In the Name of the People?: The State, Social Science and the ‘Public Interest’ in Urban Regeneration

Inkonstitusionalitas Sistem Unbundling dalam Usaha Penyediaan Listrik

Jurnal Konstitusi ◽

10.31078/jk1519 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 185

Author(s):

Jefri Porkonanta Tarigan

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

Judicial Review ◽

The State ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

The Public ◽

The People

Fungsi negara tidak hanya sebagai regulator (pengatur) dan umpire (wasit), namun juga berfungsi sebagai provider (penyedia) dan entrepreneur (pengusaha). Oleh karena itu, sudah seharusnya negara terlibat langsung dalam usaha penyediaan listrik untuk kepentingan umum bagi sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat sebagaimana amanat Pasal 33 UUD 1945. Usaha penyediaan listrik untuk kepentingan umum dengan unbundling system yaitu terpisahnya antara usaha pembangkitan, transmisi, distribusi, dan penjualan listrik, telah dinyatakan inkonstitusional oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003, bertanggal 15 Desember 2004. Namun kemudian adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 149/PUU-VII/2009, bertanggal 30 Desember 2010, justru dipandang sebagai peluang dibolehkannya kembali sistem unbundling dalam usaha penyediaan listrik sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 10 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2009 tentang Ketenagalistirkan. Hal tersebut kemudian mendorong diajukannya kembali permohonan pengujian terhadap ketentuan Pasal 10 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2009. Melalui Putusan Nomor 111/PUU-XIII/2015, bertanggal 14 Desember 2016, Mahkamah Konstitusi pun menegaskan bahwa unbundling dalam usaha penyediaan tenaga listrik adalah tidak sesuai dengan konstitusi.The function of the state is not only as a regulator and referee, but also serves as provider and entrepreneur. Therefore, the state should be directly involved in the business of electric providing for the public interest to the greatest prosperity of the people as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. The unbundling system in electric providing for the public interest is the separation between the business of generation, transmission, distribution, and sales. The unbundling system has been declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003 dated December 15, 2004. However, the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 149/PUU-VII/2009 dated 30 December 2010, is judged as an opportunity to re-enable the unbundling system in the business of electric providing as stipulated in Article 10 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 Year 2009 about Electricity. It then encourages the re-submission of the petition for judicial review of the provisions of Article 10 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 Year 2009. Then, through Decision Number 111/PUU-XIII/2015, dated December 14, 2016, the Constitutional Court confirm that unbundling in the business of providing power electricity for public interest is inconstitutional.

Download Full-text

PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEPEMILIKAN TANAH INDONESIA OLEH WARGA NEGARA ASING MELALUI PERJANJIAN NOMINEE

Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i12.p04 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (12) ◽

pp. 1862

Author(s):

Fithrah Fithrah

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Research Methods ◽

Public Interest ◽

Research Method ◽

Scientific Paper ◽

Land Ownership ◽

The State ◽

Legal Research ◽

The Public ◽

The People

Tujuan penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengkaji pengaturan terkait kepemilikan tanah di Indonesia oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dan upaya penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil dari penulisan karya ilmiah ini ialah penegakan hukum terhadap praktek kepemilikan tanah oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dapat dilakukan oleh kejaksaan selaku organ negara yang mewakili kepentingan publik, baik melalui sarana perdata maupun pidana. Hal ini perlu dilakukan guna melindungi tanah Indonesia dimiliki oleh orang asing dan guna mendukung upaya negara mewujudkan tugas konstitusionalnya, yakni menguasai tanah bagi sebesar-besarnya kesejahteraan rakyat tanpa harus memberikan ketidakadilan bagi Warga Negara Asing. The purpose of writing this scientific paper is to examine regulations related to land ownership in Indonesia by foreigners through nominee agreements and law enforcement efforts. The research method used is normative legal research methods using statute and conceptual approaches. The result of writing this scientific paper is that law enforcement against the practice of land ownership by foreigners through nominee agreements can be carried out by the prosecutor as the state organ representing the public interest, both through civil and criminal means. This needs to be done in order to protect Indonesian land owned by foreigners and to support the state's efforts to realize its constitutional duties, namely to control the land for the maximum welfare of the people without having to give injustice to foreign citizens.

Download Full-text

Limitations of Public Interest Clause in Land Acquisition So That Land Rights Holders Can Retain Their Rights

NORMA ◽

10.30742/nlj.v18i1.1291 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 58

Author(s):

Rias Frihandini

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

National Development ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

The State ◽

Public Interests ◽

The Public ◽

The People ◽

The Government ◽

Ownership Rights

This research aims to see and analyze legal protection for land rights holders who lost their land rights due to public interest clause, whether for the benefit of the state or the private sector. Based on the 1945 Constitution, it can be seen that the use of the earth (land), water, and natural resources contained therein by the state is required to be used for the greatest prosperity of the people, and not for certain elites from government agencies who need land. Limitations must be applied to this clause so that the use is not arbitrary because even though the land rights are ownership rights, it can lose since the Government carries it out. The public interest clause is always the way and the Government answer for those who refuse their land to be acquired. Research results are that public interests, which are the needs of many people or broad goals, must pay attention to social, political, psychological, vindication and security aspects based on the National development principle.Keywords: Land, Public Interest, Acquisition

Download Full-text

Hak Atas Tanah Pada Kawasan Konservasi

PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review ◽

10.47268/pamali.v1i1.483 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 40

Author(s):

