scholarly journals Real-World Treatment Patterns in Men with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Docetaxel

10.36469/9894 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-130
Author(s):  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Benjamin Gutierrez ◽  
Teresa Zyczynski ◽  
James A. Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Case Report Form ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Oncology Patient ◽  
Castration Resistant

Background: Docetaxel has been a standard of care for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the United States since 2004, yet little has been reported on its patterns of use in routine practice. To help understand these patterns, a retrospective study was conducted and is reported here. Methods: Medical records from 394 patients treated in the United States were reviewed. Data were collected by 48 physicians from oncology (patient N=344) and 8 physicians from urology (patient N=50) practices. Inclusion criteria were: CRPC diagnosed between 2004 and 2010; received docetaxel; discontinued docetaxel due to rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression of bone lesions, or progression of nodal or visceral metastases. Data were collected from physicians using an internet-based case report form. We evaluated patient demographics, characteristics of the docetaxel regimen, and other treatments used until docetaxel discontinuation. Results: Patients had a mean [±SD] age of 66.5 [8.9] years, the majority (63%) were white, and geographic dispersion was similar to the US population. The majority of patients initiated docetaxel between 2008 and 2010. After CRPC diagnosis, 8% of patients had initiated another cancer-directed therapy before starting docetaxel. Most (78.9%) patients initiated docetaxel with prednisone, while 18.5% initiated docetaxel alone and 2.6% initiated with other medications. Half of patients initiated docetaxel within 1 month after CRPC diagnosis, while 25% started ≥6 months later. Other non-chemotherapy treatments used with docetaxel were hormonal therapy (22.8%), radiotherapy (17.3%), and surgery (4.1%). Most patients (75%) received ≥4 docetaxel cycles, half received ≥6 cycles, 25% received ≥8 cycles and 10% received ≥10 cycles. Increased tumor mass, with/without new bone lesions or rising PSA, was the most common reason for docetaxel discontinuation (74% of patients). Conclusions: Concordant with guidelines, docetaxel and prednisone was the preferred first-line chemotherapy regimen in CRPC patients reviewed for this study. However, one quarter of patients did not initiate docetaxel until ≥6 months after CRPC diagnosis and total exposure varied considerably, with only 10% receiving ≥10 cycles. Future studies are needed to describe specific reasons explaining timing of docetaxel initiation and duration of exposure in some CRPC patients.

Treatment patterns in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving docetaxel.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15165-e15165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Benjamin Gutierrez ◽  
Teresa Maria Zyczynski ◽  
James A. Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Case Report Form ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Patterns Of Use ◽  
The Us ◽  
Visceral Metastases

e15165 Background: Docetaxel has been a standard of care for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the US since 2004 (TAX 327), yet little has been reported on its patterns of use in routine practice. To help understand these patterns, a retrospective study was conducted and is reported here. Methods: Medical records from 394 patients treated in the US were reviewed: 48 from oncology (N=344) and 8 from urology (N=50) practices. Inclusion criteria were: CRPC diagnosed between 2004 and 2010; received docetaxel; discontinued docetaxel due to rising PSA, progression of bone lesions, or progression of nodal or visceral metastases. Data were collected from physicians using an internet-based case report form. We evaluated patient demographics, characteristics of the docetaxel regimen and other treatments used until docetaxel discontinuation. Results: Patients had a mean [±SD] age of 66.5 [8.9] years, the majority (63%) were white, and geographic dispersion was similar to the US population. The majority of patients initiated docetaxel between 2008 and 2010. After CRPC diagnosis, 8% of patients initiated another cancer-directed therapy before starting docetaxel. Most (78.9%) patients initiated docetaxel with prednisone, while 18.5% initiated docetaxel alone and 2.6% initiated with other drugs. Half of patients initiated docetaxel within 1 month after CRPC diagnosis, while 25% started ≥6 months later. Other non-chemotherapy treatments used with docetaxel were hormonal therapy (22.8%), radiotherapy (17.3%), and surgery (4.1%). Most patients (75%) received ≥4 docetaxel cycles, half received ≥6 cycles, 25% received ≥8 cycles and 10% received ≥10 cycles. Increased tumor mass, with/without new bone lesions or rising PSA, was the most common reason for docetaxel discontinuation (74% of patients). Conclusions: Concordant with guidelines, docetaxel and prednisone was the preferred first-line chemotherapy regimen in CRPC patients. However, one quarter of patients did not initiate docetaxel until ≥6 months after CRPC diagnosis and total exposure varied considerably, with only 10% receiving ≥10 cycles. Future studies are needed to describe specific reasons for docetaxel delay and sub-maximal exposure in some CRPC patients.

scholarly journals Inhibition of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) overcomes enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 294 (25) ◽  
pp. 9911-9923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfeng Bai ◽  
Zhuangzhuang Zhang ◽  
Lijun Cheng ◽  
Ruixin Wang ◽  
Xiaoliang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Enhancer Of Zeste

