Dental Age Assessment of 8.5 to 17 Year-old Saudi Children Using Demirjian's Method

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 64-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suiaiman Al-Emran
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
French Canadian ◽  
Age Assessment ◽  
Standard Values ◽  
Mandibular Teeth ◽  
Demirjian’S Method ◽  
Demirjian Method

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the dental age in Saudi children aged 8.5 to 17 years using the Demirjian method. Methods and Materials Four hundred ninety panoramic radiographs of boys and girls were reviewed retrospectively. All children were placed in the age group closest to their chronological age. The dental age was scored on all seven left mandibular teeth by one examiner. Results Both boys and girls in age groups nine to 14 years showed advanced dental age compared to their chronological age which was found to be statistically significant except in age groups nine and 13 years. Saudi boys were 0.3 years and Saudi girls 0.4 years ahead, on average, of French-Canadian children as analyzed by the Demirjian method. Conclusion The standard values for French-Canadian children provided by Demirjian vary slightly for application to Saudi children. As a result, new graphs and tables were produced to convert these maturity scores, calculated by the Demirjian method, to the dental age for Saudi children. Citation Al-Emran S. Dental Age Assessment of 8.5 to 17 Year-old Saudi Children Using Demirjian's Method. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 March; (9)3:064-071.

scholarly journals Dental Maturity in Saudi Children Using the Demirjian Method: A Comparative Study and New Prediction Models

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad D. Baghdadi
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Models ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
French Canadian ◽  
Dental Maturation ◽  
Canadian Population ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Demirjian Method

A sample of 422 dental panoramic radiographs from individuals of known age (from 4 to 14 yrs), sex (males: 217, females: 205), and ethnicity (Saudi) was collected. A dental maturation score for each individual was calculated using the Demirjian method. Age was then estimated using the original Demirjian curves and tables based on French-Canadian population and population-specific curves and tables for Arab (Saudi and Kuwaiti) and European (Belgian) populations. The differences between dental age and chronological age were analyzed and compared using paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA test, and a post hoc Scheffé’s test. The Demirjian method utilizing French-Canadian standards presented significant difference between dental age and chronological age for the total sample and in the vast majority of age groups in both sexes. The mean overestimation of age was about 10 months (P<0.05). The tables designed specifically for Arab populations had a significantly lower error than the tables designed for French-Canadian and Belgian populations. The latter had the largest error in age predication. New age prediction models and maturation scores for Saudi population were developed based on the Demirjian method using multinomial functions.

scholarly journals Accuracy assessment of dental age estimation with the Willems, Demirjian and Nolla methods in Spanish children. Comparative cross-sectional study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Macarena Paz Cortés ◽  
Rosa Rojo ◽  
Esther Alia García ◽  
Maria Rosa Mourelle Martínez
Keyword(s):  
Accuracy Assessment ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
Paired Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Demirjian Method ◽  
Willems Method

Abstract Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the validity and accuracy of the Willems, Demirjian and Nolla methods in predicting chronological age in a Spanish ethnicity population. Methods: A sample of 604 orthopantomographs of Spanish children aged 4 to 14 years was evaluated by two independent evaluators. Descriptive statistics were applied to calculate the chronological age and dental age, presenting the mean and standard deviation. The difference between dental age and chronological age was calculated for each method. A positive result indicated an overestimation and a negative figure indicated an underestimation. The Wilcoxon test for paired data and Spearman's correlation coefficient were applied by age groups and gender to compare the chronological age and dental age of each method (that of Willems, Demirjian and Nolla). Statistical tests were performed at a 95% confidence level. Results: The interexaminer agreement was 0.98 (p = 0.00), and the intraexaminer agreement was 0.99 (p = 0.00). The Willems method significantly overestimated the age of boys (0.35 years (0.93)) and girls (0.17 years (0.88)). The Demirjian method significantly overestimated the age of boys (0.68 years (0.95)) and girls (0.73 years (0.94)). The Nolla method significantly underestimated age in boys (0.44 years (0.93)) and girls (0.82 years (0.98)). Conclusions: In the Spanish population, the use of the Demirjian method for legal and medical purposes is frequent. This study reveals that the Willems method is more appropriate due to its greater precision in estimating dental age.

scholarly journals DETERMINATION OF DENTAL AGE OF 10-13 YEAR-OLD CHILDREN OF THE CARPATHIAN REGION OF UKRAINE BY THE CAMERIERE METHOD IN COMPARISON WITH THEIR CHRONOLOGICAL AGE

2019 ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
V.F. Makieyev ◽  
O.O. Isakova
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
Ray Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Age Range

