Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies among a sample of orthodontic and non-orthodontic patients: A retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
KhalidA Aldhorae ◽  
ZainabM Altawili ◽  
Ali Assiry ◽  
Basema Alqadasi ◽  
KhalidA Al-Jawfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Prevalence of dental anomalies in French orthodontic patients: A retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 426-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Baron ◽  
M. Houchmand-Cuny ◽  
B. Enkel ◽  
S. Lopez-Cazaux
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

scholarly journals Prevalence and Pattern of Canine Impaction and Its Associated Anomalies among Orthodontic Patients Attending Tertiary Care Dental Hospital in Kathmandu

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Anshu Piya ◽  
Bikash Veer Shrestha ◽  
Anju Khapung ◽  
Prakash Bhattarai
Keyword(s):  
Root Resorption ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Deciduous Teeth ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Impacted Tooth ◽  
Impacted Canines ◽  
Dental Hospital ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
And Function

Introduction: Permanent canines are considered as the cornerstone of mouth. Canines are important for esthetics and function as they are located in the anterior segment of the mouth and help in tearing of food. An impacted tooth is that tooth that cannot or will not erupt into its normal functional occlusion due to some circumstances. Those impacted tooth are considered pathologic as they might lead to various problems like resorption of roots of adjacent teeth, cystic formation, and infection with partial eruption leading to pain and trismus. Materials & Method: All the patients (550) being treated in department of Orthodontics in Nepal Medical College from January 2017 to December 2019 were included in the study. Patients aged 13-30 years were included in the study. Clinical examinations and panoramic radiographs of patients were taken. Anterior occlusal view was done in those patients having canine impaction to determine the patterns of impaction. Data was processed in SPSS version 16.0. Result: Among 550 orthodontic patients, 31 patients were found to have canine impaction. Among them 18 (58.1%) were females and 13 (41.9%) were males. The overall prevalence of canine impaction was found to be 5.6%. Various dental anomalies were observed in the participants’ radiographs, the most common being the retained deciduous teeth (54.8%) followed by dilacerations of adjacent teeth (51.6%). Peg shaped lateral incisors and root resorption of adjacent tooth were almost equal (22.6%) with least being the odontomas and other impacted teeth. Conclusion: The prevalence of canine impaction in tertiary care dental hospital in Kathmandu was found to be 5.6%. Patients with impacted canines also had other dental anomalies. Knowing the prevalence of impacted canines, will encourage the community to be aware about canine impaction and educate the population about the clinical implications and the importance of performing preventive and interceptive procedures.

scholarly journals Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Mercuri ◽  
Michele Cassetta ◽  
Costanza Cavallini ◽  
Donatella Vicari ◽  
Rosalia Leonardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Abstract Objective: To analyze the prevalence, distribution, clinical features, and relationship with dental anomalies of maxillary canine impaction. Materials and Methods: The complete pretreatment records of 1674 orthodontic patients were examined. Subjects with maxillary impacted canines were divided into two study groups: a palatally displaced canine (PDC) group (114 patients) and a buccally displaced canine (BDC) group (37 patients). These were compared to a control group of 151 patients who were randomly selected from the initial sample without maxillary canine impaction. The significance of associations between canine impaction and dental and clinical features and anomalies was examined with the chi-square test. Results: PDC patients presented with normal overjet and facial profile and a lower degree of dental arch crowding in comparison to the control patients. PDC patients showed a higher prevalence of impaction of other teeth, dental aplasia, transposition, and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors (odds ratios 3.3, 2.6, 8.3, and 5.8, respectively). Conclusion: PDC was frequently the only orthodontic problem of patients. BDC group patients did not present with notable differences in clinical and dental features or dental anomalies compared to control subjects.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Supernumerary Teeth in Israeli Orthodontic Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Finkelstein ◽  
Yehoshua Shapira ◽  
Aikaterini Maria Pavlidi ◽  
Shirley Schonberger ◽  
Sigalit Blumer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Anterior Region ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Supernumerary Teeth ◽  
Supernumerary Tooth ◽  
Tel Aviv ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Maxillary Incisors ◽  
Pre Treatment

Background: Supernumerary teeth are one of the most common anomalies in the human dentition, found most frequently in the maxillary anterior region causing impaction or displacement of the adjacent permanent teeth. Aim :The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in orthodontically treated patients. Study design: Pre-treatment facial and intraoral photographs, study models, panoramic and periapical radiographs of 3,000 consecutively treated orthodontic patients (mean age 12.2 years) from the Department of Orthodontics Tel Aviv University, were examined to detect supernumerary teeth in both arches. They were recorded according to gender, age, number, location, position and morphology. Results: Thirty-six patients, 22 (61%) males and 14 (39%) females with 50 supernumerary teeth, of which 42 (84%) were found in the maxillary anterior region, and 8 (16%) in the mandible, presenting a prevalence of 1.2%. Conclusions: A prevalence of 1.2% was found in our study. The most common supernumerary tooth is mesiodens located at the maxillary anterior region. The characteristics of supernumeraries were based on their morphology, location and position. The most frequent complications caused were rotations, displacement and arrested eruption of maxillary incisors.

