Problem Solving and Planning: Two Sides of the Same Coin

2018 ◽  
pp. 169-214
Author(s):  
A.F. Ashman
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Two Sides

scholarly journals PROFIL ANALOGICAL REASONING SISWA SMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riyadhotus Sholihah
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Analogical Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Two Sides ◽  
Analogous Reasoning

<p>Analogical reasoning is the ability to solve problems by finding similarities between two objects, namely source and target objects. The purpose of this study was to determine the analogical reasoning profile of students at SMA N 16 Semarang. This study is included in a qualitative study with data collection techniques used in surveys by working on analogical reasoning problems. The research subjects were 100 students of class X. The results found in this study were the category of analogical reasoning ability of students of SMA N 16 Semarang low with a frequency of 74 and a percentage of 73.6%. The low ability of analogical reasoning students is influenced by the lack of learning methods that encourage students in problem-solving using analogies, besides analogies have two sides if understood will facilitate students' understanding of concepts, but if it cannot be understood misconceptions occur so teachers rarely use analogous reasoning in explaining material abstract. Therefore it is necessary to have an understanding and experience of the teacher to build this ability by using learning methods that support analogical reasoning abilities.</p>

scholarly journals An integrative view of Luria’s perspective on arithmetic problem solving: The two sides of environmental dependency

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémy Besnard ◽  
Philippe Allain ◽  
Ghislaine Aubin ◽  
Valérie Chauviré ◽  
Frédérique Etcharry-Bouyx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Arithmetic Problem ◽  
Integrative View ◽  
Two Sides

Mechanical problem-solving and imitation of meaningless postures in left brain damaged patients: Two sides of the same coin?

Cortex ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 214-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Jarry ◽  
François Osiurak ◽  
Josselin Baumard ◽  
Mathieu Lesourd ◽  
Frédérique Etcharry-Bouyx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mechanical Problem ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Two Sides

Pedagogical Experience in Engineering Education: Studying Cases of Patent Dispute as a Method for Both Innovation and Legal Education

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong-Jer Lai
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Engineering Education ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Case Method ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Design Concepts ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Two Sides

The issue of intellectual property is inevitable for an engineering design course today. Traditionally, it would be discussed separately from the technical or the legal perspective. But they are two sides of the same coin. In the course of comparative analysis of patent dispute, the case method was used to treat the issue involved from both perspectives at the same time. Patent disputes are mainly concerned with the issue of patentability or infringement, and normally both involved. For analysis of a dispute, it is normally required to compare the elements of the invented object with either the prior arts or the alleged infringement, depending on the cases. For such legal analysis one can instead take design methods such as TRIZ (an acronym in Russian standing for “theory of inventive problem solving”) and SCAMPER (an acronym standing for “substitute, combine, adapt, magnify or minify, put to other uses, eliminate or elaborate, and rearrangement or reverse”) to check the design concepts or the inventive principles behind the objects, so that the students can learn the innovation methods and the legal procedure at the same time. In this paper pedagogical experience with concrete examples was demonstrated.

scholarly journals Student’s Error in Writing Mathematical Problem Solving Associated With Corresponding Angles of The Similar Triangles

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Parastuti ◽  
B Usodo ◽  
S Subanti
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Similar Triangles ◽  
Two Sides ◽  
Daily Test

The research method used is descriptive qualitative.The aim of this research is to describe the student’s error in writing the resolution about the similarity of the two triangles. The student has many problems in mathematics include analyzing a triangle. A polygon that has three sides, three angles, and three cornersis called a triangle. The angle formed by the two sides of a triangle intersects with each other. The triangles are similar if the comparison lengths of the corresponding sides are same and the large of the corresponding angles are same. Three students are chosen as the subjects based on their score in the daily test about the similarity of two triangles. The students are given tests and then interviewed. Writing error by students in solving problems is analyzed based on Newman’s theory. The result obtained in this research is that error writing occurs because of the misconceptions when transforming the information from the problem. The students make mistakes in writing occurs when they have to solve the problems.

Toward a Pragmatist Feminist Egalitarianism: Redescribing the Vertical-Horizontal Debate From a Feminist Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-328
Author(s):  
Susan Dieleman
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Feminist Perspective ◽  
Alternative Account ◽  
Two Sides

In this response to David Rondel’s Pragmatist Egalitarianism, I suggest that the disagreement between vertical egalitarians and horizontal egalitarians has deeper roots than Rondel acknowledges. Using feminist egalitarianism as my example, I suggest that this is because Rondel fails to note that horizontal egalitarians do not merely offer an alternative account of the sites of and remedies for inequality than do vertical egalitarians; they also see vertical egalitarianism itself as contributing to inequality. Yet I also contend that, even though the two sides of the vertical-horizontal debate are more divided than Rondel lets on, a pragmatist egalitarianism, because of its emphasis on problem-solving, is still able to circumvent this debate.

Characterization of defects in tabular silver halide grains

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1046-1047
Author(s):  
C. Goessens ◽  
D. Schryvers ◽  
J. Van Landuyt ◽  
A. Verbeeck ◽  
R. De Keyzer
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Damage ◽  
Silver Halide ◽  
Chemical Characteristics ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Free Region ◽  
Central Defect ◽  
Crystallographic Defects ◽  
Physical And Chemical ◽  
Two Sides

Silver halide grains (AgX, X=Cl,Br,I) are commonly recognized as important entities in photographic applications. Depending on the preparation specifications one can grow cubic, octahedral, tabular a.o. morphologies, each with its own physical and chemical characteristics. In the present study crystallographic defects introduced by the mixing of 5-20% iodide in a growing AgBr tabular grain are investigated. X-ray diffractometry reveals the existence of a homogeneous Ag(Br1-xIx) region, expected to be formed around the AgBr kernel. In fig. 1 a two-beam BF image, taken at T≈100 K to diminish radiation damage, of a triangular tabular grain is presented, clearly showing defect contrast fringes along four of the six directions; the remaining two sides show similar contrast under relevant diffraction conditions. The width of the central defect free region corresponds with the pure AgBr kernel grown before the mixing with I. The thickness of a given grain lies between 0.15 and 0.3 μm: as indicated in fig. 2 triangular (resp. hexagonal) grains exhibit an uneven (resp. even) number of twin interfaces (i.e., between + and - twin variants) parallel with the (111) surfaces. The thickness of the grains and the existence of the twin variants was confirmed from CTEM images of perpendicular cuts.

The Eleventh Circuit Holds that Agreements in which Pharmaceutical Companies Pay Generic Companies Not to Compete May be Valid

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-184
Author(s):  
Amy Garrigues
Keyword(s):  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Trial Court ◽  
Court Of Appeals ◽  
The Us ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Per Se ◽  
Appeals Court ◽  
Two Sides

On September 15, 2003, the US. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that agreements between pharmaceutical and generic companies not to compete are not per se unlawful if these agreements do not expand the existing exclusionary right of a patent. The Valley DrugCo.v.Geneva Pharmaceuticals decision emphasizes that the nature of a patent gives the patent holder exclusive rights, and if an agreement merely confirms that exclusivity, then it is not per se unlawful. With this holding, the appeals court reversed the decision of the trial court, which held that agreements under which competitors are paid to stay out of the market are per se violations of the antitrust laws. An examination of the Valley Drugtrial and appeals court decisions sheds light on the two sides of an emerging legal debate concerning the validity of pay-not-to-compete agreements, and more broadly, on the appropriate balance between the seemingly competing interests of patent and antitrust laws.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document