Team and Individual Interactions With Reciprocity in Individual Knowledge Sharing

2019 ◽  
pp. 123-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Lee Endres ◽  
Sanjib Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Functional Diversity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Demographic Diversity ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Individual Knowledge ◽  
Individual Variables ◽  
Ability Perceptions

The study investigated the effects of expected reciprocity on knowledge sharing, as moderated by team and individual variables. Data (n = 84) were collected in an experimental study from undergraduate business student participants. The effects of expected reciprocity on knowledge sharing depend on the levels of individual competence, positive team attitudes, functional diversity, and demographic diversity. Implications include that the effectiveness of reciprocity in knowledge sharing depends on several factors relating to the team and individual. Encouraging reciprocity may have positive effects, but these can be overridden by poor team attitudes, low ability perceptions, and team diversity. Future research suggestions are offered.

The Role of Expected Reciprocity in Knowledge Sharing

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Endres ◽  
Sanjib Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Functional Diversity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Demographic Diversity ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Individual Variables ◽  
Ability Perceptions

The authors investigated the effects of expected reciprocity on knowledge sharing, as moderated by team and individual variables. Data (n = 84) was collected in an experimental study from undergraduate business student participants. Effects of expected reciprocity on knowledge sharing depended on the levels of individual competence, positive team attitudes, functional diversity and demographic diversity. Implications include that the effectiveness of reciprocity in knowledge sharing depends on several factors relating to the team and individual. Encouraging reciprocity may have positive effects, but these can be overridden by poor team attitudes, low ability perceptions and team diversity. Future research suggestions are offered.

The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujin K. Horwitz ◽  
Irwin B. Horwitz
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Demographic Diversity ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Moderating Variables ◽  
Team Outcomes ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
The Impact

Over the past few decades, a great deal of research has been conducted to examine the complex relationship between team diversity and team outcomes. However, the impact of team diversity on team outcomes and moderating variables potentially affecting this relationship are still not fully answered with mixed findings in the literature. These research issues were, therefore, addressed by quantitatively reviewing extant work and provided estimates of the relationship between team diversity and team outcomes. In particular, the effects of task-related and bio-demographic diversity at the group-level were meta-analyzed to test the hypothesis of synergistic performance resulting from diverse employee teams. Support was found for the positive impact of task-related diversity on team performance although bio-demographic diversity was not significantly related to team performance. Similarly, no discernible effect of team diversity was found on social integration. The implications of the review for future research and practices are also discussed.

scholarly journals Interaction between the Knowledge Sharing on Innovation Behavior Based on the Viewpoint of Team Diversity: Empirical Research from China

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng-Hsiu LEE ◽  
Ming-Yu YEN ◽  
Louis PERROMAT
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Organizational Performance ◽  
High Tech ◽  
High Tech Industry ◽  
Mutual Cooperation ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Innovation Behavior

In the rapidly changing and challenging environment, the possession of continuous innovation ability is primary for organizations in high-tech industry, which have to constantly apply innovation to maintain and enhance the effectiveness, create corporate value, and pursue organizational excellence so as to promote the competitive advantage for enterprise growth and survival. For organizations toady, work teams are the basic units to complete tasks. A lot of management activities are mostly preceded with teams, relying on the mutual cooperation among members. Besides, team interaction and communication could effectively enhance team performance and organizational performance. Aiming at supervisors and employees of high-tech industry in Fujian Province, total 520 copies of questionnaire are distributed, and 351 valid copies are retrieved, with the retrieval rate 68%. The research results show that 1.team diversity presents positive and significant effects on knowledge sharing, 2.knowledge sharing shows positive and remarkable effects on innovation behavior, and 3.team diversity reveals positive effects on innovation behavior. According to the results, suggestions are proposed, expecting to stimulate team innovation behaviors for high-tech industry applying different value, experience, and professional knowledge of team members.

