scholarly journals EEG Coherence Analysis for Suppression of MEP Amplitude Variability in TMS

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Keisuke Sasaki ◽  
Yuki Fujishige ◽  
Masato Odagaki
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Coherence Analysis ◽  
Eeg Coherence ◽  
Peripheral Muscle ◽  
Online Measurements ◽  
Stimulation Method

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive stimulation method for cortical neurons. When TMS is delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1), motor evoked potentials can be measured in electromyograms for the peripheral muscle. However, the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes measured by stimulations for M1 fluctuated from trial to trial. MEP fluctuations are caused by changes in cortical excitability. We hypothesized that MEP variability could be suppressed with application of TMS when cortical excitability was stable. Thus, we developed a TMS system to suppress MEP amplitude variabilities. We used electroencephalographic (EEG) online measurements with coherence analysis to obtain the similarity of cortical excitabilities. The system enables us to trigger TMS if the EEGs measured from the two channels have a high similarity in the frequency domain. In this study, we found that the suppression of MEP fluctuation was dependent on the state of cortical excitability obtained by EEG coherence analysis.

scholarly journals Development of TMS Trigger System for Suppressing MEP Fluctuation Using EEG Coherence Analysis: Algorithm Development and Validation Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Sasaki ◽  
Yuki Fujishige ◽  
Yutaka Kikuchi ◽  
Masato Odagaki
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Domain ◽  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Coherence Analysis ◽  
Eeg Coherence ◽  
Trigger System ◽  
F Test ◽  
Experimental Time ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), when applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) elicits a motor evoked potential (MEP) in electromyograms measured from peripheral muscles. MEP amplitude has often been observed to fluctuate trial by trial, even with a constant stimulus. Many factors cause MEP fluctuations in TMS. One of the primary factors is the weak stationarity and instability of cortical activity in the brain, from which we assumed MEP fluctuations originated. We hypothesized that MEP fluctuations must be suppressed if TMS is delivered to M1 at the time when several electroencephalogram (EEG) channels measured on the scalp have high similarity in the frequency domain. OBJECTIVE We developed a TMS triggering system for suppressing MEP fluctuations using EEG coherence analysis, which was performed to detect the EEG signal similarity between the two channels in the frequency domain. METHODS Seven healthy adults participated in the experiment to confirm whether the TMS trigger system works adequately, and the mean amplitude and coefficient of variation of the MEP were recorded and compared with the values in the control task. We also determined the experimental time under each condition and verified whether it was within the predicted time. RESULTS The coefficient of variation (CV) of MEP amplitude decreased in five out of seven subjects, and significant differences (P=.02) were confirmed in two of the subjects by performing an F-test. The CV of the experimental time required for each stimulus with threshold modification was less than that without threshold modification, and a significant difference (P<.001) was confirmed by performing an F-test. CONCLUSIONS We consequently found that MEP could be suppressed using the system developed in this study and that the TMS trigger system could also stabilize the experimental time by changing the triggering threshold automatically.

scholarly journals Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martje G. Pauly ◽  
Annika Steinmeier ◽  
Christina Bolte ◽  
Feline Hamami ◽  
Elinor Tzvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Premotor Cortex ◽  
Motor Pathways ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cerebellar Plasticity

AbstractNon-invasive brain stimulation techniques including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), paired associative stimulation (PAS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been applied over the cerebellum to induce plasticity and gain insights into the interaction of the cerebellum with neo-cortical structures including the motor cortex. We compared the effects of 1 Hz rTMS, cTBS, PAS and tDCS given over the cerebellum on motor cortical excitability and interactions between the cerebellum and dorsal premotor cortex / primary motor cortex in two within subject designs in healthy controls. In experiment 1, rTMS, cTBS, PAS, and tDCS were applied over the cerebellum in 20 healthy subjects. In experiment 2, rTMS and PAS were compared to sham conditions in another group of 20 healthy subjects. In experiment 1, PAS reduced cortical excitability determined by motor evoked potentials (MEP) amplitudes, whereas rTMS increased motor thresholds and facilitated dorsal premotor-motor and cerebellum-motor cortex interactions. TDCS and cTBS had no significant effects. In experiment 2, MEP amplitudes increased after rTMS and motor thresholds following PAS. Analysis of all participants who received rTMS and PAS showed that MEP amplitudes were reduced after PAS and increased following rTMS. rTMS also caused facilitation of dorsal premotor-motor cortex and cerebellum-motor cortex interactions. In summary, cerebellar 1 Hz rTMS and PAS can effectively induce plasticity in cerebello-(premotor)-motor pathways provided larger samples are studied.

