scholarly journals Criminal Liability of an Entrapped Person Through the Prism of Goals of Punishment

Law and World ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 89-108
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Doctoral Research ◽  
Important Argument ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Prevention Of Crime

Present work was written as a part of doctoral research. It aims to generate reasonable arguments on whether it is just to prosecute and punish a person that was entrapped by an agent-provocateur. In other words − does criminal entrapment constitute a substantive defence for an entrapped person or not? In scientific literature the matter is traditionally discussed within the scope of criminal procedure (admissibility of evidence, fair trial etc.) while arguments from substantive criminal law are rarely addressed. Thus, it remains un- clear whether the goals of punishment are achievable at all if an entrapped person gets sentenced. Thus, it is necessary to compre- hend the subject through the prism of goals of punishment name- ly: restoration of justice, special prevention of crime and general prevention of crime especially since all three are well-recognised by science of criminal law and current legislation. After detailed and consistent analysis done within research, there are good rea- sons to conclude that prosecution and following sentencing of an entrapped person: • Hinders restoration of justice • Hinders special prevention of crime • Partially hinders general prevention • Eventually, all that constitutes an important argument to consider entrapment as a substantive defence for the entrapped person.

APPLICATION FEATURES OF TECHNICAL AND FORENSIC TOOLS BY AN INVESTIGATOR (THE INTERROGATOR) DURING INTERROGATION IN THE PRETRIAL DETENTION CENTER

2020 ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Роман Михайлович Морозов ◽  
Дмитрий Юрьевич Волков
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Detention Center ◽  
Pretrial Detention ◽  
Forensic Tools

Целью статьи было рассмотреть проблемные аспекты тактико-криминалистического применения технических средств при производстве допроса, предложить научно обоснованные рекомендации по их использованию. В статье раскрываются особенности применения технико-криминалистических средств процессуально уполномоченными должностными лицами органов предварительного следствия и дознания при производстве допроса подозреваемых (обвиняемых), в отношении которых избрана мера пресечения в виде заключения под стражу. По результатам проведенных исследований правоприменительной практики и научной литературы авторами раскрываются процессуальные и тактические основания и порядок применения технических средств при производстве допроса на отдельных его этапах, предлагаются решения проблем, связанных с применением технико-криминалистических средств, даются рекомендации по порядку применения отдельных технических средств. Выделяются наиболее целесообразные тактические приемы допроса при применении технических средств фиксации. Авторами предложены изменения в уголовно-процессуальное законодательство по совершенствованию законодательных норм в области применения технических средств при производстве следственных действий. Сформулированные в статье выводы могут быть использованы в правоприменительной практике следователями (дознавателями) при производстве допроса в следственном изоляторе, а также при преподавании отдельных дисциплин: «Уголовный процесс», «Криминалистика», а также специальных курсов (по выбору) уголовно-правового профиля. The purpose of the article was to consider the problematic aspects of the tactical and forensic use of technical means during the interrogation, to offer evidence-based recommendations for their use. The article reveals the features of the use of technical and forensic means by the procedurally authorized officials of the preliminary investigation and inquiry bodies during the interrogation of suspects (accused), in respect of which a preventive measure in the form of detention has been chosen. According to the results of the research of law enforcement practice and scientific literature, the authors reveal the procedural and tactical grounds and the procedure for the use of technical means during the interrogation at its individual stages, offers solutions to problems associated with the use of technical and forensic means, gives some recommendations on the order of application of individual technical means. The most appropriate tactics of interrogation, the use of technical facilities of fixation. The authors propose changes to the criminal procedure legislation to improve the legislative norms in the field of application of technical means in the investigative actions realization. The conclusions formulated in the article can be used in law enforcement practice by investigators (inquirers) during the interrogation in the pretrial detention center, as well as in the teaching of certain disciplines: «Criminal procedure», «Criminalistics», as well as special courses (optional) of criminal law profile.

