scholarly journals Determination Authority of State Financial Loss in Criminal Acts of Corruption Post Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/Puu-Xiv/2016

2022 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefri Hardi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
Potential Losses ◽  
Real State ◽  
Actual Loss ◽  
Legal Force

The Constitutional Court (MK) issued Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 on January 25, 2017. This decision states clearly that the word "can" in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (UU Tipikor) is unconstitutional and lacks legal force. With the elimination of the word "can," a person can only be said to have violated Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law if the person's actions resulted in real state losses, or losses of the nature of actual loss, and not to accommodate state losses that are still potential, or potential losses.

scholarly journals Pergeseran Delik Korupsi dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Fatkhurohman Fatkhurohman ◽  
Nalom Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Finance ◽  
State Potential ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Financial Losses ◽  
Real State ◽  
Actual Loss

Putusan MK Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016 mencabut frasa "dapat" dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU Tipikor). Putusan MK ini menafsirkan bahwa frasa "dapat merugikan keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara" dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU Tipikor harus dibuktikan dengan kerugian keuangan negara yang nyata (actual loss) bukan potensi atau perkiraan kerugian keuangan negara (potential loss). Dalam pertimbangannya, setidaknya terdapat empat tolok ukur yang menjadi ratio legis MK menggeser makna subtansi terhadap delik korupsi. Keempat tolok ukur tersebut adalah (1) nebis in idem dengan Putusan MK yang terdahulu yakni Putusan MK Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006; (2) munculnya ketidakpastian hukum (legal uncertainty) dalam delik korupsi formiil sehingga diubah menjadi delik materiil; (3) relasi/harmonisasi antara frasa "dapat merugikan keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara" dalam pendekatan pidana pada UU Tipikor dengan pendekatan administratif pada Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan (UU AP); dan (4) adanya dugaan kriminalisasi dari Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) dengan menggunakan frasa "dapat merugikan keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara" dalam UU Tipikor.Constitutional Court Decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016 revokes the phrase "may" in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the amendment of Law No. 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption (Corruption Act). Decision of this Court interpreted the phrase "may be detrimental to the state finance or economy of the state" in Article 2 (1) and Article 3 of Corruption Act must prove real state financial losses (actual loss) not a potential nor estimated financial losses of the state (potential losses). In the consideration of the judgment, at least, there are four benchmarks that become the ratio legis of the Court to shift the substance of the offense of corruption. The Four benchmarks are (1) nebis in idem with the previous Constitutional Court ruling that is Constitutional Court Decision Number 003/PUU-IV/2006; (2) the emergence of legal uncertainty in the formal corruption offense that it is converted into material offense; (3) the relationship/harmonisation between the phrases "may be detrimental to the state finance or economy of the state" in the criminal approach on Corruption Law with an administrative approach to Law No. 30 of 2004 on Governmental Administration (UU AP); and (4) alleged criminalization of State Civil Apparatus (ASN) by using the phrase "may be detrimental to the state finance or economy of the state" in the Anti-Corruption Act.

scholarly journals Urgensi Regulasi Eksekusi Pidana Denda di Bidang Perpajakan Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
Arief Sultony
Keyword(s):  
Job Creation ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
Loss Recovery ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Tax Assessment ◽  
General Provision ◽  
Financial Losses ◽  
Legal Force

Job Creation Law has removed Article 13 paragraph (5) and Article 15 paragraph (4) of General Provision and Tax Procedures (KUP) Law. The absence of these articles may result in state financial loss recovery in taxation cannot be recovered. This research will identify how the regulation on the execution of tax fines related to the recovery of state financial loss before Job Creation Law was enacted and the consequences of Job Creation Law implementation on state financial losses recovery caused by tax crime. By applying the normative legal method, this research will propose the solution to the problem. The findings indicate that the KUP Law does not specifically regulate the execution of fines, so that there is a possibility that the fines will not be paid. However, based on Article 13 paragraph (5) and Article 15 paragraph (4) of the KUP Law, the state financial loss recovery can be imposed through tax assessment after court decision has permanent legal force. The elimination of these articles by Job Creation Law has the risk that the state financial losses cannot be recovered. Therefore, regulation in tax criminal fines execution is urgently required so that state financial losses can be recovered.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Hak Untuk Melakukan Perkawinan Antara Sesama Pekerja Dalam Satu Perusahaan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Olivia Sitanggang
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Professional Attitude ◽  
Legal Consideration ◽  
The World ◽  
Personal Conflict ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Legal Force

