ИНВЕСТИЦИОННЫЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТАРИЙ РАЗВИТИЯ РЕГИОНОВ

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Pisarenko
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
Socio Economic Development

В статье проведен обзор основных инструментов повышения инвестиционной привлекательности региональных экономик в парадигме устойчивого социально-экономического развития территорий. Автором обозначены факторы, определяющие инвестиционную привлекательность регионов, представлен рейтинг инвестиционного потенциала и рисковости регионов, а так же сформулированы перспективные направления развития инвестиционной привлекательности региональных экономик.The article reviews the main tools for increasing the investment attractiveness of regional economies in the paradigm of sustainable socio-economic development of territories. The author identifies the factors that determine the investment attractiveness of regions, presents the rating of investment potential and risk of regions, and also formulated promising directions for the development of investment attractiveness of regional economies.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF REGIONAL FACTORS ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF UNDERDEVELOPED REGIONS OF SIBERIA

2019 ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
S. P. Mongush
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
Highly Qualified ◽  
Qualified Personnel ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Investment Capital ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Negative Factors

Due to various factors, the regions of Russia have significant differences in the level of socio-economic development. Thus, each region of Russia has certain specific qualities inherent only to it, which must be taken into account when implementing regional policy. By reducing the influence of negative factors and, conversely, activating positive ones, it is possible to significantly increase the competitiveness of regional economies and the country as a whole. One of the features of the economies of the underdeveloped regions of Siberia is a significant share in their structure of low-productivity and low-tech industries, a lack of investment capital, low innovative activity of business entities, poor development of the territory, insufficient transport infrastructure, a shortage of highly qualified personnel and a number of others. The strategic priority of the state's economic policy in recent years in relation to underdeveloped regions is to achieve an acceptable average Russian level. In this regard, it becomes relevant to search for natural competitive advantages that can provide, through the correct and justified selection of "growth points" based on the use of the internal potential of such territories of their more dynamic development in relation to the most successful regions.

Priority Socio-Economic Development Areas: Their Effectiveness and Role in the Formation of an Optimal Tax Burden

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 78-89
Author(s):  
M. O. Kakaulina
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Tax Burden ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
Optimal Tax ◽  
Russian Region ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Tax Benefits ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Comprehensive Study

The relevance of the research is due to the fact that priority socio-economic development areas (PSEDA) can be viewed as «growth points» for regional economies and are positioned as areas enjoying preferential taxation treatment. In this regard, it is extremely important to assess the optimality of the current tax burden level in a PSEDA with respect to resident enterprises. The purpose of research was a comprehensive study of a PSEDA located in the Amur Region by evaluating the effectiveness of the PSEDA operation; construction of an econometric model for assessing the impact of the tax burden on GRP growth due to the PSEDA establishment; comparison of the optimal and actual tax burden levels in the PSEDA. Based on the research findings, it has been concluded that by establishing an optimal tax burden in a PSEDA through granting special personal income tax benefits, it is possible to create a favorable tax climate in the entire region containing priority development areas. This will contribute to the accelerated economic development of a Russian region and fast relaxation of budget revenues lost in connection with granted incentives.

scholarly journals Instability of socio-economic and sustainable development of Ural regions

2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 06020
Author(s):  
Victor Barkhatov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
External Shocks ◽  
Consumer Prices ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Federal Districts ◽  
Regional Product ◽  
Development Stability ◽  
High Instability

Problems of development stability of regional economies are of particular importance in current conditions. The article presents the analysis of the sustainability of the development of Russian regions included in one of the most industrially developed federal districts - the Ural. The study used data from Rosstat for 2001-2019. The tendencies of the instability of indicators of socio-economic development of regions are revealed: gross regional product, investments in fixed assets, industrial production, and consumer prices. It has been established that the dynamics of the growth rates of these indicators are volatile. At the same time, all trends demonstrate a reasonably rapid recovery after the external shocks of 2008 and 2014. These indicators’ volatility was assessed using the variation coefficient in three different periods: 2001-2008, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. The conclusion is made about the high instability of regional socio-economic development, while the level of instability in regions with a lower level of development turned out to be higher than in more developed ones. Particular attention is paid to trends in the level of instability, and it is noted that over time, less developed regions increase instability at a faster pace.