scholarly journals Online and offline effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation of the primary motor cortex

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Pozdniakov ◽  
Alicia Nunez Vorobiova ◽  
Giulia Galli ◽  
Simone Rossi ◽  
Matteo Feurra
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Alternating Current ◽  
Online Application ◽  
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation ◽  
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

AbstractTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows interaction with endogenous cortical oscillatory rhythms by means of external sinusoidal potentials. The physiological mechanisms underlying tACS effects are still under debate. Whereas online (e.g., ongoing) tACS over the motor cortex induces robust state-, phase- and frequency-dependent effects on cortical excitability, the offline effects (i.e. after-effects) of tACS are less clear. Here, we explored online and offline effects of tACS in two single-blind, sham-controlled experiments. In both experiments we used neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) as a probe to index changes of cortical excitability and delivered M1 tACS at 10 Hz (alpha), 20 Hz (beta) and sham (30 s of low-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation; tRNS). Corticospinal excitability was measured by single pulse TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs). tACS was delivered online in Experiment 1 and offline in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the increase of MEPs size was maximal with the 20 Hz stimulation, however in Experiment 2 neither the 10 Hz nor the 20 Hz stimulation induced tACS offline effects. These findings support the idea that tACS affects cortical excitability only during online application, at least when delivered on the scalp overlying M1, thereby contributing to the development of effective protocols that can be applied to clinical populations.

The Influence of Cortico-Cerebellar Structural Connectivity on Cortical Excitability in Chronic Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1330-1344
Author(s):  
Stephanie Guder ◽  
Benedikt M Frey ◽  
Winifried Backhaus ◽  
Hanna Braass ◽  
Jan E Timmermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Structural Connectivity ◽  
Chronic Stroke ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Stroke Patients

Abstract Brain imaging has recently evidenced that the structural state of distinct reciprocal cortico-cerebellar fiber tracts, the dentato-thalamo-cortical tract (DTCT), and the cortico-ponto-cerebellar tract (CPCeT), significantly influences residual motor output in chronic stroke patients, independent from the level of damage to the corticospinal tract (CST). Whether such structural information might also directly relate to measures of cortical excitability is an open question. Eighteen chronic stroke patients with supratentorial ischemic lesions and 17 healthy controls underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess recruitment curves of motor evoked potentials of both hemispheres. Diffusion-weighted imaging and probabilistic tractography were applied to reconstruct reciprocal cortico-cerebellar motor tracts between the primary motor cortex and the cerebellum. Tract-related microstructure was estimated by means of fractional anisotropy, and linear regression modeling was used to relate it to cortical excitability. The main finding was a significant association between cortical excitability and the structural integrity of the DTCT, the main cerebellar outflow tract, independent from the level of damage to the CST. A comparable relationship was neither detectable for the CPCeT nor for the healthy controls. This finding contributes to a mechanistic understanding of the putative supportive role of the cerebellum for residual motor output by facilitating cortical excitability after stroke.

scholarly journals Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond Agboada ◽  
Mohsen Mosayebi Samani ◽  
Asif Jamil ◽  
Min-Fang Kuo ◽  
Michael A. Nitsche
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Parameter Space ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Anodal Tdcs ◽  
Stimulation Parameters ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Motor Cortex Plasticity