Purpose:  to evaluate the chronological and dental age of children in Lviv and the Lviv region aged 10-13 years with the help of the modified formula Cameriere.  Methods. Оrthopantomograms  46 children (26 boys and 20 girls) aged 10-13 years from Lviv and Lviv region have been used for this study. A questionnaire was developed for the submission of individual patient data and a standardized format for making their indicators derived from orthopantomograms (OPG). The examination of the area of the lower seven teeth on the left was done using the Cameriere method and the age of the child was evaluated, which was further compared with the chronological age.  Results.The obtained results of the study showed a high accuracy and reliability of the estimation of dental age in children up to 10-13 years with the help of the Cameriere formula modified by us. The research is based on the detection of physiological changes (the rate of formation of the roots) in the permanent teeth of children using the X-ray method.  Evaluating the results obtained by two methods, among girls and boys of the selected age group, a statistically significant strong correlation between the chronological age and the age calculated by the Cameriere method was revealed. Cameriere research has been carried out in many countries around the world and, in particular, in European countries, by implementing the general formula. Children in the period of occlusive bite remain the most critical in terms of age and, therefore, the determination of the correct time for dental interventions. In this age group, the development of permanent teeth passes through different stages and depends on many factors of the environment, genetic, geographical and food factors. The process of teething also affects many local factors, such as space and space for a permanent tooth in the dental artery and the loss of temporary precursors. Even with a large number of factors affecting the eruption and formation of permanent teeth in children, this method showed high accuracy and independence. In order to assess the Cameriere method among the children under study and its further practical application, a comparison was made between the age obtained using this methodology and the chronological age of the children under study in different age groups, both among boys and girls. Analyzing the obtained data, it was found that the mean of chronological age among the studied boys aged 10-11 (n = 14) was 11.02 ± 0.59 years, and the Cameriere method was 10.63 ± 1.03 years.  Student's assessment did not reveal a significant difference between the data (p = 0.22) for the age group of 10-11 years.  Further analysis among the studied boys revealed that in the age group 12-13 years the average chronological age was 12.94 ± 0.49 years, and the age was determined by the Cameriere method 12.59 ± 0.63 years, and no significant difference was established between them  (p = 0.14). The results of the studies have shown the suitability of the Cameriere formula modified during the process, based on the assessment of open tops and the number of teeth with completed root formation as a marker for the physiological development of the child and one that can be used to determine the child's age.Since studies had a limited age range on a particular sample of dental patients, further studies should evaluate the utility of this method in a larger sample of children in the extended age range of the given region of Ukraine and, if possible, adjust the formula we modified for the stability of the averaged indicators in different samples by age and sex. 

scholarly journals Evaluation of dental maturation in children according to sagittal jaw relationship

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 038-043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elcin Esenlik ◽  
Aslihan Atak ◽  
Ceyhan Altun
Keyword(s):  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Vertical Plane ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
Dental Maturation ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Mandibular Teeth ◽  
Mandibular Protrusion ◽  
Demirjian Method

ABSTRACT Objective: The aims of this retrospective study were to determine compliance with dental and chronological ages and to analyze the relationships between dental age and orthodontic sagittal anomalies. Materials and Methods: A total of 221 subjects between the ages of 7 and 15.9 years (165 girls and 156 boys) were included in the study. The dental age of seven left mandibular teeth was assessed according to the Demirjian method. The maxillary protrusion, mandibular protrusion, maxillo-mandibular and vertical plane angles were measured from cephalometric films. Results: The mean difference between the chronological age and dental age in female patients was 0.94 years and 0.33 years in male patients (P < 0.01). No differences between the sagittal classification groups were found. There was no relationship between dental age and the SNA° or the GoGn-SN°. A statistically significant negative relationship was found between dental age and the SNB° and there was a significant linear relationship between dental age and the ANB°. Conclusion: Dental age in girls and boys has been estimated to be more advanced than chronological age in all classes and dental maturation advanced in cases with a tendency to develop Class II malocclusions.

scholarly journals Correlation of dental and chronological maturity in girls and boys aged 7 to 14 years

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zorana Nikolic ◽  
Ivana Scepan ◽  
Evgenija Markovic
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Data ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Correlation Ratio ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Demirjian’S Method ◽  
Dental Maturity ◽  
Correlation Level

