scholarly journals Management of immune thrombocytopenia during COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-36
Author(s):  
S. V. Semochkin ◽  
T. A. Mitina ◽  
T. N. Tolstykh

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged health professionals and patients suffering from haematological diseases with embarrassed diagnosis, treatment, surveillance, social distancing and other constraints.Aim — addressing therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the light of own experience, as well as national and international professional medical community guidelines.Main findings. A standard choice in COVID-19-negative ITP patients are conventional, e.g., glucocorticosteroid (GCS) and intravenous immunoglobulin therapies. An early transfer to thrombopoietin receptor agonists (rTPO) appears optimal as reducing the infection risk in GCS withdrawal and significantly improving the stable remission rate without supportive treatment. Combined ITP–COVID-19 patients should consider a prednisolone treatment of 20 mg/day, provided an absent active bleeding. The dose may increase to 1 mg/kg/day in no response after 3–5 days. ITP patients admitted for COVID-19 should start weight‐based LMWH thromboprophylaxis upon attaining a platelet count of ≥ 30 × 109 /L. Chronic ITP patients should carry on usual treatment with standard SARS-CoV-2 preventive and social distancing measures. We exemplify three contrasting clinical cases of COVID-19-comorbid thrombocytopenia and discuss the ITP differential diagnosis and therapy. Two patients received GCSs and rTPO agonists (romiplostim, eltrombopag), while GCSs alone provided for platelet response in the third case. All patients showed a good clinical and biological response. Issues in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are discussed.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng Mei ◽  
Xiaofan Liu ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Hu Zhou ◽  
Ying Feng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hetrombopag, a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist, has been found in phase I studies to increase platelet counts and reduce bleeding risks in adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This phase III study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag in ITP patients. Methods Patients who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment were treated with an initial dosage of once-daily 2.5 or 5 mg hetrombopag (defined as the HETROM-2.5 or HETROM-5 group) or with matching placebo in a randomized, double-blind, 10-week treatment period. Patients who received placebo and completed 10 weeks of treatment switched to receive eltrombopag, and patients treated with hetrombopag in the double-blind period continued hetrombopag during the following open-label 14-week treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (defined as those achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 109/L) after 8 weeks of treatment. Results The primary endpoint was achieved by significantly more patients in the HETROM-2.5 (58.9%; odds ratio [OR] 25.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.83–68.63; p < 0.0001) and HETROM-5 (64.3%; OR 32.81, 95% CI 12.39–86.87; p < 0.0001) group than in the Placebo group (5.9%). Hetrombopag was also superior to placebo in achieving a platelet response and in reducing the bleeding risk and use of rescue therapy throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The durable platelet response to hetrombopag was maintained throughout 24 weeks. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (42.2%), urinary tract infection (17.1%), immune thrombocytopenic purpura (17.1%) and hematuria (15%) with 24-week hetrombopag treatment. Conclusions In ITP patients, hetrombopag is efficacious and well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. Trial registration Clinical trials.gov NCT03222843, registered July 19, 2017, retrospectively registered.


Open Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 361-368
Author(s):  
Valentina Giudice ◽  
Rosa Rosamilio ◽  
Bianca Serio ◽  
Rosa Maria Di Crescenzo ◽  
Francesca Rossi ◽  
...  

AbstractThe management of older patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is still very challenging because of the fragility of older patients who frequently have severe comorbidities and/or disabilities. Corticosteroid-based first-line therapies fail in most of the cases and patients require a second-line treatment, choosing between rituximab, thrombopoietin-receptor agonists and splenectomy. The choice of the best treatment in elderly patients is a compromise between effectiveness and safety and laparoscopic splenectomy may be a good option with a complete remission rate of 67% at 60 months. But relapse and complication rates remain higher than in younger splenectomized ITP patients because elderly patients undergo splenectomy with unfavorable conditions (age >60 year-old, presence of comorbidities, or multiple previous treatments) which negatively influence the outcome, regardless the hematological response. For these reasons, a good management of concomitant diseases and the option to not use the splenectomy as the last possible treatment could improve the outcome of old splenectomized patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962110055
Author(s):  
Hafiz Abdul Waqas Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed Taher Masoud ◽  
Jia Han ◽  
Ahmed Adel Sofy ◽  
Ahmed Saeed Ahmed ◽  
...  

