scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SIMULASI DIGITAL

Author(s):  
Putri Irma Delianti ◽  
Elfi Tasrif ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

This research aimed to analyze the difference of learning outcomes by using Student Facilitator and Explaining model and direct learning model on Digital Simulation subject at class X TKJ SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. The problem in this study was the student learning result which were still under KKM on Digital Simulation subjects at SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Type of this research was Quasi Experiment. The sample was taken through Probability Sampling technique. The research samples were class X TKJ A  and class X TKJ B. Class X TKJ A as sample for experiment class using Student Facilitator and Explaining  model and class X TKJ B as sample for control class using direct learning model. Data analyzed based on post-test experiment class and control class, then analyzed for normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class, the research results obtained an average of 82.47, while the control class was averaged of 76.94. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 found tcount> ttable that is 1,78> 1,699, because tcount was bigger than ttable, so null hypothesis (H0) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It can be concluded at the real level that this study showed that Student Facilitator and Explainingmodel gave significant effect on students learning results of Digital Simulation at class X TKJ in SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Therefore, the Student Facilitator and Explaining model is better than the direct learning model.Keywords: Student Facilitator and Explaining Model,Direct Learning Model, Learning outcomes, Experiment Class, Control Class.

Author(s):  
Desri Adita ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem at this research is laerning outcomes of students at Digital Simulation subject in X TITL SMK N 2 Sawahlunto, which not achieve the baoundary of Minimal Thoroughness Criteria or in Indonesian called KKM. This research purpose in order to know what level of the difference learning outcomes by apply drills and practice learning model and simulation learning model at Digital Simulation subject in X TITL SMK N 2 Sawahlunto school year 2014/2015. This research is an experimental research using quasi experimental method. Interpretation of sampels using non probability sampling technique with purposive sampling, as first experiment class is X TITL 2. This class using drills and practice learning model. Second experiment class is X TITL 1 which use simulation learning model. Datas collection technique from posttests gave every meeting, than this data were analyzed to get normality test, homogenous test and hypothesis test. The result of research in first experimen class get subjection mean 78.79 and second experiment class get subjection mean 70.91. Value of hypothesis test degree of significant α = 0.05 was tcount > ttable (5.3005 > 2.023). It’s mean nil hypothesis (H0) was denied and alternative hypothesis (H1) was received with the difference 8.87 and percentage of different is 12.51%. In conclusion result of analyzed learning outcomes first experiment class and second experiment class, its have significant different of influences between using drills and practice learning model and used simulation learning model. Key Word : learning outcomes, drills and practice learning model, simulation learning model.


Author(s):  
Ayu Eka Putri ◽  
Edidas Edidas ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

The problem in this study is the low learning outcomes of students on Digital Simulation subjects in SMK N 3 Pariaman. This study aims to determine the effect of learning outcomes by using Active Learning model Practice Rehearsal Pairs type with direct learning models on subjects Digital Simulation class X TKJ odd semester SMK N 3 Pariaman Year Teaching 2017/2018. This type of research uses the Quasi Eksperimental design. Sampling using Probability Sampling technique, The sample of research is class X TKJ B as experiment class using Active Learning model of Practice Rehearsal Pairs type and class X TKJ A as control class using direct learning model. Data collection technique from post-test in experiment and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 86.88, while the control class gets an average value of 78.28. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got titung> ttable that is 3,780> 1,678, because big tcount of ttable, hil n hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is influence of student learning outcomes between the use of Active Learning model of Practice Rehearsal Pairs type with direct learning model on Digital Simulation subjects of class X TKJ in SMK N 3 Pariaman. The use of Practice Rehearsal Pairs model has a significant influence on the improvement of Digital Simulation learning outcomes.Keywords: Active Learning, Practice Rehearsal Pairs, Learning Outcomes, Digital Simulation