Currently, there are several companies that make regulations that require the workers to resign or even be willing to be laid off if they decide to marry another worker in the company. Some of the reasons are preventing personal conflict, subjectivity, corruption, collusion and nepotism. The formulation of the problem in this research is what is the background of the provisions regarding the prohibition of marriage between fellow workers in one company, how is the analysis of the judges legal considerations in the decision Number 13 / PUU-XV / 2017, what is the impact of the Constitutional Court decision on the inclusion of clauses prohibiting intermarriage between workers.The results showed that the background of the provisions concerning the prohibition of marriage between fellow workers in one company is to maintain a professional attitude of workers when carrying out their work in order to maintain the company's existence in the world of business competition. Another reason is that it refers to Article 153 paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13 of 2003 so that this provision is used as a reason for employers to prohibit marital ties for fellow workers in their company. The legal consideration of the judge in decision Number 13 / PUU-XV / 2017 is clear that Article 153 paragraph (1) letter f of the Labour Laws is no longer valid, because the phrase unless it has been regulated in a work agreement, company regulation, or collective working agreement is contrary to the Constitution 1945 and has no binding legal force. The impact of the Constitutional Court's decision on the inclusion of a clause on the prohibition of marriage is that employers cannot state the reasons for dismissal of workers who have marital ties to other workers in the same office in the employment agreements, company regulations or collective working agreements, so that if the entrepreneur includes it, it is considered to have violated the decision of the Constitutional Court. Keywords: Cancellation of the Rights, Marriage, Workers, One Company.

IMPLIKASI YURIDIS TERKAIT PERAN NOTARIS DALAM PENGESAHAN PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN DI INDONESIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Desimawati Sinaga
Keyword(s):  
Married Couple ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Two Phases

 Prenuptial Agreement has been changed by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIIII/2015. This decision issued toward a suit made by a woman named Ike Farida, who is married to a man with different nationality without making Prenuptial Agreement. This research aims to ascertain the legal standing of Prenuptial Agreement and the authority of Notary in legalizing Prenuptial Agreement after the establishment of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIIII/2015.This research uses normative legal method through the statute approach and secondary data analysis. This research comprises two phases, there are conducting literature review to learn the regulation of the authority of Notary in legalizing Prenuptial Agreement after the establishment of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIIII/2015 and various literature. Afterward, researcher established a field research method by interviewing Notary, the Official of Office of Religious Affairs (Kantor Urusan Agama) and the Official of Civil Registry Office (Dinas Kependudukan or Kantor Catatan Sipil).The Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIIII/2015 permits married couple to make Prenuptial Agreement after the marriage ceremony. Additionally, the Agreement may be canceled based on their consent as long as it does not inflict a financial loss to the third party. Subsequently, since the establishment of such Decision, the Legalization of Prenuptial Agreement by Notary is no longer similar to Prenuptial Agreement Legalization established by the Staff of Marriage Registry. The Notary does have authority to make an Authentic Deed concerning Prenuptial Agreement in question, and such Deed will be used for Prenuptial Agreement registration in the Office of Religious Affairs and Civil Registry Office. However, the Deed in question must legalized by the Staff of Marriage Registry hence it binds the third party.Key words: Prenuptial Agreement, Legalization, Notary, The Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIIII/2015.

scholarly journals Analisis Pasangan Calon Tunggal Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Pematang Siantar Tahun 2020

PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 298-317
Author(s):  
Gary Timothy Hasian Purba ◽  
Subhilhar Subhilhar ◽  
Hatta Ridho
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Candidate Pair ◽  
Local Election ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Legal Force ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

The purpose of this study was to analyze a single candidate pair in the regional head election of Pematang Siantar City in 2020. The purpose of this study was to explain why there was a single candidate pair in Pematang Siantar City. The legality of the Constitutional Court Decision number 100/PUU-XII/2015 is a legal force to uphold the meaning of democracy in political contestation, in this case regional head elections. Besides that, the essence of democracy which promises freedom to be elected and to vote is an additional power to bring up a single candidate pair. The failure to regenerate political parties is another trigger for the emergence of a single candidate pair in the post-conflict local election. Not only in Pematang Siantar City but also throughout Indonesia. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative with interview instruments involving political party administrators and political observers in Pematang Siantar City in addition to references to single candidate pairs. The weak cadre of political parties with the presence of wholesale parties makes incumbents not get support in Pematang Siantar City. The legal power of the Constitutional Court's decision and the meaning of democracy to be elected and voted made the single candidate pair in Pematang Siantar City win the post-conflict local election against an empty box.

scholarly journals RATIO LEGIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION ABOUT IMPEACHMENT: IS IT FINAL AND BINDING?