scholarly journals Personality Disoder and Their Judicial- Psychiatric-estimation of the Russian Federation

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
S. Vasyukov ◽  
A. Baeva
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Diminished Responsibility

In modern Russian criminal law means diminished responsibility, that the subject is not capable to regulate meaningly legally significant behaviour at the moment of socially dangerous act. Such disability comes at presence if the subject has the chronic or time mental disorder, an aphrenia or other disease state of mentality. The specified clinical phenomena define medical criterion of diminished responsibility. Special interest represents disorders which in ICD- 10 concern to «Personality Disorders» (F60-F68). Here mental disorders which have no so-called remedial basis are meant, or in their structure it is impossible to note signs of weakening process. At the same time they not only qualitatively differ from the accepted norm, but also under known conditions possess that depth or expression that can be regarded as medical criterion of the formula of diminished responsibility. The research which has been spent in the Department of psychogenias and personality disorders of Institute of Serbsky included 80 men at the age from 20 till 45 years by which the diagnosis «Personality disorder» was established. It has shown that there can be 3 variants of influence on responsibility: they can cause full loss of liability; can essentially reduce the criminal liability; their presence can be neutral and not render influences on liability. The analysis of expert judgements shows, that in expert judgements about disability of the subject to regulate the behaviour meaningly it is necessary to estimate components both medical, and psychological criteria of diminished responsibility.

From the bureau of forced labor to the criminal-executive inspections

2019 ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Ольга Васильевна Коростылёва
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Electronic Monitoring ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
100Th Anniversary ◽  
October Revolution ◽  
Forced Labor ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Legal Character

В статье рассматривается история становления и развития учреждений и органов, исполняющих уголовные наказания и иные меры уголовно-правового характера, не связанные с изоляцией от общества. После Октябрьской революции 1917 г. был актуализирован вопрос введения мер уголовной ответственности, не связанных с изоляцией осужденных от общества. Для исполнения указанных мер в 1919 г. было создано Бюро принудительных работ, которое со временем было переименовано в инспекции исправительно-трудовых работ. В настоящее время, с 1996 г., инспекции получили свое окончательное наименование - уголовно-исполнительные инспекции. На протяжении своего существования инспекции меняли только наименование, но и ведомственную принадлежность. Уголовно-исполнительные инспекции являются учреждением, исполняющим наибольшее количество уголовных наказаний и иных мер уголовно-правового характера, установленных уголовным законодательством, а также реализуют меры процессуального учреждения, связанные с применением системы электронного мониторинга подконтрольных лиц. Проведен анализ нормативного регулирования на предмет законодательного закрепления института учреждений, исполняющих наказания, альтернативные лишению свободы, в преддверии празднования 100-летнего юбилея существования уголовно-исполнительных инспекций. The article deals with the history of the formation and development of institutions and bodies executing criminal penalties and other criminal law measures not related to isolation from society. After the October revolution of 1917, the issue of introducing criminal liability measures not related to the isolation of convicts from society was actualized. For execution of these measures, in 1919, established the Office of forced labor, which eventually was renamed in the inspection of hard labor. At present, since 1996, the inspections have received their final name - criminal Executive inspections. Throughout its existence, the inspection changed only the name, but also departmental affiliation. Criminal-Executive inspections are the institution executing the greatest number of criminal punishments and other measures of criminal-legal character established by the criminal legislation, and also realizes the measures of procedural organization connected with application of system of electronic monitoring of under control persons. The analysis of normative regulation on the subject of legislative consolidation of the institution of institutions executing punishment alternative to imprisonment on the eve of the celebration of the 100th anniversary of the existence of criminal and Executive inspections.