AbstractSize and duration of the neuroplastic effects of tDCS depend on stimulation parameters, including stimulation duration and intensity of current. The impact of stimulation parameters on physiological effects is partially non-linear. To improve the utility of this intervention, it is critical to gather information about the impact of stimulation duration and intensity on neuroplasticity, while expanding the parameter space to improve efficacy. Anodal tDCS of 1–3 mA current intensity was applied for 15–30 minutes to study motor cortex plasticity. Sixteen healthy right-handed non-smoking volunteers participated in 10 sessions (intensity-duration pairs) of stimulation in a randomized cross-over design. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded as outcome measures of tDCS effects until next evening after tDCS. All active stimulation conditions enhanced motor cortex excitability within the first 2 hours after stimulation. We observed no significant differences between the three stimulation intensities and durations on cortical excitability. A trend for larger cortical excitability enhancements was however observed for higher current intensities (1 vs 3 mA). These results add information about intensified tDCS protocols and suggest that the impact of anodal tDCS on neuroplasticity is relatively robust with respect to gradual alterations of stimulation intensity, and duration.

Unwanted Memory Intrusions Recruit Broad Motor Suppression

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128
Author(s):  
Anna Castiglione ◽  
Adam R. Aron
Keyword(s):  
Memory Retrieval ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Unexpected Result ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Rapid Action

Quickly preventing the retrieval of (inappropriate) long-term memories might recruit a similar control mechanism as rapid action-stopping. A very specific characteristic of rapid action-stopping is “global motor suppression”: When a single response is rapidly stopped, there is a broad skeletomotor suppression. This is shown by the technique of TMS placed over a task-irrelevant part of the primary motor cortex (M1) to measure motor-evoked potentials. Here, we used this same TMS method to test if rapidly preventing long-term memory retrieval also shows this broad skeletomotor suppression effect. Twenty human participants underwent a Think/No-Think task. In the first phase, they learned word pairs. In the second phase, they received the left-hand word as a cue and had to either retrieve the associated right-hand word (“Think”) or stop retrieval (“No-Think”). At the end of each trial, they reported whether they had experienced an intrusion of the associated memory. Behaviorally, on No-Think trials, they reported fewer intrusions than Think trials, and the reporting of intrusions decreased with practice. Physiologically, we observed that the motor-evoked potential, measured from the hand (which was irrelevant to the task), was reduced on No-Think trials in the time frame of 300–500 msec, especially on trials where they did report an intrusion. This unexpected result contradicted our preregistered prediction that we would find such a decrease on No-Think trials where the intrusion was not reported. These data suggest that one form of executive control over (inappropriate) long-term memory retrieval is a rapid and broad stop, akin to action-stopping, that is triggered by the intrusion itself.

Time Course of Determination of Movement Direction in the Reaction Time Task in Humans

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 1195-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Sommer ◽  
Joseph Classen ◽  
Leonardo G. Cohen ◽  
Mark Hallett
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Movement Direction ◽  
Movement Onset ◽  
Thumb Movement

The primary motor cortex produces motor commands that include encoding the direction of movement. Excitability of the motor cortex in the reaction time (RT) task can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). To elucidate the timing of the increase in cortical excitability and of the determination of movement direction before movement onset, we asked six right-handed, healthy subjects to either abduct or extend their right thumb after a go-signal indicated the appropriate direction. Between the go-signal and movement onset, single TMS pulses were delivered to the contralateral motor cortex. We recorded the direction of the TMS-induced thumb movement and the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis and extensor pollicis brevis muscles. Facilitation of MEPs from the prime mover, as early as 200 ms before the end of the reaction time, preceded facilitation of MEPs from the nonprime mover, and both preceded measurable directional change. Compared with a control condition in which no voluntary movement was required, the direction of the TMS-induced thumb movement started to change in the direction of the intended movement as early as 90 ms before the end of the RT, and maximum changes were seen shortly before the end of reaction time. Movement acceleration also increased with maxima shortly before the end of the RT. We conclude that in concentric movements a change of the movement direction encoded in the primary motor cortex occurs in the 200 ms prior to movement onset, which is as early as increased excitability itself can be detected.

scholarly journals Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS): a wide range of frequencies is needed for increasing cortical excitability