scholarly journals Dental Anomalies in Permanent Teeth after Trauma in Primary Dentition

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Bardellini ◽  
Francesca Amadori ◽  
Stefania Pasini ◽  
Alessandra Majorana
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Primary Dentition ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Enamel Hypoplasia ◽  
White Spots ◽  
The Status

Objective: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the prevalence of dental anomalies in permanent teeth as a result of a trauma concerning the predecessor primary teeth. Study design: A total of 241 records of children (118 males and 123 females, mean age 3.62 ± 1.40) affected by trauma on primary teeth were analyzed. All patients were recalled to evaluate the status of the permanent successor teeth by clinical and radiographic investigations. Results: Out of 241 patients, 106 patients (for a total of 179 traumatized primary teeth) presented at the recall. Dental anomalies on successor permanent teeth were detected in 21 patients (19.8%), for a total of 26 teeth (14.5%) and 28 anomalies. Anomalies of the eruptive process were the most observed disturbances (60.7%), followed by enamel hypoplasia (25%) and white spots (14.3%). A higher percentage of anomalies on permanent teeth was observed when trauma occurred at an age less than 36 months (38.5% of cases). Intrusive and extrusive luxation were related with the most cases of clinical disturbances in the successor permanent teeth. Conclusions: The results of this study highlight the risk of dental anomalies after a trauma in primary dentition, especially in early-aged children and in case of intrusive luxation.

scholarly journals Exodontia de mesiodens em palato: relato de caso

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria de Nazaré dos Santos ◽  
Fabrício dos Santos Diniz ◽  
Jéssica Vasconcelos Mattos ◽  
José Maurício de Souza Cruz Veloso Filho ◽  
Rafaela Cardoso de Sá
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Background ◽  
Indian Population ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
South Indian Population ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Supernumerary Teeth ◽  
South Indian ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Retrospective Multicenter Study

Introdução: Os dentes supranumerários são aqueles além da quantidade normal na arcada. O tipo mais comum é o mesiodens localizado entre os incisivos centrais superiores, possui geralmente forma conóide e raiz curta. Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho é relatar um caso clínico de exodontia de um mesiodens com abordagem cirúrgica realizada pela palatina. Caso clínico: Paciente sexo masculino, 8 anos de idade, compareceu com o responsável à clínica do IAES com queixa de dificuldades na mastigação e fala, além de vergonha de sorrir por causa de “um dente a mais”. Durante o exame clínico constatou-se a presença de um elemento conóide erupcionado posteriormente aos incisivos centrais superiores. Diante dos achados clínico e radiográfico, o diagnóstico foi de mesiodens. O tratamento proposto foi a exodontia do elemento. Conclusão: A exodontia surge como um tratamento eficaz na resolução de dentes supranumerários. O pós-operatório foi satisfatório, com uma boa epitelização da ferida cirúrgica, além da diminuição das dificuldades na mastigação e fala do paciente.Descritores: Dente Supranumerário; Extração Dentária; Cirurgia Bucal.ReferênciasMafra RP, Vasconcelos RG, Vasconcelos MG, Queiroz LMG, Barboza CAG. Desenvolvimento dental: aspectos morfogenéticos e relações com as anomalias dentárias do desenvolvimento. Rev Bras Odontol. 2012;69(2):232-37.Ata-Ali F, Ata-Ali J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, treatment and complications of supernumerary teeh. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(4):414-18.Subasioglu A, Savas S, Kucukyilmaz E, Kesim S, Yagci A, Dundar M. Genetic background of supernumerary teeth. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(1):153-58.Marchetti G, Oliveira RV. Mesiodens – dentes supranumerários: diagnóstico, causas e tratamento. Rev UNINGA. 2015;24(1):19-23.Mahabob MN, Anbuselvan GJ, Kumar BS, Raja S, Kothari S. Prevalence rate of supernumerary teeth among non-syndromic South Indian population: an analysis. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2012;4(Suppl 2):S373-75.Villavicencio J, Hernández J, Medina S. Clinical variations of double mesiodens: a review and case report. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2015;27(1):216-27.Bereket C, Çakir-Özkan N, Şener İ, Bulut E, Baştan Aİ. Analyses of 1100 supernumerary teeth in a nonsyndromic Turkish population: a retrospective multicenter study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(6):731-38.Burhan AS, Nawaya FR, Arabi-Katbi ME, Al-Jawabra AS. Prevalence of supernumerary teeth in a nonsyndromic Syrian sample. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2015;90(4):146-49.Nunes KM, Medeiros MV, Ceretta LB, Simões PW, Azambuja FG, Sônego FGF et al. Dente supranumerário: revisão bibliográfica e relato de caso clínico. Rev Odontol Univ Cid São Paulo. 2015;27(1):72-81.Nam OH, Lee HS, Kim MS, Yun KH, Bang JB, Choi SC. Characteristics of mesiodens and its related complications. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(7):e105-9.Shih WY, Hsieh CY, Tsai TP. Clinical evaluation of the timing of mesiodens removal. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79(6):345-50.Lara TS, Lancia M, Silva Filho OGS, Garib DG, Ozawa TO. Prevalence of mesiodens in orthodontic patients with deciduous and mixed dentition and its association with other dental anomalies. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013;18(6):93-9.Silva IJP, Magalhães AKC, Carneiro GKM, Favretto CO. Fechamento de diastema interincisal superior associado a dente supranumerário com intervenção ortodôntica: relato de caso clínico. Arch Health Invest. 2019;8(3):130-33.

