scholarly journals Legal Implications of the Norms Conflict in the Governance Regulation of the Water Resources

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Indro Budiono ◽  
Moch. Bakri ◽  
Moh. Fadli ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Republic

AbstractArrangements for water resources or irrigation governance designs from the colonial era to the reform order always cause controversies and problems. In physiological issues, there is not known change in the meaning of water as a public good being a private good. Theoretical problems, the basis for the design of the theory of management of chaotic water resources is in line with the existence of Law No. 17 of 2019 concerning water resources. The purpose of this study is to analyze and find the implications of norm conflicts in water resources governance arrangements, both vertically between Law No. 17 of 2019 on Water Resources with Article 33 (2) and (3) with the 1945 NRI Law, and horizontally with RI Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles. This research uses normative legal research methods with various approaches, including the statute approach, historical approach and conceptual approach. The analytic part of this research is using an investigation strategy. The results showed that the article in Law No. 17 of 2019 proves that the production branches that are important for the State that control the public interest can not be controlled by the State, therefore the article in Law No. 17 Hold 2019 is contrary to Article 33 paragraph (2) and (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia cause that water is a State asset and national assets cannot be used so much for the prosperity of the people, therefore article 46 paragraph (1), Article 47, Article 48, Article 49, Article 51, Article 52 Law No.17 of 2019 is contrary to Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hukum Deponeering dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29
Author(s):  
Desi Ratnasari ◽  
Sahuri Lasmadi ◽  
Elly Sudarti
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

This article aims to identify and analyze the legal implications and analyze the regulation of public interest as a condition for implementing deponeering by the Attorney General for the sake of the public interest in the perspective of the development of criminal procedural law. This research is a legal research, obtained from statutory studies (statute approach), concept (conceptual approach), cases. The result of this research is that there is discrimination against equality before the law contained in Article 27 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and can trigger misinterpretation by the Attorney General. Then in its implementation there is no clear regulation regarding the application of the opportunity principle related to the authority of the attorney general in the implementation of case waiver (deponeering) for the public interest in the Criminal Procedure Code.  Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi hukum serta menganalisis terhadap regulasi kepentingan umum sebagai syarat pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) oleh Jaksa Agung demi kepentingan umum dalam prespektif perkembangan hukum acara pidana.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum, yang diperoleh dari studi perundang-undangan (statute approach), konsep (conceptual approach), kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah adanya diskriminatif terhadap equality before the law yang terdapat dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan dapat memicu salah tafsir oleh Jaksa Agung. Lalu di dalam pelaksanaannya belum terdapat regulasi yang jelas mengenai penerapan asas oportunitas yang berhubungan dengan kewenangan jaksa agung dalam pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) demi kepentingan umum di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Pidana (KUHAP). 

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEPEMILIKAN TANAH INDONESIA OLEH WARGA NEGARA ASING MELALUI PERJANJIAN NOMINEE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1862
Author(s):  
Fithrah Fithrah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Scientific Paper ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People

Tujuan penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengkaji pengaturan terkait kepemilikan tanah di Indonesia oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dan upaya penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil dari penulisan karya ilmiah ini ialah penegakan hukum terhadap praktek kepemilikan tanah oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dapat dilakukan oleh kejaksaan selaku organ negara yang mewakili kepentingan publik, baik melalui sarana perdata maupun pidana. Hal ini perlu dilakukan guna melindungi tanah Indonesia dimiliki oleh orang asing dan guna mendukung upaya negara mewujudkan tugas konstitusionalnya, yakni menguasai tanah bagi sebesar-besarnya kesejahteraan rakyat tanpa harus memberikan ketidakadilan bagi Warga Negara Asing. The purpose of writing this scientific paper is to examine regulations related to land ownership in Indonesia by foreigners through nominee agreements and law enforcement efforts. The research method used is normative legal research methods using statute and conceptual approaches. The result of writing this scientific paper is that law enforcement against the practice of land ownership by foreigners through nominee agreements can be carried out by the prosecutor as the state organ representing the public interest, both through civil and criminal means. This needs to be done in order to protect Indonesian land owned by foreigners and to support the state's efforts to realize its constitutional duties, namely to control the land for the maximum welfare of the people without having to give injustice to foreign citizens.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEPENTINGAN UMUM TERHADAP KEBERADAAN TANAH TERLANTAR DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Nyoman Arif Budiman
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Common Interest ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