Enzalutamide, approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2018 for the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), is an androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor. It blocks androgen binding to the AR, AR nuclear translocation, and AR-mediated DNA binding. Unfortunately, a considerable proportion of tumors eventually develop resistance during the treatment. The molecular mechanisms underlying enzalutamide resistance are not completely understood. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), the catalytic subunit of polycomb repressor complex 2, has been proposed as a prognostic marker for prostate cancer (PCa). With the goal to test whether EZH2 also plays a critical role in acquisition of enzalutamide resistance in CRPC, here we examined whether EZH2 inhibition/depletion enhances the efficacy of enzalutamide in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells. We show that combining the EZH2 inhibitor GSK126 with enzalutamide synergistically inhibits cell proliferation and colony formation and promotes apoptosis in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells. EZH2 depletion also overcomes enzalutamide resistance in both cultured cells and xenograft tumors. Mechanistically, we found that EZH2 directly binds to the promoter of prostate-specific antigen and inhibits its expression in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells. In agreement, bioinformatics analysis of clinical RNA sequencing data involving GSEA indicated a strong correlation between AR and EZH2 gene expression during PCa progression. Our study provides critical insights into the mechanisms underlying enzalutamide resistance, which may offer new approaches to enhance the efficacy of enzalutamide in CRPC.

scholarly journals Clinical Utility of CLIA-Grade AR-V7 Testing in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Markowski ◽  
John L. Silberstein ◽  
James R. Eshleman ◽  
Mario A. Eisenberger ◽  
Jun Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant

Purpose A splice variant of the androgen receptor, AR-V7, confers resistance to AR-targeted therapies (ATTs) but not taxane chemotherapies in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Since August 2015, a clinical-grade assay to detect AR-V7 messenger RNA expression in circulating tumors cells (CTCs) has been available to providers through a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified laboratory at Johns Hopkins University. Methods We contacted ordering providers of the first 150 consecutive tests by using a questionnaire-based survey to determine how the results of AR-V7 testing were used to influence clinical practice. Results In all, 142 (95%) of 150 questionnaires were completed by 38 providers from 29 sites across the United States and Canada. AR-V7 test results were reported either as CTC– (28%), CTC+/AR-V7– (30%), or CTC+/AR-V7+ (42%). Prevalence of AR-V7 detection increased with prior exposure to ATTs (abiraterone and enzalutamide naïve, 22%; after abiraterone or enzalutamide, 35%; after abiraterone and enzalutamide, 43%). Overall, management was affected by AR-V7 testing in 53% of the patients and even more often with CTC+/AR-V7+ results. AR-V7+ patients were commonly switched from ATT to taxane chemotherapy (43%) or were offered a clinical trial (43%); management remained unchanged in only 14% of these patients. Overall, patients who had a change in management on the basis of AR-V7 testing were significantly more likely to achieve a physician-reported 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen response on next-line therapy than those who did not change treatment (54% v 31%; P = .015). Conclusion Providers used AR-V7 testing to influence clinical decision making more often than not. Physicians reported that men with AR-V7+ results had the most treatment changes, and such men were preferentially managed with taxane therapy or offered a clinical trial, which may have improved outcomes.

scholarly journals 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 430
Author(s):  
Yasemin Sanli ◽  
Duygu Has Simsek ◽  
Oner Sanli ◽  
Rathan M. Subramaniam ◽  
Ayse Tuba Kendi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Meta Analyses

The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the current status of 177Lu-PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen) therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the light of the current literature. We also addressed patient preparation, therapy administration and side effect profiles. 177Lu-PSMA therapy efficacy was assessed by using prospective trials, meta-analyses and major retrospective trials. Predictors of efficacy were also mentioned. Although there are some different approaches regarding the use of 177Lu-PSMA therapy in different countries, this type of therapy is generally safe, with a low toxicity profile. From the oncological point of view, a PSA (prostate specific antigen) decline of ≥50% was seen in 10.6–69% of patients with mCRPC; whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was reported to be 3–13.7 months in different studies. Consequently, 177Lu-PSMA therapy is a promising treatment in patients with mCRPC, with good clinical efficacy, even in heavily pretreated patients with multiple lines of systemic therapy. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials in the United States, including a phase III multicenter FDA registration trial.

scholarly journals Prospective International Randomized Phase II Study of Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food Versus Standard Dose Abiraterone In Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (14) ◽  
pp. 1389-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Z. Szmulewitz ◽  
Cody J. Peer ◽  
Abiola Ibraheem ◽  
Elia Martinez ◽  
Mark F. Kozloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
The United States ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Fat ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Androgen Levels

Purpose Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a standard of care for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite a large food effect, AA was administered under fasting conditions in its pivotal trials. We sought to test the hypothesis that low-dose AA (LOW; 250 mg with a low-fat meal) would have comparable activity to standard AA (STD; 1,000 mg fasting) in patients with CRPC. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 72) with progressive CRPC from seven institutions in the United States and Singapore were randomly assigned to STD or LOW. Both arms received prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was assessed monthly, and testosterone/dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were assessed every 12 weeks with disease burden radiographic assessments. Plasma was collected for drug concentrations. Log change in PSA, as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for efficacy, was the primary end point, using a noninferiority design. Progression-free survival (PFS), PSA response (≥ 50% reduction), change in androgen levels, and pharmacokinetics were secondary end points. Results Thirty-six patients were accrued to both arms. At 12 weeks, there was a greater effect on PSA in the LOW arm (mean log change, −1.59) compared with STD (−1.19), and noninferiority of LOW was established according to predefined criteria. The PSA response rate was 58% in LOW and 50% in STD, and the median PFS was approximately 9 months in both groups. Androgen levels decreased similarly in both arms. Although there was no difference in PSA response or PFS, abiraterone concentrations were higher in STD. Conclusion Low-dose AA (with low-fat breakfast) is noninferior to standard dosing with respect to PSA metrics. Given the pharmacoeconomic implications, these data warrant consideration by prescribers, payers, and patients. Additional studies are indicated to assess the long-term efficacy of this approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document