Orias Reizal De Rooy ◽

Hendrik Salmon ◽

Reny Heronia Nendissa

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

Land Rights ◽

The State ◽

Conservation Areas ◽

The Public ◽

Basic Rights ◽

The People ◽

The Government ◽

Legal Concepts ◽

Laws And Regulations

Introduction: Regulation of the land control and land use on conservation areas, especially in coastal and coastal areas refers to the agrarian regulation in general, both for the benefit of the government and the public interest. The public interest is related to the rights that the State can give to its people for certain objects. Concerning the rights of the people, the state constitution guarantees the existence of the basic rights of the people, not only to the rights to land but also to other basic rights that are indeed held by the people and must be protected by the State.Purposes of the Research: Analyze the status of land rights in conservation areas and the legal consequences of land rights in conservation areas.Methods of the Research: The research methods used in this article is Normative Research, which is to examines and identify laws and regulations as well as legal concepts, especially about Land Rights on Conservation Areas to be the subject of study in finding the answers to the issues above.Results of the Research: The nature of the law which is always open and dynamic following the dynamics of changing community needs is expected to be able to answer the need for legal certainty itself through synchronization and harmonization of laws and regulations that explicitly regulate control and use of land in conservation areas that can guarantee certainty of community rights in the area. the coast.

Download Full-text

Legal Implications of the Norms Conflict in the Governance Regulation of the Water Resources

EU agrarian Law ◽

10.2478/eual-2020-0004 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 17-23

Author(s):

Indro Budiono ◽

Moch. Bakri ◽

Moh. Fadli ◽

Imam Koeswahyono

Keyword(s):

Water Resources ◽

Public Interest ◽

The State ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Colonial Era ◽

The Public ◽

The People ◽

Legal Implications ◽

The Republic

AbstractArrangements for water resources or irrigation governance designs from the colonial era to the reform order always cause controversies and problems. In physiological issues, there is not known change in the meaning of water as a public good being a private good. Theoretical problems, the basis for the design of the theory of management of chaotic water resources is in line with the existence of Law No. 17 of 2019 concerning water resources. The purpose of this study is to analyze and find the implications of norm conflicts in water resources governance arrangements, both vertically between Law No. 17 of 2019 on Water Resources with Article 33 (2) and (3) with the 1945 NRI Law, and horizontally with RI Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles. This research uses normative legal research methods with various approaches, including the statute approach, historical approach and conceptual approach. The analytic part of this research is using an investigation strategy. The results showed that the article in Law No. 17 of 2019 proves that the production branches that are important for the State that control the public interest can not be controlled by the State, therefore the article in Law No. 17 Hold 2019 is contrary to Article 33 paragraph (2) and (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia cause that water is a State asset and national assets cannot be used so much for the prosperity of the people, therefore article 46 paragraph (1), Article 47, Article 48, Article 49, Article 51, Article 52 Law No.17 of 2019 is contrary to Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Download Full-text

UNDERSTANDING THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN DEVELOPMENT NYIA (New Yogyakarta International Airport): AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND LEGAL APPROACH

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.38230 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 477

Author(s):

Muhammad Fikri Alan

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

Development Policy ◽

Development Process ◽

The State ◽

The Public ◽

International Airport ◽

The People ◽

Approach Method ◽

The One ◽

The Right

<em>This paper seeks to use economic and law approaches in looking at the problems that occur over the construction of New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA). According to the legal approach that is often done, it has not given a clear meaning of what the phrase "public interest" is. In fact, the meaning of this phrase becomes very important, considering that this is used as the basis by the state in seizing the right to land owned by people, which is then used for the construction of the airport. For the economic approach method, it is expected to be able to complete the approach, by analyzing whether the current development process can benefit the country economically or not. Thus, the use of economic approaches, in this case is the NYIA's development policy, in fact, can be ambiguous. On the one hand it can be a justification for the state to continue the development process. On the other hand, it can be a justification for the people who until now continue to expect the development of the NYIA to be halted.</em>

Download Full-text

Normative Juridical Review Comparison of Land Acquisition Regulations for Railway Infrastructure between Indonesia and Malaysia

Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia ◽

10.37367/jpi.v4i1.111 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Dhina Setyo Oktaria ◽

Agustinus Prasetyo Edi Wibowo

Keyword(s):

Public Interest ◽

Influencing Factor ◽

Land Acquisition ◽

Infrastructure Development ◽

The Public ◽

Indonesian Government ◽

The People ◽

Railway Infrastructure ◽

The World ◽

The Government

Land acquisition for public purposes, including for the construction of railroad infrastructure, is a matter that is proposed by all countries in the world. The Indonesian government or the Malaysian royal government needs land for railroad infrastructure development. To realize this, a regulation was made that became the legal umbrella for the government or royal government. The people must agree to regulations that require it. Land acquisition for public use in Malaysia can be completed quickly in Indonesia. The influencing factor is the different perceptions of the understanding of what are in the public interest, history and legal systems of the two countries as well as the people's reaction from the two countries

Download Full-text

100 Years of State Pension: Learning from the Past

British Actuarial Journal ◽

10.1017/s1357321700005717 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 15 (3) ◽

pp. 483-501

Keyword(s):

Financial Reporting ◽

Public Interest ◽

Public Debate ◽

The State ◽

The Public ◽

The Past ◽

Tangible Evidence ◽

State Pension

The President (Mr R. S. Bowie, F.F.A.): Tonight's topic is ‘100 years of state pension: — learning from the past’. I am reminded of the expression: why are the bankers so keen to find new ways of losing money when the old ways seem to have worked perfectly well!The state pension has been going in a recognisable form for only 100 years and only for the last 60 as a universal pension; and only for the last 30 years in the form that we all might recognise today.If the Actuarial Profession can bring value to something from the past, it is to bring a perspective and a context to it so that we can learn from it. In this way, the Profession can create an informed climate within which public debate on matters of public interest can take place. As you will all know, the Financial Reporting Council are pressing the Profession hard to give tangible evidence of its commitment to the public interest, and this book falls into that category, creating an informed background for debate on a matter of huge public interest.

Download Full-text