2017 ◽  
pp. 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fandi Ahmad

The study aimed at examining (1) the difference between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar taught by using Think-Pair-Share (TPS) learning model and the ones using direct learning on Hydrolisis of Salt, (2) the diffrence between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar with high initial ability on Hydrolysis of Salt, (3) the interaction betwen learning model and initial ability in influenching learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar on hydrolysis of Salt. The Study was a quasi-experiment research which employed factorial 2x2 design.The population of the study was all grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar of academic year 2012/2013 with 7 classes. The samples were two classes, namely grade XI IPA1 and grade XI IPA3 selected using random sampling technique. Hypothesis test was conducted by employing two-way analysis of variant of GLM univariat supported by SPSS 16.0 program. The results of the study revealed that (1) therewas a difference between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar taught by using TPS learning model and the ones using direct learning on Hydrolysis of salt, (2) there was a difference between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar with high initial ability and low initial ability on Hydrolysis of Salt, (3) there was interaction between learning model and initial ability in influenching learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar on Hydrolysis of Salt. The average of students’ learning outcomes taught by using TPS learning model was higher than taught by using direct learning model, and learning outcomes of students who have high initial ability was higher than students with low initial ability.


Author(s):  
Nova Perdana Roza Putri ◽  
Efrizon Efrizon ◽  
Titi Sriwahyuni

The purpose of this research is to reveal the magnitude of the percentage of the influence of the application of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning method with direct learning model on the subjects of Digital Simulation class X Software Engineering semester odd SMK Negeri 4 Payakumbuh Year Teaching 2017/2018. This type of research is quantitative using experimental type quasi experimental design research method. This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 4 Payakumbuh on 15 October until 15 November 2017. Population in this research that is student of class X, XI, XII RPL SMK Negeri 4 Payakumbuh. Sampling technique used is probability sampling with simple random sampling technique. The selected to be samples in this study are students of class X RPL2 experimental class and X1 RPL1 as control class. Based on the result of the research, the average of learning result of the experimental class is 82,71, while the control class get the average value 79,34. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount>ttable that is (3,64> 1, 6668), because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. This means that Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning method has a positive effect on the learning outcomes Digital Simulation students of class X SMK Negeri 4 Payakumbuh.Keywords: Learning outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning methods, direct learning models


Author(s):  
Wonang Saputra ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of students on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics is under the Minimum Criterion of completeness which has been established SMKN 1 Batipuh is 75. This study aims to determine the effect of application of Team Assisted Individualization model to learning outcomes on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics in Audio Video Techniques department at SMKN 1 Batipuh. The type of this research is experimental research with pre experimental design with intact group comparison design. The sample of research is class X TAV 2A as experiment class using Team Assisted Individualization model and class X TAV 2B as control class using direct learning model. Data is collected  from post-test in the experimental class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity, normality and hypothesis test. From the experimental class results obtained an average value of 80.71, while the control class gets an average value of 75.79. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 2,442 > 2,056, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted.itCan be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is work on of student learning result which signifikan between usage of Team Assisted Individualization type with direct learning model on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics of student of Audio Video Technique at SMKN 1 Batipuh. So the Team Assisted Individualization learning model is better than the direct learning model. Keywords: Applying Digital Engineering Basics, Team Assisted Individualization model, direct learning model, pre experimental design, learning outcomes.


Author(s):  
Aprayanti Nasution ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Sukaya Sukaya

The problem of the research is the low learning results of the students on the subjects of computer systems of SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This is due to several factors one of which is the method or strategy learning that is less innovative. The purpose of the research is to know the difference of result the study by using cooperative learning model of type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subjects of a computer system class X TKJ of  SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This type of research is experimental. Where is to take the sampling by using random sampling technique. As the experimental class is class X TKJ A which will be treated by using cooperative learning model type STAD and control class is X TKJ B which will be treated by using inquiry model of learning. The technique of collecting data from post test, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results get the average value 82, 29, while the control class gets an average value of 76.93. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got  thitung> ttabel  that is (2,182> 2,056) Because thitung  is bigger than ttabel hence hypothesis (H0) rejected and hypothesis (Ha) accepted. From the calculation of the learning result Gain where O1 is the average of the experimental class and O2 is the control class, the percentage of learning result is increased by 6.79%. It can be concluded that by using cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type has an effect on student learning result which proves from improvement of learning result. Keyword    : Learning Resultss, Cooperative Learning Model TypeSTAD, Inquiry Learning Model.