ANALYSIS OF MEASURES OF STATE SUPPORT FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES IN THE FIELD OF TOURISM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC: INTERNATIONAL AND KAZAKH EXPERIENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2(52)) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Zholumbetov Elnur Maratbekovich
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Service Sector ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
State Support ◽  
The World ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Important Branch

Analysis of trends in the socio-economic development of the country and regions shows that at present more than half of the gross domestic product is produced in the service sector. The service sector is one of the most promising, rapidly developing sectors of the Kazakhstani economy. At the same time, tourism, as a subsystem of the service sector, has become an important branch of national and regional economies in many countries of the world, its growth rates, as a rule, are outstripping in relation to the service sector and the national economy as a whole. This defines entrepreneurship in tourism as an area of ​​priority for the state, since its support and stimulation contribute to the acceleration of socio-economic development.

scholarly journals SOURCES OF SYNERGISTIC EFFECT OF TERRITORIAL CLUSTERS

2021 ◽  
pp. 174-180
Author(s):  
Александр Геннадьевич Завьялов ◽  
Надежда Николаевна Беденко
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
Cluster Approach ◽  
Cluster Development ◽  
Scientific Innovation ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Strategic Goal

В статье рассмотрены особенности внедрения кластерного подхода, как перспективного фактора ускорения социально-экономического развития субъектов Российской Федерации, способного выступать важным и эффективным двигателем экономического роста и развития конкурентоспособности территорий. Цель статьи - установление преимуществ развития кластеров непосредственно для участников и для региональных экономик в целом. В результате интеграции различных резидентов кластеров формируются реальные сетевые партнерства, получающие многообразные конкурентные преимущества и источники получения синергетических эффектов. При этом синергизм является не только характерной чертой кластерных структур, но стратегической целью интеграции их участников. Научная новизна заключается в определении видов потенциала для синергетического эффекта, а также условий, оказывающих влияние на устойчивость кластерных структур и результативность их проектов. The article considers the peculiarities of the cluster approach implementation as a promising factor for accelerating the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation regions, which can act as an important and effective engine for economic growth and the development of the competitiveness of territories. The purpose of the article is to establish the advantages of cluster development directly for participants and for regional economies as a whole. As a result of the integration of different cluster residents, real network partnerships are formed, which receive a variety of competitive advantages and sources of synergy. At the same time, synergy is not only a characteristic feature of cluster structures, but also a strategic goal of integrating their participants. The scientific innovation consists in determining the types of potential for synergy, as well as the conditions that affect the sustainability of cluster structures and the effectiveness of their projects.

scholarly journals The Role of Strategies in Diversification of Regional Economies: Planned Development versus Unplanned Results

REGIONOLOGY ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-305
Author(s):  
Yaroslav Yu. Eferin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Regional Economies ◽  
Managerial Decisions ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Regional Authorities ◽  
The Impact

Introduction. The issues of long-term strategic planning are crucial for the successful socio-economic development of Russia’s regions. At the same time, the validity of the choice of industry priorities is often not supported by a comprehensive analysis of the unique competitive advantages of the region, which makes it difficult to achieve the established goals. The purpose of the study is to identify the links between the stated priorities and structural changes in Russia’s regions, particularly, the emergence of new industries of specialization in the regions. Materials and Methods. The study was based on the strategies for socio-economic development of Russia’s regions adopted in 2005–2010. The method of content analysis of documents was employed when forming a list of the priority industries declared in the strategies of 66 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The adapted methodology of the European Cluster Observatory for identifying industry specializations was used to determine the diversification of regional industry portfolios. Results. The conducted analysis of the strategic documents has shown that the industry priorities of Russia’s regions do not reveal their unique specializations, but are focused on the sectors which are most common for the Russian economy. In half of the strategies the food industry and heavy engineering are named as priorities for long-term development. Diversification of regional industry portfolios has been recorded in 46 regions. A total of 76 cases of industries emerging in regional portfolios from 2005 to 2015 have been identified. In 11 regions, the declared industry priorities have not been associated to the real processes of diversification. Discussion and Conclusion. The study has revealed that the diversification of the economy in many Russia’s regions is unplanned. This is not so much the result of a strategic decision of regional authorities, but rather the impact of factors that are not taken into account when choosing industry priorities, which have a significant impact on industry development. The provisions and regional classifications developed in the article may contribute to the development of the theory of public and municipal administration in terms of assessing the impact of managerial decisions on the socio-economic development of territories.

Social Recourses of the Population under Conditions of Losing Economic Stability

2015 ◽  
pp. 86-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Avraamova ◽  
T. Maleva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Social Policy ◽  
Social Development ◽  
Safety Margin ◽  
Economic Stability ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Development Stability ◽  
Made In

The loss of country’s socio-economic development stability puts on the agenda the problem of finding solutions contributing to the maintenance of Russian households’ welfare. The authors believe that these solutions lie in the broader area than applying various instruments of monetary support. The most effective solutions are related to the actualization of own resources of households that can act as a safety margin as well as a source of social development. The attempt to evaluate the households’ resource provision and highlight the significance of each resource enabling or creating barriers to the growth of households’ welfare is made in this article. On the basis of received conclusions social policy areas directed at preserving or enhancing the welfare are defined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document