Research on Readjustments of Land Property Rights in Comprehensive Land Management

2014 ◽  
Vol 484-485 ◽  
pp. 488-492
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
Xin Ju Li

Research purpose: The paper studies readjustments of land property rights which practice in the project area of Fan Zhen comprehensive land management in Taian City. According to the study make reasonable suggestions, for the similar areas of readjustments of land property rights provide experience. Research Methods: Investigating method and contrastive analysis method. Results: The right of the project area to an adjustment measures properly, and has achieved good economic benefits, social benefits and ecological benefits. Research Conclusions: Developing the new rural construction the problem from the social, economic and environmental field, effectively protect the fundamental interests of farmers to get sustainable development.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Dija Hedistira ◽  
' Pujiyono

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to analyze the ownership and mastery of a fiduciary collateral object, in cases that often occur today, many disputes between creditors and debtors in fiduciary collateral agreements are caused because creditors assume that with executive rights as fiduciary recipients, the fiduciary collateral object legally owned by creditors and creditors the right to take and sell fiduciary collateral objects when the debtor defaults unilaterally, as well as the debtor who considers that the fiduciary collateral object is owned by him because the object is registered on his name, so that the debtor can use the object free as  giving to a third party or selling the object of fiduciary guarantee unilaterally. the author uses a normative <br />juridical approach, and deductive analysis method based on the Civil Code and fiduciary law applicable in Indonesia, Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The conclusion of the discussion is the ownership of the object of the Fiduciary Guarantee is owned by the debtor in accordance with the Law, mastery of the object of collateral controlled by the debtor for economic benefits, the procedure of execution The object of Fiduciary Guarantee is carried out in accordance with the Fiduciary Guarantee Act, an alternative mediation in resolving the dispute. There needs to be clarity in the use of language in making a law, so as not to conflict with each other between Article one and the other Articles.<br />Keywords: Ownership; Mastery; Object of Fiduciary Guarantee; Debtor; Creditors.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tentang kepemilikan dan penguasaan suatu objek jaminan fidusia, dalam kasus yang saat ini sering terjadi, banyak sengketa antara kreditur dan debitur dalam perjanjian jaminan fidusia disebabkan karena kreditur beranggapan bahwa dengan adanya hak eksekutorial sebagai penerima fidusia, maka objek jaminan fidusia tersebut secara sah dimiliki oleh kreditur dan kreditur berhak mengambil dan menjual objek jaminan fidusia saat debitur cidera janji<br />(wanprestasi) secara sepihak, begitupun dengan debitur yang menganggap bahwa objek jaminan fidusia tersebut dimiliki olehnya karena objek tersebut terdaftar atas namannya, sehingga debitur dapat mempergunakan objek tersebut secara bebas seperti menyerahkan kepada pihak ketiga atau menjual objek jaminan fidusia tersebut secara sepihak. penulis menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dan metode analisis deduktif yang didasarkan pada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata<br />dan hukum jaminan fidusia yang berlaku di Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Kesimpulan pembahasan adalah Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia dimiliki oleh debitur sesuai Undang-undang, penguasaan objek jaminan dikuasai debitur untuk manfaat ekonomis, prosedur eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia dilakukan sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia, alternatif secara mediasi dalam menyelesaikan sengketa yang terjadi. Perlu ada kejelasan dalam<br />penggunaan bahasa pada pembuatan suatu Undang-Undang, agar tidak saling bertentangan antar Pasal satu dengan Pasal yang lainnya. <br />Kata Kunci: Kepemilikan; Penguasaan; Objek Jaminan Fidusia; Debitur; Kreditur.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (87) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna Horislavska ◽  
◽  
Anastasiia Androshchuk ◽  

