On the Implementation of International Law in the Constitutional Legal System of Russia: Theory and Practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Mishalchenko ◽  
N. V. Bugel’ ◽  
E. L. Egorova
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
National Level ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
European Court ◽  
Actual Direction ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
Mechanism Of Interaction ◽  
Sociocultural Processes

Implementation of international law at the national level continues to be an actual direction for both theoretical and practical studies. Within the framework of the processes of globalization and integration, this issue is of particular importance. This article examines the theoretical aspects of the implementation of International Law in the constitutional legal system, as well as the features of the practice of making decisions by the European Court of Human Rights in modern conditions. The influence of sociocultural processes taking place in Western European countries on the interaction of national and international legal order. The purpose of the work is to analyze the theoretical and practical aspects of the implementation of International Law in the national legal system within the framework of integration processes that have a direct impact to the main spheres of society. In the course of the research have been used: formal logical and technical-legal methods. The authors made a number of conclusions about the modern mechanism of interaction between the national and international legal order.

Viet Nam

2019 ◽  
pp. 476-496
Author(s):  
Trinh Hai Yen
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Viet Nam ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
General Principles Of Law ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Case Basis

This chapter explores international law in Viet Nam. It is difficult to comprehensively conceptualize international law in Viet Nam’s legal system. There is no formal documentation concerning two of the main sources of public international law: international custom and general principles of law. Treaties, by contrast, are dealt with in great detail. Viet Nam adopts a modified monist approach by maintaining the primacy of the Constitution and the priority of treaties and incorporating treaties into the muninipal law on a case-by-case basis. The use of treaties in Viet Nam can be divided into two phases: (i) colonial times and (ii) since independence in 1945 when modern Viet Nam, proactively relying on international law in the quest for ultimate independence and unification in 1975 and since, started a period of robust engagement in the international legal order. The chapter finally looks at Viet Nam’s current practice of concluding and enforcing treaties.

scholarly journals Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberal International Legal Order Between 1933 and 1945

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Carty
Keyword(s):  
Eastern Europe ◽  
International Law ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Carl Schmitt ◽  
The West ◽  
Liberal Tradition ◽  
Anti Semitism ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
Shadow Side

Carl Schmitt was an intellectual who made the discipline of international law grapple with the major issues of his time. His work as an international lawyer remains largely untranslated. It is riddled with racism and anti-Semitism. However, an interest of his work is that it reflects the ‘shadow side’ of contemporary international law, forgotten because the moral defeat of Germany in 1945 was so total. Schmitt argues for an inherent tendency to violence and demonization in Western liberal international law theory and practice. He argues for the acceptance of difference as against homogeneity in world society as the only way to limit this violence. Finally, he argues that the liberal tradition is fundamentally compromised by its own colonialist heritage. Its objections to Nazi Germany translating this colonialist imperialism onto Eastern Europe are incoherent. Schmitt's avowed racism and anti-Semitism remain shocking. The article does not try to downplay this aspect of his work. However, it is worth noting that his Nazi bosses, for the most part, thought his racism insincere. If any negative spirit imbues the actual technical detail of Schmitt's work it is his aversion to the West. This probably had its roots in the envy which the Kaiserreich had of the British, French, and American Empires while Schmitt was growing to maturity.

4. International Law and Domestic Law

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Dixon ◽  
Robert McCorquodale ◽  
Sarah Williams
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Society ◽  
Legal System ◽  
International Community ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
State Sovereignty ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
Municipal Law ◽  
Domestic Law

The interaction between international law and domestic (or national or ‘municipal’) law demonstrates the struggle between State sovereignty and the international legal order. While the international legal order seeks to organise international society in accordance with the general interests of the international community, State sovereignty can be used to protect a State against the intervention of international law into its national legal system. This chapter discusses theories about the relations between international law and national law; national law on the international plane; international law on the national plane; and examples of international law on the national plane.

Coordination of Different Principles and Values in International Law

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-250
Author(s):  
Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Transition Phase ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
A Value ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
Jus Cogens ◽  
Ideological Change

The theme of coordination between different principles and values is becoming central to contemporary international law. This is because the latter has become a broad and complex legal system and is going through a phase of profound transformation. This also implies a paradigmatic and ideological change of the international legal order, which tends to shift from a law of rules to a law of values. In this transition phase, conflicts occur especially between the principles of ‘old’ international law and the principles of ‘new’ international law. In this paper it is claimed that, in international law, three different methods are used to try to resolve the antinomies between conflicting principles: a) a ‘traditional positivist’ method; b) a ‘modern positivist’ method; c) a ‘value-based’ method. These three methods are strictly linked to three different conceptions on the sources of general international law and on the means for identification of that law. This article examines separately the three methods and the practical results to which they arrive, using as a main example the conflict between principles on international immunities and principles on fundamental human rights. The conclusion is that the interpreter should today avoid the ‘traditional positivist’ method, because it is now unsuitable for the reality of contemporary international law. Instead, he should use both the ‘modern positivist’ method and the ‘value-based’ method, coordinating them among themselves. Keywords: Conflicting Principles, Antinomies, Sources of International Law, Jus Cogens, Immunities, Fundamental Human Rights, Access to Justice, Balancing

Treaty withdrawal and recalcitrant States

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-240
Author(s):  
Joseph Crampin
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Vienna Convention ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
The Law

