scholarly journals Cervical Cancer in Women with Normal Papanicolaou Tests: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miseon Kim ◽  
Hyeongsu Kim ◽  
Dong Hoon Suh ◽  
Yong Beom Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study

scholarly journals Cervical cancer in Sub‐Saharan Africa: a multinational population‐based cohort study on patterns and guideline adherence of care

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Griesel ◽  
Tobias P Seraphin ◽  
Nikolaus CS Mezger ◽  
Lucia Hämmerl ◽  
Jana Feuchtner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Guideline Adherence ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Sub Saharan

scholarly journals Effect of introducing human papillomavirus genotyping into real-world screening on cervical cancer screening in China: a retrospective population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110109
Author(s):  
Binhua Dong ◽  
Huachun Zou ◽  
Xiaodan Mao ◽  
Yingying Su ◽  
Hangjing Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Hpv Genotyping ◽  
Cytology Screening

Background: China’s Fujian Cervical Pilot Project (FCPP) transitioned cervical cancer screening from high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) nongenotyping to genotyping. We investigated the clinical impact of this introduction, comparing performance indicators between HR-HPV genotyping combined with cytology screening (HR-HPV genotyping period) and the previous HR-HPV nongenotyping combined with cytology screening (HR-HPV nongenotyping period). Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was performed using data from the FCPP for China. We obtained data for the HR-HPV nongenotyping period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013, and for the HR-HPV genotyping period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016. Propensity score matching was used to match women from the two periods. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess factors associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN2+ in women aged ⩾25 years. Performance was assessed and included consistency, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and cost. Results: Compared with HR-HPV nongenotyping period, in the HR-HPV genotyping period, more CIN2+ cases were identified at the initial screening (3.06% versus 2.32%; p < 0.001); the rate of colposcopy referral was higher (10.87% versus 6.64%; p < 0.001); and the hazard ratio of CIN2+ diagnosis was 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.43–1.88; p < 0.001) after controlling for health insurance status and age. The total costs of the first round of screening (US$66,609 versus US$65,226; p = 0.293) were similar during the two periods. Higher screening coverage (25.95% versus 25.19%; p = 0.007), higher compliance with age recommendations (92.70% versus 91.69%; p = 0.001), lower over-screening (4.92% versus 10.15%; p < 0.001), and reduced unqualified samples (cytology: 1.48% versus 1.73%, p = 0.099; HR-HPV: 0.57% versus 1.34%, p < 0.001) were observed in the HR-HPV genotyping period. Conclusions: Introduction of an HR-HPV genotyping assay in China could detect more CIN2+ lesions at earlier stages and improve programmatic indicators. Evidence suggests that the introduction of HR-HPV genotyping is likely to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer in China.

scholarly journals Colorectal Cancer Risk in Women with Gynecologic Cancers—A Population Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3127
Author(s):  
Szu-Chia Liao ◽  
Hong-Zen Yeh ◽  
Chi-Sen Chang ◽  
Wei-Chih Chen ◽  
Chih-Hsin Muo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Increased Risk

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) risk for women with gynecologic malignancy using insurance claims data of Taiwan. We identified patients who survived cervical cancer (N = 25,370), endometrial cancer (N = 8149) and ovarian cancer (N = 7933) newly diagnosed from 1998 to 2010, and randomly selected comparisons (N = 165,808) without cancer, matched by age and diagnosis date. By the end of 2011, the incidence and hazard ratio (HR) of CRC were estimated. We found that CRC incidence rates were 1.26-, 2.20-, and 1.61-fold higher in women with cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers, respectively, than in comparisons (1.09/1000 person–years). The CRC incidence increased with age. Higher adjusted HRs of CRC appeared within 3 years for women with endometrial and ovarian cancers, but not until the 4th to 7th years of follow up for cervical cancer survivals. Cancer treatments could reduce CRC risks, but not significantly. However, ovarian cancer patients receiving surgery alone had an incidence of 3.33/1000 person–years for CRC with an adjusted HR of 3.79 (95% CI 1.11–12.9) compared to patients without any treatment. In conclusion, gynecologic cancer patients are at an increased risk of developing CRC, sooner for those with endometrial or ovarian cancer than those with cervical cancer.