Now the world countries ran into the sharp problem of overcoming and counteraction to distribution in the whole world of COVID-19, and also application of responsibility for violation of quarantine. It is set on results research, that the personal unproperty rights for citizens were exposed to rather significant limitations, in fact normatively-legal acts in relation to responsibility for violation of quarantine and sanitary rules for prevention of COVID-19 have a row of legal contradictions. In the article on the basis of analysis of current national legislation, considerations of cases and theoretical and legal sources are investigated effective mechanisms of the legal providing of requirements of observance of sanitary rules and norms on prevention of infectious diseases in Ukraine. The problems of determination of legal nature, maintenance and realization of the personal unproperty rights open up in the conditions of introduction of quarantine events on warning of COVID-19. The article describes the concept of "the right to freedom of movement". This right was and is now more than ever one of the fundamental personal moral rights. The article examines the judicial practice of resolving cases in the context of the introduction of quarantine measures and ensuring the fundamental rights and freedoms of an individual through the introduction of technical means and risks that may arise in appropriate conditions. Proposals to eliminate the shortcomings of legal regulation in the studied area are substantiated. Human rights and freedoms, the degree of their recognition in the state and society, the level of their protection are determined by the type of its socio-economic organization, as well as the degree of social development and democratization of society. Personal non-property rights that ensure the social existence of an individual, including the right to freedom of movement, are closely related, both those that can be limited at the legislative level under certain conditions, and those that are not "subject to" such restrictions. Therefore, restrictions on the freedom of movement of an individual are possible only in cases provided by the Constitution and the Civil Code of Ukraine, other laws (but not by-laws, which are the rulings of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine). And also in compliance with the principles of expediency, proportionality to goals. It is necessary to determine the participants in the emerging legal relationship, both those who "control" and those participants who are "controlled, limited".


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87
Author(s):  
Billy Handiwiyanto ◽  
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto

Intellectual Property Rights consist of various types, one of which is Copyright, Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights that has a broad scope of scope of objects, to the Copyright that is owned, the Author and / or the Copyright Holder get an Exclusive Right on the Work , in which this Exclusive Right consists of 2 (two) types, namely the Moral Right to the Work, and also the Economic Right to the Work. The right to exploit the Work rests with the Author and/or the Copyright Holder of the Work, but there are often violations of the Exclusive Rights in this case the Economic Right which is the Right of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to obtain economic benefits from the utilization of the Copyright, in which a Work is commercialized without Rights by other Parties who do not have the Right to Commercialize the Work. This study aims to determine the basis of the Liability of those commercializing a Work without Rights, which violates the Exclusive Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to utilize the Work in order to obtain economic benefits from the Work. This research was conducted using the Normative Jurisdiction research method which examines a problem on the basis of applicable laws and regulations, as well as from views and doctrines in the science of law. The results of this study state that other parties who without the right to commercialize a Work must be held accountable for violating the Exclusive Rights in this case the Exclusive Rights to the Economic Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder.Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terdiri dari berbagai macam jenis, salah satunya Hak Cipta, Hak Cipta merupakan salah satu Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang memiliki ruang lingkup cakupan obyek yang luas, terhadap Hak Cipta yang dimiliki, Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta mendapatkan Hak Eksklusif atas Ciptaan tersebut, yang mana Hak Eksklusif ini terdiri dari 2 (dua) macam, yaitu Hak Moral atas Ciptaannya, dan juga Hak Ekonomi atas Ciptaan. Hak untuk mengeksploitasi Ciptaan tersebut terletak pada Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta dari Ciptaan tersebut, namun seringkali terjadi pelanggaran terhadap Hak Eksklusif yang dalam hal ini ialah Hak Ekonomi yang merupaan Hak dari si Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari pemanfaatan terhadap Hak Cipta tersebut, yang mana suatu Ciptaan dikomersialkan tanpa Hak oleh Pihak lain yang tidak punya Hak untuk Mengkomersialkan Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar Tanggung Gugat dari pihak yang mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan tanpa Hak, yang melanggar Hak Eksklusif Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk memanfaatkan Ciptaan tersebut guna mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif yang mana meneliti suatu masalah dengan dasar peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, juga dari pandangan-pandangan dan doktrin-doktrin dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa pihak lain yang dengan tanpa hak mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan harus bertanggung gugat karena melanggar Hak Eksklusif dalam hal ini Hak Eksklusif terhadap Hak Ekonomi dari Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (23) ◽  
pp. 129-143
Author(s):  
FRANCIVALDO ALVES NUNES

