scholarly journals A Analysis of Islamic Banks in Indonesia and Malaysia Using CAMEL

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-99
Author(s):  
Pipin Lestari

Indonesia is a country with the largest Muslim population in ASEAN, but in Islamic banking Indonesia is still lagging behind Malaysia. This study compares the financial performance of Islamic banking in both countries with the CAMEL method. There are five aspects to the CAMEL approach, namely Capital Adequacy (CAR), Asset Quality (NPF), Management Quality (NPM), Earnings (ROA, BOPO), and Liquidity (FDR). The analytical tool used is a different t-test to find out whether there is a difference or not between the financial performance of Indonesian and Malaysian sharia. From the results of data analysis with the Independent t-test three variables namely (NPF, NPM, BOPO) showed significant differences, while the variables (CAR, ROA, and FDR) there were no significant differences between Indonesian and Malaysian banks.

This article evaluates and compares the financial soundness of Islamic and conventional PCBs operating in Bangladesh based on the CAMEL approach over the period 2015 to 2019. For this purpose, the authors select a sample of 17 Conventional PCBs and 6 Islamic PCBs listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange. In terms of composite CAMEL ratings, none of the banks is found to be strong or satisfactory in financial soundness in 2019. Out of 17 conventional banks, 13 of them are in a fair position i.e. having financial, operational, or compliance weakness and need more than normal supervision and regulation to address the deficiencies. Another 4 conventional banks are in a marginal position means that they are in serious financial problems and need close supervision and regulation. Ranking of conventional banks based on composite CAMEL ratings shows that Brac Bank Ltd. is in top position (Score 2.65) with Bank Asia Ltd. securing second position (score 2.7) while AB Bank Ltd., IFIC Bank Ltd, One Bank Ltd., and Mutual Trust Bank Ltd. are in the worst position with marginal status. Among 6 Islamic banks, 5 are in a fair position and only 1 in a marginal position in 2019. Shahjalal Islami Bank Ltd. secures the top position (Score 2.8) with fair status and Social Islami Bank Ltd. is in the worst position with marginal status. Independent sample test is used to see whether there is any significant difference between Islamic and Conventional PCBs concerning CAMEL parameters. The study finds that except for liquidity there is no significant difference in capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, and earnings quality. The study also reveals that there is no significant difference in the average CAMEL ratings of two types of Banking. However, on average Islamic banks have better asset quality, management quality while conventional banks have better capital adequacy, earnings, and liquidity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashidah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Mazni Yanti Masngut

The current study uses CAMEL (Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Quality, Earnings Efficiency, and Liquidity) ratings system, with the addition of Shariah Compliance Ratio (CAMELS) in order to detect the financial distress of Islamic banks in Malaysia. Using neural network, the study analyses data collected from the 17 Islamic banks annual reports for the period 2006 to 2010. It was found that all Islamic banks have higher ETA ratios which portray a good performance of capital adequacy and are less likely to face financial distress. As for asset quality, all Islamic banks did not have the possibility to face financial distress as they are able to handle their non-performing loans throughout the years. Meanwhile for management quality, all Islamic banks show lower ratios in paying salaries to their employee. Earning efficiency for all Islamic banks show better performance and will be less likely to face financial distress in terms of return on assets but not for return of equity. Liquidity indicates that the Islamic banks have a large number of loans but they have sufficient liquid assets in order to cover their liabilities and commitments. Lastly for Shariah Compliance, Islamic banks have complied with all rules and regulations that have been regulated by Bank Negara Malaysias Shariah Advisory Council.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Tanim Ul Islam ◽  
Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman

The aims of this study are to evaluate the financial performance of Islamic and conventional banks of Bangladesh through CAMEL test during the period of 2009 to 2013. The study tries and to determine whether there are significant differences between the two categories of banks for each of the ratios used in CAMEL test. A sample of five listed conventional banks and five listed Islamic banks were selected to study the objectives. The data used in this study were compiled from the financial statements of the respective sample banks. To make substantial noteworthy results, t-test(independent sample) is used. This paper found no significant difference between the Islamic banks and conventional banks regarding capital adequacy, management capability and earnings but found a significant difference regarding asset quality.Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka) Vol.10(1) 2015; 73-91