The aim of the study was to assess correlation level of dental and chronological maturity related to gender in a group of children of our population. Material and method: Total number of 320 girls and boys, 7 to 14 years old, participated in the study. Dental age assessed by Demirjian's method. Statistical data were analyzed by mean value and SD for dental maturity in age groups of 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 years for girls and boys, respectively. Calculating the equation of linear regression and the determination and correlation ratio assessed correlation level of dental and chronological age. Results and conclusion: According to the results obtained, it can be concluded that mean values of dental age are coinciding with the chronological maturity in all 8 age groups which is confirmed by high interdependence of dental and chronological maturity (78.6% for boys and 79.6% for girls). .

scholarly journals Evaluation of Dental Maturity Using the Demirjian’s Method in Romanian Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
Eugen Silviu Bud ◽  
Anamaria Bud ◽  
Cristina Bică ◽  
Oana Elena Stoica ◽  
Adelia-Elena Oltean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Demirjian’S Method ◽  
Larger Sample ◽  
Dental Maturity ◽  
Age Category

Abstract Demirjian’s method is the most frequently used method of dental maturity estimation. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the method in a sample of Romanian children. The study was conducted on X-rays of 126 children with ages ranging from 5 to 15 years old. Dental age was determined and t-tests were used to assess the difference between dental age and chronological age within each age category. The boys in our study have advanced dental age in all age groups, while the girls have only in the age categories 7 to 8 years, 9 to 10 years and 11 to 12 years. The results of our study show that the method is appropriate for Romanian children and that these standards are applicable only in certain age groups. Further research is required on a larger sample.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Demirjian’s Method to Estimate Chronological Age in 5‒17-Year-Old Iranian Population

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Mahnaz Sheikhi ◽  
Ali Dakhilalian ◽  
Faranak Jalalian
Keyword(s):  
Regression Line ◽  
T Test ◽  
Iranian Population ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
Line Equation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Demirjian’S Method ◽  
Paired T Test ◽  
Demirjian Method

Introduction: To detect physiological maturity of a child, use of dental and skeletal development can be helpful. The Demirjian’s Method is one of the commonly used methods to estimate dental age. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity of Demirjian method in Iranian population with different races. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was performed on a randomly selected sample of panoramic radiographs of 3073 patients aged 5‒17 years. The chronological age (CA) was calculated by subtracting the date of birth from the date on which the radiographs were taken. Estimated age (EA) was performed by Demirjian method using seven left mandibular teeth. Paired t-test was used to compare differences between chronological and estimated age. Results: The mean of CA was 11.14±2.61 years whereas the mean EA was 11.35±2.62; therefore, EA was calculated 2.5 months more than CA. According to paired t-test the difference between CA & EA was significant (P≤ 0.001). Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a strong linear correlation between CA and EA in total (r=0.891, P≤0.001), in girls (r=0.895, P≤ 0.001) and in boys (r=0.876, P≤ 0.001). The new regression line equation based on Iranian standards would be CA=1.08±0.89EA in total, CA=1.09±0.89EA in girls and CA=1.12+0.88EA in boys. Conclusion: Using Demirjian’s Method overestimated dental age in the Iranian population. A new regression line equation based on Iranian standards was obtained according to the results of the present study.

COMPARISION OF DENTAL SCORING SYSTEM WITH RADIOGRAPHIC SKELETAL SYSTEM IN AGE ESTIMATION

JKCD ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Sadaf Ambreen
Keyword(s):  
Age Estimation ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Skeletal Age ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Dental Age ◽  
Scoring Method ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Male Subjects

Objectives: To compare Demirjian Dental scoring method with Greulich-Pyle (GP) Skeletal method of age estimation in pubertal children. Materials and Methods: Sample of the study included 267 male healthy subjects of 11-16 years of age group.. Demirjian Scoring system was utilized to evaluate the orthopantomograms to assess their Dental age and the Hand-Wrist radiographs were analyzed to calculate the skeletal age by utilizing GP atlas. Chronological age was obtained from the date of birth of the subject .Both methods were compared with one another and with the chronological age. It was a cross-sectional study and only healthy male subjects without any clinical abnormalities were included in the study. Results: A total of 267 male subjects of 11-16 years of age group were assessed by Demirjian and Greulich Pyle Methods. Both were compared with Chronological Age. Data obtained was statistically analyzed and the Student “t” test was applied in the study population. The mean difference between Chronolgical age and dental age was 0.69years and that of chronological age and skeletal age was 0.87 years. It was observed from dental age assessment that it does not differ much from the skeletal age. Conclusion: It was concluded that Demirjian method of Age Estimation is more precise than Greulich Pyle method of Age Estimation. Furthermore both methods can be used selectively in Medicolegal cases to access bone age which can be easily correlated to chronological age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document