A proposta deste artigo é compreender como os agentes públicos concebiam a concessão de direitos de propriedade sobre a terra nas colônias agrá­colas na Amazônia do século XIX. Mostraremos que a concessão do direito de utilização da terra, ou seja, a garantia legal da permanência de colonos nos seus direitos á  utilização dos recursos fundiários estava condicionada á  ocupação regular da terra e á  agricultura. Apoiados nos relatórios e correspondências da administração provincial, destacaremos que as colônias eram representadas como espaços modelares em que se observa a polá­tica governamental de institucionalização de direitos de propriedade sobre a terra, subordinada a uma disciplina do trabalho agrá­cola. Esta relação é representada como uma estratificação social, reconhecendo á  partida aos colonos, o estatuto social de agricultores autônomos, detentores de propriedade individual, ainda que condicionada. Por último, identificamos exemplos de dificuldades de implantação, conflito e resistência a essa disciplina, representadas nos discursos oficiais.  Palavras-chave: Colônias Agrá­colas. Direitos de Propriedade. Amazônia do Século XIX.ACCESS TO THE LAND, PROPERTY AND AGRICULTURE IN COLONIAL NUCLEI OF THE AMAZON OF THE XIX CENTURYAbstract:  The purpose of this article is the understanding of how public agents conceived the concession of property rights over land in agricultural colonies in the nineteenth century Amazon. It will be demonstrated that the granting of the right to use land, that is, the legal guarantee of the colonists' permanence in their rights to the use of the land resources was conditional on the regular occupation of land and agriculture. Based on reports and correspondence from the provincial administration, it will be pointed out that the colonies were represented as model spaces in which the governmental policy of institutionalizing property rights over land, subordinated to a discipline of agricultural work, were observed. This relationship is represented as a social stratification, recognizing to the colonists the social status of autonomous farmers, holders of individual property although conditioned. Finally, we identify examples of difficulties of implantation, conflict and resistance to this discipline, represented in official speeches.  Keywords:  Agricultural Colonies. Property Rights. Amazon of the XIX Century.  ACCESO A LA TIERRA, PROPIEDAD Y AGRICULTURA EN NÚCLEOS COLONIALES DE LA AMAZONIA OCHOCENTISTAResumen:  El propósito de este artá­culo es entender cómo los funcionarios públicos vieron la concesión de los derechos de propiedad de la tierra en colonias agrá­colas en la Amazonia del siglo XIX. Demostraremos que la concesión del derecho de uso de la tierra, es decir, la garantá­a legal de la permanencia de colonos en sus derechos de uso de los recursos de la tierra estaba condicionada a la ocupación regular de la tierra y a la agricultura. Con base en los informes y correspondencias de la administración provincial, destacamos que las colonias eran representadas como zonas modelo donde se observa la polá­tica gubernamental de institucionalización de derechos de propiedad sobre la tierra, sujeta a una disciplina del trabajo agrá­cola. Esta relación se representa como una estratificación social, reconociendo la partida a los colonos, el estatuto social de los agricultores autónomos, poseedores de propiedad individual, aunque condicionada. Por último, identificamos ejemplos de las dificultades de implantación, conflicto y resistencia a esta disciplina, representadas en los discursos oficiales.Palabras clave:  Colonias Agrá­colas. Derechos de Propiedad. Amazonia del siglo XIX.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando R. Tesón

Abstract:This essay argues that the territorial rights of states derive from the property rights of the individuals that make up those states. The argument draws from the Lockean tradition of justification of political powers. Persons in the state of nature have natural rights. Those rights are first-order substantive rights (the right to property), and second-order executive rights (the right to enforce the right to property.) In the social contract, individuals transfer to the state their executive rights, not their substantive rights. The state can thus define the boundaries of property rights and adjudicate property disputes, but does not legitimately own land itself. The article discusses and rejects, for deontic and consequentialist reasons, positions that justify collective and state ownership of territory. Some important consequences follow from the argument: First, no actual state has territorial rights, since no actual state wields delegated powers in land. Second, notwithstanding the preceding conclusion, actual states have an obligation to exercise their (putative) territorial powers consistently with the respect for private property.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marthen Salinding

