scholarly journals Rule of law as a national phenomenon people's consciousness

Author(s):  
Olena Panchenko

The article is devoted to the study of the rule of law as a social phenomenon, which is formed and viewed by us through the national legal consciousness of the people. These philosophical and legal categories are important for the formation of the correct (tested by time and reality) and the right awareness of society of their behavior, as well as effectively serve from the point of view of natural and legal influence on the formation and implementation of legal relations, and are a natural basis of law itself The main thrust of this article is that the rule of law in society depends to some extent on the national spirit of law and finds its foundations in the mentality of the people themselves. Historically, state and natural features of the rule of law further influence the formation of legal consciousness and legal culture in particular. Willingness is an important element of the national phenomenon in the consciousness of our people. The rule of law is the legal culture and legal consciousness that are closely linked to the national elements and characteristics of the people themselves who use the phenomenon. Since the rule of law is largely inherently in the form of ideas and perceptions, it is appropriate to note that such perceptions are necessarily nationalist in nature. Legal ideas and national ideas are fundamental to the formation and awareness of the rule of law Just as the rule of law is directly related to human nature, its national identity, and its vitality, it directly controls the sphere of human behavior and actions. The basic tenets that are enshrined in the rule of law are the ideas of freedom and justice. The rule of law as a national phenomenon of justice of the people is of the highest philosophical and legal value, since its place in the legal reality is determined by social and national factors and personality structure. Keywords: law, rule of law, phenomenon, national, legal consciousness.

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Roestamy

If all stakeholders of land provision adhere to the principles governed by the Constitution and the State Controlling Right, then the issue of the regulation of land will not be a national dilemma inheriting a prolonged conflict and not less as a result of the loss of life. Land is something sacred (magical) for people who have historical and spiritual value is not just a matter of investment and business commodities that have been going on, but the land is the right of the nation that has the value of the struggle that becomes the object of the interests of all parties, the people, government, and speculators. This research is expected to be an input to stakeholders to support the birth of Land Bank as an institution in charge of providing land for public interest. The research was conducted by using Sociological Juridical Method combined with Normative Juridical with a Qualitative Approach. It concerns the problem of access to the rule of law which cannot run properly, and legal culture is still low so that with the sociological and juridical approach. Those can be found the nature of the primary cause problematic of land supply in Indonesia, especially for the public interest and more specifically for the benefit of providing housing for low-income people.Keywords : Procurement of Land, Legal Culture, State Right Controlling, Land Bank


Author(s):  
Reinis Odiņš

In the article, the author looks at the origin of the principle of the private autonomy from the point of view of the basic normal theory, stating that the basic legal and democratic norms of the country are derived from the rule of law. Moreover, the private autonomy also includes, in principle, the right of a person to exercise the right to carry out material legal claims, even in part, if the person so wishes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-378
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Gersdorf ◽  
Mateusz Pilich

Relations between the judiciary and the elected authorities (i.e. the legislative and the executive) in each country and at all times are among the most sensitive from the point of view of statehood. There is an obvious truth expressed in the famous saying of Lord Acton: ‘Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely’2. The universal calling of judges is to restrain executive and legislative branches of government in their efforts to increase their power, especially at the expense of individuals. A state where there is no sufficiently strong counterweight to the natural omnipotence of the people’s representatives is not in line with the principle of the rule of law, because there is no one to remind the elected powers that their mandate has its limits – contemporarily established in particular by constitutional norms and the international regime for the protection of human rights.3 Naturally, courts do not directly take part in a political discourse, even though some kind of judicial review of the acts of public authorities exists virtually everywhere; these should not be characterised as an interference in political matters.4 The mutual respect of the judiciary and elected authorities proves the maturity of the state constitutional system, regardless of how far-reaching the powers are of judges to examine the constitutionality of legislation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Cecep Wiharma

The law society's awareness of the factors that strongly holds an important role in the efforts of the law enforcement itself, because it is this persfektif that need to be arranged so that the rule of law in this country can run. The relevance of the rule of law in the perspective of the rule of Justice as part of the legal consciousness of the public, is an alternative effort over mistrust against law enforcement officials of the ruling is positive and which is the mainstream of the view legalistic. When talking about the law in persfektif justice in the area of ethics or morality and does not discuss the legal issues in a sense narrow. How positive law is made, and whether it has made positive law represents the community's sense of fairness, as well as the legal apparatus that this mentality of enforcing the law? The culture of the law society legal culture depends on its members which is influenced by the background of his education, the environment, culture, position, even the interests. Keywords: Law enforcement, Legal Awareness, and Justice


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-175
Author(s):  
Jed W. Atkins

Abstract Tertullian first coined the phrase ‘the freedom of religion’. This article considers what this entails. I argue that Tertullian’s discussion of religious liberty derives its theoretical significance from his creative repurposing of the Roman idea of liberty as non-domination. Tertullian contends that the Roman magistrates’ treatment of Christian citizens and loyal subjects amounts to tyrannical domination characterized by the absence of the traditional conditions for non-domination: the rule of law, rule in and responsive to the interests of the people, and citizens’ rights. On his reworking of these criteria, he argues that citizens and loyal subjects should have the right to act publicly on the convictions of their conscience even if these actions conflict with the state’s civil religion. Tertullian shows that non-domination is a highly flexible idea that does not necessarily entail the participatory ‘free state’ of republicanism. Moreover, by applying the logic of non-domination to questions surrounding religious liberty, he opens up an important avenue of investigation largely ignored in the contemporary republican literature on non-domination.