scholarly journals RADIOGRAPHIC INVESTIGATION OF DENTAL ANOMALIES IN LIBYAN ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman Abdelgader ◽  
Tyisir Gnaiber ◽  
Kadija Emnina ◽  
Sulieman Orofi
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Division I ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Dental Anomaly ◽  
Ectopic Eruption ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Male Subjects

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of dental anomalies in different Libyan orthodontic malocclusions.Materials and Methods: Pretreatment orthodontic records of 252 Subjects (57 Males and 195 Females) were classified as Class I (159), Class II Division I (66), Class II Division II (8) and Class III (19). The incidence rates of specific dental anomalies were investigated and analyzed to study the differences of rates of each anomaly according to sex and malocclusion using descriptive analysisResult: It was found that (53.5%) of the patients had at least one dental anomaly in this study. ectopic eruption was the most prevalent dental anomaly (34.9%) followed by thin pipette-shaped roots and short blunt root (30.1%, 24.2%) respectively.Conclusions: Male subjects showed more ectopic eruption and short blunt root then female, Class I malocclusion had the most prevalent dental anomalies compared to the other malocclusion groups.

scholarly journals Prevalence of dental anomalies in a Mexican population

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Ruben Herrera-Atoche ◽  
Silvia Diaz-Morales ◽  
Gabriel Colome-Ruiz ◽  
Mauricio Escoffie-Ramirez ◽  
Maria Fernanda Orellana
Keyword(s):  
Ethnic Origin ◽  
Mexican Population ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Dental Anomaly ◽  
The World ◽  
Background Data ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Different Populations

Background: Data on dental anomaly prevalence is instrumental to diagnosis and treatment in different populations. A retrospective study was done to determine dental anomaly prevalence and associations in a group of orthodontic patients in a Mexican population. Methods: Number, shape, eruption and structural dental anomalies were assessed from the records of 670 subjects. Prevalence, distribution, and associations between the different anomalies were calculated. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests (p<0.05) were used to identify significant differences by sex, and to establish associations among the studied anomalies. Results: Twenty-eight percent of the sample exhibited at least one dental anomaly. Statistical analysis identified no differences by gender. The most common anomaly was impacted teeth (13.58%), followed by microdontic upper lateral incisors (6.26%). These two anomalies also had the highest number of significant associations with other anomalies. Conclusions: The dental anomalies prevalence documented here differ from those reported in the literature for other populations in the world. Dental anomalies are normally associated with each other and occur in groups linked to ethnic origin. The present results indicate the presence of differing suites of anomalies between the studied Mexican population and other populations in the world. This variation highlights the need for further research on dental anomalies in Latin America to aid in their diagnosis and treatment.

scholarly journals Impacted Maxillary Canine Prevalence and Its Association with Other Dental Anomalies in a Mexican Population

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Rubén Herrera-Atoche ◽  
María del Rosario Agüayo-de-Pau ◽  
Mauricio Escoffié-Ramírez ◽  
Fernando Javier Aguilar-Ayala ◽  
Bertha Arelly Carrillo-Ávila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Mexican Population ◽  
Amelogenesis Imperfecta ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Supernumerary Teeth ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Impacted Teeth

Objective. We quantified the prevalence of impacted maxillary canines (IMC) and their association with other dental anomalies (DAs).Materials and Methods. A retrospective study was done with 860 patients 12 to 39 years of age. The prevalence of IMC was calculated and compared by sex. The sample was divided into a control group and an impaction group, and the prevalence was calculated in both for a series of anomalies: agenesis, supernumerary teeth, shape anomalies of the upper laterals (microdontia, peg and barrel shape, and talon cusp), fusion, gemination, other impacted teeth, transposition, and amelogenesis imperfecta. The prevalence values for both groups were compared (Pearson’sχ2test,p≤0.05).Results. IMC were present in 6.04% of the sample with no difference by sex (p=0.540). Other DAs occurred in 51.92% of the IMC group and in 20.17% of the controls (p<0.05). Significant associations (p<0.05) were identified between IMC and four other DAs: microdontia, barrel shape, other impacted teeth, and transposition. The prevalence of all anomalies was lower in the control group.Conclusion. IMC were seen in 6.04% of patients. Patients with this condition also had a higher prevalence of other DAs. These other anomalies should be used as risk indicators for early diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document