Abstract The need for land for the business world is getting bigger, while the land supply is limited. One of the rights to land used by investors to support their business is the building rights. The  building rights.is the right to own and own buildings on land which is not his own with a maximum period of 30 years. The land which can be granted of the right building is the State Land, the land of management rights and the land of property rightsTeh Building Right  as one of the objects granting of Right Building is the hereditary, strongest and most fulfilled right which can be owned by people on the land keeping in mind the provisions in Article 6 of the Basic Agrarian Law.The Building Right  on the land Property rights have special characteristics because the granting of their rights is set forth in the form of deed granting of building Right on the land of property rights, which specifically regulates the agreement of the parties in order to fulfill the principle of freedom of contract. In addition, in making the deed granting of Building Right on the land of proprietary rights can be arranged specifically about the contents of the deed by deviating from the prevailing laws and regulations. Where a Building Rights Holders intend to impose a mortgage right and transfer this right shall obtain the consent of the right holder. This is different from the building right   on state land. The buildings rights  on state land may be borne by mortgages and transferred without obtaining the consent of othersKeywords; Building Right , Property  Right ,Land 


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Friendly

There has been considerable attention on Brazil’s experience in applying the right to the city, influencing the urban reform movement and subsequent legislation including the 1988 Constitution and the 2001 Statute of the City. While much is known about Brazil’s urban transformations, this article views this trajectory within debates on social citizenship, expanding the focus to show that property is integral to this debate. Through the lens of social citizenship, property rights and insurgency, this article traces Brazil’s right to the city debate through a focus on three issues: (1) the rights dimension of such debates; (2) the role of the social function of property in urban legislation; and (3) the role of insurgent planning evident in urban social movements. While property rights and land rights are often distanced from debates on social citizenship, the Brazil case provides evidence in which the two are clearly intertwined.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umar Husin

<p>Intellectual Property Rights give the owner the right to enjoy the economic benefits of the creations produced. Copyright and Industrial Design are part of Intellectual Property Rights. The dispute between Copyright and Industrial Design is commonplace in the community known as the tangent point. Decision No. 238 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2014 is one of the results of a decision on the case of tangent copyright and industrial design, where the decision of the cassation considers the space for similar violations. Copyright is born automatically in realization without any registration and given to copyright holders, while protection for industrial design is not automatic because it is given in accordance with the registration of the new design. From the brief description above, it is obtained the formulation of the problem in the form of how to protect the law against the copyright holder and what factors can cause a dispute between copyright and industrial design.</p>


2006 ◽  
pp. 54-75
Author(s):  
Klaus Peter Friedrich

Facing the decisive struggle between Nazism and Soviet communism for dominance in Europe, in 1942/43 Polish communists sojourning in the USSR espoused anti-German concepts of the political right. Their aim was an ethnic Polish ‘national communism’. Meanwhile, the Polish Workers’ Party in the occupied country advocated a maximum intensification of civilian resistance and partisan struggle. In this context, commentaries on the Nazi judeocide were an important element in their endeavors to influence the prevailing mood in the country: The underground communist press often pointed to the fate of the murdered Jews as a warning in order to make it clear to the Polish population where a deficient lack of resistance could lead. However, an agreed, unconditional Polish and Jewish armed resistance did not come about. At the same time, the communist press constantly expanded its demagogic confrontation with Polish “reactionaries” and accused them of shared responsibility for the Nazi murder of the Jews, while the Polish government (in London) was attacked for its failure. This antagonism was intensified in the fierce dispute between the Polish and Soviet governments after the rift which followed revelations about the Katyn massacre. Now the communist propaganda image of the enemy came to the fore in respect to the government and its representatives in occupied Poland. It viewed the government-in-exile as being allied with the “reactionaries,” indifferent to the murder of the Jews, and thus acting ultimately on behalf of Nazi German policy. The communists denounced the real and supposed antisemitism of their adversaries more and more bluntly. In view of their political isolation, they coupled them together, in an undifferentiated manner, extending from the right-wing radical ONR to the social democrats and the other parties represented in the underground parliament loyal to the London based Polish government. Thereby communist propaganda tried to discredit their opponents and to justify the need for a new start in a post-war Poland whose fate should be shaped by the revolutionary left. They were thus paving the way for the ultimate communist takeover


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document