Study on CO2 Injection for Enhancing the Oil Recovery at Gao89 Block in Shengli Oilfield

2013 ◽  
Vol 734-737 ◽  
pp. 1464-1467
Author(s):  
Song Lin Shi ◽  
Jian Kang ◽  
Meng Li
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Shengli Oilfield ◽  
Geological Features ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Original Production ◽  
Enhance Oil Recovery

Gao 89 Block is a low permeability oil reservoir. These reservoirs have difficulty in water injection, poor well condition, and low original production. Gas injection can solve this problem. It is the most efficient recovery method for low-permeability reservoirs at home and abroad. In accordance with the geological features and development actuality of Gao89 Block, the feasibility and optimization of gas injection are studied, the effect of gas injection on the development index and development results are demonstrated. The results indicate that the gas injection can dramatically enhance oil recovery and increase the oil production.

scholarly journals Investigation of Oil Recovery in Fractured Carbonate Rock by

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
H. Karimaie ◽  
O. Torsæter
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Asmari Limestone ◽  
Fractured Carbonate ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Live Oil ◽  
Non Equilibrium

The purpose of the three experiments described in this paper is to investigate the efficiency of secondary andtertiary gas injection in fractured carbonate reservoirs, focusing on the effect of equilibrium gas,re-pressurization and non-equilibrium gas. A weakly water-wet sample from Asmari limestone which is the mainoil producing formation in Iran, was placed vertically in a specially designed core holder surrounded withfracture. The unique feature of the apparatus used in the experiment, is the capability of initializing the samplewith live oil to obtain a homogeneous saturation and create the fracture around it by using a special alloy whichis easily meltable. After initializing the sample, the alloy can be drained from the bottom of the modified coreholder and create the fracture which is filled with live oil and surrounded the sample. Pressure and temperaturewere selected in the experiments to give proper interfacial tensions which have been measured experimentally.Series of secondary and tertiary gas injection were carried out using equilibrium and non-equilibrium gas.Experiments have been performed at different pressures and effect of reduction of interfacial tension werechecked by re-pressurization process. The experiments showed little oil recovery due to water injection whilesignificant amount of oil has been produced due to equilibrium gas injection and re-pressurization. Results alsoreveal that CO2 injection is a very efficient recovery method while injection of C1 can also improve the oilrecovery.

Optimized Cyclic Water Injection Strategy for Oil Recovery in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Sun* ◽  
Yanyu Zhang ◽  
Jie Wu ◽  
Mengke Xie ◽  
Hang Hu
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Tracer Tests ◽  
Oil Prices ◽  
Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Operational Parameters ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoir ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

With the worldwide decline in conventional oil production, tremendous unconventional resources, such as low-permeability reservoirs, are becoming increasingly important. Cyclic water injection (CWI) as an oil recovery method has attracted increasing attention in the present environment of low oil prices. However, the optimal CWI strategy is difficult to determine for a mature oilfield due to the involvement of multiple wells with multiple operational parameters. Thus, our main focus in this paper is to present a novel and systematic approach to optimize CWI strategies by studying a typical low-permeability, namely, reservoir G21. To this end, a comprehensive method that combines the advantages of streamline simulation and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) was proposed to identify water channeling in the reservoir. Second, the reliability of the method was verified using tracer tests. Finally, a new hybrid optimization algorithm, the simulated annealing-genetic algorithm (SAGA), coupled with a reservoir simulator was developed to determine an optimal CWI strategy for the low-permeability reservoir. The results show that the CWI technique is viable as a primary means in the present environment of low oil prices to improve the waterflood performance in low-permeability reservoirs. The oil recovery of the most efficient strategy increases by 6.8% compared to conventional waterflooding. The asymmetric CWI scheme is more efficient than the symmetric CWI scheme for the low-permeability reservoir.

The Mechanism of Flue Gas Injection for Enhanced Light Oil Recovery

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. (Raj) Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Air Injection ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Flue Gases ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Light Oil ◽  
Light Oil Reservoirs

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

The Research and Evaluation of Finely Layered Water Injection Standard in Low-Permeability Reservoirs - A Case from Block A in one Low-Permeability Reservoir