MBIA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
Dimas Pratama Putra

Abstract This study was conducted on Islamic Banking in Indonesia. The direction of this study to analyze financial performance of Islamic banking with income statement approach and value added approach. Population in this study is the 13 islamic Banks. The sample is taken using purposive sampling with specified criteria resulting 6 islamic Banking in Indonesia. This study conducted through Paired samples t-test by using SPSS 20. For testing the variable, researcher exercise financial rasio. The results show that : (1) There are significant differences on the ROA ratio if analyzed with income statement approach and value added approach, (2) There are significant differences toward ROE ratio with income statement approach dan value added approach, (3) There are significant differences on the LBAP ratio if analyzed with income statement approach and value added approach, (4) There are significant differences toward NPM ratio with income statement approach and value added approach. The overall results of the study are significant differences in financial performance with income statement approach and value added approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 688-700
Author(s):  
Tiara Tresnawulan Barkah ◽  
Dimas Sumitra Danisworo ◽  
Muhamad Umar Mai

This research was conducted to analyze the performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia using the Maqashid Sharia Index. The research used Simple Additive Weigting  method and independent analysis t-test. From this research it can be concluded that the performance value of Islamic banking in Indonesia using the Maqashid Sharia Index in 2014-2018 is 1.534 and Malaysia is 0.823. Based on the analysis of the independent t test, there is a significant difference between the average value of Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia with a value of Tcount 2.819>Ttable 2.306, MSI's first goal is to obtain T-count value of 1.189 <2.306. The second objective of MSI is to get the T-count value of 2.327> 2.306. The third objective of MSI with T-count value of 1.856 <2.306 T table. This means that there is a significant difference in financial performance with MSI in Indonesia and Malaysia.


Author(s):  
S. M. Akber ◽  
Asha Dey

The paper analyzes and evaluated the performance of Islamic banks and Traditional private commercial banks in Bangladesh with a duration from 2015 to 2019. The basis of the analysis used in this paper is CAMEL test.  All the relevant data has collected from the bank’s websites. To measure and compare the performance this paper has used a sample of five Islamic banks and five Traditional private commercial banks. It considered the average ratio of each year.  A standard test format (CAMEL tests) has used to analyze the performance of Islamic and Traditional private commercial banks. To justify the reliability of the data this paper has used t-tests. The outcome of this paper says that apart from the quality of the management significant difference doesn’t exist between the performance of Islamic Banks and Traditional private commercial banks in Bangladesh based on CAMEL test. Considering the quality of the management and asset quality Traditional private commercial banks perform better, but for the capital adequacy and liquidity position Islamic banks perform better in Bangladesh.


Author(s):  
Furqonti Ranidiah ◽  
Tezar Arianto

This research is based on the importance of Islamic bank financial performance. Islamic bank financial performance is a picture of the achievements of banks in their operations, both related to the aspects of finance, marketing, collection and distribution of funds, technology, and human resources. This study aims to determine the financial performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia. Performance measurement tools that can be used based on financial statements is to calculate financial ratios so that they can find out the performance using ratio analysis. This research uses a quantitative approach to observe, gather information and present an analysis of research results. The population in this study is state-owned Islamic banks in Indonesia for the period 2015-2018. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The number of banks sampled were three Islamic banks. The analytical methods used in this study are Loan to Defosit Ratio (LDR), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) and Operational Costs Against Operational Income (BOPO). The results of this study obtained the ratio of LDR, CAR and BOPO in Islamic banking financial performance on average have good criteria. While the ROA and ROE ratio of Islamic banking has an average that is not good, for that ratio Return On Assets must be improved, especially in the aspect of managing assets to generate net profit. Likewise, the Return On Equity ratio can have the ability of equity in generating profits and utilizing owned capital capable of generating profits. Keywords: LDR, ROA, CAR, ROE dan BOPO                                                                     