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Moret ◽  
Rita Donato ◽  
Massimo Nucci ◽  
Giorgia Cona ◽  
Gianluca Campana
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Band ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
High Frequency Band ◽  
Neural Excitability ◽  
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is a recent neuromodulation protocol. The high-frequency band (hf-tRNS) has shown to be the most effective in enhancing neural excitability. The frequency band of hf-tRNS typically spans from 100 to 640 Hz. Here we asked whether both the lower and the higher half of the high-frequency band are needed for increasing neural excitability. Three frequency ranges (100–400 Hz, 400–700 Hz, 100–700 Hz) and Sham conditions were delivered for 10 minutes at an intensity of 1.5 mA over the primary motor cortex (M1). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered over the same area at baseline, 0, 10, 20, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after stimulation, while motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded to evaluate changes in cortical excitability. Only the full-band condition (100–700 Hz) was able to modulate excitability by enhancing MEPs at 10 and 20 minutes after stimulation: neither the higher nor the lower sub-range of the high-frequency band significantly modulated cortical excitability. These results show that the efficacy of tRNS is strictly related to the width of the selected frequency range.

Automatic Recruitment of the Motor System by Undetected Graspable Objects: A Motor-evoked Potential Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1918-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas A. McNair ◽  
Ashleigh D. Behrens ◽  
Irina M. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Action ◽  
Motor Pathway ◽  
The Right

Previous behavioral and neuroimaging studies have suggested that the motor properties associated with graspable objects may be automatically accessed when people passively view these objects. We directly tested this by measuring the excitability of the motor pathway when participants viewed pictures of graspable objects that were presented during the attentional blink (AB), when items frequently go undetected. Participants had to identify two briefly presented objects separated by either a short or long SOA. Motor-evoked potentials were measured from the right hand in response to a single TMS pulse delivered over the left primary motor cortex 250 msec after the onset of the second target. Behavioral results showed poorer identification of objects at short SOA compared with long SOA, consistent with an AB, which did not differ between graspable and nongraspable objects. However, motor-evoked potentials measured during the AB were significantly higher for graspable objects than for nongraspable objects, irrespective of whether the object was successfully identified or undetected. This provides direct evidence that the motor system is automatically activated during visual processing of objects that afford a motor action.

scholarly journals The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high-definition montages

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pellegrini ◽  
Maryam Zoghi ◽  
Shapour Jaberzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Response Variability ◽  
Pulse Interval ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation

AbstractResponse variability following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) highlights need for exploring different tDCS electrode montages. This study compared corticospinal excitability (CSE), cortico-cortical excitability and intra-individual variability following conventional and HD anodal (a-tDCS) and cathodal (c-tDCS) tDCS. Fifteen healthy young males attended four sessions at least one-week apart: conventional a-tDCS, conventional c-tDCS, HD-a-tDCS, HD-c-tDCS. TDCS was administered (1mA, 10-minutes) over the primary motor cortex (M1), via 6×4cm active and 7×5cm return electrodes (conventional tDCS) and 4×1 ring-electrodes 3.5cm apart in ring formation around M1 (HD-tDCS). For CSE, twenty-five single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) peak-to-peak motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded at baseline, 0-minutes and 30-minutes post-tDCS. For cortico-cortical excitability, twenty-five paired-pulse MEPs with 3-millisecond (ms) inter-pulse interval (IPI) and twenty-five at 10ms assessed short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) respectively. MEP standardised z-values standard deviations represented intra-individual variability. No significant differences were reported in CSE between conventional and HD a-tDCS, but significant differences between conventional and HD c-tDCS 0-minutes post-tDCS. Intra-individual variability was significantly reduced in conventional tDCS compared to HD-tDCS for a-tDCS (0-minutes) and c-tDCS (30-minutes). No significant changes were reported in SICI and ICF. These novel findings highlight current technical issues with HD-tDCS, suggesting future tDCS studies should utilise conventional tDCS to minimise intra-individual variability, ensuring tDCS after-effects are true changes in CSE and cortico-cortical excitability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document