner and the improved management of water are imperative to sustainable development, poverty alleviation and biodiversity preservation. Despite much research on gender and natural resources management, there have been only a handful of studies on gender and water, especially those trying to link the two with poverty issues. This paper seeks to fill this gap specifically by looking at the linkages among gender, water and poverty in terms of gender participation in irrigated agriculture and irrigation institutions. The main objective of the study is to examine gender participation in irrigated agriculture and irrigation institutions and to analyze the impact of irrigation projects on men and women. The study approach has been a qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary and secondary data. Key findings reveal a considerable degree of gender inequalities, especially in terms of participation in irrigation institutions. Despite a high level of female involvement in irrigated agriculture, their participation in irrigation institutions is much lower. Furthermore, water projects with gender equality interventions have enhanced women's status in particular by raising their abilities to participate. The results suggest that the incorporation of gendersensitive policies and programs in irrigation schemes could have significant positive impacts both on gender equality and poverty.

scholarly journals Policy Framework Surrounding Women Economic Participation in Jordan

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
NAHIDA EL-SAIES
Keyword(s):  
Gender Gap ◽  
Policy Framework ◽  
World Economic Forum ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Skill Sets ◽  
Political Empowerment ◽  
Economic Participation ◽  
World Economic ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
Global Gender Gap Index

Women situation in the MENA Region countries, have long lived under difficult economic and social conditions, have the worst gender equality rankings according to the Global Gender Gap Index 2017. (The Global Gender Gap report is an annual insight report that is carried out by the World Economic Forum. This tool shows vital gender-based indicators to determine the performance of each of the selected 144 countries.) Some of these indicators are:i) economic participation and opportunity, ii) health and educational attainment, iii) political empowerment, vi) workforce, v) skill sets, and vi) educational degrees.

scholarly journals Building Back Better, Gender Equality, and Feminist Dilemmas

IDS Bulletin ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohela Nazneen ◽  
Susana Araujo
Keyword(s):  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Gender Based Violence ◽  
Women's Voice ◽  
Response And Recovery ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Gender Power ◽  
Women And Girls ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
Gender Specific

The Covid-19 pandemic has affected men and women differently, exacerbating existing gender inequalities across a range of areas including health, education, and livelihoods. Globally, the levels of gender-based violence have increased. Consensus exists in policy circles that emergency response and recovery plans should consider both the immediate and longer-term gender impact of Covid-19, and without effective measures, the progress made to date on gender equality will not be sustainable. But has this crisis led to a moment when gender power hierarchies in our economies, politics, and society can be renegotiated? In this article, we explore: what does building back better look like if gender equality was at its core? What kinds of feminist dilemmas arise with respect to how we frame women’s voice and agency as we advocate for transformative systemic change? We start with a vision for building back better with a gender lens; and move on to discuss the gender-specific impacts of Covid-19 that exacerbate the vulnerabilities of women and girls. In connection with the latter, we discuss the feminist dilemmas that arise with respect to discourse on women’s agency, representation, participation, and the key issues that we need to consider for transforming systemic gender power hierarchies.

scholarly journals लिंगआधारीत बजेट आणि वास्तवीकता

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAKSHIT MADAN BAGDE
Keyword(s):  
Gender Gap ◽  
Indian Society ◽  
Gender Inequalities ◽  
Women's Development ◽  
Modern Age ◽  
The Government ◽  
Changing Times ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
And Gender ◽  
The Uk

In the modern age, gender-based budgeting is influenced by the growing consciousness of different sections of society. Indian society is divided into different castes, religions, and sects. In all of this, the expectation of equality and the consciousness to fulfill it seem to have been created. Considering the Indian economy, the concept of a gender-based budget has come to the fore these days. Through this, the nation and the state are trying to extend the benefits of the government scheme to the women in the society and to bridge the gender gap between men and women. Gender-based budgeting does not mean creating a separate budget for women but trying to address social and gender inequalities by adjusting to the main budget. At the experimental level, the first gender-based budget was introduced in Australia in 1980. Since then, gender-based budgets have been used in the UK in 1989 and now in 70 countries around the world. At present, welfare has taken the place of empowerment in India due to the changing times and that is why in the 9th Five Year Plan, Rs 30 crore was distributed in the country in the form of various schemes for women in the form of gender-based budget. In 2001, the Government of India declared 'Women's Empowerment Year' and gave priority to women's development in the country. On March 16, 2012, Pranab Mukherjee presented the 2012-13 budget in the Lok Sabha. Judging by this, it cannot be called an ambitious budget.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document