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Bishnu Prasad Bhattarai

The study attempts to determining the capital adequacy ratio of commercial banks in Nepal. This study is based on the secondary balance panel data. The data were collected from the 11 commercial banks for the period of 2013/14 to 2017/18 leading to 55 observations. The convenience sampling technique has been used to selection of sample of the study. The study period has been made for fresh data in the analysis. The descriptive, correlational and casual comparative research design has been used for data analysis. The study assumes that the capital adequacy ratio of commercial banks depends on bank specific variable: credit risk, asset quality, management quality, return on assets, liquidity, size of bank and macroeconomics variables gross domestic products growth rate and consumer price index i.e. inflation rate. The three different model like Pooled OLS, Fixed Effects Model and Random Effects Model have been used for data analysis. The results of the study revealed that the liquidity has positive and statistically significant effects on capital adequacy ratio.  Size of bank and inflation rate have negatively and statistically significant results. The others variables profitability, asset quality, credit risk, management quality and growth of gross domestic products does not effect to capital adequacy ratio. The study concluded that liquidity, size of bank and inflation have major determinants of capital adequacy ratio in Nepal.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Ema Dwi Suryani ◽  
Dyah Fitriani

The purpose of this study was to assets the financial performance of Bank Muamalat Indonesia in 2010-2014, assets the financial performance of Bank Syariah Mandiri in 2010-2014, to know is there any difference in the performance of Bank Muamalat Indonesia and Bank Syariah Mandiri in 2010-2014. This data source which used are secondary data in the form of financial statements of the company obtained from the publication of Bank Indonesia. Data analysis was performed using analysis of financial ratios of capital adequacy ratio, asset quality ratios, profitability ratios and liquidity ratios. The method used to compare the performance of Bank Muamalat Indonesia with Bank Syariah Mandiri is using the test independent sample t test. Based on the calculation of independent sample t test showed that for each ratio is the ratio Provision of Minimum Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), the ratio of asset quality (KAP), the ratio of Net Operational Margin (NOM) and the ratio of Short Term Mismatch (STM) there was no difference in financial performance significantly between Bank Muamalat.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Early Ridho Kismawadi ◽  
Abdul Hamid ◽  
Rasydah Rasydah ◽  
Aigatama Rafida

This study aims to determine the effect of the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non-Performing Financing (NPF), and Operational Efficiency Ratio (OER) at Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia for the 2010-2019 period. The test was carried out using panel data regression with the Random Effect Model (REM) model, tested using the t-test and f test with a significance of 5%. Based on the results of the t-test, partially, OER has a negative and significant effect on Return on Assets (ROA), whilst NPF and CAR do not significantly affect ROA. Moreover, the results of the F-test show that CAR, NPF, and OER simultaneously affect ROA. The results of this study indicate that to maximize the financial performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia, the Islamic banks must pay attention to the OER variable.==========================================================================================================ABSTRACT - Determinan Apa yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah di Indonesia? Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non-Performing Financing (NPF), dan Beban Operasional terhadap Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO) pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia periode 2010-2019. Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan regresi data panel dengan model Random Effect Model (REM) yang pengujiannya menggunakan uji t dan uji f dengan signifikansi yaitu 5%. Berdasarkan hasil uji t, secara parsial BOPO berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap Return on Asset (ROA), sedangkan variabel NPF dan CAR tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap ROA. Selanjutnya, hasil uji F menunjukkan bahwa CAR, NPF, dan BOPO secara simultan berpengaruh terhadap ROA. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi kepada Bank Syariah di Indonesia agar memberikan perhatian yang lebih serius terhadap variabel BOPO jika ingin memaksimalkan kinerja keuangannya..


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document