scholarly journals Knowledge Sharing Among Healthcare Practitioners: Identifying the Psychological and Motivational Facilitating Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Ying Wu ◽  
Wei-Tsong Wang ◽  
Ming-Hsuan Hsiao
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Autonomous Motivation ◽  
Psychological Ownership ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Model ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Facilitating Factors ◽  
The Impact

There exists a lack of an understanding of how to facilitate knowledge sharing (KS) behaviors in healthcare organizations. This study is among the first to specifically address this issue through synthesizing psychological ownership (PO), self-determination theory, and psychological empowerment (PE) theory. This study developed a research model that described the impact of the psychological and motivational facilitating factors, including autonomous motivation, user PE, and PO on knowledge sharing intention (KSI) and knowledge sharing behavior (KSB). Data collected from 343 healthcare professionals were analyzed using the technique of partial least squares (PLS) to validate the research model. The results indicated that user PE, organization-based PO, and autonomous motivation all had significant direct/indirect positive effects on KSI and KSB as we hypothesized. Surprisingly, knowledge-based PO had a significant positive effect on KSI, which contradicted our original hypothesis. The implications for theory and for practice, limitations, and future research directions are discussed accordingly.

scholarly journals Diversity and creativity in cross-national teams: The role of team knowledge sharing and inclusive climate

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ahmad Bodla ◽  
Ningyu Tang ◽  
Wan Jiang ◽  
Longwei Tian
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Deep Level ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Team Creativity ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
National Team ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Team Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Cross National ◽  
Inclusive Climate

AbstractDiversity literature has demonstrated negative effects of surface-level diversity and positive effects of deep-level diversity. How do two types of diversity among cross national team members influence team knowledge sharing and team creativity? The purpose of this study is to explore conditions that leverage the positive and restrain the negative effects of team diversity on team knowledge sharing, which leads to team creativity. We expect inclusive climate as the significant condition and knowledge sharing as the profound intervening mechanism between team diversity and team creativity relationship. We tested the hypotheses with data from a sample of 60 cross-national research teams from several universities in China. The results support the hypothesized relationships among inclusive climate, team knowledge sharing, and team creativity. Our findings contribute to the advancement of team diversity and team creativity literature, and their theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Entrepreneurial Team Conflict and Cohesion: Meta-structural Equation Modeling

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangok Yoo ◽  
Jin Lee ◽  
Yunsoo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Team Conflict ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Venture Performance ◽  
Entrepreneurial Team

Abstract We explore the mediating effects that entrepreneurial team conflict and cohesion have on the relationship between team diversity and performance based on an inputs-mediators-outcomes framework. Using 56 samples from 54 empirical studies, we conducted a meta-analysis of the hypothesized relationships and used meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) to test the mediating models. Our findings reveal that team diversity was related to cognitive and affective conflict, and only affective conflict was associated with objective and subjective venture performance. Furthermore, entrepreneurial team cohesion had positive effects on venture performance. Our unique contributions to the entrepreneurial team literature and future research suggestions are also discussed.

How knowledge sharing connects interpersonal trust and innovation capability

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Lei ◽  
Thuong Thi Nguyen ◽  
Phong Ba Le
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Product Innovation ◽  
Interpersonal Trust ◽  
Process Innovation ◽  
Psychological State ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Service Firms ◽  
Innovation Capability ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Positive Effects

Purpose Knowledge sharing (KS) and innovation are generally believed as the antecedents of key outcomes that help firms to attain and sustain competitive advantage in long term. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the mechanism of how interpersonal trust and leader support affect KS and improve firm’s innovation capabilities. Design/methodology/approach This is a research paper which is built using empirical data collected from 68 manufacturing and service firms in China. Findings First, the findings show that leader supports moderate the correlation between interpersonal trust and KS. Second, KS serves as mediator in the relationship between interpersonal trust and firm’s innovation capabilities. Research limitations/implications KS plays a crucial role in stimulating innovation capabilities for both manufacturing and service firms. Future research should explore the effects of the motivational factors (such as positive psychological state, perceived benefits and costs) on KS and firm’s innovation capabilities. Practical implications The paper provides the evidence for the positive effects of interpersonal trust on KS, which in turn is significantly associated with product innovation and process innovation. It highlights the important role of leader supports in promoting the degree of sharing knowledge among individuals to enhance innovation capabilities for firms. Originality/value This study puts the theory of innovation forward based on exploring the key factors that have potential and positive impacts on two specific types of innovation capability, namely, product innovation and process innovation, for both manufacturing and service firms.

