scholarly journals Climatology of stratocumulus cloud morphologies: microphysical properties and radiative effects

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 6695-6716 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Muhlbauer ◽  
I. L. McCoy ◽  
R. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Trade Wind ◽  
Radiative Effects ◽  
Regional Variability ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Low Clouds ◽  
Low Cloud

Abstract. An artificial neural network cloud classification scheme is combined with A-train observations to characterize the physical properties and radiative effects of marine low clouds based on their morphology and type of mesoscale cellular convection (MCC) on a global scale. The cloud morphological categories are (i) organized closed MCC, (ii) organized open MCC and (iii) cellular but disorganized MCC. Global distributions of the frequency of occurrence of MCC types show clear regional signatures. Organized closed and open MCCs are most frequently found in subtropical regions and in midlatitude storm tracks of both hemispheres. Cellular but disorganized MCC are the predominant type of marine low clouds in regions with warmer sea surface temperature such as in the tropics and trade wind zones. All MCC types exhibit a pronounced seasonal cycle. The physical properties of MCCs such as cloud fraction, radar reflectivity, drizzle rates and cloud top heights as well as the radiative effects of MCCs are found highly variable and a function of the type of MCC. On a global scale, the cloud fraction is largest for closed MCC with mean cloud fractions of about 90%, whereas cloud fractions of open and cellular but disorganized MCC are only about 51% and 40%, respectively. Probability density functions (PDFs) of cloud fractions are heavily skewed and exhibit modest regional variability. PDFs of column maximum radar reflectivities and inferred cloud base drizzle rates indicate fundamental differences in the cloud and precipitation characteristics of different MCC types. Similarly, the radiative effects of MCCs differ substantially from each other in terms of shortwave reflectance and transmissivity. These differences highlight the importance of low-cloud morphologies and their associated cloudiness on the shortwave cloud forcing.

scholarly journals Climatology of stratocumulus cloud morphologies: microphysical properties and radiative effects

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 6981-7023 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Muhlbauer ◽  
I. L. McCoy ◽  
R. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Trade Wind ◽  
Radiative Effects ◽  
Regional Variability ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Low Clouds ◽  
Low Cloud

Abstract. An artificial neural network cloud classification scheme is combined with A-Train observations to characterize the physical properties and radiative effects of marine low clouds based on their morphology and type of mesoscale cellular convection (MCC) on a global scale. The cloud morphological categories are (i) organized closed MCC, (ii) organized open MCC and (iii) cellular but disorganized MCC. Global distributions of the frequency of occurrence of MCC types show clear regional signatures. Organized closed and open MCCs are most frequently found in subtropical regions and in mid-latitude storm tracks of both hemispheres. Cellular but disorganized MCC are the predominant type of marine low clouds in regions with warmer sea surface temperature such as in the tropics and trade wind zones. All MCC types exhibit a pronounced seasonal cycle. The physical properties of MCCs such as cloud fraction, radar reflectivity, drizzle rates and cloud top heights as well as the radiative effects of MCCs are found highly variable and a function of the type of MCC. On a global scale, the cloud fraction is largest for closed MCC with mean cloud fractions of about 90% whereas cloud fractions of open and cellular but disorganized MCC are only about 51% and 40%, respectively. Probability density functions (PDFs) of cloud fractions are heavily skewed and exhibit modest regional variability. PDFs of column maximum radar reflectivities and inferred cloud base drizzle rates indicate fundamental differences in the cloud and precipitation characteristics of different MCC types. Similarly, the radiative effects of MCCs differ substantially from each other in terms of shortwave reflectance and transmissivity. These differences highlight the importance of low cloud morphologies and their associated cloudiness on the shortwave cloud forcing.

scholarly journals EUREC<sup>4</sup>A observations from the SAFIRE ATR42 aircraft

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Bony ◽  
Marie Lothon ◽  
Julien Delanoë ◽  
Pierre Coutris ◽  
Jean-Claude Etienne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Trade Wind ◽  
Flight Pattern ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Base Level ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Research Aircraft

