scholarly journals COAL BED METHANE POTENCYOF TANJUNG FORMATION IN TANAH BUMBU SOUTH KALIMANTAN

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
David P Simatupang ◽  
Deddy Amarullah
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Environmentally Friendly ◽  
Calorific Value ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Coal Bed Methane ◽  
Energy Sources ◽  
Gas Chromatograph ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Deep Coal Mine ◽  
Coal Deposits

Coal deposits distributes widely in Indonesia, mainly in Sumatera and Kalimantan. These deposits become an indication for a huge quantity of coal-bed methane (CBM) potency. As an environmentally friendly source of energy, CBM could be one of Indonesia's future energy sources. Centre for Geological Resources (CGR) started the exploration for this energy since 2005, while the study was conducted in 2008 at Tanjung Formation in Tanah Bumbu Area, South Kalimantan.CSAT-1 well was drilled to provide CBM resources and deep coal mine potency data for Tanjung Formation (Eocene) in Asem-asem Basin. This well went through 10 coal seams with three main seam, which is E seam at 212.34-213.30 m depth, I seam at 261.93-264.20 m, and J seam at 270.20-275.35 m depth. Calorific value from this three main seam categorized as high rank coal, vary from 6197-6745 cal/gram (adb), with total moisture between 4.51-7.11 %, adb.Total coal resources used for CBM resources quantification is 112,733,226 tons (between 300 to 1000 meters depth). Based on desorption test and gas chromatograph measurement from samples at various depth from three main seams, those coal gives methane resources estimation about 430 MSCF, with methane content vary between 1.2 - 6.6 cu-ft/ton of coal.

Insights of Cleat Attribute of Barakar Coal Deposits of Son Valley Basin, India: Implication for Coal Bed Methane Exploration

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
Susheel Kumar ◽  
◽  
Atul Kumar Varma ◽  
Vinod Atmaram Mendhe ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central India ◽  
Atomic Ratio ◽  
Volatile Matter ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Coal Bed Methane ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
Terrestrial Source ◽  
Type Composition ◽  
The Face

Cleat attributes and coal quality have been evaluated through field observation, SEM images analysis and proximate-ultimate analyses on representative coal samples collected from four different underground coal mines of Son-Valley coal Basin of central India for the characterization of coal bed methane prospective. The coal samples were characterized as durainic-clarodurainic-vitrainic type to durocalrainic-clarainic type based on litho-type composition. Cleats were identified as face cleat and butt cleat range 5-10 cm-1 to 2–3 cm-1 depending on the litho-types whereas, cleat density ranges 7-16 cm-2 revealed that cleat development is influenced by litho-types. The cleat orientation shows two main strikes almost NW-SE to NNW-SSE and NE-SW to ENE-WSW elucidates the face cleat and butt cleats are perpendicular to each other. SEM images for coal samples were analysed to validate the cleat geometry at micro-scale, illustrates that face cleat and butt cleats are orthogonal to each other. The technological properties viz. moisture (Wa), volatile matter yield (VMdaf) ash yield (Ad) of coal samples are placed in the range of 0.66–11.80, 32.0–50.05 and 13.23–43.73 wt.% respectively. The fuel ratios of all the samples varied from 1.05–2.35 indicating that coal samples were of sub-bituminous to bituminous rank. The carbon and hydrogen (Cdaf, Hdaf) content of samples ranges from 68.89–86.08 and 5.22–6.60 wt.% respectively. The atomic ratio H/C and O/C through van-Krevelen diagram demonstrate the predominance of type-III/IV kerogens usually derived from terrestrial source in studied coal belongs to the gas genesis window.

Recovering coal bed methane from deep unmineable coal seams and carbon sequestration

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Brown ◽  
Donald K. Harrison ◽  
J. Richard Jones ◽  
Kenneth A. LaSota
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Coal Bed Methane ◽  
Coal Seams

Important Factors to Propose High-Produced New Development Wells in CBM Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 1030-1032 ◽  
pp. 2578-2581
Author(s):  
Zhao Hui Xia ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Bin Ren ◽  
Liang Chao Qu ◽  
Ze Hong Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Seam ◽  
3D Model ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Coal Bed Methane ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Well Design ◽  
New Development ◽  
Reservoir Type ◽  
High Production

Coal bed methane (CBM) is a kind of natural gas that generated from coal and disseminated organic matters during the stage of diagenesis and coalification, which mainly composed of methane and hosted in coal seam by free, adsorbed, and dissolved forms. Genetic, reservoir type and occurrence condition in CBM are different from traditional reservoir. And the high-produced development wells in CBM aiming to drill more coal seams with high quality therefore needs to be analyzed in the methods that are different from traditional reservoir. 3 important factors including the study on correlation and elevation depth of coal seam roof and floor in section and areal by using well-seismic ties, outcrop boundary based on coal mine data and distributions of CBM reservoir properties in 3D model are needed for high-produced development well analyze in CBM. Application in Australia CBM project shows this methodology is very successful for the development well design with high production.

