scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JIGSAW II PADA MATERI BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA KELAS X SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 3 KLATEN UTARA

Intersections ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Aji Permana Putra
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Personality Types ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
Direct Learning

The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Jigsaw II or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among Jigsaw II or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students of SMK  Muhammadiyah 3 Klaten Utara on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 85 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded as follows: (1) Jigsaw II  had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw II  had better than direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement.

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA SMK KELAS X DI KABUPATEN KLATEN

Intersections ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Aji Permana Putra ◽  
Nuria Mahdra Fajarini ◽  
Nurni Utami
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Personality Types ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
Direct Learning

The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Investigation (GI) or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among GI or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students in tenth grade of vocational schools technology, health, and agriculture in Klaten Regency on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 80 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded as follows: (1) GI had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model GI  had better than cooperative learning Jigsaw II direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>

scholarly journals Perbedaan Prestasi Siswa Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dan NHT Materi Koordinat Kartesius

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-296
Author(s):  
Rahman Hidayat ◽  
Sripatmi Sripatmi ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Nani Kurniati
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
School Year ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Implementation Data ◽  
Student Team

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in maths learning achievement between classes taught by cooperative learning model Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type and class taught by cooperative learning type Numbered Head Together (NHT) in material sistim coordinat cartesius class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kediri 2018/2019 school year. Data collection techniques in this study are test techniques with instruments in the form of learning achievement test, learning implementation observasion sheets and learning implementation. Data analysis techniques use descriptive statistics. Hypothesis test of students' final ability (posstest) with t-test of two parties at a significance level of 5% resulted in tcount <ttable namely 0,020 < 2.030 which means that there were nothing differences in mathematics learning achievement between classes taught by cooperative learning model Student Team Achievement Division ( STAD) and classes taught by the cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) in material sistim coordinat cartesius class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kediri academic year 2018/2019.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara ◽  
Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi ◽  
Imam Sujadi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Spatial Ability ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning

<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong>: </strong>The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect on the subject of plane geometry viewed from the students spatial ability, and category of spatial ability consisted of high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. The sample of this research consisted of 261 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test, questionnaire of students affective aspect and spatial ability test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. (5) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (6) On the cooperative learning models of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw type, students with the high, medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. On the direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspects than students with the medium spatial ability, while students with the high and low spatial ability and students with the medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. (7) On students spatial ability high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (8) On students with the high and medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model gives the same affective aspect. On students with the medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better affective aspect than the direct learning model, while the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw and also the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type and direct learning model gaves the same affective aspect.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Jigsaw, CTL approach, spatial ability, learning achievement, and affective aspect. </p>

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-196
Author(s):  
Viola Vesa Novena ◽  
Kriswandani Kriswandani
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Equilibrium Test

This experimental research aims to find out whether or not: 1) the probing-prompting learning model affects learning achievement, 2) the self-efficafy affects learning achievement, and 3) the model affects the interaction between the learning model and student’s self-efficacy on learning outcomes. The population in this study were all third grade students of Christian Elementary School Eben Haezer Salatiga as many as 72 students. The sampling technique used Cluster Random Sampling and obtained by grade IIIA students as experimental class used probing-prompting learning model and class IIIC as control class using conventional learning model, with each consists of 24 students. Both models are used in science learning on natural resource materials. The instuments used were the test of science learning achievement and questionnaire about student self-efficacy. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential analysis consisting of normality test, homogenity test with Levene's, early equilibrium test with independent sample t test, and hypothesis test with Anava. The whole test was performed with SPSS calculation tool at 0.05 significance level. The results of the hypothesis testing concluded: 1) there was no effect of probing prompting learning model on students' learning achievements; 2) there was an effect of self-efficacy to the learning achievements; the result of student learning with high self-efficacy category is better (higher) than the moderate and low self-efficacy, and student’s learning result with moderate self-efficacy category was better than the ones with low self-efficacy; 3) There was no effect on interaction between the learning model and self-efficacy on student science learning outcomes.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING BERBANTU KARTU MASALAH PADA MATERI GERAK LURUS TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X IPA SMA N 1 MRANGGEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Wisnu Kemuning ◽  
Nur Khoiri ◽  
Sigit Ristanto
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Science Class ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Learning Group ◽  
Academic Year