Abstract. As part of the EUREC4A (Elucidating the role of cloud-circulation coupling in climate) field campaign, which took place in January and February 2020 over the western tropical Atlantic near Barbados, the French SAFIRE ATR42 research aircraft conducted 19 flights in the lower troposphere. Each flight followed a common flight pattern that sampled the atmosphere around the cloud-base level, at different heights of the subcloud layer, near the sea surface and in the lower free troposphere. The aircraft's payload included a backscatter lidar and a Doppler cloud radar that were both horizontally oriented, a Doppler cloud radar looking upward, microphysical probes, a cavity ring-down spectrometer for water isotopes, a multiwavelength radiometer, a visible camera and multiple meteorological sensors, including fast rate sensors for turbulence measurements. With this instrumentation, the ATR characterized the macrophysical and microphysical properties of trade-wind clouds together with their thermodynamical, turbulent and radiative environment. This paper presents the airborne operations, the flight segmentation, the instrumentation, the data processing and the EUREC4A datasets produced from the ATR measurements. It shows that the ATR measurements of humidity, wind and cloud-base cloud fraction measured with different techniques and samplings are internally consistent, that meteorological measurements are consistent with estimates from dropsondes launched from an overflying aircraft (HALO), and that water isotopic measurements are well correlated with data from the Barbados Cloud Observatory. This consistency demonstrates the robustness of the ATR measurements of humidity, wind, cloud-base cloud fraction and water isotopic composition during EUREC4A. It also confirms that through their repeated flight patterns, the ATR and HALO measurements provided a statistically consistent sampling of trade-wind clouds and of their environment. The ATR datasets are freely available at the locations specified in Table 11.

scholarly journals An assessment of macrophysical and microphysical cloud properties driving radiative forcing of shallow trade-wind clouds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Elizabeth Luebke ◽  
André Ehrlich ◽  
Michael Schäfer ◽  
Kevin Wolf ◽  
Manfred Wendisch
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Trade Wind ◽  
Radiative Effects ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Cloud Radiative Effects

Abstract. The clouds in the Atlantic trade-wind region are known to have an important role in the global climate system. Acquiring a comprehensive characterization of these clouds based on observations is a challenge, but it is a necessary piece of information for the evaluation of their representation in models. An exploration of how the macrophysical and microphysical cloud properties and organization of the cloud field impact the large-scale cloud radiative forcing is presented here. Direct measurements of the cloud radiative effects from the Broadband AirCrAft RaDiometer Instrumentation (BACARDI) on board the High Altitude and LOng Range Research Aircraft (HALO) and cloud observations from the GOES-16 satellite during the Elucidating the role of clouds-circulation coupling in climate (EUREC4A) campaign provide evidence to demonstrate what drives the cloud radiative effects in shallow trade-wind clouds. We find that the solar and terrestrial radiative effects of these clouds are largely driven by their macrophysical properties (cloud fraction and a scene-averaged liquid water path). However, we also conclude that the microphysical properties, cloud top height and the organization of the cloud field demonstrate an increasing relevance in determining the cloud radiative effects as the cloud fraction increases.

scholarly journals Using A-Train Observations to Evaluate East Pacific Cloud Occurrence and Radiative Effects in the Community Atmosphere Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (14) ◽  
pp. 6187-6203
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berry ◽  
Gerald G. Mace ◽  
Andrew Gettelman
Keyword(s):  
Single Layer ◽  
Eastern Pacific ◽  
Radiative Effects ◽  
Boundary Layer Clouds ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Low Clouds ◽  
Community Atmosphere Model ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Atmosphere Model ◽  
The Difference

AbstractUsing information from the A-Train satellites, the properties and radiative effects of eastern Pacific Ocean boundary layer clouds are evaluated in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), from the summer of 2007 and 2008. The cloud microphysical properties are inferred using measurements from CloudSat and CALIPSO (CC) that are then used to calculate the broadband radiative flux profiles. Accounting appropriately for sampling differences between the measurements and the simulation, evidence of the “too few, too bright” low cloud bias is found in CAM5. Single-layer low clouds have a frequency of occurrence of 42% from CC, as compared with just 29% in CAM5, and the averaged cloud radiative kernel (CRK) for the model shows stronger cooling. For stratocumulus in particular, the cooling in the model CRK is larger by a factor of 2 relative to the observations, implying an overly sensitive tropical low cloud feedback. Differences in the day/night occurrence of stratocumulus help to explain some of the difference in the CRK. The cloud-type microphysics for liquid clouds is represented reasonably well by the model, with a tendency for smaller water paths and smaller effective radii. Overall, the occurrence and CRK have partially compensating errors such that the net cooling at the top of the atmosphere for eastern Pacific low clouds is −43 W m−2 in CAM5, as compared with −32 W m−2 from CC. The cooling effect in the model is accomplished by fewer low clouds with a narrower range of properties, as compared with more clouds with a broader range of properties in the observation-based dataset.