2020 ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
G.N. Aksenova

The problem of legal nihilism and idealism as a distortion of the Russian legal consciousness doesnot lose its relevance. The roots of legal nihilism in Russia go back to its historical past. This article willexamine the causes of nihilism and idealism, the nature of the relationship between nihilism and idealism.The questions of legal culture of Russia, which, as in most countries, depends primarily on the level ofdevelopment of legal consciousness of the population, the level of development of legal activity and the levelof development of the entire system of legal acts, are considered. Analysis of legal culture, which was madein this article, necessary to first identify and describe the legal values, ideals, and patterns to be pursued,legislators, enforcers, citizen and society in General, and then, evaluating from this point of view the realstate of Affairs and forms of distortion of legal consciousness in the form of legal nihilism and idealism toseek ways and means of achieving the ideals of rule of law and society


Author(s):  
Andrew Coan

The first special prosecutor was appointed by President Ulysses S. Grant in 1875. Ever since, presidents of both parties have appointed special prosecutors and empowered them to operate with unusual independence. In short order, such appointments became a standard method for neutralizing political scandals and demonstrating the president’s commitment to the rule of law. This long, mostly forgotten history shows that special prosecutors can do much to protect the rule of law under the right circumstances. It also shows that they are fallible. Many have been thwarted by the formidable challenges of investigating a sitting president and his close associates. Some have abused the powers entrusted to them. Yet such cases are rare. At their best, special prosecutors function as avatars of the people channeling an unfocused popular will to safeguard the rule of law. But special prosecutors can function effectively only if the people care about holding the president accountable. If a president thinks he can fire a special prosecutor without incurring serious political damage, he has the power to do so. Ultimately, only the American people can decide whether the president is above the law. At any given moment, this question can seem like a purely partisan one. All Americans, however, have a profound stake in preserving the “government of laws and not of men” passed down to us by previous generations. Prosecuting the President provides the information every American needs to perform this civic duty intelligently and responsibly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
С. И. Дудник ◽  
И. Д. Осипов

The article discusses the problems of evolution and the formation of the ideology of an enlightened monarchy in Russia. In this regard, the philosophical and political ideas of Catherine the Great, as well as their theoretical and ideological premises, are analyzed. It is noted that the philosophy of education in Russia was closely connected with the concepts of Voltaire, Didro, Montesquieu, Beccaria, Bentham, their views on natural law and human freedom, humanism and the rule of law. These concepts in the philosophy of Catherine received a specific interpretation, due to the sociocultural conditions of Russia. This was manifested in the famous work of Catherine the Great “The Nakaz”, which recognized Montesquieu's argument in favor of the autocracy, but at the same time, his point of view on the separation of powers was rejected. The specificity of the doctrine of enlightened monarchy lies in the combination of liberal and conservative values, which form eclectic forms. This was the dialectic of the supreme power, the difference between the enlightened monarchy and the ideology of absolutism. The article also notes that education in Russia is associated with fundamental socio-political reforms, processes of secularization of culture. At this time, the natural and human sciences are developing. The changes positively influenced the development of medicine, beautification of towns and public education. Also considered are the views on the autocracy of the opposition nobility intelligentsia: A. N. Radishchev and noted that his criticism of the autocracy was determined by an alternative cultural policy, proceeding from the protection of the interests of the people. The doctrine of enlightened monarchy is characterized by internal worldview inconsistency and political inconsistency, which did not allow solving the pressing social problems of the establishment of legal state, democratization of society and the abolition of serfdom.


Author(s):  
Mariіa Konstantinovna Kulava

Within the presented article, taking into account already existing achievements of scientists, the concept, the main features of the principles of state administration of the executive system of Ukraine are defined. The principles of activity of executive bodies bodies according to the current legislation of Ukraine are determined. A brief description of the principles is presented, namely: the rule of law, legality, compulsory, independence, justice, impartiality and objectivity, discretion, transparency and openness of executive proceedings and its fixation by technical means, the reasonableness of the time limits for enforcement proceedings, the proportionality of enforcement measures and the amount of claims for decisions, the right to appeal decisions, actions or omissions of state executives, private performers. It is established that in general the principles of executive proceedings in the investigated normative acts are duplicated, in addition to the principles of independence and the right to appeal decisions, actions or inaction of state executives, private performers. The actual vision of the principles of public administration of the executive system of Ukraine is determined. The opinion on the need to supplement the list of principles with the following: the principle of equal competition between state and private performers through the balance between them; the principle of responsibility of the executive system bodies, their officials and private executors for damage caused as a result of violations of regulatory requirements; the principle of introducing effective incentives for voluntary implementation of decisions; the principle of professionalism and competence. Also, within the submitted article, it is stated that the use of the terms “principles” and “principles” in the Laws of Ukraine “On Bodies and Officials Performing Enforcement of Court Decisions and Decisions of Other Bodies”, “On Enforcement Proceedings”, which are adopted simultaneously and regulated, are unjustified, identical social relations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-141
Author(s):  
Tomasz Stępniewski

The present paper discusses the following research questions: to what extent did errors made by the previous presidents of Ukraine result in the country’s failure to introduce systemic reforms (e.g. combating corruption, the development of a foundation for a stable state under the rule of law and free-market economy)?; can it be ventured that the lack of radical reforms along with errors in the internal politics of Ukraine under Petro Poroshenko resulted in the president’s failure?; will the strong vote of confidence given to Volodymyr Zelensky and the Servant of the People party exact systemic reforms in Ukraine?; or will Volodymyr Zelensky merely become an element of the oligarchic political system in Ukraine?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document