Eltrombopag is an orally administered, non-peptide, thrombopoietin receptor agonist which initiates thrombopoietin signaling and stimulates the production of normally functioning platelet. We aimed to do a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available published data to verify whether eltrombopag treatment in patients with chronic immune-mediated thrombocytopenia can prolong survival. We searched for published, randomized, controlled trials in PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases using the following search strategy (“Eltrombopag” OR “Benzoates” OR “Hydrazines”) AND (“Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura” OR “immune thrombocytopenia” OR “Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpuras” OR “Immune Thrombocytopenia” OR “Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia” OR “Werlhof”). The pooled relative risk (RR) showed that eltrombopag group has significantly higher overall platelet response than placebo group (MD = 3.42, 95% CI [2.51, 4.65], P > .0001); pooled results were homogenous ( P = .27, I2 = 22%). The pooled relative risk showed that eltrombopag group has lower incidence of any bleeding than placebo group (MD = 0.65, 95% CI [0.48, 0.87], P = .003); pooled results were heterogenous ( P = .001, I2 = 75%) and the detected heterogeneity was best resolved after excluding Bussel et al ( P = .10). Homogeneous results were still favored eltrombopag group (MD = 0.75, 95% CI [0.60, 0.93], P = .008).


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Eun-Ju Lee ◽  
Madhav Seshadri ◽  
James B. Bussel

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by a platelet count &lt; 100 x 109 / L due to accelerated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production (McMillan 1981). At present, there are 3 available thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) approved for treatment of chronic ITP in adults. All three agents have high response rates, 40-90%, depending on the criteria used to define response (Ghanima et al 2019). Previous studies illustrate efficacy of Romiplostim and Eltrombopag having surprisingly high response rates when switching from one to the other, particularly if there was a response to the first TPO-RA (Gonzalez-Porras et al 2015; Lakhwani et al 2017; Cantoni et al 2018) but no studies have compared all 3 approved TPO-RA. Herein we describe 7 patients with difficult to treat chronic ITP who received all 3 TPO-RA and assess responses of the 7 to each of Eltrombopag, Romiplostim and Avatrombopag. Methods This was a retrospective review of all patients with chronic ITP seen at the Platelet Disorders Program at Weill Cornell Medicine-NY Presbyterian Hospital between July 2019 (following FDA approval of Avatrombopag) and June 2020 who had been treated with Eltrombopag, Romiplostim and Avatrombopag. Seven patients were identified (most had been followed for many years) and information collected on demographics, laboratory results, and clinical data including response and tolerance to ITP treatments, in particular the 3 TPO-RA. Results There were 4 females and 3 males with median age of 64 years (range 33-77). All had primary ITP with median 3 (range 2-13) separate ITP treatments, including investigational therapies, preceding treatment with their first TPO-RA (Table 1). All 7 patients had difficult to treat ITP with episodes of severe thrombocytopenia despite chronic treatments, requiring periodic rescue with IVIg and/or steroids. Three patients received Eltrombopag as their first TPO-RA and 4 patients Romiplostim. All 7 patients received Avatrombopag as their third TPO-RA and all also received other therapies either in conjunction with or in between TPO-RAs (Figure 1). No patient went directly from one TPO-RA to another without intervening treatment. All 7 patients (100%) responded to their first TPO-RA. For the 3 initially on Eltrombopag, duration of treatment ranged from 1 week to 8 years. When these 3 were switched to Romiplostim as a second TPO-RA, they responded with median time on treatment 27 months (range 21-48 months). Reasons prompting the switch from Eltrombopag to Romiplostim included: lost response (1), allergic reaction (1), insurance/financial issues (1). The 4 patients who started with Romiplostim had a median duration on treatment of 18 months (range 4-96 months). Two of these 4 who switched to Eltrombopag as their second TPO-RA responded to Eltrombopag with median time on treatment 5.5 months. Reasons for switching from Romiplostim to Eltrombopag included: unstable platelet response (2), patient preference for an oral agent (2). Prior to taking Avatrombopag, 5 patients returned to a TPO-RA they had previously responded to with 3 requiring higher doses on re-exposure. These patients (4, 6, 7) had switched from that initial agent due to patient preference (1), financial issues (1) and unstable platelet response (1). Five/7 patients (71%) responded to the third TPO-RA, Avatrombopag. Reasons prompting the switch to Avatrombopag from the previous TPO-RA included: patient preference (4), lost response (2), unclear/suboptimal response (1). The 5 responders remain on only Avatrombopag with durations of 3 months to 11 months. Conclusions: All 7 patients responded initially to TPO-RA whereas response rates of around 70% were seen when patients are switched to a second and subsequent third TPO-RA; response was very good to all 3 agents without clear preference of one over the others. Responders to distinct second and third TPO-RAs included patients who switched due to lack of response to a preceding TPO-RA as well as those who switched due to preference (for an oral agent without dietary restrictions) or intolerance/side effects. Loss of response to one TPO-RA should not preclude trying another. Patients may not respond as well on re-exposure to a previously seen TPO-RA; hence, ideally treatment would be maintained if possible with the initial agent. Disclosures Bussel: RallyBio: Consultancy; Momenta: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy; 3SBios: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Principia: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; UCB: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2369-2369
Author(s):  
Kristin A. Shimano ◽  
Rachael F. Grace ◽  
Carolyn M. Bennett ◽  
Robert J Klaassen ◽  
Cindy Neunert ◽  
...  

Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common autoimmune cytopenia diagnosed in children, typically causing a severely low platelet count, variable bleeding symptoms, and reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Eltrombopag is an established therapy for pediatric patients with chronic ITP. Favorable safety and efficacy were shown in the PETIT and PETIT2 trials leading to FDA-approval for children with chronic ITP in 2015. Off-label use of eltrombopag for adults with newly diagnosed ITP has been described in two small single-center trials. Gomez-Almaguer et al. reported 100% response (platelets >30 x 109/L) at completion of therapy and 66.7% relapse-free survival at 1 year in a single-arm study of dexamethasone in combination with 4 weeks of eltrombopag upfront in adult patients with newly diagnosed ITP, better outcomes than expected for comparable patients treated with steroids alone. In a second study, Tripathi et al. found 76% of steroid-nonresponsive patients had a durable response to eltrombopag after 3 months of therapy. Pediatric hematologists are already using thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in some cases of newly diagnosed ITP, according to a retrospective study by Neunert et al. TPO-RAs may be an efficacious first-line therapy for newly diagnosed ITP patients who require treatment. Study Design and Methods: The PINES (Pediatric ITP Newly diagnosed patients Eltrombopag vs Standard therapy) Study, NCT03939637, is an investigator-initiated prospective, open label, randomized, multi-center trial sponsored by the ITP Consortium of North America (ICON) and funded by Novartis. The primary objective is to determine if the proportion of patients with a platelet response, defined as ≥ 6 of 8 weeks with platelets >50 x109/L during weeks 5-12 of therapy without rescue treatment, is significantly greater in patients with newly diagnosed ITP treated with eltrombopag than in those treated with standard first-line treatments. This is a primary outcome used in a previous pediatric study of eltrombopag in chronic ITP (PETIT2) and is a clinically relevant outcome measuring a sustained, rather than transient, platelet response. Patients (n=156) from 20 ICON centers will be randomized 2:1 to receive the experimental treatment, eltrombopag, or investigator's choice of 3 standard front-line therapies: prednisone, intravenous immune globulin, or anti-D globulin at protocol-specified doses (Figure). Eligible patients are ages 1 to <18 with primary ITP, within 3 months of diagnosis, with platelet count <30 x109/L who require pharmacologic treatment from the perspective of the treating clinician. There are 2 treatment groups: 1) upfront treatment, defined as patients within 10 days of ITP diagnosis with no prior treatment, and 2) treatment failure, defined as patients previously managed with observation or a first-line standard agent. Patients are excluded if they have severe bleeding, defined by Buchanan Overall Grade 4 or 5 bleeding or bleeding requiring emergent treatment in the opinion of the provider. Patients will be followed for 1 year. Patients may receive prednisone, intravenous immune globulin, or anti-D globulin as rescue treatments beyond their study-assigned treatment in the first 12 weeks of the study. Patients randomized to the eltrombopag arm may continue this treatment throughout the 1-year duration of study participation if needed, with guidelines given for dose adjustments. Treatment after the first 12 weeks of study in the standard therapy arm or for patients originally assigned to eltrombopag who do not respond is at the discretion of the treating physician. Randomization is stratified by age and treatment status (upfront treatment vs. treatment failure). A one-sided z-test, at alpha=0.025, will be used to compare the proportion of patients who have a platelet response between the two arms. All randomized patients will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary objectives include comparison of bleeding scores (WHO Bleeding Scale and Modified Buchanan Score), changes in HRQoL (measured by the Kids ITP Tool, Hockenberry Fatigue Scale, PROMIS, and Global Change Scale), and changes in percentage of CD4+25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Samples will be banked for optional future biology studies. Site activation and enrollment began in May 2019, and updated enrollment data will be presented at the meeting. Figure Disclosures Shimano: Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Grace:Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bennett:Novartis: Research Funding. Neufeld:Octapharma, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, Celgene, NHLBI/NIH: Research Funding; Octapharma, Agios, Acceleron, Grifols, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, ApoPharma, Genentech, Novartis, Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Octapharma: Other: study investigator, NuProtect study (Octapharma-sponsored). London:United Therapeutics: Consultancy; ArQule, Inc: Consultancy. Despotovic:Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Dova: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist FDA-approved for use in chronic ITP.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 928-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Saber Elgebaly ◽  
Gehad El Ashal ◽  
Mohamed Elfil ◽  
Ahmed Menshawy