scholarly journals Characterisation and surface radiative impact of Arctic low clouds from the IAOOS field experiment

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 4079-4101
Author(s):  
Julia Maillard ◽  
François Ravetta ◽  
Jean-Christophe Raut ◽  
Vincent Mariage ◽  
Jacques Pelon
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiment ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
The North ◽  
Low Clouds ◽  
Radiative Impact ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Ocean Observing ◽  
Cloud Base Height

Abstract. The Ice, Atmosphere, Arctic Ocean Observing System (IAOOS) field experiment took place from 2014 to 2019. Over this period, more than 20 instrumented buoys were deployed at the North Pole. Once locked into the ice, the buoys drifted for periods of a month to more than a year. Some of these buoys were equipped with 808 nm wavelength lidars which acquired a total of 1777 profiles over the course of the campaign. This IAOOS lidar dataset is exploited to establish a novel statistic of cloud cover and of the geometrical and optical characteristics of the lowest cloud layer. The average cloud frequency from April to December over the course of the campaign was 75 %. Cloud occurrence frequencies were above 85 % from May to October. Single layers are thickest in October/November and thinnest in the summer. Meanwhile, their optical depth is maximum in October. On the whole, the cloud base height is very low, with the great majority of first layer bases beneath 120 m. In April and October, surface temperatures are markedly warmer when the IAOOS profile contains at least one low cloud than when it does not. This temperature difference is statistically insignificant in the summer months. Indeed, summer clouds have a shortwave cooling effect which can reach −60 W m−2 and balance out their longwave warming effect.

Measuring the variability of the shallow convective mass flux profiles in the tropical trade wind region

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Klingebiel ◽  
Heike Konow ◽  
Bjorn Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Doppler Radar ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Trade Wind ◽  
Geophysical Research ◽  
Wind Region ◽  
Convective Mass Flux

&lt;p&gt;Mass flux is a key parameter to represent shallow convection in global circulation models. To estimate the shallow convective mass flux as accurately as possible, observations of this parameter are necessary. Prior studies from Ghate et al. (2011) and Lamer et al. (2015) used Doppler radar measurements over a few months to identify a typical shallow convective mass flux profile based on cloud fraction and vertical velocity. In this study, we extend their observations by using long term remote sensing measurements at the Barbados Cloud Observatory (13&amp;#176; 09&amp;#8217; N, 59&amp;#176; 25&amp;#8217; W) over a time period of 30 months and check a hypothesis by Grant (2001), who proposed that the cloud base mass flux is just proportional to the sub-cloud convective velocity scale. Therefore, we analyze Doppler radar and Doppler lidar measurements to identify the variation of the vertical velocity in the cloud and sub-cloud layer, respectively. Furthermore, we show that the in-cloud mass flux is mainly influenced by the cloud fraction and provide a linear equation, which can be used to roughly calculate the mass flux in the trade wind region based on the cloud fraction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;References:&lt;br&gt;Ghate,&amp;#160; V.&amp;#160; P.,&amp;#160; M.&amp;#160; A.&amp;#160; Miller,&amp;#160; and&amp;#160; L.&amp;#160; DiPretore,&amp;#160; 2011:&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Vertical&amp;#160; velocity structure of marine boundary layer trade wind cumulus clouds. Journal&amp;#160; of&amp;#160; Geophysical&amp;#160; Research: Atmospheres, 116&amp;#160; (D16), doi:10.1029/2010JD015344.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grant,&amp;#160; A.&amp;#160; L.&amp;#160; M.,&amp;#160; 2001:&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Cloud-base&amp;#160; fluxes&amp;#160; in&amp;#160; the&amp;#160; cumulus-capped boundary layer. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 127 (572), 407&amp;#8211;421, doi:10.1002/qj.49712757209.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lamer, K., P. Kollias, and L. Nuijens, 2015:&amp;#160; Observations of the variability&amp;#160; of&amp;#160; shallow&amp;#160; trade&amp;#160; wind&amp;#160; cumulus&amp;#160; cloudiness&amp;#160; and&amp;#160; mass&amp;#160; flux. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120&amp;#160; (12), 6161&amp;#8211;6178, doi:10.1002/2014JD022950.&lt;/p&gt;