The recent prevalence of high-profile unilateral treaty withdrawals raises broader questions over trust in treaty-making. Given the foundational importance of trust in treaties to international law, these withdrawals present risks to the international legal order generally. The issue for international law is how it can regulate treaty withdrawal in a way that preserves trust in the international legal system. The problem of trust is twofold. If international law adopts too permissive a stance towards unilateral withdrawal, then this will undermine trust in the binding force of treaties: pacta sunt servanda. If it is too restrictive, it will undermine the authority of international law, since it will result in situations in which recalcitrant States (ie States which have decided no longer to comply with their obligations) disobey, and are seen to disobey, their obligations. The paper seeks to explore this tension that underlies the regulation of treaty withdrawal. First, it analyses historical approaches to the problem, and, second, how the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties has sought to resolve it. It then examines how the principle is and can be used to achieve a balance between integrity and authority that can assist international law in regulating withdrawal and recalcitrance in a manner that preserves trust in treaty-making.

scholarly journals Community Interest and the International Public Legal Order

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Thin
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Future Development ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Public Authority ◽  
International Level ◽  
The Public ◽  
Community Interest ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
International Legal System

AbstractTraditional ideas about the private nature of the international legal order are increasingly being forced to contend with the development of public legal elements at the international level. The notion of the international community interest is key to understanding these developments and, as such, has transformed our understanding of international law. There are many different approaches to the public/private distinction in law, broadly categorised into relational, public authority, and interest-based approaches. These can be reduced to four key elements of publicness: the existence of a community or public; the universality of the public regime in question with its own boundaries; normative and institutional hierarchies; the objectivity of obligation and responsibility. The development of the community interest and related norms of international law can be seen to have introduced and strengthened all of these elements of publicness within the international legal system. It is thus on its way to becoming an international public legal order. This has important implications for our understanding of international law and the future development of the international legal order.

Constitutional Pluralism and Transnational Justice

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alec Stone Sweet ◽  
Clare Ryan
Keyword(s):  
National Level ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
National Courts ◽  
European Court ◽  
Transnational Justice ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Constitutional Pluralism ◽  
Combined Impact ◽  
Proportionality Principle

In Europe, a cosmopolitan legal order was instantiated through the combined impact of Protocol no. 11 of the ECHR (1998), and the incorporation of the Convention into national legal systems. As a result, two processes—(i) the evolution of constitutional pluralism at the national level; and (ii) the development of rights protection at the transnational level—became causally connected to one another. The first undermined traditional models of domestic orders wherein the notions of constitutional unity and centralized sovereignty reinforced one another. The second process created a multi-level legal system whose effectiveness depends on the extent to which the European Court is able to induce and sustain the cooperation of national courts and officials. The constitutionalization of the proportionality principle, at both the domestic and transnational levels, provided a doctrinal interface for inter-jurisdictional dialogue, and the collective enforcement of the UPR.

Foreign Affairs Federalism in the European Union

2019 ◽  
pp. 331-351
Author(s):  
Robert Schütze
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
International Law ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Foreign Affairs ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
European Court ◽  
Treaty Of Rome ◽  
Formed Part ◽  
Mixed Agreements

The European Union was born as an international organization. The 1957 Treaty of Rome formed part of international law, although the European Court of Justice was eager to emphasize that the Union constitutes “a new legal order” of international law. With time, this new legal order has indeed evolved into a true “federation of States.” Yet how would the foreign affairs powers of this new supranational entity be divided? Would the European Union gradually replace the member states, or would it preserve their distinct and diverse foreign affairs voices? In the past sixty years, the Union has indeed significantly sharpened its foreign affairs powers. While still based on the idea that it has no plenary power, the Union’s external competences have expanded dramatically, and today it is hard to identify a nucleus of exclusive foreign affairs powers reserved for the member states. And in contrast to a classic international law perspective, the Union’s member states only enjoy limited treaty-making powers under European law. Their foreign affairs powers are limited by the exclusive powers of the Union, and they may be preempted through European legislation. There are, however, moments when both the Union and its states enjoy overlapping foreign affairs powers. For these situations, the Union legal order has devised a number of cooperative mechanisms to safeguard a degree of “unity” in the external actions of the Union. Mixed agreements constitute an international mechanism that brings the Union and the member states to the same negotiating table. The second constitutional device is internal to the Union legal order: the duty of cooperation.

Transnational constitutional aspects of the European Court of Human Rights

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-174
Author(s):  
GEIR ULFSTEIN
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Direct Effect ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Not Given ◽  
National Courts ◽  
European Court ◽  
International Court ◽  
International Legal Order

AbstractThe European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is an international court operating in the international legal order. Its judgments are not given direct effect in national law. In this sense we have a system of legal pluralism between international and national law. But the ECtHR has constitutional effects in national law through the weight placed on the Court’s practice by national courts. Therefore, constitutional principles are applicable in the interaction between the ECtHR and national courts. This article discusses the transnational constitutional aspects of the Court, and how this should guide the roles of, respectively, the ECtHR and national courts.

China and International Adjudication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Eder
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
International Law ◽  
South China ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Great Power ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
International Adjudication

China aims to become a “leader country” in international law that “guides” the international legal order. Delivering the first comprehensive analysis of case law and Chinese academic debates from 2002 to 2018, this book shows that gradually increased engagement with international adjudication is part of a broad effort to consolidate China’s economic and political gains, and regain great power status. It covers trade, investment, territorial and law of the sea matters – including the South China Sea disputes – and delineates a decades-long process between caution and ambition. Both in debate patterns and in actual engagement, this book finds remarkable similarities in all covered fields of law, merely the timetables differ.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document