Leflunomide Use and Risk of Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Conway ◽  
Candice Low ◽  
Robert J. Coughlan ◽  
Martin J. O’Donnell ◽  
John J. Carey
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Increased Risk

Objective.To evaluate the relative risk (RR) of pulmonary disease among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with leflunomide (LEF).Methods.We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to April 15, 2014. We included double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCT) of LEF versus placebo or active comparator agents in adults with RA. Studies with fewer than 50 subjects or shorter than 12 weeks were excluded. Two investigators independently searched both databases. All authors reviewed selected studies. We compared RR differences using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method to assess total respiratory adverse events, infectious respiratory adverse events, noninfectious respiratory adverse events, interstitial lung disease, and death.Results.Our literature search returned 5673 results. A total of 8 studies, 4 with placebo comparators, met our inclusion criteria. There were 708 respiratory adverse events documented in 4579 participants. Six cases of pneumonitis occurred, all in the comparator group. Four pulmonary deaths were reported, none in the LEF group. LEF was not associated with an increased risk of total adverse respiratory events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.56–1.78) or infectious respiratory adverse events (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.58–1.82). LEF was associated with a decreased risk of noninfectious respiratory adverse events (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41–0.97).Conclusion.Our study found no evidence of increased respiratory adverse events in RCT of LEF treatment.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for COVID-19 Treatment: An Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhu ◽  
Zhaowei Teng ◽  
Lirong Yang ◽  
Shuanglan Xu ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Registration Number

AbstractBACKGROUNDRemdesivir, an inhibitor of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, has been identified as a candidate for COVID-19 treatment. However, the therapeutic effect of remdesivir is controversial.METHODSWe searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to June 11, 2020 for randomized controlled trials on the clinical efficacy of remdesivir. The main outcomes were discharge rate, mortality, and adverse events. This study is registered at INPLASY (INPLASY202060046).RESULTSData of 1075 subjects showed that remdesivir significantly increased the discharge rate of patients with COVID-19 compared with the placebo (50.4% vs. 45.29%; relative risk [RR] 1.19 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.34], I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.754). It also significantly decreased mortality (8.18% vs. 12.70%; RR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44–0.92], I2 = 45.7%, P = 0.175) compared to the placebo. Data of 1296 subjects showed that remdesivir significantly decreased the occurrence of serious adverse events (RR 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63–0.94], I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.716).CONCLUSIONRemdesivir is efficacious and safe for the treatment of COVID-19.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERThis study is registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202060046).

scholarly journals Effect of janus kinase inhibitors and methotrexate combination on malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Solipuram ◽  
Akhila Mohan ◽  
Roshniben Patel ◽  
Ruoning Ni
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease. The combination therapy of methotrexate (MTX) and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) is commonly used. Patients with RA are at increased risk of malignancy, however, it remains unclear whether the combination therapy is associated with a higher risk. Objective To assess the malignancy risk among patients with RA receiving combination therapy of JAKi and MTX compared to MTX alone. Methods PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were thoroughly searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with RA receiving JAKi and MTX, from inception to July 2020. Primary endpoints were malignancy events, Non melanomatous skin cancer (NMSC) and malignancy excluding NMSC and secondary endpoints were serious adverse events (SAE), deaths. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effect method. Results 659 publications were screened and 13 RCTs with a total of 6911 patients were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in malignancy [RR = 1.42; 95% CI (0.59, 3.41)], neither NMSC [RR = 1.44 (0.36, 5.76)] nor malignancies excluding NMSC [RR = 1.12 (0.40, 3.13)]. No statistically significant difference between the two groups for SAE [RR = 1.15 (0.90, 1.47)] and deaths [RR = 1.99 (0.75, 5.27)] was found. Conclusion The adjunction of JAKi to MTX is not associated with an increased risk of malignancy when compared to MTX alone. There is no increased risk of SAE and deaths when compared to MTX alone in patients with RA.