Development of a German-Language Questionnaire to Measure Collective Orientation as an Individual Attitude

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Hagemann
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
German Language ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Collective Orientation ◽  
Team Research ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Individual Variables ◽  
The Individual

Abstract. The individual attitudes of every single team member are important for team performance. Studies show that each team member’s collective orientation – that is, propensity to work in a collective manner in team settings – enhances the team’s interdependent teamwork. In the German-speaking countries, there was previously no instrument to measure collective orientation. So, I developed and validated a German-language instrument to measure collective orientation. In three studies (N = 1028), I tested the validity of the instrument in terms of its internal structure and relationships with other variables. The results confirm the reliability and validity of the instrument. The instrument also predicts team performance in terms of interdependent teamwork. I discuss differences in established individual variables in team research and the role of collective orientation in teams. In future research, the instrument can be applied to diagnose teamwork deficiencies and evaluate interventions for developing team members’ collective orientation.

The Contingent Effect of Team Composition on the Performance of Entrepreneurial Teams

2019 ◽  
pp. 654-680
Author(s):  
Serghei Musaji ◽  
Julio De Castro
Keyword(s):  
Future Research ◽  
Team Composition ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Diversity ◽  
Entrepreneurial Teams ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Fertile Ground ◽  
Active Debate ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Relationship

Despite the continuous interest in studying entrepreneurial teams, the relationship between team composition and, particularly, team diversity and performance remains fertile ground for active debate. Taking roots in the knowledge-based view and organizational learning literatures, this chapter argues that performance in entrepreneurial teams is contingent on (a) the overlap between team members’ knowledge/competences and the content of the performed tasks, (b) the duplication of the team members’ knowledge in the areas with that content, (c) the nature of tasks (exploration or exploitation), (d) the team’s flexibility to adapt to changes in the content and nature of those tasks, and (e) the rate of environmental change. Because an important source of ambiguity in the understanding of how team diversity and performance are linked ties to issues of how team diversity is conceptualized and operationalized, the chapter also proposes a new way of looking at diversity in future research.

Conclusion

2020 ◽  
pp. 698-719
Author(s):  
Ronald E. Rice ◽  
Simeon J. Yates ◽  
Jordana Blejmar
Keyword(s):  
Digital Technology ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Digital Culture ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Technology And Society ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Research Areas

We conclude the Handbook of Digital Technology and Society by identifying topics that appear in multiple chapters, are more unique to some chapters, and that represent general themes across the material. Each of these is considered separately for the ESRC theme chapters and the non-ESRC chapters. In the ESRC theme chapters, cross-cutting research topics include digital divides and inequalities; data and digital literacy; governance, regulation, and legislation; and the roles and impacts of major platforms. Cross-cutting challenges include methods; theory development, testing, and evaluation; ethics; big data; and multi-platform/holistic studies. Gaps include policy implications, and digital culture. In the non-ESRC chapters, more cross-cutting themes include future research and methods; technology venues; relationships; content and creation; culture and everyday life; theory; and societal effects. More unique, these were digitization of self; managing digital experience; names for the digital/social era; ethics; user groups; civic issues; health, and positive effects. The chapter also shows how the non-ESRC chapters may be clustered together based on their shared themes and subthemes, identifying two general themes of more micro and more macro topics. The identification of both more and less common topics and themes can provide the basis for understanding the landscape of prior research, what areas need to be included in ongoing research, and what research areas might benefit from more attention. The chapter ends with some recommendations for such ongoing and future research in the rich, important, and challenging area of digital technology and society.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document