Anti-Corruption Compliance Standards in the Aftermath of the Siemens Scandal

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1343-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Sidhu
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Washington Dc ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Board Directors ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Community Board ◽  
Corporate Community ◽  
A Company

Legal proceedings against Siemens AG arising from allegations of bribery were concluded on 15 December 2008 in Munich, Germany, as well as in Washington, DC. The Siemens case has been the largest of its kind. It has changed the compliance landscape and has brought criminal law out of its dark corner and to the attention of the corporate community. Board directors and other managers have painfully become aware that noncompliance with criminal law may not only threaten the existence of a company, but also may lead directly to personal criminal liability. The subject of compliance has also raised the attention of legal advisors and accountants that naturally must recommend the “best standard,” especially if the sensitive subject of corruption is concerned. Last but not least, prosecutors now have a deeper inside knowledge of corruption structures than ever before. Thus, compliance standards tend to rise expeditiously even without regulators taking any action. Siemens thereby smartly has lifted compliance to the “cornerstone” of its business and generally - in particular when it comes to anti-corruption programs -presents its improved and expanded compliance organization as a leading example.

The Necessity Plea in English Criminal Law

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Glazebrook
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Sharp Contrast ◽  
Striking Feature ◽  
Vast Number ◽  
English Law ◽  
Prevention Of Crime

The sharp contrast between the vast number of detailed statutory provisions defining particular offences and the small handful of widely phrased provisions concerned with the general principles of criminal liability is, perhaps, the most striking feature of English criminal law, and, like the continued co-existence of both common law and statutory offences, one of the unhappy consequences of England's failure to enact a penal code. Among the few statutory provisions laying down general principles of liability or excuse there is none which comprehends a defence of necessity, and so commentators have inevitably looked to the case law for an answer to the question: Is there in English criminal law a defence of necessity? by which they have meant: Is there a defence of necessity in the sense in which there is a defence of, for instance, insanity, or infancy, or duress or prevention of crime? To the question understood in that sense, the answer returned must, it is thought, be a plain No. To ask and to answer the question in that sense may, however, be misleading: it may be more revealing (as this paper suggests) to ask, How does English law handle the plea of necessity when it arises? What, in other words, is the juristic technique employed?

Citizenship V. Territory: Explaining the Scope of the Criminal Law

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-448
Author(s):  
Alejandro Chehtman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
The State ◽  
Universal Jurisdiction ◽  
Collective Interest ◽  
International Crimes ◽  
The Right ◽  
Meaningful Role ◽  
Antony Duff

Antony Duff and his coauthors have influentially argued that citizenship plays a central role in accounting both for the way in which the state makes individuals criminally responsible for certain wrongs and for calling them to answer for their wrongs. This paper takes issue with this citizenship-based understanding of the scope of the criminal law. It argues that Duff's model of civic criminal liability faces difficulties in explaining states' right to punish foreigners for crimes committed on their territory, and sits very uncomfortably with states claiming universal jurisdiction over international crimes. In contrast, it advocates a territorial conception of the criminal law. It suggests that to account for the allocation and scope of the right to punish, we need to look at the (collective) interest of those individuals who actually are in the territory of a particular state, not merely its citizens. Finally, it examines whether the notion of citizenship plays any meaningful role in a convincing account of the authority of the state to try an offender. Contra Duff and others, it argues that this authority rests exclusively on defendants receiving a fair trial and a verdict based on reliable evidence.

scholarly journals Some Aspects of Criminal Liability for Sports Injuries

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Bronislava Coufalová ◽  
Jan Pinkava
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Sports Injuries ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Internal Relations ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Individual Sports

Abstract The essence of the problem of using criminal law to affect sports injuries caused in sport lies in the fact that the means of criminal law to interfere in sport or not. From this perspective, we talk about two theories: the theory of absolute immunity sports and the theory of strict adherence to the rule of law. These two concepts are supplemented by a number of theories that perspective as an autonomous system that contains its own rules of conduct that regulate internal relations in sports. In the event that disciplinary liability is not sufficient in this case, can be applied liable under civil and administrative law. In the most serious cases, the possibility of protecting the rights and legitimate interests in sport according to the norms of criminal law. The subject of this article is selected aspects of criminal responsibility in different sports, both individual and collective. From individual sports we mainly deal with skiing. The contact sports in this article will be football, hockey and rugby.