Self-Reported Sexual, Bowel and Bladder Function in Cervical Cancer Patients Following Different Treatment Modalities: Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1717-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quirine D. Pieterse ◽  
Gemma G. Kenter ◽  
Cornelis P. Maas ◽  
Cor D. de Kroon ◽  
Carien L. Creutzberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Unexpected Finding ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Sexual Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

ObjectiveConventional radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHL) for early-stage cervical cancer is associated with significant bladder, anorectal, and sexual dysfunction. Nerve-sparing modification of RHL (NS-RHL) has been developed with the aim to reduce surgical treatment-related morbidity. Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is offered to patients with unfavorable prognostic features to improve local control. The aim of the study was to assess self-reported morbidity of various types of treatment in cervical cancer patients.MethodsSelf-reported symptoms were prospectively assessed before and 1 and 2 years after treatment by the Dutch Gynaecologic Leiden Questionnaire.ResultsIncluded were 229 women (123 NS-RHL and 106 conventional RHL). Ninety-four (41%) received RT. Up to 2 years (response rate, 81%), women reported significantly more bowel, bladder, and sexual symptoms compared with the pretreatment situation. No significant difference was found between the conventional RHL and NS-RHL with the exception of the unexpected finding that a smaller percentage in the NS-RHL group (34% vs 68%) complained about numbness of the labia and/ or thigh. Radiation therapy had a negative impact on diarrhea, urine incontinence, lymphedema, and sexual symptoms (especially a narrow/short vagina).ConclusionsIn the current longitudinal cohort study, treatment for early-stage cervical cancer was associated with worse subjective bladder, anorectal, and sexual functioning, irrespective of the surgical procedure used. Postoperative RT resulted in a significant deterioration of these functions. The results have to be interpreted with caution in view of the study design and method used.

scholarly journals Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. i276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangrong Wang ◽  
Bengt Andrae ◽  
Karin Sundström ◽  
Peter Ström ◽  
Alexander Ploner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cervical Screening ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Glandular Cells ◽  
Atypical Glandular Cells

Effect of Treatment Delay on Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Historical Cohort Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1326-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Perri ◽  
Gal Issakov ◽  
Gilad Ben-Baruch ◽  
Shira Felder ◽  
Mario E. Beiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Treatment Delay ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Node Involvement ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Effect Of Treatment

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment delay on prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.MethodsThe study group of this historic cohort study comprised 321 patients newly diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1999 and 2010. Time from diagnosis to treatment was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable in 3 groups that differed in waiting time between diagnosis and treatment initiation: 30 days or less (group 1, n = 134), 30 to 45 days (group 2, n = 86), and more than 45 days (group 3, n = 101). Associations between waiting time group, patients’ characteristics, and disease outcome were investigated usingttests, analyses of variance and Cox regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests.ResultsTime from diagnosis to treatment initiation, when analyzed as a continuous variable, was not a significant factor in survival. There were no between-group differences in age, smoking rate, marital status, gravidity, parity, tumor histology, or lymph node involvement. Early-stage disease and small tumor diameter were diagnosed most frequently in group 3. However, there was no significant between-group difference in 3-year survival rates (74.6%, 82.2%, and 80.8% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively;P= 0.38). On multivariate analysis, only stage, histology, and lymph node involvement were significant prognostic factors for survival. Before starting treatment, 28 patients underwent ovarian preservation procedures.ConclusionsLonger waiting time from diagnosis to treatment was not associated with worse survival. Our findings imply that if patients desire fertility or ovarian preservation procedures before starting treatment, it is acceptable to allow time for them.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document