Factors facilitating or limiting the use of AVO for coal-bed methane

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. C49-C56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suping Peng ◽  
Huajing Chen ◽  
Ruizhao Yang ◽  
Yunfeng Gao ◽  
Xinping Chen
Keyword(s):  
Poisson’S Ratio ◽  
Poisson's Ratio ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Coal Bed Methane ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Impedance Contrast ◽  
Reservoir Potential ◽  
Sweet Spots

There are similarities and differences in employing amplitude variation with offset (AVO) to explore for gas-sand reservoirs, as opposed to coal-bed methane (CBM) reservoirs. The main similarity is that large Poisson’s ratio contrasts, resulting in AVO gradient anomalies, are expected for both kinds of reservoirs. The main difference is that cleating and fracturing raise the Poisson’s ratio of a coal seam as it improves its reservoir potential for CBM, while gas always lowers the Poisson’s ratio of a sandstone reservoir. The top of gas sands usually has a negative AVO gradient, leading to a class one, two, or three anomaly depending on the impedance contrast with the overlying caprock. On the other hand, the top of a CBM reservoir has a positive AVO gradient, leading to a class four anomaly. Three environmental factors may limit the usage of AVO for CBM reservoirs: the smaller contrast in Poisson’s ratio between a CBM reservoir and its surrounding rock, variations in the caprock of a specific CBM reservoir, and the fact that CBM is not always free to collect at structurally high points in the reservoir. However, other factors work in favor of using AVO. The strikingly high reflection amplitude of coal improves signal/noise ratio and hence the reliability of AVO measurements. The relatively simple characteristics of AVO anomalies make them easy to interpret. Because faults are known to improve the quality of CBM reservoirs, faults accompanied by AVO anomalies would be especially convincing. A 3D-AVO example offered in this paper shows that AVO might be helpful to delineate methane-rich sweet spots within coal seams.

INFLUENCE OF ANALYSIS RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL COAL SAMPLES ON THE PREDICTION ACCURACY OF HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES OF COAL SEAMS

2021 ◽  
pp. 176-186
Author(s):  
Yevhen Rudniev ◽  
◽  
Vyacheslav Galchenko ◽  
Elvira Filatieva ◽  
Mykhailo Filatiev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Calorific Value ◽  
Mining Area ◽  
The State ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Initial State ◽  
Mining Operations ◽  
Mineral Components ◽  
Scientific Substantiation

Purpose: to establish possible quantitative errors in determining the values of some indicators of the degree of metamorphism without attracting the content of total moisture and mineral impurities to predict the hazardous properties of coal mine layers during mining. Methodology: based on the use of initial data on the quality indicators and properties of coals for specific coal seams, given in the reference sources, with the subsequent recalculation of the state of samples from their dry ashless or ashless state to the raw state. Comparison of the samples of indicators were determined, respectively, using analytical samples and based on the results of recalculation to the initial state (close to the production state), conclusions were drawn about possible errors in the case of using the analysis results of the analytical samples to predict hazardous properties of mines. Results: The analytical state of the samples for dry ashless state (daf) or wet ashless state (af) does not correspond to the state of coal in the working area of mining operations (r), which most accurately characterizes the manifestation of mine hazardous properties. The indicators of the release of volatile substances during thermal decomposition of coals, which are used to predict the hazardous properties of mine coal seams, do not directly reflect changes in the elemental composition of coals during metamorphic transformations. Methods for preparing analytical samples provide for grinding to small fractions, removing external moisture and enriching to ash content less than 10%, which does not correspond to the state of coal (r) in the mining area. The use of indicators set for dry ashless combustible (organic) mass excludes the possibility of analyzing the influence of moisture and mineral impurities on the manifestation of the hazardous properties of coal seams. The use of such indicators to predict the hazardous properties of mine coal seams can lead to errors in their determination of 45 ÷ 50%. The hazardous properties of coal seams can be adequately characterized only by the combined composition and properties of organic matter and mineral impurities in a state close to the presence of coal in the mining area. Using the example of possible significant errors in the calorific value, in the case of its use to characterize the hazardous properties of coal mine seams, the expediency of scientific substantiation of a set of indicators for a reliable forecast of a specific hazardous property for a specific seam formation was proved. Scientific novelty: hazardous properties of coal seams are reliably predicted on the basis of the composition and properties of organic and mineral components, reduced to conditions close to the state during mining operations. Practical value: the results obtained give grounds to scientifically substantiate the selection of the necessary indicators for predicting a specific hazardous property of coal seams and make proposals for improving the regulatory framework for the safe conduct of mining operations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document