A 19-Month Record of Marine Aerosol–Cloud–Radiation Properties Derived from DOE ARM Mobile Facility Deployment at the Azores. Part I: Cloud Fraction and Single-Layered MBL Cloud Properties

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3665-3682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiquan Dong ◽  
Baike Xi ◽  
Aaron Kennedy ◽  
Patrick Minnis ◽  
Robert Wood
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Mixed Boundary ◽  
Cloud Condensation Nuclei ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Cloud Properties

Abstract A 19-month record of total and single-layered low (&lt;3 km), middle (3–6 km), and high (&gt;6 km) cloud fractions (CFs) and the single-layered marine boundary layer (MBL) cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties was generated from ground-based measurements at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM) Azores site between June 2009 and December 2010. This is the most comprehensive dataset of marine cloud fraction and MBL cloud properties. The annual means of total CF and single-layered low, middle, and high CFs derived from ARM radar and lidar observations are 0.702, 0.271, 0.01, and 0.106, respectively. Greater total and single-layered high (&gt;6 km) CFs occurred during the winter, whereas single-layered low (&lt;3 km) CFs were more prominent during summer. Diurnal cycles for both total and low CFs were stronger during summer than during winter. The CFs are bimodally distributed in the vertical with a lower peak at ~1 km and a higher peak between 8 and 11 km during all seasons, except summer when only the low peak occurs. Persistent high pressure and dry conditions produce more single-layered MBL clouds and fewer total clouds during summer, whereas the low pressure and moist air masses during winter generate more total and multilayered clouds, and deep frontal clouds associated with midlatitude cyclones. The seasonal variations of cloud heights and thickness are also associated with the seasonal synoptic patterns. The MBL cloud layer is low, warm, and thin with large liquid water path (LWP) and liquid water content (LWC) during summer, whereas during winter it is higher, colder, and thicker with reduced LWP and LWC. The cloud LWP and LWC values are greater at night than during daytime. The monthly mean daytime cloud droplet effective radius re values are nearly constant, while the daytime droplet number concentration Nd basically follows the LWC variation. There is a strong correlation between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration NCCN and Nd during January–May, probably due to the frequent low pressure systems because upward motion brings more surface CCN to cloud base (well-mixed boundary layer). During summer and autumn, the correlation between Nd and NCCN is not as strong as that during January–May because downward motion from high pressure systems is predominant. Compared to the compiled aircraft in situ measurements during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX), the cloud microphysical retrievals in this study agree well with historical aircraft data. Different air mass sources over the ARM Azores site have significant impacts on the cloud microphysical properties and surface CCN as demonstrated by great variability in NCCN and cloud microphysical properties during some months.

scholarly journals Meteorological and Aerosol Effects on Marine Stratocumulus

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 807-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Li ◽  
Huiwen Xue ◽  
Jen-Ping Chen ◽  
Wei-Chyung Wang
Keyword(s):  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Marine Stratocumulus ◽  
Diurnal Cycles ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Southeastern Pacific ◽  
Lower Cloud

Abstract This study investigates the effects of meteorological conditions and aerosols on marine stratocumulus in the southeastern Pacific using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Two regimes with different temperature and moisture conditions in the finest model domain are investigated. The western regime is around 87°–79°W, while the eastern regime is around 79°–71°W. In both regimes, cloud fraction, liquid water path (LWP), cloud thickness, and precipitation show significant diurnal cycles. Cloud fraction can be 0.83 during the night and down to 0.29 during the day in the western regime. The diurnal cycles in the eastern regime have smaller amplitudes but are still very strong. Stratocumulus properties also differ in the two regimes. Compared to the western regime, the eastern regime has lower temperature, higher relative humidity, and a more coupled boundary layer, leading to higher cloud fraction (by 0.11) and lower cloud-base height. The eastern regime also has lower inversion height that causes lower cloud-top height and thinner clouds and, hence, lower LWP and less precipitation. Cloud microphysical properties are very sensitive to aerosols in both regimes. Increasing aerosols greatly increase cloud number concentration, decrease cloud effective radius, and suppress precipitation. Cloud macrophysical properties (cloud fraction, LWP) are not sensitive to aerosols in either regime, most notably in the eastern regime where precipitation amount is less. The changes in cloud fraction and LWP caused by changes in aerosol concentrations are smaller than the changes in the diurnal cycle and the spatial variability between the two regimes.

