scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN

Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>

Author(s):  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara ◽  
Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi ◽  
Imam Sujadi

<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong>: </strong>The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect on the subject of plane geometry viewed from the students spatial ability, and category of spatial ability consisted of high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. The sample of this research consisted of 261 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test, questionnaire of students affective aspect and spatial ability test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. (5) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (6) On the cooperative learning models of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw type, students with the high, medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. On the direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspects than students with the medium spatial ability, while students with the high and low spatial ability and students with the medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. (7) On students spatial ability high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (8) On students with the high and medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model gives the same affective aspect. On students with the medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better affective aspect than the direct learning model, while the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw and also the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type and direct learning model gaves the same affective aspect.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Jigsaw, CTL approach, spatial ability, learning achievement, and affective aspect. </p>


Intersections ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Aji Permana Putra

The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Jigsaw II or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among Jigsaw II or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students of SMK  Muhammadiyah 3 Klaten Utara on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 85 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded as follows: (1) Jigsaw II  had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw II  had better than direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas masing-masing kategori model pembelajaran, motivasi belajar siswa dan interaksinya terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Madiun yang terdiri dari 4 kelas. Penentuan sampel menggunakan cluster random sampling. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode tes dan metode angket. Uji hipotesis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan sel tak sama dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah (1) prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Artikulasi lebih baik dari model pembelajaran Talking Stick, (2) jika ditinjau dari masing-masing tingkatan motivasi belajar, siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi prestasi belajarnya jauh lebih baik dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar sedang maupun rendah dan (3) model pembelajaran Artikulasi lebih efektif dari model pembelajaran Talking Stick untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa, untuk setiap tingkat motivasi belajar siswa.Abstract:  The aims of this research were to find out the effectivennes of each categories of learning model, motivation to study and their interaction towards student mathematics learning achievement. The population was all students of grade VIII Five Junior High School of Madiun City consisted of four class. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0.05. The conclution of this research that (1) the model of Articulation learning gives a better mathematics achievement than model of Talking Stick learning, (2) students with the high motivation to study had better achievement than students with the medium and low motivation to study, and (3) the model of Articulation learning was more effective than the model of Talking Stick learning to enhance students mathematics learning achievement for each level of students motivation to study.


Intersections ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Aji Permana Putra ◽  
Nuria Mahdra Fajarini ◽  
Nurni Utami

The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Investigation (GI) or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among GI or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students in tenth grade of vocational schools technology, health, and agriculture in Klaten Regency on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 80 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded as follows: (1) GI had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model GI  had better than cooperative learning Jigsaw II direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement


Author(s):  
Nurul Farida

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models (STAD by problem solving method, STAD, and conventional) on mathematics achievement viewed from student creative attitude. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in Central Lampung Regency. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional (2) For students who middle and low creative attitude, students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional. 


Author(s):  
Fhela Vhantoria Ningrum

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of PISK, STAD and conventional approach to the mathematics achievement viewed from student activities. This research was a quasi experimental using 3x3 factorial design. The populations of the research were all students of senior high school in Sukoharjo Regency. The sampel was 9 classes and it was taken using stratified random sampling technique. The instruments used to collect data were student activities questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The requirements test for data included the population normality test using Lilliefors method and the population homogenity variance test using Bartlett method. The balance test toward student’s early ability in mathematics data using unbalance one-way analysis of variance and it was concluded that experimental and control classes had balance prior knowledge in  mathematics. The testing of hypotesis using unbalance two-way analysis of variance. The conclusion of this research shows as follows. (1) Students taught by PISK cooperative learning model had better mathematics achievements than students taught by STAD cooperative learning model and conventional model. In addition, STAD cooperative learning model and conventional model gave the same mathematics achievement. (2) Students in high activity had better mathematics achievement than students in middle and low activity; also students in middle activity had better mathematics achievements than students in low activity. (3) There was an interaction between learning model and activity toward mathematics achievement


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-296
Author(s):  
Rahman Hidayat ◽  
Sripatmi Sripatmi ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Nani Kurniati

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in maths learning achievement between classes taught by cooperative learning model Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type and class taught by cooperative learning type Numbered Head Together (NHT) in material sistim coordinat cartesius class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kediri 2018/2019 school year. Data collection techniques in this study are test techniques with instruments in the form of learning achievement test, learning implementation observasion sheets and learning implementation. Data analysis techniques use descriptive statistics. Hypothesis test of students' final ability (posstest) with t-test of two parties at a significance level of 5% resulted in tcount <ttable namely 0,020 < 2.030 which means that there were nothing differences in mathematics learning achievement between classes taught by cooperative learning model Student Team Achievement Division ( STAD) and classes taught by the cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) in material sistim coordinat cartesius class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kediri academic year 2018/2019.