scholarly journals The efficacy and safety of intrathecal bupivacaine alone versus bupivacaine combined with magnesium sulfate in adults using spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi-Zhou Wang ◽  
Rui Dong ◽  
Li-Na Jia ◽  
Deng-Bin Ai ◽  
Jian-Hua Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: Several studies have investigated the effects of intrathecal magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant for bupivacaine; however, their conclusions are inconsistent. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis on this topic.Methods We searched Pubmed, EMBASE (OvidSP) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with magnesium sulfate versus bupivacaine alone in adults using spinal anesthesia.Results Eighteen studies that met our inclusion criteria were included in our analysis. We found that the addition of intrathecal magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine provided a longer duration of analgesia (SMD 0.99; 95% CI [0.45, 1.52], P = 0.0003, I2 = 93%), prolonged the duration of sensory block (MD=106.69; 95% CI, 60.93-152.45; P<0.00001), delayed the onset of sensory block (SMD 1.20; 95% CI [0.65, 1.75], P =<0.0001, I2 = 91%) and motor block (SMD 1.46; 95% CI [0.23, 2.69], P =0.02, I2 = 96%), decreased the requirement for rescue analgesia (SMD -0.81; 95% CI [-1.06, -0.56], P < 0.00001, I2 = 11%). For duration of motor block, and incidence of postoperative adverse events (such as nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, shivering and neurological deficit), no statistically differences were observed between the 2 groups.Conclusions Our meta-analysis demonstrated that intrathecal magnesium sulfate combined with bupivacaine prolongs the dusration of analgesia, without an impact on the adverse events. However, the quality of evidence was very low when using GRADE to assess it. Given adverse effects before use, more high-quality trials with large samples are required before magnesium sulfate is routinely used as a intrathecal adjunct.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Interventions for Acne Vulgaris: A Network Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyang Shi ◽  
Lizi Tan ◽  
Zhe Chen ◽  
Long Ge ◽  
Xiaoyan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Inflammatory Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Acne has several effects on physical symptoms, but the main impacts are on the quality of life, which can be improved by treatment. There are several acne treatments but less evidence comparing their relative efficacy. Thus, we assessed the comparative efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for acne. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2019, to include randomized controlled trials for acne that compared topical antibiotics (TA), benzoyl peroxide (BPO), topical retinoids (TR), oral antibiotics (OA), lasers, light devices including LED device (LED), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and intense pulsed light, chemical peels (CP), miscellaneous therapies or complementary and alternative medicine (MTCAM), or their combinations. We performed Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects for all treatments compared with placebo and each other. Mean differences (MDs) of lesions count and risk ratios of adverse events with their 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated, and all interventions were ranked by the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values. Additional frequentist additive network meta-analysis was performed to detect the robustness of results and potential interaction effects. Sensitivity analyses were carried out with different priors, and metaregression was to adjust for nine potential effect modifiers. In the result, seventy-three randomized controlled trials (27,745 patients with mild to moderate acne), comparing 30 grouped intervention categories, were included with low to moderate risk of bias. For adverse effects, OA had more risk in combination treatment with others. For noninflammatory lesions reduction, seventeen interventions had significant differences comparing with placebo and three interventions (TR+BPO: MD = −21.89, 95%CrI [−28.97, −14.76]; TR+BPO+MTCAM: −22.48 [−34.13, −10.70]; TA+BPO+CP: −20.63 [−33.97, −7.13]) were superior to others with 94, 94, and 91% SUCRA values, respectively. For inflammatory lesions reduction, nineteen interventions were significantly better than placebo, and three interventions (TR+BPO: MD = −12.13, 95%CrI [−18.41, −5.80]; TR+BPO+MTCAM: −13.21 [−.39, −3.04]; LED: −11.30 [−18.34, −4.42]) were superior to others (SUCRA: 81, 81, and 77%, respectively). In summary of noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions results, TR+BPO and TA+BPO were the best options compared to others. The frequentist model showed similar results as above. In summary, current evidence supports the suggestion that TR+BPO and TA+BPO are the best options for mild to moderate acne. LED is another option for inflammatory lesions when drug resistance occurs. All the combinations involved with OA showed more risk of adverse events than others. However, the evidence of this study should be cautiously used due to the limitations.

Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Psychosocial Impact on Women Participating in Two Randomized Controlled Trials

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1885-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Fallowfield ◽  
Anne Fleissig ◽  
Rob Edwards ◽  
Andrea West ◽  
Trevor J. Powles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Sexual Functioning ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prevention Of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychosocial implications of tamoxifen versus placebo in women who are at increased risk of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 488 women in the psychosocial study were recruited from participants in two placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast cancer in women who are at high familial risk. During a 5-year period, repeated assessments were made of anxiety, psychological distress, and sexual functioning using standardized questionnaires before treatment at baseline and at 6-month intervals during the trial. RESULTS: Questionnaire completion over 5 years was good, with 71.1% of women returning at least 8 of 10 follow-up assessments. Although scores from individuals showed considerable fluctuation and variation over time, changes in anxiety, mood, and sexual functioning were not associated with treatment group. The number of symptoms reported at 48 months via a self-report cheklist were not associated with treatment group, but vasomotor symptoms were more frequent among tamoxifen-treated women. Symptoms of low energy, breast sensitivity, and visual blurring were reported most frequently in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In general, these results are comparable to those from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project psychosocial study despite differences in study populations, methodology, and instruments. The long-term use of tamoxifen and other selective estrogen response modulators as preventive agents in high-risk groups has been questioned, but we found no evidence of treatment-related side effects that affect women’s psychosocial and sexual functioning.

scholarly journals Liver-related safety assessment of green tea extracts in humans: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 1221-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Isomura ◽  
S Suzuki ◽  
H Origasa ◽  
A Hosono ◽  
M Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract There remain liver-related safety concerns, regarding potential hepatotoxicity in humans, induced by green tea intake, despite being supposedly beneficial. Although many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of green tea extracts have been reported in the literature, the systematic reviews published to date were only based on subjective assessment of case reports. To more objectively examine the liver-related safety of green tea intake, we conducted a systematic review of published RCTs. A systematic literature search was conducted using three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) in December 2013 to identify RCTs of green tea extracts. Data on liver-related adverse events, including laboratory test abnormalities, were abstracted from the identified articles. Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed. After excluding duplicates, 561 titles and abstracts and 119 full-text articles were screened, and finally 34 trials were identified. Of these, liver-related adverse events were reported in four trials; these adverse events involved seven subjects (eight events) in the green tea intervention group and one subject (one event) in the control group. The summary odds ratio, estimated using a meta-analysis method for sparse event data, for intervention compared with placebo was 2.1 (95% confidence interval: 0.5–9.8). The few events reported in both groups were elevations of liver enzymes. Most were mild, and no serious liver-related adverse events were reported. Results of this review, although not conclusive, suggest that liver-related adverse events after intake of green tea extracts are expected to be rare.

Febuxostat use and risks of CVD events, death from cardiac-cause and all-cause mortality: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. jrheum.200307
Author(s):  
Hao Deng ◽  
Bao Long Zhang ◽  
Jin Dong Tong ◽  
Xiu Hong Yang ◽  
Hui Min Jin
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Objective To assess whether febuxostat use increases the risk of developing cardiovascular events, death from cardiac-cause and all-cause mortalities. Methods The relevant literature was searched in several databases including the MEDLINE (PubMed, 1 Jan. 1966–29 Feb. 2020), Web of science, EMBASE (1 Jan. 1974–29 Feb. 2020), ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. Manual searches for references cited in the original studies and relevant review articles were also performed. All studies included in this metanalysis were published in English. Results In the end, 20 studies that met our inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. Use of febuxostat was found not to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.57–1.32, P =0.507). Also, there was no association between febuxostat use and mortalities arising from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.49–1.45, P=0.528). The RR also revealed that febuxostat use was not associated with CVD events (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P =0.827). Furthermore, the likelihood of occurrence of CVD events was found not to be dependent on febuxostat dose (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.30, P =0.723). Conclusion Febuxostat use is not associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality, death from CVD or CVD events. Accordingly, it is a safe drug for the treatment of gout. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019131872

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials of Acupressure Therapy for Primary Dysmenorrhea

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-ru Jiang ◽  
Shuang Ni ◽  
Jin-long Li ◽  
Miao-miao Liu ◽  
Ji Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Primary Dysmenorrhea ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Register

The evidence of acupressure is limited in the management of dysmenorrhea. To evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we searched MEDLINE, the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from inception until March 2012. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.1 software. Eight RCTs were identified from the retrieved 224 relevant records. Acupressure improved pain measured with VAS (−1.41 cm 95% CI [−1.61, −1.21]), SF-MPQ at the 3-month followup (WMD −2.33, 95% CI [−4.11, −0.54]) and 6-month followup (WMD −4.67, 95% CI [−7.30, −2.04]), and MDQ at the 3-month followup (WMD −2.31, 95% CI [−3.74, −0.87]) and 6-month followup (WMD −4.67, 95% CI [−7.30, −2.04]). All trials did not report adverse events. These results were limited by the methodological flaws of trials.