This journal shall be entitled as " Implementation Of Public Interest Principles To Neglected Land In Indonesia".The existence of the land on earth must be beneficial both for the welfare and happiness that has it and for the people and the state. The purpose of this study is to know and understand the absolute limits of property rights to land; and want to understand the relationship between the principle of public interest in land. The method in this research is normative by using  conceptual  approach and statute approach. This journal’s preparation is done by legal research, and the approach method being used in this journal shall be used is the combination of the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The result of this research is the essence of the principle of public interest to the land is to create development based on the principle of humanity in the balance as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The exemption of land rights is caused by public and private interest with the provision of compensation and guided by the principle of musyawarah. While the revocation of land rights is the spirit of the provisions of Article 18 of the Basic Agrarian Laws states that for the interest of the state and the state and the common interest of the people of the right to land may be revoked by compensation. The legal effort that a third party can take to exploit the state land (abandoned land) is to apply the right to the government (Provincial or Regency / City Land Office). Jurnal ini mengambil julul “Penerapan Prinsip Kepentingan Umum Terhadap Terlantar. Keberadaan atas tanah di muka bumi ini  harus bermanfaat baik bagi kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan yang mempunyainya maupun bagi masyarakat dan negara. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ialah ingin mengetahui dan memahami batas-batas absolut dari hak milik  terhadap tanah; dan ingin memahami hubungan antara prinsip kepentingan umum atas tanah. Jurnal ini mengangkat permasalahan yang juga menjadi tujuan penulisan yaitu apa hakikat kepentingan umum atas tanah dan apa upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga terhadap tanah terlantar. Penyusunan jurnal ini dilakukan dengan tipe penelitian normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan peaturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Hakekat dari prinsip kepentingan umum terhadap tanah ialah untuk menciptakan pembangunan yang berlandaskan asas perikemanusiaan dalam keseimbangan sebagaimana diatur dalam UUD NRI tahun 1945. Pembebasan hak atas tanah disebabkan oleh kepentingan umum dan swasta dengan pemberian ganti rugi dan berpedoman pada asas musyawarah. Sedangkan pencabutan hak atas tanah merupakan semangat dari ketentuan Pasal 18 UUPA menggariskan bahwa untuk kepentingan bangsa dan negara serta kepentingan bersama (hanya untuk kepentingan umum) dari rakyat hak atas tanah dapat dicabut dengan memberikan ganti kerugian. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga untuk dapat memanfaatkan tanah negara (tanah terlantar) ialah melakukan permohonan hak kepada kepada pemerintah (Kantor Pertanahan Provinsi atau Kabupaten/Kota).

scholarly journals Public Interest Opposite the Freedom of Contractual Will in Administrative Contracts in the Republic of Albania

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (s2) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Artan Spahiu
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
The State ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Administrative Contract ◽  
The Public ◽  
General Arrangement ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Republic

Abstract The protection of the public interest is the main principle governing the activity regulation of the administrative bodies. This activity, traditionally, has been developed through administrative acts, as an expression of the unilateral and authoritarian willpower of public authority, which creates legal consequences. The administrative act has been and remains the most important instrument for the administration bodies to accomplish their mission, but it is no longer effective. Particularly this lack of efficiency is noticed in recent years when the development of the economy and the needs of the evergrowing society have prompted the administration to adapt its activity by making use of other mechanisms “borrowed” from private law. An important part of public activity can also be achieved through the contract as a way that brings the state closer to the private, mitigating its dominant position and leaving space for the efficiency of private activity to fulfil public engagements. Such contracts today are known as “administrative contracts” or “public contracts”. The terms mentioned above are instruments that establish legal relations, for the regulation of which the principle of public interest is opposed and competes with the principle of freedom of the contractual willpower. The regulation of these types of contracts is reached through the private law, which constitutes the general normative framework of contracts (lex generalis) even for the administrative contracts. But this general arrangement will have effect for as long as it does not contradict the imperative provisions of the specific act of public law (lex specialis), which regulates the administrative procedure for the completion of these contracts. This paper aims to bring to the spotlight the way our legislation predict and regulates administrative contracts, by emphasising particularly the features of their dualistic nature. The coexistence and competition of the principles of the freedom of contractual willpower and the protection of the public interest, evidenced in administrative contracts, is presented in this paper through the legal analysis of the Albanian legal framework which regulates these contracts. Under the terms when the role of the state in providing public services tends to increase and our legislation aims the harmonization in accord with the European legislation, it is necessary to improve the administrative contract regulation and extend its scope of action.