scholarly journals ASPECTS OF INSOLVENCY IN CRIMINAL LAW

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (72) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Ivars Kronis
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Behavior Patterns ◽  
Insolvency Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Law ◽  
Insolvency Proceedings

The article contains analysis of the legal norms that govern criminal liability for risks posed to insolvency. Based on case law and conclusions made by the law scholars, the preconditions have been studied the presence of which has to be proven in order to enable calling of a person to criminal account for leading to insolvency, filing of a fraudulent application for insolvency proceedings, hindering the insolvency proceedings and breach of the conditions of legal protection. The study enables deepen understanding of the preconditions to application of the law and helps to gain knowledge of criminal legal protection of insolvency and to avoid any behavior patterns that might be interpreted as criminal. The period since enactment of the new Insolvency Law that has changed the concept of insolvency as well as the course of procedure and therefore has affected the application of criminal legal protection has been too short for development of judiciary in this area. The few sources of scientific literature on the regulation of criminal legal protection of insolvency in the Criminal Law had been published before enactment of the new Insolvency Law. Five years of operation of the Insolvency Law is a kind of milestone for updating the issues of criminal legal protection of insolvency and extended assessment of the insolvency regulations in the Criminal Law.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability for Knowingly Unlawful Sentence, Decision or Other Judicial Act

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-102
Author(s):  
Pavel Metelsky ◽  
Nadezhda Verchenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Considerable Complexity

Introduction. The publication is devoted to the corpus delicti, provided for by Art. 305 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which, being, in fact, a special type of official abuse, stands out as the direct object of a criminal assault and a special subject, since it can be committed exclusively by professional judges. The main features of the objective and subjective parties, qualifying signs of the offense are revealed, some problems that arise when applying this criminal law are outlined. Purpose. The goal is to analyze the design features of the crime and issues that arise when applying this rule. Methodology. The method of a formal legal analysis of the norms of the criminal law and theoretical provisions on problems directly related to the application of this rule was used. Results. The public danger of a criminal act that undermines the very foundations of justice is obvious, in connection with which it stands out as an independent crime by all the Russian Criminal Codes, starting in 1922, the history of criminal responsibility for its commission can be traced in our country in general since the 16th century. The current criminal law prohibition is characterized by considerable complexity, due to both the blanket nature of the disposition of the norm itself and the presence of discrepancies in the understanding of the signs embodied in it. Conclusion. The implementation of criminal liability for this crime involves the establishment of not only circumstances directly related to the corpus delicti that lie in the criminal law field. The subject of an infringement, a judicial act, must be subjected to procedural review without fail, after which, subject to the consent of the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation, in fact, and the mechanism of criminal prosecution is “launched”. That is, a truly “multi-way” combination of actions is necessary, carried out in several stages, and the problem itself to some extent becomes interdisciplinary, going beyond only criminal law.

scholarly journals TRAINING AND METHODOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF THE INSTITUTION OF THE VICTIM IN TEACHING COURSES CRIMINAL CYCLE

2017 ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
Оксана Кравцова ◽  
Oksana Kravtsova ◽  
Ирина Блинова-Сычкарь ◽  
Irina Blinova-Sicker ◽  
Сергей Дмитриенко ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Legal Psychology ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Interdisciplinary Study ◽  
Subject Characteristics

The Institute of the victim is the subject of several criminal Sciences: criminal law, criminal process, criminalistics, criminology, legal psychology and others. Each of them gives their classification of victims, includes them in the corresponding subject characteristics (criminal law, criminal procedure, forensic, criminological, victimological). Elements of these characteristics vary, however, their interdisciplinary implications are obvious and not in doubt. Therefore, it is accepted to speak about the Institute the victim as the subject of interdisciplinary study and its use in the learning process of students

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document