Author(s):  
Palupi Palupi ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of students on subjects Applying Electric and Electronics Engineering Basics is under the Minimum Criterion of completeness (KKM) which has been established SMKN 5 Padang is 75. This study aims to determine the effect of application of learning models Contextual Teaching & Learning and Problem Base Learning model on student learning outcomes on subjects Applying Electric and Electronics EngineeringBasics of students Audio Video Techniques at SMKN 5 Padang 2017/2018. The type of this research is experimental research with Pre experimental design with NonProbability Sampling design. The sample of research is class 1E 1B as experiment class using Contextual Teaching & Learningmodel and class 1E 1A as control class using Problem Base Learning model. Data collection techniques from post-test in the experimental class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 82.47, while the control class gets an average value of 77.88 with more influence6 %. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got count> ttable that is 2,869>1,696, because big count of ttable, null hypothesis (Ho) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is influence of student learning result which signifikan between usage model ofContextual Teaching & Learning type with Problem Base Learning model on subjects Applying Electric and Electronics Engineering Basics of student of Audio Video Technique at SMKN 5 Padang. So the Contextual Teaching & Learninglearning model is gives better than results to the Problem Base Learning.Keywords : Learning outcomes, Model of Learning,Contextual Teaching & Learning, Problem Base Learning.


Author(s):  
Elvi Syukri ◽  
Ilmiyati Rahmy Jasril

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the application of the Cooperative Learning model of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type to the learning outcomes of Basic Electricity and Electronics in class X TAV students at SMKN 1 Kinali. This type of research is a quasi experiment with a randomized control group only design. The sampling technique uses Simple Random Sampling. The research sample XTAV1 (control class) is applied to the conventional learning model and XTAV2 (experimental class) is applied to the TAI learning model. The research data are the posttest value of the experimental and control class. Then the normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test were analyzed. Based on the research data, the mean value of the control class was 76,30 and the experiment was 84,10. Hypothesis test results at a significant level α = 0,05 obtained tcount 3,14 and ttable 1,69 (tcount>ttable) can be identified Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. The test results provide an interpretation of the significant influence of learning outcomes by applying the TAI learning model in the subjects of Basic Electricity and Electronics class X TAV in SMK N 1 Kinali. Keywords:TAI Learning Model, quasi experiment, Learning Outcomes


Author(s):  
Firmansyah Nur Utomo ◽  
Agus Efendi ◽  
Endar Supri Wihidayat

<p>This study aims to find out (1) whether there are differences in learning outcomes in the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation with conventional learning models; (2) Are there differences in student learning activeness in the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation with conventional learning models (3) Is the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Integrated Group Investigation more effective than conventional learning. This study used the quasi-experimental design method with a pretest-posttest control group design model. The population in this study were students of X Axioo class and X RPL B of SMK Negeri 5 Surakarta. The sample used was 70 people. The sampling technique used is total sampling. Data collection techniques using pretest-posttest and observation sheet. The data analysis technique used is balanced test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis test. The results of the study are as follows. First, there are differences in learning outcomes between learning models of Problem Based Learning in conventional Group Investigation and Learning. Second, there are differences in learning activeness between learning models of Problem Based Learning in conventional Group Investigation and Learning. Third, the effectiveness of the learning model of Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation is higher than conventional Learning in improving learning outcomes.</p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Conventional Learning, Learning Outcomes, Activity


Author(s):  
Elmizal Elmizal ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman

        The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of learners on the subjects of Electrical Engineering is under the Learning Completeness (KB) which has been established SMKN 5 Padang is 75. There are 48.15% 1E1, 61.29 1E2 and 65.62% 1E3. This study aims to determine the comparative application of cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share and Problem Based Learning on student learning outcomes on the subjects Electrical Engineering class X Audio Video Technique at SMKN 5 Padang. The type of this research is experimental design with intact grup comparison design. The sample of this research is 1E1 A class as experiment class I using Think Pair Share and class 1E3 B as experiment class II using Problem Based Learning model. Data collection techniques were obtained from post-test in experimental class I and II, than analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. This research results the average value of students using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share type (80,27) is higher then using Problem Based Learning model that is (74,13). The result of hypotehesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05, obtained t count > t table that is 2,580> 2,045, because tcount is bigger than ttable, hil n hypothesis (Ho) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted.  Keywords: Think Pair Share model, Problem Based Learning model, Experimental, Learning Outcomes,  Experiments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document