2014 ◽  
Vol 1073-1076 ◽  
pp. 2310-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Xian Wang ◽  
Wan Jing Luo ◽  
Jie Ding
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Reservoir Permeability ◽  
Engineering Parameters ◽  
The Common ◽  
Common Problems ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Due to the common problems of waterflood in low-permeability reservoirs, the reasearch of finely layered water injection is carried out. This paper established the finely layered water injection standard in low-permeability reservoirs and analysed the sensitivity of engineering parameters as well as evaluated the effect of the finely layered water injection standard in Block A with the semi-quantitative to quantitative method. The results show that: according to the finely layered water injection standard, it can be divided into three types: layered water injection between the layers, layered water injection in inner layer, layered water injection between fracture segment and no-fracture segment. Under the guidance of the standard, it sloved the problem of uneven absorption profile in Block A in some degree and could improve the oil recovery by 3.5%. The sensitivity analysis shows that good performance of finely layered water injection in Block A requires the reservoir permeability ratio should be less than 10, the perforation thickness should not exceed 10 m, the amount of layered injection layers should be less than 3, the surface injection pressure should be below 14 MPa and the injection rate shuold be controlled at about 35 m3/d.

scholarly journals Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flows in Heterogeneous Porous Media

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
I. Carneiro ◽  
M. Borges ◽  
S. Malta
Keyword(s):  
Porous Media ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Heterogeneous Porous Media ◽  
Flow In Porous Media ◽  
High Porosity ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Porosity And Permeability

In this work,we present three-dimensional numerical simulations of water-oil flow in porous media in order to analyze the influence of the heterogeneities in the porosity and permeability fields and, mainly, their relationships upon the phenomenon known in the literature as viscous fingering. For this, typical scenarios of heterogeneous reservoirs submitted to water injection (secondary recovery method) are considered. The results show that the porosity heterogeneities have a markable influence in the flow behavior when the permeability is closely related with porosity, for example, by the Kozeny-Carman (KC) relation.This kind of positive relation leads to a larger oil recovery, as the areas of high permeability(higher flow velocities) are associated with areas of high porosity (higher volume of pores), causing a delay in the breakthrough time. On the other hand, when both fields (porosity and permeability) are heterogeneous but independent of each other the influence of the porosity heterogeneities is smaller and may be negligible.

Risk Assessment and Enhanced Oil Recovery Effect of Gravity Assisted Oxygen-Reduced Air Flooding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Huang ◽  
Zongfa Li ◽  
Shaoran Ren ◽  
Yanming Liu
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Air Injection ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Risk Area ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
High Risk Area

Abstract The technology of air injection has been widely used in the second and tertiary recovery in oilfields. However, due to the injected air and natural gas will explode, the safety of the gas injection technology has attracted much attention. Gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air flooding is a new method that eliminates explosion risks and improves oil recovery in large-dip oil reservoirs or thick oil layers. The explosion limit data of different components of natural gas under high pressure were obtained through explosion experiments, which verified the suppression effect of oxygen-reduced air on explosions. The influence of natural gas composition and concentration on explosion limits was also investigated. In addition, a rotatable displacement device was used to study the feasibility of gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air injection for improving the heavy oil reservoirs recovery. Under pressure and temperature conditions of 20MPa and 371K, the sand-filled gravity flooding experiments with different dip angles were carried out using oxygen-reduced air with an oxygen content of 8%. The results show that with the increase of the reservoir dip, the pore volume of the injected fluid at the gas channeling point, the efficient development time of gas injection, and the final displacement efficiency of gas injection development all increase through gravity stabilization caused by gravity differentiation. In the presence of a dip angle, the cumulative oil production before the gas breakthrough point exceeded 80% of the oil production during the entire production process, indicating that gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air flooding is an effective and safe improving oil recovery method. Finally, the explosion risk of each link of the air injection process is analyzed, and the high-risk area and the low-risk area are determined.

Reservoir Simulation Study on Air-Foam Flooding to Enhance Oil Recovery in Waterflooding Sandstone Reservoir

2014 ◽  
Vol 962-965 ◽  
pp. 461-464
Author(s):  
Ping Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Low Temperature ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Steam Injection ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Low Temperature Oxidation ◽  
Temperature Oxidation ◽  
Sandstone Reservoir ◽  
Foam Flooding ◽  
Enhance Oil Recovery

In the later waterflooding sandstone reservoir, there are many serious development contradictions, especially in the aspects of water breakthrough and heterogeneous development. Based on the laboratory experiments, numerical simulation research on historical match of the low temperature oxidation kinetics model, the injection mode, foaming agent concentration, gas to liquid ratio, steam injection rate and other key parameters of air-foam flooding were carried out. The results show that, air foam flooding technology integrated comprehensive effect of low-temperature oxidation, air flooding and foam flooding, which enhance oil recovery nearly 8% by block the thief layer effectively and improving the swept volume. Air-foam flooding technology also can reduce the amount of water injection and water production, which improved the utilization rate of water resources and reduced output liquid processing cost. This technology shows its broad prospect of application and can provide reference for similar reservoirs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document