This study aims "To determine whether there is influence of discovery learning model assisted problem card in a straight motion on the results of study X science class SMA Negeri 1 Mranggen academic year 2014/2015". The population in this study were all class X  SMAN 1 Mranggen Academic Year 2014/2015. Sampling using cluster random sampling technique with the normal condition of all classes and homogeneous. Sampling results obtained by X-class science experiment 1 as a class were treated when learning takes place using discovery learning model and problem cards for class X IPA 2 as the control class is given learning using discuss learning group. Based on the final analysis of the t-test showed that t = 4.6738 while the table = 1.671 with a significance level of 5%. Because thitung > ttable is 4.6738> 1.671 it can be interpreted that the average student learning outcomes experimental class better than the class control. The average value of the experimental class is 77.6316 and 70.6579 as control class. Pursuant to the results of this study concluded that there are significant of discovery learning model assisted problem card in a straight motion on the results of study X science class SMA Negeri 1 Mranggen academic year 2014/2015.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Faqihi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Independent Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, GI, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X1 higher Secondary School in Lombok East on academic year of  2014/2015. The size of the sample was 282 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach. (2) the student with the high, medium, and ow independent learning levels have equal learning achievement. (3) in each of the learning models, the high, medium, and, low independent learning levels, result in the equal learning achievement. (4) in each of the independent learning levels, the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SIMULASI DIGITAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putri Irma Delianti ◽  
Elfi Tasrif ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Digital Simulation ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
The Difference

This research aimed to analyze the difference of learning outcomes by using Student Facilitator and Explaining model and direct learning model on Digital Simulation subject at class X TKJ SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. The problem in this study was the student learning result which were still under KKM on Digital Simulation subjects at SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Type of this research was Quasi Experiment. The sample was taken through Probability Sampling technique. The research samples were class X TKJ A  and class X TKJ B. Class X TKJ A as sample for experiment class using Student Facilitator and Explaining  model and class X TKJ B as sample for control class using direct learning model. Data analyzed based on post-test experiment class and control class, then analyzed for normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class, the research results obtained an average of 82.47, while the control class was averaged of 76.94. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 found tcount> ttable that is 1,78> 1,699, because tcount was bigger than ttable, so null hypothesis (H0) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It can be concluded at the real level that this study showed that Student Facilitator and Explainingmodel gave significant effect on students learning results of Digital Simulation at class X TKJ in SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Therefore, the Student Facilitator and Explaining model is better than the direct learning model.Keywords: Student Facilitator and Explaining Model,Direct Learning Model, Learning outcomes, Experiment Class, Control Class.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN PENGGUNAAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENULIS TEKS BERITA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 24 JAMBI

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Abdoel Gafar ◽  
Firman Tara
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
Cooperative Models ◽  
Language Text ◽  
Better Than

This research aims to: (1) Describe the ability to write news text students are taught using STAD type cooperative learning model and students are taught using direct learning model; (2) Describe the ability to write high-priority student-language text texts that are taught using STAD-type cooperative models and are taught using direct learning models; (3) Describe the ability to write low-priority student-language text texts that are taught using STAD-type cooperative models and are taught using direct learning models, and (4) Describe the interaction of cooperative learning model type STAD and initial ability to the ability to write news text of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 Jambi. The type of this research is quantitative with 2x2 factorial experimental designs. The population of the research is the students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 consisting of 6 classes. The sample of this research is class VIIIA for experiment class with 40 students and class VIIIB for control class with 38 students. Sample determination is determined by purposive sampling technique. The data of students' news text writing capability was obtained using performance test and analyzed using two ways Anova test. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that STAD type cooperative learning model affects the ability to write student news text. The effect can be explained as follows. First, the ability to write news texts of students taught using STAD type cooperative learning model is better than students taught using direct learning model. Second, the ability to write high-priority students' text news taught using STAD type cooperative models is better than students taught using direct learning models. Third, the ability to write low-priority students' text taught using STAD type cooperative models is better than students being taught using direct learning models. Fourth, there is no interaction between STAD type cooperative learning model and initial ability to write news text skills of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 Jambi.Keywords: Writing News Texts, Cooperative Learning, Direct Learning

scholarly journals Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Co-Op Co-Op dengan Pendekatan Predict-Observe-Explain untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-302
Author(s):  
Sri Maryanti
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group

The purpose of this study was to find our whether cooperative learning model Co-Op Co-Op approach POE (predict-observe-explain) can increase the ability troubleshooting mathematical students. This research is a research Quasi Eksperimental Design and design researchers used  in this study is the design of the control group pretest-postest, with a technique random class. Hypothesis test used in this research is t-test. From the results of statistical tests showed that the value of t_hitung based on the calculation obtained t_hitung = 5.500869, and t_tabel = 2.001 so that t_hitung> t_tabel. So based on these calculation can be concluded that the model cooperative learning CO-Op Co-Op approach POE (predict-observe-explain) can increase the ability troubleshooting mathematical students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document