Author(s):  
Hayatun Nufus ◽  
Rezi Ariawan ◽  
Erdawati Nurdin ◽  
Hasanuddin Hasanuddin

This study examines the problem of improving mathematics learning outcomes among students with cooperative learning model NHT type and conventional learning approaches is reviewed as a whole and for each level of mathematical ability (high, medium, and low). This research is a quasi-experimental research design Nonequivalent Control Group Design uses Simple Random Sampling technique. The population in this study were students of class VII in a private junior high school in the city of Pekanbaru in Riau in the academic year 2014/2015. While the sample is graders VII2 as control class and class VII2 as an experimental class. The instrument used in this study is the mathematics achievement test. Quantitative analysis was performed using two mean difference test. The results showed that: (1) there is significant implementation of cooperative learning model NHT on the results of students' mathematics learning is reviewed as a whole and the level of ability was; (2) there is no effect of the application of cooperative learning model NHT towards mathematics learning outcomes of students based on high and low-level capabilities.


Author(s):  
Hayatun Nufus ◽  
Rezi Ariawan ◽  
Erdawati Nurdin ◽  
Hasanuddin Hasanuddin

This study examines the problem of improving mathematics learning outcomes among students with cooperative learning model NHT type and conventional learning approaches is reviewed as a whole and for each level of mathematical ability (high, medium, and low). This research is a quasi-experimental research design Nonequivalent Control Group Design uses Simple Random Sampling technique. The population in this study were students of class VII in a private junior high school in the city of Pekanbaru in Riau in the academic year 2014/2015. While the sample is graders VII2 as control class and class VII2 as an experimental class. The instrument used in this study is the mathematics achievement test. Quantitative analysis was performed using two mean difference test. The results showed that: (1) there is significant implementation of cooperative learning model NHT on the results of students' mathematics learning is reviewed as a whole and the level of ability was; (2) there is no effect of the application of cooperative learning model NHT towards mathematics learning outcomes of students based on high and low-level capabilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-174
Author(s):  
Laily Yunita Susanti ◽  
Mufti Anisa

Abstrak Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kurang pahamnya siswa dalam memahami konsep materi dalam pembelajaran IPA SMP, khususnya materi sistem reproduksi pada manusia. Hal tersebut dikarenakan model pembelajaran yang digunakan dalam pembelajaran di kelas kurang bervariasi dan karena peserta didik kurang serius dalam mengikuti pelajaran di dalam kelas dan diduga peserta didik merasa bosan dengan pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh pendidik. Kurangnya pemahaman konsep pada materi reproduksi pada manusia kemungkinan disebabkan karena peserta didik kurang serius dalam mengikuti pelajaran di dalam kelas dan diduga peserta didik merasa bosan dengan pembelajaran yang dilakukan oleh pendidik. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT terhadap pemahaman konsep pada materi Sistem Reproduksi pada Manusia kelas IX SMPN 1 Rambipuji Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. penelitian ini menerapkan jenis penelitian Quasi Experimental Design. penentuan sampel dengan teknik pourposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara, observasi, tes dan dokumentasi.analisis dan uji hipoteisis menngunakan rumus independent sample T-Test di SPSS 22.00. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian di SMP Negeri 1 Rambipuji menunjukkan bahwa: ada pengaruh pemahaman konsep antara peserta didik menggunakan model pembelajaran NHT dan Saintifik 5M dengan hasil uji independent sample T-test pada posttest diperoleh signifikansi 0,030 kurang dari taraf signifikansi (α)= 0,05, maka Ha diterima dan H0 ditolak.   Abstract This research was motivated by students' lack of understanding in understanding the concept of material in junior high school science learning, especially material on the reproductive system in humans. This is because the learning model used in classroom learning is less varied and because students are not serious about taking lessons in the classroom and it is suspected that students feel bored with the learning carried out by educators. Lack of understanding of the concept of reproductive material in humans is probably due to students being less serious in taking lessons in class and it is suspected that students feel bored with the learning carried out by educators. This study aims to determine the effect of implementing the NHT type of cooperative learning model on understanding concepts in the material of the Reproductive System in Humans class IX SMPN 1 Rambipuji for the 2019/2020 academic year. This research applies Quasi Experimental Design research. determination of the sample using pourposive sampling technique. The data collection techniques used interviews, observation, tests and documentation. The analysis and pituitary test used the independent sample T-Test formula at SPSS 22.00. Based on the results obtained from research at SMP Negeri 1 Rambipuji shows that: there is an effect of conceptual understanding between students using the NHT and Scientific 5M learning model with the results of the independent sample T-test on the posttest, it is obtained a significance of 0.030 less than the significance level (α) = 0.05, then Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document