scholarly journals Tafsir Wewenang Seponering Jaksa Agung Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 29/PUU-XIV/2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilham Dwi Rafiqi
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
State Power ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Definition Of

The affirmation of the attorney general's authority in the Elucidation of Article 35 letter C of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Law after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 29/PUU-XIV/2016 still leaves problems and has the potential to cause new legal problems. This research will look at and analyze how the authority of the Attorney General after the decision is as well as how the concept of an ideal arrangement that ensures legal certainty. This research uses normative juridical research with a statutory approach and case studies which in this case are court decisions. The results showed that after Constitutional Court decision, there was a change in the meaning of the Elucidation of Article 35 letter c of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Law. Based on the results of these interpretations and decisions, the legal implications that followed were related to the conditions for setting aside cases in the public interest, namely in setting aside cases in the public interest, the Attorney General was required to 'require' first to pay attention to suggestions and opinions from state power agencies that have relationship with the problem. The concept of an ideal arrangement that can guarantee legal certainty as an indicator to measure and assess the implementation of the Attorney General's obligations can be done by clarifying the definition of "state power agencies" for which advice and opinions are requested and making criteria for the term "public interest".

scholarly journals Inkonstitusionalitas Sistem Unbundling dalam Usaha Penyediaan Listrik

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Jefri Porkonanta Tarigan
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People

Fungsi negara tidak hanya sebagai regulator (pengatur) dan umpire (wasit), namun juga berfungsi sebagai provider (penyedia) dan entrepreneur (pengusaha). Oleh karena itu, sudah seharusnya negara terlibat langsung dalam usaha penyediaan listrik untuk kepentingan umum bagi sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat sebagaimana amanat Pasal 33 UUD 1945. Usaha penyediaan listrik untuk kepentingan umum dengan unbundling system yaitu terpisahnya antara usaha pembangkitan, transmisi, distribusi, dan penjualan listrik, telah dinyatakan inkonstitusional oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003, bertanggal 15 Desember 2004. Namun kemudian adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 149/PUU-VII/2009, bertanggal 30 Desember 2010, justru dipandang sebagai peluang dibolehkannya kembali sistem unbundling dalam usaha penyediaan listrik sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 10 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2009 tentang Ketenagalistirkan. Hal tersebut kemudian mendorong diajukannya kembali permohonan pengujian terhadap ketentuan Pasal 10 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2009. Melalui Putusan Nomor 111/PUU-XIII/2015, bertanggal 14 Desember 2016, Mahkamah Konstitusi pun menegaskan bahwa unbundling dalam usaha penyediaan tenaga listrik adalah tidak sesuai dengan konstitusi.The function of the state is not only as a regulator and referee, but also serves as provider and entrepreneur. Therefore, the state should be directly involved in the business of electric providing for the public interest to the greatest prosperity of the people as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. The unbundling system in electric providing for the public interest is the separation between the business of generation, transmission, distribution, and sales. The unbundling system has been declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003 dated December 15, 2004. However, the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 149/PUU-VII/2009 dated 30 December 2010, is judged as an opportunity to re-enable the unbundling system in the business of electric providing as stipulated in Article 10 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 Year 2009 about Electricity. It then encourages the re-submission of the petition for judicial review of the provisions of Article 10 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 Year 2009. Then, through Decision Number 111/PUU-XIII/2015, dated December 14, 2016, the Constitutional Court confirm that unbundling in the business of providing power electricity for public interest is inconstitutional.

scholarly journals Efektifitas Fungsi Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kabupaten Gorontalo dalam Penyelenggaraan Penerimaan Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Nurwita Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Service ◽  
Sociological Research ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Public Expectation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Basic Philosophy