Background: Eltrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist that stimulates the production of normally functioning platelets. The aim of this meta-analysis is to synthesize evidence about the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for both adult and children with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods: A computer literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central was conducted. Records were screened for eligible studies, and data were extracted and synthesized using Review Manager for Windows. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to investigate whether treatment effect varies significantly between adults and children. Results: Six randomized controlled trials (N = 611 patients) were included in the final analysis. The overall effect estimates favored eltrombopag group in terms of overall platelet response (relative risk [RR]: 3.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.51-4.65; P < .0001), incidence of significant bleeding (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41-0.77; P = .0004), and number of cases needed to rescue treatment (RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32-0.65; P < .0001). The efficacy of eltrombopag did not differ significantly between children and adults except for incidence of any bleeding (RR: 0.83 vs 0.51; P = .008). Conclusion: Eltrombopag is a tolerable and effective drug for the management of chronic ITP in children and adults.


Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lassandro ◽  
Valentina Palladino ◽  
Giovanni Carlo Del Vecchioa ◽  
Viviana Valeria Palmieri ◽  
Paola Carmela Corallo ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common bleeding disorder in childhood. The management of ITP in children is controversial, requiring personalized assessment of patients and therapeutic choices. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), eltrombopag and romiplostim, have been shown to be safety and effective for the treatment of pediatric ITP. The aim of our research is defining the role of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in the management of pediatric ITP. Method: This review focuses on the use of TPO-RAs in pediatric ITP, in randomized trials and in clinical routine, highlighting their key role in management of the disease. Results: Eltrombopag and romiplostim appear effective treatment options for children with ITP. Several clinical studies have assessed that the use of TPO-RAs increases platelet count, decreases bleeding symptoms and improves health-related quality of life. Moreover, TPO-RAs are well tolerated with minor side effects. Conclusion: Although TPO-RAs long term efficacy and safety still require further investigations, their use is gradually expanding in clinical practice of children with ITP.


Author(s):  
Paul W Turke

Abstract The severity of COVID-19 is age-related, with the advantage going to younger age groups. Five reasons are presented. The first two are well-known, are being actively researched by the broader medical community, and therefore are discussed only briefly here. The third, fourth, and fifth reasons derive from evolutionary life history theory, and potentially fill gaps in current understanding of why and how young and old age groups respond differently to infection with SARS-CoV-2. Age of onset of generalized somatic aging, and the timing of its progression, are identified as important causes of these disparities, as are specific antagonistic pleiotropic tradeoffs in immune system function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document