scholarly journals Shallow cumulus cloud feedback in large eddy simulations – bridging the gap to storm-resolving models

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 3275-3288
Author(s):  
Jule Radtke ◽  
Thorsten Mauritsen ◽  
Cathy Hohenegger
Keyword(s):  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Feedback ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Trade Wind ◽  
Cumulus Cloud ◽  
Shallow Cumulus ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Carry Over

Abstract. The response of shallow trade cumulus clouds to global warming is a leading source of uncertainty in projections of the Earth's changing climate. A setup based on the Rain In Cumulus over the Ocean field campaign is used to simulate a shallow trade wind cumulus field with the Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic Large Eddy Model in a control and a perturbed 4 K warmer climate, while degrading horizontal resolution from 100 m to 5 km. As the resolution is coarsened, the base-state cloud fraction increases substantially, especially near cloud base, lateral mixing is weaker, and cloud tops reach higher. Nevertheless, the overall vertical structure of the cloud layer is surprisingly robust across resolutions. In a warmer climate, cloud cover reduces, alone constituting a positive shortwave cloud feedback: the strength correlates with the amount of base-state cloud fraction and thus is stronger at coarser resolutions. Cloud thickening, resulting from more water vapour availability for condensation in a warmer climate, acts as a compensating feedback, but unlike the cloud cover reduction it is largely resolution independent. Therefore, refining the resolution leads to convergence to a near-zero shallow cumulus feedback. This dependence holds in experiments with enhanced realism including precipitation processes or warming along a moist adiabat instead of uniform warming. Insofar as these findings carry over to other models, they suggest that storm-resolving models may exaggerate the trade wind cumulus cloud feedback.

scholarly journals An Estimate of Low-Cloud Feedbacks from Variations of Cloud Radiative and Physical Properties with Sea Surface Temperature on Interannual Time Scales

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1106-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Eitzen ◽  
Kuan-Man Xu ◽  
Takmeng Wong
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Radiative Properties ◽  
Radiative Effect ◽  
Cloud Optical Depth ◽  
Cloud Radiative Effect ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Sst Anomaly

Abstract Simulations of climate change have yet to reach a consensus on the sign and magnitude of the changes in physical properties of marine boundary layer clouds. In this study, the authors analyze how cloud and radiative properties vary with SST anomaly in low-cloud regions, based on five years (March 2000–February 2005) of Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES)–Terra monthly gridded data and matched European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) meteorological reanalaysis data. In particular, this study focuses on the changes in cloud radiative effect, cloud fraction, and cloud optical depth with SST anomaly. The major findings are as follows. First, the low-cloud amount (−1.9% to −3.4% K−1) and the logarithm of low-cloud optical depth (−0.085 to −0.100 K−1) tend to decrease while the net cloud radiative effect (3.86 W m−2 K−1) becomes less negative as SST anomalies increase. These results are broadly consistent with previous observational studies. Second, after the changes in cloud and radiative properties with SST anomaly are separated into dynamic, thermodynamic, and residual components, changes in the dynamic component (taken as the vertical velocity at 700 hPa) have relatively little effect on cloud and radiative properties. However, the estimated inversion strength decreases with increasing SST, accounting for a large portion of the measured decreases in cloud fraction and cloud optical depth. The residual positive change in net cloud radiative effect (1.48 W m−2 K−1) and small changes in low-cloud amount (−0.81% to 0.22% K−1) and decrease in the logarithm of optical depth (–0.035 to –0.046 K−1) with SST are interpreted as a positive cloud feedback, with cloud optical depth feedback being the dominant contributor. Last, the magnitudes of the residual changes differ greatly among the six low-cloud regions examined in this study, with the largest positive feedbacks (∼4 W m−2 K−1) in the southeast and northeast Atlantic regions and a slightly negative feedback (−0.2 W m−2 K−1) in the south-central Pacific region. Because the retrievals of cloud optical depth and/or cloud fraction are difficult in the presence of aerosols, the transport of heavy African continental aerosols may contribute to the large magnitudes of estimated cloud feedback in the two Atlantic regions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document