In essence the right of everyone to get the same job and opportunity in government, is one of the instruments in trying to improve prosperity and prosperity of the people. This corresponds to the basic philosophy of the state summarized in Pancasila, where the five precepts of Pancasila should be viewed as one unified whole. Even has been translated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD) Year 1945, as well as a constitutional basis in governance, nation and state.The importance of Gorontalo Regency Government / related agencies especially Regional Personnel Agency (BKD) performs acceptance in accordance with the mechanisms stipulated in several Laws and Regulations in particular PP. 43 of 2007, with the expectation that the quantity of civil servants can dominate the quality so that the public expectation of the quality of service and the acceleration of regional development can be fulfilled. Type of research Sociological Juridical. Juridical Sociological Research is a legal research that combines the research of normative law and sociological law research.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Aparat Kepolisian dalam Pengawalan Konvoi Kendaraan Bermotor Berukuran Besar di Jalan Raya

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-403
Author(s):  
I Made Adi Putra ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Road Transportation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Traffic Signs ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Road ◽  
The Republic ◽  
On The Road ◽  
National Police

It is common for a large motorbike convoy to cause accidents, both between large motorbike riders and other vehicle riders. This is due to the fact that the speed of the large-sized motorbikes itself can be said to be quite fast, coupled with the behavior of some of these riders who sometimes like to run red lights and put aside the traffic signs, which often results in accidents. Based on this factual background, the legal issues examined in this study are: What is the authority of the police in escorting large motorbike convoys and what is the responsibility of the police in implementing the convoy when accident victims occur on the road. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The results of this research are that the authority of the police apparatus in providing escort for large motorbike convoys is the provision of Article 14 letters a and 18 paragraph (1) of Law no. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia and Article 12 letter e of Law No. 22 of 2009. These provisions basically constitute the authority of the police apparatus to carry out the regulation, guarding, escort and patrol of community and government activities as needed, and to give the authority to act according to their own judgment in the public interest. The responsibility of the police is to carry out the convoy in the event of a victim of an accident on the highway in order to maintain order and ensure security, safety, orderliness and smoothness of road transportation.

scholarly journals KONSEP HAK MENGUASAI NEGARA TERHADAP TANAH DALAM HUKUM TANAH (UUPA) DAN KONSTITUSI

GANEC SWARA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 991
Author(s):  
NI LUH ARININGSIH SARI
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
State Control ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
East Indies ◽  
The People ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

     The concept of the State's Right to Control over Land in Land Law (UUPA) and the Constitution are things that need to be clarified based on law. The type of research in this research is normative research, namely research on legal principles related to the concept of the State's right to control over land seen from the aspects of the Basic Agrarian Law and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The approach method used in this research is the statutory approach (the statute approach), the conceptual approach, which utilizes the views and thoughts of experts regarding the concept of the rule of law and the historical approach is carried out by examining what background. which underlie a development of the implementation of the right to control the State. The results of the study show that the concept of the right to control of the State which is regulated in the 1945 Constitution and the UUPA, is different from the legal relationship which is ownership between the State and land based on the Domeinverklaring principle which is regulated in the Land Law for the Administration of the Dutch East Indies Government which has been revoked in the UUPA. The principle of Domeinverklaring contradicts the legal awareness of the Indonesian people and the principles of an independent and modern State, especially in the 1945 Constitution which regulates State control of all agrarian resources which are essentially intended for the greatest prosperity of the people (Article 33 paragraph (3)).

scholarly journals Monopoly of State-Owned Enterprise of Social Justice

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Rory Jeff Akyuwen
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
General Benefit ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The role of the state through BUMN becomes so important when it is formulated in a provision as formulated in Article 33 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, where the production branches which are important for the State and which affect the livelihood of the public must be controlled by Country. Here it indicates the authority of the State to participate in economic activities through the operation of production branches that can be categorized as important for the State and considered vital and strategic for the interest of the State.This is based on the reasons as formulated in the explanatory section of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, so that the benefits of the production branches do not fall into the hands of individuals, the State actively takes the role to cultivate it because the production branch is considered important and which control the livelihood of the people for the greatest prosperity of the people. State-Owned Enterprises is formed with the aim of contributing to the development of the national economy in general and the state's revenue in particular; The pursuit of profit; To hold general benefit in the form of providing goods and / or services of high quality and adequate for the fulfillment of the livelihood of the public; Pioneering business activities that have not yet been implemented by the private sector and cooperatives and actively providing guidance and assistance to weak economic entrepreneurs, cooperatives, and communities.SOEs are given the right to monopoly in the economic field which is considered to control the livelihood of many people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document