scholarly journals Anti–PD-1 and Anti–PD-L1 in Head and Neck Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Botticelli ◽  
Alessio Cirillo ◽  
Lidia Strigari ◽  
Filippo Valentini ◽  
Bruna Cerbelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Head And Neck Carcinoma ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Register

ObjectiveThe monoclonal antibodies anti-programmed death protein-1 (anti–PD-1) nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the first immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) approved for treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck carcinoma R/M HNSCC in first line and in platinum refractory disease. This network meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of anti–PD-1- vs anti–PD-L1-based therapy in R/M HNSCC cancer patients through a systematic review of the literature to provide support for evidence-based treatment decisions. In particular, the effectiveness of ICIs for R/M HNSCC is analyzed according to the different mechanisms of action of the check-points inhibitory drugs in different subgroups of patients.MethodsWe did a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science. Our search identified a total of five randomized controlled trials: Keynote 040, Keynote 048, Eagle, Condor, Checkmate 141. These trials included 3001 patients. Treatment was sub-categorized into PD-L1–based, PD-1–based, and standard chemotherapy. Treatments were indirectly compared with anti–PD-L1-based therapy.ResultsThe network meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in OS between different subgroups except for the metastatic patients in which anti–PD-1-based therapy was associated with significantly less risk of death. Furthermore, anti–PD-1-based therapy appeared to be effective in smoker patients and in human papilloma–negative (HPV) patients. Conversely, anti–PD-L1-based therapy seems to be better efficient in female patients, in locally recurrent setting and in HPV positive patients.ConclusionThis is the first NMA study that aimed to indirectly compare anti–PD-1- and anti–PD-L1-based therapy in HNSCC patients. The results of our NMA could help define a profile of patient responder or resistant to specific classes of immune drugs and can be used to guide/design future studies in the novel scenario of precision immune-oncology.

Immune-related adverse events and efficacy outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Eric Druyts ◽  
Mark Boye ◽  
Himani Agg ◽  
Catherine Muehlenbein ◽  
Andrew Frederickson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Efficacy Data ◽  
Incidence Data ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Central Register

92 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Evidence on the association of irAEs and efficacy is limited. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to July 1, 2019) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting irAEs, incidence and efficacy data for pembrolizumab (PEM), nivolumab (NIVO), ipilimumab (IPI), atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and aldesleukin in lung, renal, head and neck cancer, and melanomas. RCTs assessing IO monotherapy or IO combinations in at least one arm were included. Evaluated outcomes were 1) irAE incidence (rash, pruritis, diarrhea, colitis, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, transaminitis, hypophysitis, pneumonitis, arthralgia, anemia, and hepatitis); and 2) efficacy (response and survival). irAE incidence data will be pooled and meta-analysis performed to assess the association of irAEs with efficacy; heterogeneity between RCTs will be evaluated. Results: Fifty RCTs were included: IOs were compared to chemotherapy or chemotherapy-combinations (19), to other interventions (8), to placebo (3), and head-to-head (20). irAE reporting and definitions were heterogeneous across RCTs. The most common all-grade irAEs were skin, GI, and endocrine. For skin irAEs, rash ranged from 0% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 6) to 73% (NIVO + IPI, n = 11); pruritus was from 1% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 89) to 50% (NIVO + IPI, n = 6). For GI irAEs, diarrhea ranged from 0% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 6) to 64% (NIVO + IPI, n = 11); colitis was from 0% (NIVO 3 mg/kg, n = 98) to 23% (NIVO + IPI, n = 94). For endocrine irAEs, hypothyroidism ranged from 0% (NIVO 3 mg/kg, n = 12) to 83% (NIVO + IPI, n = 6), hyperthyroidism was from 0% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 6 and IPI 3 mg/kg, n = 46) to 27% (NIVO + IPI, n = 11), and hypophysitis was from 0% (PEM 10 mg/kg, n = 84 and NIVO 3 mg/kg, n = 25) to 26% (NIVO + IPI, n = 35). Liver, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal irAEs, and anemia, were reported less frequently and with lower incidence. Conclusions: irAEs are increasingly reported in IO RCTs, but lack reporting and definition consistency. The meta-analysis results may provide clarity on irAEs incidence and association with efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document