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Khamim Muhammad Ma'rifatulloh
Keyword(s):  
Research Problem ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Material Content ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Legal Force

Arrangement of the final and binding legal force ‎the decisions of the Constitutional Court's impeachment not previously regulated in legislation. After PMK No 21 Year 21 Year 2009 paragraph (5) is issued, it also raises legal problems related to its material content. The formulation of the research problem is what ratio legislation Constitutional Court No. 21 of 2009 Article 19 Paragraph (5) About Impeachment. This research is a normative juridical approach with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach. The results of this study are to fill in the gaps or incomplete arrangements for the final nature and tie the decisions of the Constitutional Court's impeachment which were previously not in the legislation.

Reconstruction to Prove Elements of Detrimental to State Finances in the Criminal Act of Corruption in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Firmansyah Firmansyah ◽  
Topo Santoso ◽  
Febrian Febrian ◽  
Nashriana Nashriana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Financial Losses ◽  
Actual Loss ◽  
Research Show

State financial loss is one of the elements of the criminal act of corruption in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime. The formulation of the element of detrimental to state finances in the two articles at the level of evidence still raises various obstacles because it is an obscure norm and is multi-interpretative in nature. The results of the research show that proving that the element of detrimental to state finances in the criminal act of corruption is still understood as a formal crime so that the proof is sufficient by fulfilling the act and there is no need for consequences, whether potential loss of state finances or actual loss, the perpetrator can be convicted. After the Constitutional Court through its decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 stated that the word "can" in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 is unconstitutional and has fundamentally changed the qualification of corruption to become a material crime, but in its application there are different views of law enforcement officials in proving that the element is detrimental to state finances, giving rise to legal uncertainty. In the upcoming reform of the criminal law of corruption, a more appropriate model of proof is to use the concept of state financial loss in the sense of material crime. Through this concept, a new act can be seen as fulfilling the elements of a corruption crime on the condition that there must be an effect that the state loss is real and occurs (actual loss). The concept of proving state financial losses in a material sense ensures fair legal certainty. Keywords  : Reconstruction, Evidence, State Financial Losses, Corruption Crime.

scholarly journals PENGAWASAN NOTARIS OLEH MAJELIS PENGAWAS NOTARIS DAERAH PASCA PUTUSAN M.K.NO. 49/PUU-X/2012

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 783
Author(s):  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra ◽  
Sagung Putri M.E Purwani
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Force

Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) No 30 Tahun 2014, pengawasan notaris dilakukan oleh Menteri, dan kata pengawasan di dalamnya termasuk juga mengenai pembinaan. Untuk melaksanakan tugas dimaksud oleh menteri, dalam hal ini Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dibentuk Majelis  Pengawas Notaris, yaitu suatu badan yang mempunyai kewenangan dan kewajiban untuk melakukan pengawasan dan pembinaan terhadap notaris. Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN menentukan: Untuk kepentingan proses peradilan, penyidik, penuntut umum, mengambil fotokopi minuta akta dan/atau surat-surat yang dilekatkan dalam minuta akta atau protokol notaris, serta pemanggilan notaris untuk hadir dalam  pemeriksaan berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya, atau protokol notaris, dengan persetujuan MPD. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusan nya Nomor 49/PUU-X/2012,  menyatakan frase “dengan persetujuan Majelis Pengawas Daerah” pada Pasal 66 UUJN, adalah bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Permasalahan yuridis nya adalah: Apa saja wewenang MPD pasca putusan MK No. 49/PUU-X/2012 ? dan Bagaimana mekanisme pemeriksaan notaris oleh MPD? Dengan jenis penelitian hukum normatif permasalahan tersebut terjawab, bahwa Tugas dan wewenang  MPD pasca Putusan MK. No. 49/PUU-X/2012 hanya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan berkala dan/atau jika dipandang perlu, serta melakukan pemeriksaan notaris jika ada pengaduan dari masyarakat. Tugas dan kewenangan notaris sebagaimana Pasal 66 UUJN, berdasarkan No. 2 Tahun 2014 sebagai UU Perubahan atas UUJN dilakukan oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris. Mengenai mekanisme pemeriksaan Notaris harus dilakukan sesuai dengan UUJN Nomor 30 Tahun 2004, UU Per UUJN No 2 Tahun 2014, Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia  Republik Indonesia Nomor M.02.PR.08.10 Tahun 2004 Tentang Tata Cara Pengangkatan Anggota, Pemberhentian Anggota, Susunan Organisasi, Tata Kerja, Dan Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Notaris; dan Keputusan Menteri  Hukum  Dan Hak Asasi Manusia  Republik Indonesia No. M.39-PW.07.10 Tahun 2004 Tentang  Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Majelis Pengawas  Notaris. The Law on Position of Notary (UUJN) No 30 Year 2014, the supervision of a notary is conducted by the Minister, and the supervisory word in it also includes the guidance. To carry out the duties referred to by the minister, in this case the Minister of Justice and Human Rights established the Supervisory Board of Notary, which is an agency having the authority and obligation to conduct supervision and guidance on the notary. Article 66 Paragraph (1) UUJN determines: For the purposes of the judicial process, investigators, prosecutors, taking photocopies of minas deeds and / or letters embedded in minority deed or notary protocols, and notarial notes to be present in the examination relating to the deeds they make , Or notary protocol, with the approval of the MPD. The Constitutional Court in its decision No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012 states that the phrase "with the approval of the Regional Supervisory Board" in Article 66 UUJN, is contradictory to the 1945 Constitution and has no legal force. The juridical issue is: What are the powers of the MPD after the Constitutional Court's decision No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012? And What is the mechanism of notary examination by MPD? With this type of normative legal research the problem is answered, that the task and authority of the MPD after the Constitutional Court Decision. No. 49 / PUU-X / 2012 only to conduct periodic and / or deemed necessary inspections and to conduct a notary examination if there is a complaint from the public. Duties and authorities of a notary as referred to in Article 66 UUJN, based on No. 2 of 2014 as Law on Amendment of UUJN is conducted by the Honorary Board of Notary. Regarding the mechanism of inspection of a Notary must be done in accordance with UUJN Number 30 Year 2004, UU Per UUJN No 2 Year 2014, Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.02.PR.08.10 Year 2004 About Procedures for Member Appointment, Dismissal of Members, Organizational Structure, Work Procedures, and Procedure of Notary Inspection; And Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. M.39-PW.07.10 of 2004 on Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties of the Notary Supervisory Board.

scholarly journals Juridical Review of Executorial Confiscation Power after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 Against Act No. 42 of 1999 Regarding Fiduciary Guarantee

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Lupita Randawi ◽  
Akhmad Khisni ◽  
Amin Purnawan
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Force

The purpose of this research is uTo: 1) To determine the legal strength of the executorial confiscation of a fiduciary guarantee certificate against a debtor who is in default (in default) and does not want to voluntarily hand over the goods that are the object of fiduciary security and 2) To know the procedure for implementing the execution of a fiduciary guarantee certificate for debtors who are in default (default) After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 and (3) To find out what weaknesses and solutions can be obtained from the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data, and tertiary data that can support the assessment, which are then analyzed using the normative juridical method. Based on the results of data analysis, it is concluded that: 1) based on the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 seizure of the execution of the fiduciary guarantee by the creditor mustdone when there is an agreement regarding the default and the debtor's willingness to hand over the object that becomes the object of fiduciary. 2) If there is no agreement regarding default and the debtor does not voluntarily submit the object of guarantee, then the procedure for executing the fiduciary guarantee is carried out the same as the execution of a court decision which has permanent legal force.

scholarly journals JUDGE’S DECISION ON WORK TERMINATION DISPUTE IN INDONESIA AFTER CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 37/PUU-IX/2011

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neni Vesna Madjid ◽  
Saldi Isra ◽  
Kurnia Warman ◽  
Mardenis Mardenis
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Industrial Relation ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Force

Testing the provision of Article 155 section (2) Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been decided by the Constitutional Court (CC) through decision Number 37/PUU/IX/2011. Prior to the Constitutional Court decision, there are many various interpretations of undetermined clause. The Constitutional Court firmly states that the undetermined clause must be interpreted as “having a permanent legal force ".This study aims to analyze how the judges dismissed dispute of work termination cases in Indonesia after the decision. The research applied juridical normative method  by using secondary data literature such as legal documents, previous studies and other references which are relevant to the judges' decision within the Supreme Court after the Constitutional Court decision. Based on the analysis temporary result, the judges within the Supreme Court in 3 regions (Padang, Pekanbaru and Jakarta Pusat) and the Supreme Court itself are not practically guided by the Constitutional Court decision. It obviously results in the lack of legal certainty for the parties, especially workers.Keyword: Constitutional Court, Industrial Relation Court, Interpretation, Supreme Court.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document